Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3446871.3469780acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract
Public Access

Interpretations and Uses of Data for Equity in Computing Education

Published: 17 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Computing education’s booming enrollment exacerbates inclusion challenges ranging from tools that do not support diverse learners to instructors not being aware of unique challenges that students of minoritized groups face. While data often perpetuates inequities in many contexts, it could also serve to support equity-related goals if properly contextualized. To understand how data could support equitable learning, I explore how affording information and agency supports students’ self-directed learning of Python programming, how contextualizing psychometric data on test bias with curriculum designers’ domain expertise could support equitable curriculum improvements, and how contextualizing student feedback with demographic information and peer perspectives could help instructors become aware of challenges that students from minoritized groups face while preserving student privacy and well-being. By studying how students, curriculum designers, and teachers interpreted and used data relating to experiences learning computing, I contribute techniques that contextualize equity-oriented interpretations and uses of data with stakeholders’ domain expertise.

References

[1]
Paulo Blikstein and Sepi Hejazi Moghadam. 2019. Computing Education Literature Review and Voices from the Field. In The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research. Cambridge University Press, 56–78.
[2]
Sarah Mercer. 2012. The Complexity of Learner Agency. Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies (2012).
[3]
National Academies of Sciences and Medicine. 2018. Assessing and Responding to the Growth of Computer Science Undergraduate Enrollments. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
[4]
Heather E Price. 2019. Large-Scale Datasets and Social Justice: Measuring Inequality in Opportunities to Learn. In Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity in Education, Kamden K Strunkand Leslie Ann Locke (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 203–215.
[5]
Niral Shah, Daniel Reinholz, Lynette Guzman, Kenneth Bradfield, and Gregory Beaudine. 2016. Equitable Participation in a Mathematics Classroom from a Quantitative Perspective. In Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 7.
[6]
Benjamin Xie, Greg L Nelson, Harshitha Akkaraju, William Kwok, and Amy J Ko. 2020. The Effect of Informing Agency in Self-Directed Online Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the Seventh (2020) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale(L@S 2020). ACM.
[7]
Bruno D Zumbo. 2007. Three generations of DIF analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Lang. Assess. Q. 4, 2 (2007).
  1. Interpretations and Uses of Data for Equity in Computing Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ICER 2021: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
    August 2021
    451 pages
    ISBN:9781450383264
    DOI:10.1145/3446871
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 August 2021

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. assessment
    2. computing education
    3. equity
    4. student feedback

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    ICER 2021
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 128
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)60
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media