Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3447548.3467195acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

PAMI: A Computational Module for Joint Estimation and Progression Prediction of Glaucoma

Published: 14 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Glaucoma, which can cause irreversible damage to the sight of human eyes, is conventionally diagnosed by visual field (VF) sensitivity. However, it is labor-intensive and time-consuming to measure VF. Recently, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been adopted to measure retinal layers thickness (RT) for assisting the diagnosis because glaucoma makes structural changes to RT and it is much less costly to obtain RT. In particular, RT can assist in mainly two manners. One is to estimate a VF from an RT such that clinical doctors only need to obtain an RT of a patient and then convert it to a VF for the diagnosis. The other is to predict future VFs by utilizing both past VFs and RTs, i.e., the prediction of progression of VF over time. The two computational tasks are performed as two data mining tasks because currently there is no knowledge about the exact form of the computations involved. In this paper, we study a novel problem which is the integration of the two data mining tasks. The motivation is that both the two data mining tasks deal with transforming information from the RT domain to the VF domain such that the knowledge discovered in one task can be useful for another. The integration is non-trivial because the two tasks do not share the way of transformation. To address this issue, we design a progression-agnostic and mode-independent (PAMI) module which facilitates cross-task knowledge utilization. We empirically demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art method for the estimation by 6.33% in terms of mean of the root mean square error on a real dataset, and outperforms the state-of-the-art method for the progression prediction by 3.49% for the best case.

References

[1]
Deng Cai, Xiaofei He, Jiawei Han, and Thomas S Huang. 2010. Graph regularized nonnegative matrix factorization for data representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 33, 8 (2010), 1548--1560.
[2]
Nello Cristianini, John Shawe-Taylor, et al. 2000. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge university press.
[3]
Josef Flammer, Stephen M Drance, and Mario Zulauf. 1984. Differential light threshold: short-and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Archives of Ophthalmology, Vol. 102, 5 (1984), 704--706.
[4]
Yuri Fujino, Hiroshi Murata, Chihiro Mayama, and Ryo Asaoka. 2015. Applying regression to predict future visual field progression in glaucoma patients. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol. 56, 4 (2015), 2334--2339.
[5]
Stuart K Gardiner and David P Crabb. 2002. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol. 43, 5 (2002), 1400--1407.
[6]
David F Garway-Heath, Joseph Caprioli, Fred W Fitzke, and Roger A Hitchings. 2000. Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol. 41, 7 (2000), 1774--1782.
[7]
Ronald S Harwerth, Louvenia Carter-Dawson, Earl L Smith, George Barnes, William F Holt, and Morris LJ Crawford. 2004. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol. 45, 9 (2004), 3152--3160.
[8]
Catharina Holmin and CET Krakau. 1982. Regression analysis of the central visual field in chronic glaucoma cases: A follow-up study using automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmologica, Vol. 60, 2 (1982), 267--274.
[9]
Donald C Hood. 2017. Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: an approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT). Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, Vol. 57 (2017), 46--75.
[10]
Donald C Hood and Randy H Kardon. 2007. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, Vol. 26, 6 (2007), 688--710.
[11]
NM Jansonius. 2010. On the accuracy of measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 94, 10 (2010), 1404--1405.
[12]
Sharon Kingman. 2004. Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Vol. 82 (2004), 887--888.
[13]
Mauro T Leite, Linda M Zangwill, Robert N Weinreb, Harsha L Rao, Luciana M Alencar, and Felipe A Medeiros. 2012. Structure-function relationships using the Cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomograph and standard automated perimetry. Journal of Glaucoma, Vol. 21, 1 (2012), 49.
[14]
Zenghan Liang, Ryota Tomioka, Hiroshi Murata, Ryo Asaoka, and Kenji Yamanishi. 2013. Quantitative prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss from few measurements. In ICDM. IEEE, 1121--1126.
[15]
Rizwan Malik, Helen Baker, Richard A Russell, and David P Crabb. 2013. A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to NICE guidelines. BMJ Open, Vol. 3, 5 (2013).
[16]
Shigeru Maya, Kai Morino, Hiroshi Murata, Ryo Asaoka, and Kenji Yamanishi. 2015. Discovery of glaucoma progressive patterns using hierarchical MDL-based clustering. In KDD. ACM, 1979--1988.
[17]
Shigeru Maya, Kai Morino, and Kenji Yamanishi. 2014. Predicting glaucoma progression using multi-task learning with heterogeneous features. In BigData. IEEE, 261--270.
[18]
Harsha L Rao, Linda M Zangwill, Robert N Weinreb, Mauro T Leite, Pamela A Sample, and Felipe A Medeiros. 2011. Structure-function relationship in glaucoma using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Archives of Ophthalmology, Vol. 129, 7 (2011), 864--871.
[19]
Sebastian Ruder. 2017. An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05098 (2017).
[20]
John Shawe-Taylor, Nello Cristianini, et al. 2004. Kernel methods for pattern analysis. Cambridge university press.
[21]
Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).
[22]
Ya Su, Xinbo Gao, Xuelong Li, and Dacheng Tao. 2012. Multivariate multilinear regression. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), Vol. 42, 6 (2012), 1560--1573.
[23]
Hiroki Sugiura, Taichi Kiwaki, Siamak Yousefi, Hiroshi Murata, Ryo Asaoka, and Kenji Yamanishi. 2018. Estimating glaucomatous visual sensitivity from retinal thickness with pattern-based regularization and visualization. In KDD. ACM, 783--792.
[24]
Shiliang Sun. 2013. A survey of multi-view machine learning. Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 23, 7--8 (2013), 2031--2038.
[25]
Yukako Taketani, Hiroshi Murata, Yuri Fujino, Chihiro Mayama, and Ryo Asaoka. 2015. How many visual fields are required to precisely predict future test results in glaucoma patients when using different trend analyses? Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol. 56, 6 (2015), 4076--4082.
[26]
Toshimitsu Uesaka, Kai Morino, Hiroki Sugiura, Taichi Kiwaki, Hiroshi Murata, Ryo Asaoka, and Kenji Yamanishi. 2017. Multi-view Learning over Retinal Thickness and Visual Sensitivity on Glaucomatous Eyes. In KDD. ACM, 2041--2050.
[27]
Chang Xu, Dacheng Tao, and Chao Xu. 2013. A survey on multi-view learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.5634 (2013).
[28]
Linchuan Xu, Ryo Asaoka, Taichi Kiwaki, Hiroshi Murata, Yuri Fujino, Masato Matsuura, Yohei Hashimoto, Shotaro Asano, Atsuya Miki, Kazuhiko Mori, et al. 2020 a. Predicting the glaucomatous central 10 degrees visual field from optical coherence tomography using deep learning and tensor regression. American Journal of Ophthalmology (2020).
[29]
Linchuan Xu, Ryo Asaoka, Hiroshi Murata, Taichi Kiwaki, Yuhui Zheng, Masato Matsuura, Yuri Fujino, Masaki Tanito, Kazuhiko Mori, Yoko Ikeda, et al. 2020 b. Improving visual field trend analysis with OCT and deeply regularized latent-space linear regression. Ophthalmology Glaucoma (2020).
[30]
Siamak Yousefi, Michael H Goldbaum, Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian, Tzyy-Ping Jung, Robert N Weinreb, Felipe A Medeiros, Linda M Zangwill, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Christopher A Girkin, and Christopher Bowd. 2013. Glaucoma progression detection using structural retinal nerve fiber layer measurements and functional visual field points. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 61, 4 (2013), 1143--1154.
[31]
Yu Zhang and Qiang Yang. 2017. A survey on multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.08114 (2017).
[32]
Yuhui Zheng, Linchuan Xu, Taichi Kiwaki, Jing Wang, Hiroshi Murata, Ryo Asaoka, and Kenji Yamanishi. 2019. Glaucoma Progression Prediction Using Retinal Thickness via Latent Space Linear Regression. In KDD. ACM, 2278--2286.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. PAMI: A Computational Module for Joint Estimation and Progression Prediction of Glaucoma

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '21: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
    August 2021
    4259 pages
    ISBN:9781450383325
    DOI:10.1145/3447548
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 August 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. convolutional neural networks
    2. glaucoma prediction
    3. matrix factorization
    4. multi-task learning
    5. multi-view learning
    6. regression

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
    • JST-AIP
    • JST KAKENHI

    Conference

    KDD '21
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 218
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media