Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3437120.3437326acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Development of an IoT seismograph

Published: 04 March 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Earthquakes have troubled mankind for thousands of years, mainly due to the extensive and significant disasters they can cause. The effects of a strong earthquake can be devastating; both in terms of building infrastructure and in terms of human losses. Earthquake effects can also be divided into direct, such as the collapse of a building, and indirect, such as causing fires from liquid/gaseous fuel leaks. Given the significant damage that occurs at regular intervals in various parts of the world due to an earthquake and especially in seismogenic areas, it is necessary to monitor seismic activity and have the possibility of warning of possible hazards. This paper focuses on the development of a low-cost seismograph with IoT capability. The seismograph can operate either as standalone, protecting the building that has been installed or it can operate as a node of a greater system protecting a greater area.

References

[1]
Theodoros M. Tsapanos. 2008. Seismicity and Seismic Hazard Assessment in Greece. In Earthquake Monitoring and Seismic Hazard Mitigation in Balkan Countries. Springer Netherlands, 253–270.
[2]
Vasilis Papazachos and Katerina Papazachou. 2003. The earthquakes of Greece. Ziti.
[3]
(GeIn) Institute of Geodynamics. 2020. Access to NOA EIDA Services. Retrieved from http://eida.gein.noa.gr/webdc3/
[4]
Claudio Satriano, Yih Min Wu, Aldo Zollo, and Hiroo Kanamori. 2011. Earthquake early warning: Concepts, methods and physical grounds. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 31, 2 (2011), 106–118.
[5]
IRIS Instrumentation Committee. 2003. Global Seismographic Network Data Logger Specifications.
[6]
Richard M. Allen and Alon Ziv. 2011. Application of real-time GPS to earthquake early warning. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, 16 (2011), 1–7.
[7]
Robert W. Clayto, Monica Kohler, Richard Guy, Julian Bunn, Thomas Heaton, and Mani Chandy. 2020. CSN-LAUSD Network: A dense accelerometer network in Los Angeles schools. Seismol. Res. Lett. 91, 2 A (2020), 622–630.
[8]
Chaoyong Peng, Xiaoyi Zhu, Jiansi Yang, Bing Xue, and Yang Chen. 2013. Development of an integrated onsite earthquake early warning system and test deployment in Zhaotong, China. Comput. Geosci. 56, (2013), 170–177.
[9]
Yih Min Wu, Da Yi Chen, Ting Li Lin, Chih Yih Hsieh, Tai Lin Chin, Wen Yen Chang, Wei Sen Li, and Shaw Hsung Ker. 2013. A high-density seismic network for earthquake early warning in Taiwan based on low cost sensors. Seismol. Res. Lett. 84, 6 (2013), 1048–1054.
[10]
Hiroo Kanamori. 2005. Real-time seismology and earthquake damage mitigation. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 33, 1 (2005), 195–214.
[11]
John Douglas. 2003. Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: A review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth-Science Rev. 61, 1–2 (2003), 43–104.
[12]
B Bradley, M Cubrinovski, G MacRae, and R Dhakal. 2010. Ground motion prediction equation for spectrum intensity based on spectral acceleration equations.
[13]
Mehmet Palanci and Sevket Murat Senel. 2019. Correlation of earthquake intensity measures and spectral displacement demands in building type structures. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 121, January (2019), 306–326.
[14]
Anaxagoras Elenas, Lazaros Vasiliadis, and E Pouliou. 2006. Seismic damage potential description through spectral intensity parameters. 8th US Natl. Conf. Earthq. Eng. 2006 2, (2006), 728–735.
[15]
Omron. 2017. D7S-A0001 Product Specifications.
[16]
Y (JMA) Japan Meteorological Agency. Tables explaining the JMA Seismic Intensity Scale.
[17]
Yoko Ota, Takashi Azuma, and Yu Nong Nina Lin. 2009. Application of INQUA Environmental Seismic intensity scale to recent earthquakes in Japan and Taiwan. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 316, June (2009), 55–71.
[18]
Kazi R. Karim and Fumio Yamazaki. 2002. Correlation of JMA instrumental seismic intensity with strong motion parameters. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31, 5 (2002), 1191–1212.
[19]
Emmanuel M. Scordilis. 2005. Globally valid relations converting Ms, mb and MJMA to Mw. In Nato Advanced Research Workshop on “Earthquake Monitoring and Seismic Hazard Mitigation in Balkan Countries,” Borovetz – Rila Mountain – Bulgaria.
[20]
Jane Ann Cheryl Yatan, Abd Kadir Mahamad, Sharifah Saon, Mohd Anuaruddin Bin Ahmadon, and Shingo Yamaguchi. 2017. Earthquake monitoring system. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE), 61–64.
[21]
A Paschalis, I Voyiatzis, and D Gizopoulos. 2012. Accumulator Based 3-Weight Pattern Generation. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. 20, 2 (2012), 357–361.
[22]
I Voyiatzis, A Paschalis, D Nikolos, and C Halatsis. 1998. R-CBIST: an effective RAM-based input vector monitoring concurrent BIST technique. In Proceedings International Test Conference 1998 (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36270), 918–925.
[23]
C Efstathiou, Ioannis Voyiatzis, and Nicolas Sklavos. 2008. On the modulo 2n+1 multiplication for diminished-1 operands. 1–5.
[24]
I Voyiatzis. 2008. An Accumulator-Based Compaction Scheme For Online BIST of RAMs. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. 16, 9 (2008),
[25]
I Voyiatzis and C Efstathiou. 2014. Input Vector Monitoring Concurrent BIST Architecture Using SRAM Cells. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. 22, 7 (2014), 1625–1629.
[26]
I Voyiatzis, T Haniotakis, C Efstathiou, and H Antonopoulou. 2010. A concurrent BIST architecture based on Monitoring Square Windows. In 5th International Conference on Design Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era, 1–6.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PCI '20: Proceedings of the 24th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
November 2020
433 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 March 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

PCI 2020
PCI 2020: 24th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
November 20 - 22, 2020
Athens, Greece

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 390 submissions, 49%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 61
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media