Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Practice-Based Teacher Questioning Strategy Training with ELK: A Role-Playing Simulation for Eliciting Learner Knowledge

Published: 22 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Practice is essential for learning. However, for many interpersonal skills, there often are not enough opportunities and venues for novices to repeatedly practice. Role-playing simulations offer a promising framework to advance practice-based professional training for complex communication skills, in fields such as teaching. In this work, we introduce ELK (Eliciting Learner Knowledge), a role-playing simulation system that helps K-12 teachers develop effective questioning strategies to elicit learners' prior knowledge. We evaluate ELK with 75 pre-service teachers through a mixed-method study. We find that teachers demonstrate a modest increase in effective questioning strategies and develop sympathy towards students after using ELK for 3 rounds. We implement a supplementary activity in ELK in which users evaluate transcripts generated from past role-play sessions. We have tentative evidence that a combination of role-play and evaluating conversation moves may be more effective for learning. We contribute design implications of using role-play systems for communication strategy training.

References

[1]
Karan Ahuja, Dohyun Kim, Franceska Xhakaj, Virag Varga, Anne Xie, Stanley Zhang, Jay Eric Townsend, Chris Harrison, Amy Ogan, and Yuvraj Agarwal. 2019. EduSense: Practical classroom sensing at Scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 3, 3 (2019), 1--26.
[2]
Martha W Alibali, Mitchell J Nathan, Matthew S Wolfgram, R Breckinridge Church, Steven A Jacobs, Chelsea Johnson Martinez, and Eric J Knuth. 2014. How teachers link ideas in mathematics instruction using speech and gesture: A corpus analysis. Cognition and instruction, Vol. 32, 1 (2014), 65--100.
[3]
Susan A Ambrose, Michael W Bridges, Michele DiPietro, Marsha C Lovett, and Marie K Norman. 2010a. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
[4]
Susan A Ambrose, Michael W Bridges, Michele DiPietro, Marsha C Lovett, and Marie K Norman. 2010b. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
[5]
NC Anderson, SH Chapin, and CO O'Connor. 2012. Classroom discussions in math: A facilitator's guide to support professional learning of discourse and the Common Core. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions (2012).
[6]
Ewa Pihammar Andersson. 1993. The perspective of student nurses and theirperceptions of professional nursing duringthe nurse training progranune. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 18 (1993), 808--815.
[7]
Sinem Aslan, Nese Alyuz, Cagri Tanriover, Sinem E Mete, Eda Okur, Sidney K D'Mello, and Asli Arslan Esme. 2019. Investigating the impact of a real-time, multimodal student engagement analytics technology in authentic classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.
[8]
Deborah Loewenberg Ball and David K Cohen. 1999. Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice, Vol. 1 (1999), 3--22.
[9]
John D Bransford, Ann L Brown, Rodney R Cocking, et almbox. 2000. How people learn. Vol. 11. Washington, DC: National academy press.
[10]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, Vol. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[11]
Sara E Brownell, Jordan V Price, and Lawrence Steinman. 2013. Science communication to the general public: why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education, Vol. 12, 1 (2013), E6.
[12]
Julia Cambre, Scott Klemmer, and Chinmay Kulkarni. 2018. Juxtapeer: Comparative peer review yields higher quality feedback and promotes deeper reflection. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[13]
Narges Toghian Chaharsoughi, Shahnaz Ahrari, and Shahnaz Alikhah. 2014. Comparison the effect of teaching of SBAR technique with role play and lecturing on communication skill of nurses. Journal of caring sciences, Vol. 3, 2 (2014), 141.
[14]
S Chapin and Catherine O'Connor. 2012. Project Challenge: Using challenging curriculum and mathematical discourse to help all students learn. High-expectation curricula: Helping all students succeed with powerful learning (2012), 113--127.
[15]
Nancy Van Note Chism, Matthew Holley, and Cameron J Harris. 2012. 9: Researching the Impact of Educational Development: Basis for Informed Practice. To improve the academy, Vol. 31, 1 (2012), 129--145.
[16]
Amy Shannon Cook, Steven P Dow, and Jessica Hammer. 2017. Towards Designing Technology for Classroom Role-Play. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 241--251.
[17]
National Research Council et almbox. 2004. How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. National Academies Press.
[18]
Sandra Crespo. 2000. Seeing more than right and wrong answers: Prospective teachers' interpretations of students' mathematical work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol. 3, 2 (2000), 155--181.
[19]
Brent Duckor and Carrie Holmberg. 2017. Mastering formative assessment moves: 7 high-leverage practices to advance student learning. ASCD.
[20]
Barbara J Ericson, James D Foley, and Jochen Rick. 2018. Evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of adaptive parsons problems. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 60--68.
[21]
K Anders Ericsson, Ralf T Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Römer. 1993. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological review, Vol. 100, 3 (1993), 363.
[22]
Peter J Fadde and Gary A Klein. 2010. Deliberate performance: Accelerating expertise in natural settings. Performance Improvement, Vol. 49, 9 (2010), 5--14.
[23]
Erin Marie Furtak and Howard M. Glasser. 2016. Using Formative Assessment Data for Science Teaching and Learning. (2016).
[24]
David Gerritsen. 2018. A socio-technical approach to feedback and instructional development for teaching assistants. Ph.D. Dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University.
[25]
David Gerritsen, John Zimmerman, and Amy Ogan. 2018. Towards a framework for smart classrooms that teach instructors to teach. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].
[26]
Elena L Glassman, Lyla Fischer, Jeremy Scott, and Robert C Miller. 2015a. Foobaz: Variable name feedback for student code at scale. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. 609--617.
[27]
Elena L Glassman, Jeremy Scott, Rishabh Singh, Philip J Guo, and Robert C Miller. 2015b. OverCode: Visualizing variation in student solutions to programming problems at scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 22, 2 (2015), 1--35.
[28]
Lynne Godfrey and Mary Catherine O'Connor. 1995. The vertical hand span: Nonstandard units, expressions, and symbols in the classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 14, 3 (1995), 327--345.
[29]
Ricki Goldman, Roy Pea, Brigid Barron, and Sharon J Derry. 2014. Video research in the learning sciences. Routledge.
[30]
Amelia Wenk Gotwals, Joanne Philhower, Dante Cisterna, and Steven Bennett. 2015. Using video to examine formative assessment practices as measures of expertise for mathematics and science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 13, 2 (2015), 405--423.
[31]
Pamela Grossman, Christa Compton, Danielle Igra, Matthew Ronfeldt, Emily Shahan, and Peter Williamson. 2009. Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, Vol. 111, 9 (2009), 2055--2100.
[32]
Maria Riaz Hamdani. 2018. Learning how to be a transformational leader through a skill-building, role-play exercise. The International Journal of Management Education, Vol. 16, 1 (2018), 26--36.
[33]
Sara Hennessy, Sylvia Rojas-Drummond, Rupert Higham, Ana María Márquez, Fiona Maine, Rosa María Ríos, Rocío García-Carrión, Omar Torreblanca, and María José Barrera. 2016. Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, Vol. 9 (2016), 16--44.
[34]
Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M McLaren, and Vincent Aleven. 2018. Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-enhanced classrooms. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education. Springer, 154--168.
[35]
Bell Hooks. 2003. Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. Vol. 36. Psychology Press.
[36]
Bell Hooks. 2014. Teaching to transgress. Routledge.
[37]
IES. 2020. Teacher characteristics and trends. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=28
[38]
Andy Jacob and Kate McGovern. 2015. The Mirage: Confronting the Hard Truth about Our Quest for Teacher Development. TNTP (2015).
[39]
Emily Jensen, Meghan Dale, Patrick J Donnelly, Cathlyn Stone, Sean Kelly, Amanda Godley, and Sidney K D'Mello. 2020. Toward automated feedback on teacher discourse to enhance teacher learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[40]
Beres Joyner and Louise Young. 2006. Teaching medical students using role play: twelve tips for successful role plays. Medical teacher, Vol. 28, 3 (2006), 225--229.
[41]
Jeremy Kilpatrick, Jane Swafford, Bradford Findell, National research council, et almbox. 2001. Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Vol. 2101. Citeseer.
[42]
Juho Kim. 2015. Learnersourcing: improving learning with collective learner activity. Ph.D. Dissertation. Cambridge, MA, USA.
[43]
Juho Kim, Philip J. Guo, Carrie J. Cai, Shang-Wen (Daniel) Li, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, and Robert C. Miller. 2014. Data-driven Interaction Techniques for Improving Navigation of Educational Videos. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (UIST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 563--572. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647389
[44]
Paul A Kirschner and Jeroen Van Merriënboer. 2008. Ten steps to complex learning a new approach to instruction and instructional design.
[45]
Eric Knuth and Dominic Peressini. 2001. Unpacking the nature of discourse in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, Vol. 6, 5 (2001), 320.
[46]
Herbert Kohl. 1994. I won't learn from you! Confronting student resistance. Rethinking our classrooms: Teaching for equity and justice, Vol. 1 (1994), 134--135.
[47]
Chinmay Kulkarni, Julia Cambre, Yasmine Kotturi, Michael S Bernstein, and Scott R Klemmer. 2015b. Talkabout: Making distance matter with small groups in massive classes. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1116--1128.
[48]
Chinmay E Kulkarni, Michael S Bernstein, and Scott R Klemmer. 2015a. PeerStudio: rapid peer feedback emphasizes revision and improves performance. In Proceedings of the second (2015) ACM conference on learning@ scale. 75--84.
[49]
Gloria Ladson-Billings. 1995. Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American educational research journal, Vol. 32, 3 (1995), 465--491.
[50]
Magdalene Lampert, Megan Loef Franke, Elham Kazemi, Hala Ghousseini, Angela Chan Turrou, Heather Beasley, Adrian Cunard, and Kathleen Crowe. 2013. Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of teacher education, Vol. 64, 3 (2013), 226--243.
[51]
Douglas Larkin. 2012. Misconceptions about "misconceptions": Preservice secondary science teachers' views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, Vol. 96, 5 (2012), 927--959.
[52]
Arthur Levine. 2006. Educating school teachers. Education Schools Project(2006).
[53]
Ching Liu, Juho Kim, and Hao-Chuan Wang. 2018. ConceptScape: Collaborative Concept Mapping for Video Learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 387, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173961
[54]
Janet Macdonald. 2003. Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product. Computers & Education, Vol. 40, 4 (2003), 377--391.
[55]
O Mary Catherine and Chairman Director Sarah Michaels. 1993. Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, Vol. 24, 4 (1993), 318--335.
[56]
Morva McDonald, Elham Kazemi, and Sarah Schneider Kavanagh. 2013. Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of teacher education, Vol. 64, 5 (2013), 378--386.
[57]
Sarah Michaels and Catherine O'Connor. 2015. Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussion. Socializing intelligence through talk and dialogue (2015), 347--362.
[58]
Luisa Molinari and Consuelo Mameli. 2013. Process quality of classroom discourse: Pupil participation and learning opportunities. International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 62 (2013), 249--258.
[59]
Sonia Moore. 1984. The Stanislavski system: Professional Traning of an Actor. Viking Penguin Inc.
[60]
NSF Inquiry Project. 2020. Talk Science Professional Development. https://inquiryproject.terc.edu/prof_dev/pathway5/index.html
[61]
Catherine O'Connor and Sarah Michaels. 2007. When is dialogue ?dialogic'? Human Development, Vol. 50, 5 (2007), 275--285.
[62]
Mary Catherine O'Connor and Sarah Michaels. 1996. Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. Discourse, learning, and schooling, Vol. 63 (1996), 103.
[63]
Fred Paas, Alexander Renkl, and John Sweller. 2003. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, Vol. 38, 1 (2003), 1--4.
[64]
Poskin, Jamie and Coker, Berk. 2020. TeachFX. https://teachfx.com/
[65]
Anand Ramakrishnan, Erin Ottmar, Jennifer LoCasale-Crouch, and Jacob Whitehill. 2019. Toward automated classroom observation: Predicting positive and negative climate. In 2019 14th IEEE international conference on automatic face & gesture recognition (FG 2019). IEEE, 1--8.
[66]
Curt Reese and Terri Wells. 2007. Teaching academic discussion skills with a card game. Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 38, 4 (2007), 546--555.
[67]
Justin Reich, Yoon Jeon Kim, Kevin Robinson, Dan Roy, and Meredith Thompson. 2018. Exploring Authenticity and Playfulness in Teacher Practice Spaces. (2018).
[68]
Philip M Sadler, Gerhard Sonnert, Harold P Coyle, Nancy Cook-Smith, and Jaimie L Miller. 2013. The influence of teachers' knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 50, 5 (2013), 1020--1049.
[69]
Anisha Sasidharan and Kok Eng Tan. 2017. Pupils'and Teachers' Perceptions of a Language Board Game, Challenge. The English Teacher 3 (2017), 20.
[70]
Meghan Shaughnessy and Timothy A Boerst. 2018. Uncovering the skills that preservice teachers bring to teacher education: The practice of eliciting a student's thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 69, 1 (2018), 40--55.
[71]
Hong Shen, Haojian Jin, Ángel A Cabrera, Adam Perer, Haiyi Zhu, and Jason I Hong. 2020. Designing Alternative Representations of Confusion Matrices to Support Non-Expert Public Understanding of Algorithm Performance. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 4, CSCW 2 (2020).
[72]
Laurie Sleep. 2012. The work of steering instruction toward the mathematical point: A decomposition of teaching practice. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 49, 5 (2012), 935--970.
[73]
Ann Stes, Liesje Coertjens, and Peter Van Petegem. 2010. Instructional development for teachers in higher education: Impact on teaching approach. Higher education, Vol. 60, 2 (2010), 187--204.
[74]
James W Stigler and Kevin F Miller. 2018. 24 Expertise and Expert Performance in Teaching. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2018), 431.
[75]
Meredith Thompson, Kesiena Owho-Ovuakporie, Kevin Robinson, Yoon Jeon Kim, Rachel Slama, and Justin Reich. 2019. Teacher Moments: A digital simulation for preservice teachers to approximate parent--teacher conversations. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, Vol. 35, 3 (2019), 144--164.
[76]
University of Michigan. 2020. TeachingWorks. http://www.teachingworks.org/
[77]
University of Washington. 2020. Tools for Ambitious Science Teaching. https://ambitiousscienceteaching.org/tools/
[78]
Xu Wang, Carolyn Rose, and Kenneth Koedinger. 2021. Seeing Beyond Expert Blind Spots: Online Learning Design for Scale and Quality. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[79]
Xu Wang, Srinivasa Teja Talluri, Carolyn Rose, and Kenneth Koedinger. 2019. UpGrade: Sourcing Student Open-Ended Solutions to Create Scalable Learning Opportunities. In Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (Chicago, IL, USA) (L@S '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333614
[80]
Xu Wang, Miaomiao Wen, and Carolyn Rose. 2017. Contrasting explicit and implicit support for transactive exchange in team oriented project based learning. Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
[81]
Zuowei Wang, Kevin Miller, and Kai Cortina. 2013. Using the LENA in Teacher Training: Promoting Student Involement through automated feedback. Vol. 4. na.
[82]
Gordon Wells. 2007. Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge. Human Development, Vol. 50, 5 (2007), 244--274.
[83]
Miaomiao Wen, Keith Maki, Steven Dow, James D Herbsleb, and Carolyn Rose. 2017. Supporting virtual team formation through community-wide deliberation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--19.
[84]
Joseph Jay Williams, Juho Kim, Anna Rafferty, Samuel Maldonado, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Walter S. Lasecki, and Neil Heffernan. 2016. AXIS: Generating Explanations at Scale with Learnersourcing and Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (Edinburgh, Scotland, UK) (L@S '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 379--388. https://doi.org/10.1145/2876034.2876042
[85]
Francc eska Xhakaj, Vincent Aleven, and Bruce M McLaren. 2017. Effects of a teacher dashboard for an intelligent tutoring system on teacher knowledge, lesson planning, lessons and student learning. In European conference on technology enhanced learning. Springer, 315--329.
[86]
Nesra Yannier, Kenneth R Koedinger, and Scott E Hudson. 2015. Learning from mixed-reality games: Is shaking a tablet as effective as physical observation?. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1045--1054.
[87]
Bowen Yu, Ye Yuan, Loren Terveen, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Jodi Forlizzi, and Haiyi Zhu. 2020. Keeping Designers in the Loop: Communicating Inherent Algorithmic Trade-offs Across Multiple Objectives. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1245--1257.
[88]
Mi Yu and Kyung ja Kang. 2017. Effectiveness of a role-play simulation program involving the sbar technique: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, Vol. 53 (2017), 41--47.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Speaking, Playing, Learning: Unveiling the Potential of Role Playing Models in Differentiated Elementary EducationJurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran10.23887/jipp.v8i3.836048:3(405-413)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2024
  • (2024)F2Key: Dynamically Converting Your Face into a Private Key Based on COTS Headphones for Reliable Voice InteractionProceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services10.1145/3643832.3661860(127-140)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)UbiPhysioProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435528:1(1-27)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW1
CSCW
April 2021
5016 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3460939
Issue’s Table of Contents
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 April 2021
Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. communication strategy training
  2. conversation
  3. decomposition of practice
  4. learning
  5. role-play
  6. scalable professional training
  7. sympathy building
  8. teacher education

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)319
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)39
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Speaking, Playing, Learning: Unveiling the Potential of Role Playing Models in Differentiated Elementary EducationJurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran10.23887/jipp.v8i3.836048:3(405-413)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2024
  • (2024)F2Key: Dynamically Converting Your Face into a Private Key Based on COTS Headphones for Reliable Voice InteractionProceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services10.1145/3643832.3661860(127-140)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)UbiPhysioProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435528:1(1-27)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
  • (2024)EarSlideProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435158:1(1-29)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
  • (2024)HyperHARProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435118:1(1-29)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
  • (2024)AFaceProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435108:1(1-33)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
  • (2024)VesNet: A Vessel Network for Jointly Learning Route Pattern and Future TrajectoryACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/363937015:2(1-25)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
  • (2024)EarSEProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314477:4(1-33)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2024)TS2ACTProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314457:4(1-22)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2024)CAvatarProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314247:4(1-24)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media