Applying coupling and cohesion concepts in object-oriented software: a controlled experiment
Article No.: 8, Pages 1 - 10
Abstract
Context: Coupling and cohesion concepts support the object-oriented (OO) design activity. A better design implies less coupled and more cohesive classes. Thus, it is expected studies on OO design investigate issues impacting the good application of these concepts. However, most studies in the area have focused on high-level metaphors, such as code smells and design patterns; or software metrics. Objective: This study aims to build empirical evidence reinforcing that basic concepts deserve more attention towards better OO design. The study investigates the application of coupling and cohesion concepts during programming activity. Two topics are addressed: i) how developer characteristics (“previous knowledge on the concepts” and “developers experience”) impact on software design during programming activity; and ii) the differences in applying the concepts, independently. Method: A quasi-experiment with 17 participants. The participants were graduate and undergraduate students, but all have professional experience in software development. The software they programmed was compared with the experiment’s oracle in terms of the application of coupling and cohesion concepts. Result: One finding is previous knowledge on the concepts impacts on design quality, in some way; while developers experience doesn’t. Another finding is: application of cohesion is significantly easier than application of coupling. Conclusion: A conjecture based on these findings is training on basic OO principles (including formal education) might be more relevant than developer experience towards better software design. At last, the topic needs more investigation. We suggest this approach brings a complementary perspective of analysis to discuss the topic.
References
[1]
G. Bavota, B. Dit, R. Oliveto, M. Di Penta, D. Poshyvanyk, and A. De Lucia. 2013. An empirical study on the developers’ perception of software coupling. In 2013 35th ICSE. 692–701.
[2]
S. R. Chidamber and C. F. Kemerer. 1994. A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20, 6 (1994), 476–493.
[3]
Norman Cliff. 1996. Ordinal Methods for Behavioral Data Analysis. Erlbaum.
[4]
S. Counsell, S. Swift, A. Tucker, and E. Mendes. 2005. Object-oriented cohesion as a surrogate of software comprehension: an empirical study. In Fifth IEEE International Workshop on SCAM. 161–169.
[5]
Steve Counsell, Stephen Swift, Allan Tucker, and Emilia Mendes. 2006. Object-Oriented Cohesion Subjectivity amongst Experienced and Novice Developers: An Empirical Study. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 31, 5 (Sept. 2006), 1–10.
[6]
Ward Cunningham. 1992. The WyCash Portfolio Management System. In Addendum to the Proceedings on OOPSLA (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29–30.
[7]
Bruno C. da Silva, Claudio N. Sant’Anna, and Christina von F.G. Chavez. 2014. An Empirical Study on How Developers Reason about Module Cohesion. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on MODULATIRY (Lugano, Switzerland). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121–132.
[8]
Nell Dale and John Lewis. 2016. Computer Science Illuminated. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc., USA.
[9]
Rafael Maiani de Mello, Roberto Oliveira, and Alessandro Garcia. 2017. On the Influence of Human Factors for Identifying Code Smells: A Multi-Trial Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on ESEM (Markham, Ontario, Canada). IEEE Press, 68–77.
[10]
Amr F. Desouky and Letha H. Etzkorn. 2014. Object Oriented Cohesion Metrics: A Qualitative Empirical Analysis of Runtime Behavior. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Southeast Regional Conference (Kennesaw, Georgia). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 58, 6 pages.
[11]
Tore Dybå, Dag I.K. Sjøberg, and Daniela S. Cruzes. 2012. What Works for Whom, Where, when, and Why?: On the Role of Context in Empirical Software Engineering. In Proc. of the 6th International Symposium on ESEM. 19–28.
[12]
R. Johnson E. Gamma, R. Helm and J. Vlissides. 1994. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Professional, U.S.
[13]
M. Fowler. 1999. Refactoring: improving the design of existing code. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
[14]
M. Höst, C. Wohlin, and T. Thelin. 2005. Experimental context classification: incentives and experience of subjects. In Proc. of the 27th ICSE. 470–478.
[15]
Andreas Jedlitschka, Marcus Ciolkowski, and Dietmar Pfahl. 2008. Reporting Experiments in Software Engineering. In Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, Forrest Shull, Janice Singer, and Dag I. K. Søberg(Eds.). Springer London, 201–228.
[16]
Huzefa Kagdi Jonathan I. Maletic. 2008. Expressiveness and effectiveness of program comprehension: Thoughts on future research directions. In FoSM (Beijing, China). 31–37.
[17]
F. Khomh and Y. Guéhéneuc. 2008. Do Design Patterns Impact Software Quality Positively?. In 2008 12th European CSMR. 274–278.
[18]
Barbara Kitchenham, Lech Madeyski, David Budgen, Jacky Keung, Pearl Brereton, Stuart Charters, Shirley Gibbs, and Amnart Pohthong. 2017. Robust Statistical Methods for Empirical Software Engineering. Empirical Softw. Engg. 22, 2 (April 2017), 579–630.
[19]
Stefan Kramer and Hermann Kaindl. 2004. Coupling and Cohesion Metrics for Knowledge-Based Systems Using Frames and Rules. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 13, 3 (July 2004), 332–358.
[20]
Philippe Kruchten, Robert Nord, and Ipek Ozkaya. 2019. Managing Technical Debt: Reducing Friction in Software Development (1st ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.
[21]
Michele Lanza and Radu Marinescu. 2005. Object-Oriented Metrics in Practice. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA.
[22]
C. Larman. 2002. Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and the Unified Process. Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ, United States.
[23]
Mika V. Mäntylä and Casper Lassenius. 2006. Drivers for software refactoring decisions. In Proc. of 5th ISESE. 297–306.
[24]
S. McConnell and S.M. McConnell. 1993. Code Complete: A Practical Handbook of Software Construction. Microsoft Press.
[25]
Bertrand Meyer. 1988. Object-Oriented Software Construction(1st ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
[26]
Fabio Palomba, Gabriele Bavota, Massimiliano Di Penta, Rocco Oliveto, and Andrea De Lucia. 2014. Do they Really Smell Bad? A Study on Developers’ Perception of Bad Code Smells. In Proc. of the 30th IEEE ICSME.
[27]
Amit Rathee and Jitender Kumar Chhabra. 2017. Restructuring of Object-Oriented Software Through Cohesion Improvement Using Frequent Usage Patterns. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 42, 3 (Sept. 2017), 1–8.
[28]
Arthur J. Riel. 1996. Object-Oriented Design Heuristics(1st ed.). Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
[29]
J. Romano, J.D. Kromrey, J. Coraggio, and J. Skowronek. 2006. Appropriate statistics for ordinal level data: Should we really be using t-test and Cohen’sd for evaluating group differences on the NSSE and other surveys?. In In annual meeting of the Florida Association of Institutional Research. 1–3.
[30]
José Amancio Santos, Manoel Mendonça, and Carlos Silva. 2013. An exploratory study to investigate the impact of conceptualization in god class detection. In Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE). 48–59.
[31]
José Amancio Santos, João B. Rocha-Junior, and Manoel Gomes de Mendonça. 2017. Investigating factors that affect the human perception on god class detection: an analysis based on a family of four controlled experiments. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development (JSERD) 5, 8(2017).
[32]
José Amancio M. Santos, João B. Rocha-Junior, Luciana Carla Lins Prates, Rogeres Santos do Nascimento, Mydiã Falcão Freitas, and Manoel Gomes de Mendonça. 2018. A systematic review on the code smell effect. Journal of Systems and Software 144 (2018), 450 – 477.
[33]
A. Shalloway and J. R. Trott. 2002. Design Patterns Explained: A New Perspective on Object-Oriented Design. Addison-Wesley Professional, U.S.
[34]
W. P. Stevens, G. J. Myers, and L. L. Constantine. 1974. Structured Design. IBM Syst. J. 13, 2 (June 1974), 115–139.
[35]
Norman G. Vinson and Janice Singer. 2008. A Practical Guide to Ethical Research Involving Humans. In Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, Forrest Shull, Janice Singer, and Dag I. K. Søberg(Eds.). Springer London, 229–256.
[36]
F. Wedyan and S. Abufakher. 2020. Impact of design patterns on software quality: a systematic literature review. IET Software 14, 1 (2020), 1–17.
[37]
C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M.C. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, and A. Wesslén. 2012. Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[38]
E. Yourdon and L.L. Constantine. 1978. Structured design: fundamentals of a discipline of computer program and systems design. Yourdon Press.
[39]
Min Zhang, Tracy Hall, and Nathan Baddoo. 2011. Code Bad Smells: A Review of Current Knowledge. Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 23, 3 (April 2011), 179–202.
Recommendations
A Coupling and Cohesion Metrics Suite for Object-Oriented Software
ICCTD '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computer Technology and Development - Volume 01The increasing need for software quality measurements has led to extensive research into software metrics and the development of software metric tools. To maintain high quality software, developers need to strive for a low-coupled and highly cohesive ...
Dynamic cohesion measures for object-oriented software
Most of the object-oriented cohesion metrics proposed in the literature define static cohesion at class level. Measurement of object-level dynamic cohesion however gives better insight into the behavioural aspects of the system. In this paper, dynamic ...
An empirical study of slice-based cohesion and coupling metrics
Software reengineering is a costly endeavor, due in part to the ambiguity of where to focus reengineering effort. Coupling and Cohesion metrics, particularly quantitative cohesion metrics, have the potential to aid in this identification and to measure ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
December 2020
430 pages
ISBN:9781450389235
DOI:10.1145/3439961
- Editors:
- Ivan Machado,
- Heitor Costa,
- Adriano Albuquerque,
- Suzana Sampaio,
- Rodrigo Santos,
- Sheila Reinehr,
- Gleison Santos,
- Sandro Bezerra,
- Davi Viana,
- Adriano Bessa Albuquerque,
- Ana Regina Cavalcanti da Rocha,
- Gleison Santos,
- Ivan Machado,
- Marcello Thiry,
- Monalessa Perini Barcellos,
- Sheila Reinehr,
- Tayana Conte,
- Davi Viana,
- Marcelo Schots
Copyright © 2020 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 06 March 2021
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
SBQS'20
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 99 submissions, 35%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 89Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)17
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format