Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3447548.3467072acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lane Change Scheduling for Autonomous Vehicle: A Prediction-and-Search Framework

Published: 14 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Automation in road vehicles is an emerging technology that has developed rapidly over the last decade. There have been many inter-disciplinary challenges posed on existing transportation infrastructure by autonomous vehicles (AV). In this paper, we conduct an algorithmic study on when and how an autonomous vehicle should change its lane, which is a fundamental problem in vehicle automation field and root cause of most 'phantom' traffic jams. We propose a prediction-and-search framework, called Cheetah (Change lane smart for autonomous vehicle), which aims to optimize the lane changing maneuvers of autonomous vehicle while minimizing its impact on surrounding vehicles. In the prediction phase, Cheetah learns the spatio-temporal dynamics from historical trajectories of surrounding vehicles with a deep model (GAS-LED) and predict their corresponding actions in the near future. A global attention mechanism and state sharing strategy are also incorporated to achieve higher accuracy and better convergence efficiency. Then in the search phase, Cheetah looks for optimal lane change maneuvers for the autonomous vehicle by taking into account a few factors such as speed, impact on other vehicles and safety issues. A tree-based adaptive beam search algorithm is designed to reduce the search space and improve accuracy. Extensive experiments on real and synthetic data evidence that the proposed framework excels state-of-the-art competitors with respect to both effectiveness and efficiency.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (lane_change_scheduling_for_autonomous-shuncheng_liu-han_su-38958041-WxI0.mp4)
Presentation Video.

References

[1]
Afzal Ahmed, Fatma Outay, Syeda Ofaq Raza Zaidi, Muhammad Adnan, and Dong Ngoduy. 2020. Examining queue-jumping phenomenon in heterogeneous traffic stream at signalized intersection using UAV-based data. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2020), 1--16.
[2]
Alexandre Alahi, Kratarth Goel, Vignesh Ramanathan, Alexandre Robicquet, Li Fei-Fei, and Silvio Savarese. 2016. Social lstm: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 961--971.
[3]
Florent Altché and Arnaud de La Fortelle. 2017. An LSTM network for highway trajectory prediction. In 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 353--359.
[4]
PS Bokare and AK Maurya. 2017. Acceleration-deceleration behaviour of various vehicle types. Transportation research procedia, Vol. 25 (2017), 4733--4749.
[5]
Gianluca Cesari, Georg Schildbach, Ashwin Carvalho, and Francesco Borrelli. 2017. Scenario model predictive control for lane change assistance and autonomous driving on highways. IEEE Intelligent transportation systems magazine, Vol. 9, 3 (2017), 23--35.
[6]
M. Chen, Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, X. Yu, and K. Zheng. 2020. Modeling Spatial Trajectories with Attribute Representation Learning. TKDE (2020).
[7]
Charisma Choudhury, Tomer Toledo, and Moshe Ben-Akiva. 2004. NGSIM Freeway Lane Selection Model. Technical Report. Federal Highway Administration.
[8]
Debashish Chowdhury, Dietrich E Wolf, and Michael Schreckenberg. 1997. Particle hopping models for two-lane traffic with two kinds of vehicles: Effects of lane-changing rules. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 235, 3--4 (1997), 417--439.
[9]
James Colyar and John Halkias. 2007. Next Generation Simulation NGSIM US Highway 101 Dataset. Technical Report. Federal Highway Administration.
[10]
A Karim Daoudia and Najem Moussa. 2003. Numerical simulations of a three-lane traffic model using cellular automata. Chinese journal of physics, Vol. 41, 6 (2003).
[11]
LC Davis. 2004. Effect of adaptive cruise control systems on traffic flow. Physical Review E, Vol. 69, 6 (2004), 066110.
[12]
Fabr'icio Olivetti de Francc a. 2018. A greedy search tree heuristic for symbolic regression. Information Sciences, Vol. 442 (2018), 18--32.
[13]
Nachiket Deo and Mohan M Trivedi. 2018a. Convolutional social pooling for vehicle trajectory prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 1468--1476.
[14]
Nachiket Deo and Mohan M Trivedi. 2018b. Multi-modal trajectory prediction of surrounding vehicles with maneuver based lstms. In 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 1179--1184.
[15]
Markus Freitag and Yaser Al-Onaizan. 2017. Beam Search Strategies for Neural Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Neural Machine Translation. Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, 56--60.
[16]
John Halkias and James Colyar. 2006. Next Generation Simulation NGSIM Interstate 80 Freeway Dataset. Technical Report. Federal Highway Administration.
[17]
Robert Herman, Elliott W Montroll, Renfrey B Potts, and Richard W Rothery. 1959. Traffic dynamics: analysis of stability in car following. Operations research, Vol. 7, 1 (1959), 86--106.
[18]
SAE International. 2018. SAE International Releases Updated Visual Chart for Its ?Levels of Driving Automation" Standard for Self-Driving Vehicles. https://www.sae.org/news/press-room/2018/12/sae-international-releases-updated-visual-chart-for-its-levels-of-driving-automation-standard-for-self-driving-vehicles
[19]
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
[20]
Suzanne E Lee, Erik CB Olsen, Walter W Wierwille, et al. 2004. A comprehensive examination of naturalistic lane-changes. Technical Report. United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
[21]
Minh-Thang Luong, Hieu Pham, and Christopher D Manning. 2015. Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.04025 (2015).
[22]
Kai Nagel, Dietrich E Wolf, Peter Wagner, and Patrice Simon. 1998. Two-lane traffic rules for cellular automata: A systematic approach. Physical Review E, Vol. 58, 2 (1998), 1425.
[23]
Seong Hyeon Park, ByeongDo Kim, Chang Mook Kang, Chung Choo Chung, and Jun Won Choi. 2018. Sequence-to-sequence prediction of vehicle trajectory via LSTM encoder-decoder architecture. In 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 1672--1678.
[24]
Morten Monrad Pedersen and Peder Thusgaard Ruhoff. 2002. Entry ramps in the Nagel-Schreckenberg model. Physical Review E, Vol. 65, 5 (2002), 056705.
[25]
Colin Raffel and Daniel PW Ellis. 2015. Feed-forward networks with attention can solve some long-term memory problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.08756 (2015).
[26]
Marcus Rickert, Kai Nagel, Michael Schreckenberg, and Andreas Latour. 1996. Two lane traffic simulations using cellular automata. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 231, 4 (1996), 534--550.
[27]
Kenneth Schofield. 2005. Automotive lane change aid. US Patent 6,882,287.
[28]
David Schrank, Bill Eisele, and Tim Lomax. 2019. 2019 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT. Technical Report. Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
[29]
Tesla. 2020. MODEL S OWNER'S MANUAL. https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/model_s_owners_manual_north_america_en_us.pdf
[30]
Tomer Toledo and David Zohar. 2007. Modeling duration of lane changes. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1999, 1 (2007), 71--78.
[31]
L. Wang and B. K. P. Horn. 2020. On the Stability Analysis of Mixed Traffic With Vehicles Under Car-Following and Bilateral Control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, Vol. 65, 7 (2020), 3076--3083. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2019.2945888
[32]
M. Won, T. Park, and S. H. Son. 2017. Toward Mitigating Phantom Jam Using Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 18, 5 (2017), 1313--1324. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2605925
[33]
RD Worrall and AGR Bullen. 1970. An empirical analysis of lane changing on multilane highways. Highway Research Record 303 (1970).
[34]
Hwasoo Yeo, Alexander Skabardonis, John Halkias, James Colyar, and Vassili Alexiadis. 2008. Oversaturated freeway flow algorithm for use in next generation simulation. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2088, 1 (2008), 68--79.
[35]
Feng You, Ronghui Zhang, Guo Lie, Haiwei Wang, Huiyin Wen, and Jianmin Xu. 2015. Trajectory planning and tracking control for autonomous lane change maneuver based on the cooperative vehicle infrastructure system. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, 14 (2015), 5932--5946.
[36]
Li Zhang, Shangshu Cai, Yunlong Zhang, and Min Zhang. 2010. Comparison of lane changing algorithms between NGSIM and CORSIM. In 2010 IEEE 71st Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE, 1--6.
[37]
Yan Zhao, Shuo Shang, Yu Wang, Bolong Zheng, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, and Kai Zheng. 2018. REST: A Reference-based Framework for Spatio-temporal Trajectory Compression. In SIGKDD. 2797--2806.
[38]
Kai Zheng, Yan Zhao, Defu Lian, Bolong Zheng, Guanfeng Liu, and Xiaofang Zhou. 2020. Reference-based Framework for Spatio-temporal Trajectory Compression and Query Processing. TKDE, Vol. 32, 11 (2020), 12227--2240.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Comfort-Aware Lane Change Planning With Exit Strategy for Autonomous VehicleIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2023.334855036:7(2927-2941)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)Parameterized Decision-Making with Multi-Modality Perception for Autonomous Driving2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00340(4463-4476)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)LightTR: A Lightweight Framework for Federated Trajectory Recovery2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00337(4422-4434)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
KDD '21: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
August 2021
4259 pages
ISBN:9781450383325
DOI:10.1145/3447548
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 August 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. autonomous vehicle
  2. lane change maneuvers
  3. trajectory prediction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

KDD '21
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)106
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Comfort-Aware Lane Change Planning With Exit Strategy for Autonomous VehicleIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2023.334855036:7(2927-2941)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)Parameterized Decision-Making with Multi-Modality Perception for Autonomous Driving2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00340(4463-4476)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)LightTR: A Lightweight Framework for Federated Trajectory Recovery2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00337(4422-4434)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)FedCross: Towards Accurate Federated Learning via Multi-Model Cross-Aggregation2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00170(2137-2150)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2023)Target-Oriented Maneuver Decision for Autonomous Vehicle: A Rule-Aided Reinforcement Learning FrameworkProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3615072(3124-3133)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in a Mixed-Autonomy Traffic System: A Hybrid Stochastic Predictive Approach Incorporating Lane ChangeIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology10.1109/TVT.2022.320208472:1(136-148)Online publication date: Jan-2023
  • (2023)Impact-aware Maneuver Decision with Enhanced Perception for Autonomous Vehicle2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE55515.2023.00250(3255-3268)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2023)Scenario-Based Hybrid Model Predictive Design for Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Mixed-Autonomy Environments2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)10.1109/CDC49753.2023.10383460(6104-6109)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Trajectory Planning of Automated Vehicles Using Real-Time Map UpdatesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.329135011(67468-67481)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Jacobian linear regression and Tate Bryant Euler angle enabled autonomous vehicle LiFi communication sustained IOTAutomatika10.1080/00051144.2023.224791064:4(1095-1106)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media