Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3447535.3462480acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Bayesian Analysis of Collective Action and Internet Shutdowns in India

Published: 22 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Since 2011, internet shutdowns have steadily become an increasingly popular form of digital repression, especially in India – which accounted for more than 50% of global recorded shutdowns from 2016 to 2019. Common shutdown justifications include ‘ensuring public safety’ in order to curb the prevalence of collective action in the form of protests and riots. This paper examines the correlation between internet shutdowns and a range of predictors, identifying riots as the main predictor of a shutdown.
We focus on shutdowns throughout India between 2016 and 2019 with particular attention to Jammu and Kashmir. Primarily using data from the NGO Access Now and the Integrated Conflict Early Warning System, we apply Bayesian inference via generalised linear modelling implemented using the Stan probabilistic programming language, to estimate correlates of shutdown behaviour. We first examine how the prevalence of collective action may impact the probability of observing a shutdown; and second how the length of a shutdown impacts subsequent collective action.
Our main finding is that riots seem to be the key predictor of a shutdown with increased protests and riots increasing the odds of observing a shutdown the same day by 7% with a 95% credible interval of 0.01-0.13 and 15% with a 95% credible interval of 0.03-0.26 respectively. As a predictor, however, the duration of an internet shutdown only has a marginal negative effect on the occurrence of riots at -8% per subsequent shutdown day with a 95% credible interval of -0.16 to -0.002.

References

[1]
E. Stepanova, “The Role of Information Communication Technologies in the “ Arab Spring" IMPLICATIONS BEYOND THE REGION,” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, no. 159, pp. 1–6, 2011.
[2]
P. N. Howard and M. M. Hussain, Democracy's Fourth Wave? 2013.
[3]
H. Peleg and J. Mendilow, “Corruption and the Arab Spring Comparing the Pre- and Post-Spring Situation,” pp. 99–115, 2014.
[4]
L. Grinin, A. Korotayev, and A. Tausch, Islamism, Arab Spring, and the Future of Democracy, Perspectives on Development in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region. 2018.
[5]
B. Wellman, “The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 0–0, 2003.
[6]
L. DeNardis, “Hidden levers of internet control: An infrastructure-based theory of Internet governance,” Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 720–738, 2012.
[7]
Access Now, “Fighting Internet Shutdowns Around The World,” Access Now, p. 4, 2018.
[8]
Access Now, “The State of Internet Shutdowns Around the World: The 2018 #Keepiton Report,” 2019.
[9]
Access Now, “Targeted, Cut off, and Left in the Dark: The #KeepItOn report on internet shutdowns in 2019,” 2020.
[10]
Internet Shutdown Project, “Internet Shutdown Tracker,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://internetshutdowns.in/. [Accessed: 21-Jun-2020].
[11]
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, “IFLA Statement on Internet Shutdowns,” no. August. 2018.
[12]
Access Now, “RightsCon Silicon Valley 2016,” pp. 1–9, 2016.
[13]
J. Wright, A. Darer, and O. Farnan, “On identifying anomalies in tor usage with applications in detecting internet censorship,” WebSci 2018 - Proc. 10th ACM Conf. Web Sci., pp. 87–96, 2018.
[14]
Internet Society, “Internet Shutdowns An Internet Society Public Policy Briefing,” no. December, pp. 1–13, 2017.
[15]
K. Collins, “Inside the dystopian nightmare of an internet shutdown,” CNET, 31-Oct-2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnet.com/features/inside-the-dystopian-nightmare-of-an-internet-shutdown/. [Accessed: 13-Jun-2020].
[16]
E. Marchant and N. Stremlau, “AFRICA ’ S INTERNET SHUTDOWNS WORKSHOP,” 2019.
[17]
Internet and Mobile Association of India, “DIGITAL IN INDIA 2019-ROUND 2 REPORT,” 2019.
[18]
D. M. West, “Internet shutdowns cost countries $2.4 billion last year,” Brookings Inst., no. October, pp. 1–20, 2016.
[19]
R. Kathuria, M. Kedia, G. Varma, K. Bagchi, and R. Sekhani, “The Anatomy of an INTERNET BLACKOUT: Measuring the Economic Impact of Internet Shutdowns in India,” no. April, 2018.
[20]
United Nations, “General Assembly - Item #10, Document Reference A/HRC/32/L.20.” 2016.
[21]
J. Rydzak, “Disconnected: A Human Rights-Based Approach to Network Disruptions,” 2019.
[22]
R. Shandler, “Measuring the political and social consequences of government-initiated cyber shutdowns,” 8th USENIX Work. Free Open Commun. Internet, FOCI 2018, co-located with USENIX Secur. 2018, 2018.
[23]
J. Wright, “Regional variation in Chinese internet filtering,” Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 121–141, 2014.
[24]
C. Davenport, “State Repression and Political Order,” Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2007.
[25]
W. Moore, “Repression and Dissent: Substitution, Context, and Timing,” Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 851–873, 1998.
[26]
D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, and M. Zald, Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. New York, New York, USA: Cambridge University Press., 1996.
[27]
T. Gurr, “Why Men Rebel,” 1970.
[28]
M. Olson, “The Logic of Collective Action,” The Political Economy of Growth. 1965.
[29]
R. Hardin, “Collective Action As An Agreeable n-Prisoners’ Dilemma,” Behav. Sci., vol. 16, 1971.
[30]
B. Bimber, A. J. Flanagin, and C. Stohl, “Action in the Contemporary,” Commun. Theory, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 365–388, 2005.
[31]
W. L. Bennett and A. Segerberg, “The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics,” Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 739–768, 2012.
[32]
BBC, “Citizenship Act protests: Three dead and thousands held in India - BBC News,” 19-Dec-2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-50833361. [Accessed: 17-Jun-2020].
[33]
S. Keelery, “Number of social network users in India from 2015 to 2018 with a forecast until 2023,” Statista Database, 07-Jul-2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278407/number-of-social-network-users-in-india/. [Accessed: 05-Sep-2020].
[34]
J. Rydzak, “A Total Eclipse of the Net: The Dynamics of Network Shutdowns and Collective Action Responses TT - Une éclipse totale du Net: Les coupures de communication digitale et l'action collective,” ProQuest Diss. Theses, p. 268, 2018.
[35]
E. Boschee, J. Lautenschlager, S. O'Brien, S. Shellman, and J. Starz, “ICEWS Coded Event Data,” Harvard Dataverse, vol. V28, 2015.
[36]
M. Betancourt, “Towards A Principled Bayesian Workflow,” Apr-2020. [Online]. Available: https://betanalpha.github.io/assets/case_studies/principled_bayesian_workflow.html. [Accessed: 27-Aug-2020].
[37]
Stan Development Team, “Stan Modeling Language: User's Guide and Reference Manual,” 2015.
[38]
P.-C. Buerkner, “brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan,” J. Stat. Softw., vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2017.
[39]
J. Fox, “Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. Chapter 15: Generalized Linear Models,” 2015.
[40]
A. Vehtari, A. Gelman, J. Gabry, P.-C. Bürkner, and M. Magnusson, “Efficient Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation and WAIC for Bayesian Models,” Stat. Comput., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1413–1432, 2017.
[41]
A. Gelman, A. Jakulin, M. G. Pittau, and Y. S. Su, “A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models,” Ann. Appl. Stat., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1360–1383, 2008.
[42]
Y. Breindl and J. Wright, “Internet filtering trends in western liberal democracies: French and German regulatory debates,” 2nd USENIX Work. Free Open Commun. Internet, FOCI 2012, co-located with USENIX Secur. 2012, 2012.
[43]
D. Polatin-Reuben and J. Wright, “An internet with BRICS characteristics: Data sovereignty and the balkanisation of the internet,” 4th USENIX Work. Free Open Commun. Internet, FOCI 2014, co-located with USENIX Secur. 2014, 2014.
[44]
B. Zevenbergen, I. Brown, J. Wright, and D. Erdos, “Ethical Privacy Guidelines for Mobile Connectivity Measurements,” SSRN Electron. J., no. November, pp. 1–41, 2013.
[45]
A. Darer, O. Farnan, and J. Wright, “FilteredWeb: A framework for the automated search-based discovery of blocked URLs,”, 2017 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA), 2017.
[46]
A. Darer, O. Farnan, J. Wright, "Automated discovery of internet censorship by web crawling", Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. 2018
[47]
K. Rasler, “Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution,” vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 132–152, 1996.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Net Loss: An econometric method to measure the impact of Internet shutdownsACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/36594662:2(1-22)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2023)The Effect of Internet Shutdowns on Protest Activity in India: an Empirical Investigation2023 16th International Conference Management of large-scale system development (MLSD)10.1109/MLSD58227.2023.10304037(1-4)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WebSci '21: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021
June 2021
328 pages
ISBN:9781450383301
DOI:10.1145/3447535
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Bayesian Analysis
  2. Collective Action
  3. Internet Shutdowns

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WebSci '21
Sponsor:
WebSci '21: WebSci '21 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021
June 21 - 25, 2021
Virtual Event, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)55
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Net Loss: An econometric method to measure the impact of Internet shutdownsACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/36594662:2(1-22)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2023)The Effect of Internet Shutdowns on Protest Activity in India: an Empirical Investigation2023 16th International Conference Management of large-scale system development (MLSD)10.1109/MLSD58227.2023.10304037(1-4)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media