Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Accessible Web Development: Opportunities to Improve the Education and Practice of web Development with a Screen Reader

Published: 21 July 2021 Publication History

Abstract

There are a growing number of jobs related to web development, yet there is little formal literature about the accessibility of web development with a screen reader. This article describes research to explore (1) web development accessibility issues and their impact on blind learners and programmers; (2) tools and strategies used to address issues; and (3) opportunities for creating inclusive web development curriculum and supportive tools. We conducted a Comprehensive Literature Review (CLR) to formulate accessibility issue categories, then interviewed 12 blind programmers to validate and expand on both issues in education and practice. The CLR yielded five issue categories: (1) visual information without an accessible equivalent, (2) orienting, (3) navigating, (4) lack of support, and (5) knowledge and use of supportive technologies. Our interview findings validated the use of CLR-derived categories and revealed nuances specific to learning and practicing web development. Blind web developers grapple with the inaccessibility of demonstrations and explanations of web design concepts, wireframing software, independent verification of computed Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), and navigating browser-based developer tool interfaces. Tools and strategies include seeking out alternative education materials to learn independently, use of CSS frameworks, collaboration with sighted colleagues, and avoidance of design and front-end development. This work contributes to our understanding of accessibility issues specific to web development and the strategies that blind web developers employ in both educational and applied contexts. We identify areas in which greater awareness and application of accessibility best practices are required in Web education, a need to disseminate existing screen reader strategies and accessible tools, and to develop new tools that support Web design and validation of CSS. Finally, this research signals future directions for the development of accessible web curriculum and supportive tools, including solutions that leverage artificial intelligence, tactile graphics, and supportive-online communities of practice.

References

[1]
Gregory Abowd and Elizabeth Mynatt. 2000. Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1 (2000), 29–58.
[2]
AIRA Tech Corp. 2020. AIRA. Retrieved from https://aira.io/.
[3]
Khaled Albusays and Stephanie Ludi. 2016. Eliciting programming challenges faced by developers with visual impairments: Exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering. ACM, 82–85.
[4]
Khaled Albusays. 2018. Exploring auditory cues to locate code errors and enhance navigation for developers who are blind. SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 120 (2018), 11–15.
[5]
Khaled Albusays, Stephanie Ludi, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2017. Interviews and observation of blind software developers at work to understand code navigation challenges. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 91–100.
[6]
Michael. Allen. 2003. Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say? A Summary of the Findings. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED479051.
[7]
Apple. 2021. VoiceOver User Guide. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/voiceover/info/guide/_1121.html.
[8]
Apple. 2021. TextEdit User Guide. Retrieved from https://support.apple.com/guide/textedit/welcome/mac.
[9]
Apple. 2021. Xcode. Retrieved from https://developer.apple.com/xcode/.
[10]
Ameer Armaly and Collin McMillan. 2016. An empirical study of blindness and program comprehension. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 683–685.
[11]
Cheryl Aasheim, Lixin Li, and Susan Williams. 2009. Knowledge and skill requirements for entry-level information technology workers: A comparison of industry and academia. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 20, 3 (2009), 349–356. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol20/iss3/10.
[12]
Suzanne P. Balik, Sean P. Mealin, Matthias F. Stallmann, Robert D. Rodman, Michelle L. Glatz, and Veronica J. Sigler. 2014. Including blind people in computing through access to graphs. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 91–98.
[13]
Catherine M. Baker, Lauren R. Milne, and Richard E. Ladner. 2015. StructJumper: A tool to help blind programmers navigate and understand the structure of code. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 3043–3052.
[14]
Catherine M. Baker, Cynthia L. Bennett, and Richard E. Ladner. 2019. Educational experiences of blind programmers. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 759–765.
[15]
Martin Bauer. 2000. Classical content analysis: a review. In Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound, Martin Bauer and George Gaskell (Eds.). SAGE Publications Ltd., 132–151. Retrieved from https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781849209731.
[16]
Florian Beijers, A Vision of Coding, without Opening your Eyes. Retrieved from https://medium.com/free-code-camp/looking-back-to-what-started-it-all-731ef5424aec.
[17]
Florian Beijers. 2018. Stories from the trenches: What I've learned from working as a blind developer for a sighted dev team. Retrieved from https://www.24a11y.com/2018/stories-from-the-trenches/.
[18]
E. Bell and A. Silverman. 2018. The impact of attitudes and access to mentors on the interest in STEM for teens and adults who are blind. J. Blind Innov. Res. 8, 2 (2018) Retrieved from https://nfb.org/images/nfb/publications/jbir/jbir18/jbir080201.html.
[19]
Andy Borka. 2020. Developer toolkit. Retrieved from https://addons.nvda-project.org/addons/developerToolkit.en.html#:∼:text=Developer%20toolkit%20(DTK)%20is%20an,size%2C%20position%2C%20and%20characteristics.
[20]
Bert Boss. 2016. CSS 20. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS20/history.html.
[21]
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Computer Programmers. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/computer-programmers.htm.
[22]
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. 2020. Occupational Outlook Handbook, Web Developer. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/web-developers.htm.
[23]
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2020. Occupational Outlook Handbook: Web Developers. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/web-developers.htm#tab-8.
[24]
Randy Connolly. 2019. Facing backwards while stumbling forwards: The future of teaching web development. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 518–523.
[25]
John Creswell. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Qualitative and Quantitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson Education Inc., Boston.
[26]
Diagram Center. 2015. Image Description Guidelines. Retrieved from http://diagramcenter.org/table-of-contents-2.html.
[27]
Parham Doustdar. 2016. The Tools of a Blind Programmer. Retrieved from https://www.parhamdoustdar.com/2016/04/03/tools-of-blind-programmer/.
[28]
Parham Doustdar. 2016. An Autobiography of a Blind Programmer. Retrieved from https://www.parhamdoustdar.com/2016/03/27/autobiography-blind-programmer/.
[29]
Joseph Dumas and J. Janice Redish. 1999. A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Intellect Books.
[30]
Foundation Inc. 2020. Eclipse. Retrieved from https://www.eclipse.org/ide/.
[31]
W. Erickson, C. Lee, and S. von Schrader, S. 2017. Disability Statistics from the American Community Survey (ACS). Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute (YTI), Ithaca, NY. Retrieved from Cornell University Disability Statistics website: www.disabilitystatistics.org.
[32]
A. C. Finkelstein, G. Kappel, and W. Retschitzegger. 2002. Ubiquitous web application development–-A framework for understanding. Retrieved from http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/A.Finkelstein/papers/uwa.pdf.
[33]
Freedom Scientific. 2021. JAWS. Retrieved from https://www.freedomscientific.com/products/software/jaws/.
[34]
Free Software Foundation. 2015. GNU Emacs. Retrieved from https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/Eclipse
[35]
W. O. Galitz. 2007. The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques. John Wiley & Sons.
[36]
Ronald J. Glotzbach and Nishant Kothary. 2003. Usability & human behavior analysis through real-time performance data. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Web Graphics (SIGGRAPH'03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY.
[37]
Ezekiel Kimball, Rachel Friedensen, and Elton Silva. 2017. Engaging disability: Trajectories of involvement for college students with disabilities. In Disability as Diversity in Higher Education: Policies and Practices to Enhance Student Success. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cfssr_publishedwork/7.
[38]
Google Inc. and Gallup Inc. 2016. Trends in the state of computer science in U.S. K–12 Schools. Retrieved from https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/trends-in-the-state-of-computer-science-report.pdf.
[39]
Google Inc. & Gallup Inc. 2016. Diversity gaps in computer science: Exploring the underrepresentation of girls, blacks and Hispanics. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/PG34aH.
[40]
Don Ho. 2011. What is Notepad++. Retrieved from https://notepad-plus-plus.org/.
[41]
Shaun K. Kane and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2014. Tracking @stemxcomet: teaching programming to blind students via 3D printing, crisis management, and Twitter. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 247–252.
[42]
Shaun K. Kane, Varsha Koushik, and Annika Muehlbradt. 2018. Bonk: Accessible programming for accessible audio games. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 132–142.
[43]
Claire Kearney-Volpe, Amy Hurst, and Scott Fitzgerald. 2019. Blind web development training at Oysters and Pearls Technology Camp in Uganda. In Proceedings of the 16th Web For All 2019 Personalization Conference – Personalizing the Web (W4A'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1–10.
[44]
Claire Kearney-Volpe, Devorah Kletenik, Kate Sonka, Deborah Sturm, and Amy Hurst. 2019. Evaluating instructor strategy and student learning through digital accessibility course enhancements. In Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 377–388.
[45]
Claire Kearney-Volpe. 2019. Web development training for students that are blind. In Proceedings of the 16th Web For All 2019 Personalization Conference – Personalizing the Web (W4A’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1–2.
[46]
Jonathan Lazar, Aaron Allen, Jason Kleinman, and Chris Malarkey. 2007. What frustrates screen reader users on the web: A study of 100 blind users. Int. J. Hum.-comput. Interact. 22, 3 (2007), 247–269.
[47]
Jingyi Li, Son Kim, Joshua A. Miele, Maneesh Agrawala, and Sean Follmer. 2019. Editing spatial layouts through tactile templates for people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1–11.
[48]
V. McKinney, K. Yoon, and F. M. Zahedi. 2002. The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Inf. Syst. Res. 13, 3 (2002), 296–315.
[49]
Sean Mealin and E. Murphy-Hill. 2012. An exploratory study of blind software developers. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC’12). Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6344485.
[50]
Microsoft Corporation. 2019. Microsoft Notepad. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/windows-notepad/9msmlrh6lzf3?activetab=pivot:overviewtab.
[51]
Microsoft Corporation. 2021. Visual Studio Code. Retrieved from https://code.visualstudio.com/.
[52]
Alana Morris, Anthony Onwuegbuzie, and Hannah Gerber. 2018. Using expert interviews within MODES in online and offline spaces to extend comprehensive literature review processes. Qualitat. Rep. 23, 8 (2018), 1777–1798. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss8/1.
[53]
Mozilla Developer Network. 2019. Retrieved from developer.mozilla.org.
[54]
National Science Foundation. 2017. Women minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/static/downloads/nsf17310-digest.pdf.
[55]
National Science Foundation. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/static/data/tab7-5.pdf.
[56]
Jacob Nielson. 1994. Severity ratings for usability problems. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-rate-the-severity-of-usability-problems/.
[57]
Kirk Norman, Yevgeniy Arber, and Ravi Kuber. 2013. How accessible is the process of web interface design? In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1–2.
[58]
NV Access. 2021. NVDA. Retrieved from https://www.nvaccess.org/.
[59]
Anthony Onwuegbuzie and Rebecca Frels. 2016. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach. Sage.
[60]
Tuukka Ojala. 2017. Software development 450 words per minute. Retrieved from https://www.vincit.fi/en/software-development-450-words-per-minute/.
[61]
Venkatesh Potluri, Priyan Vaithilingam, Suresh Iyengar, Y. Vidya, Manohar Swaminathan, and Gopal Srinivasa. 2018. CodeTalk: Improving programming environment accessibility for visually impaired developers. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1–11.
[62]
Python Software Foundation. 2021. IDLE. Retrieved from https://docs.python.org/3/library/idle.html.
[63]
T. V. Raman. 1996. Emacspeak—a speech interface. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'96). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 66–71.
[64]
Janice (Ginny) Redish, Randolph G. Bias, Robert Bailey, Rolf Molich, Joe Dumas, and Jared M. Spool. 2002. Usability in practice: Formative usability evaluations—Evolution and revolution. In CHI'02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 885–890.
[65]
Jaime Sánchez and Fernando Aguayo. 2005. Blind learners programming through audio. In CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1769–1772.
[66]
Advait Sarkar. 2015. The Impact of Syntax Colouring on Program Comprehension. PPIG.
[67]
Emmanuel Schanzer, Sina Bahram, and Shriram Krishnamurthi. 2019. Accessible AST-based programming for visually impaired programmers. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 773–779.
[68]
Margrit Schreier. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage, London.
[69]
Kristen Shinohara, Saba Kawas, Andrew J. Ko, and Richard E. Ladner. 2018. Who teaches accessibility? A survey of U.S. computing faculty. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 197–202.
[70]
Ann C. Smith, Joan M. Francioni, and Sam D. Matzek. 2000. A Java programming tool for students with visual disabilities. In Proceedings of the 4th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Assets’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 142–148.
[71]
Ann C. Smith, Justin S. Cook, Joan M. Francioni, Asif Hossain, Mohd Anwar, and M. Fayezur Rahman. 2003. Nonvisual tool for navigating hierarchical structures. In Proceedings of the 6th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets'04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 133–139.
[72]
Andreas Stefik, Christopher Hundhausen, and Robert Patterson. 2011. An empirical investigation into the design of auditory cues to enhance computer program comprehension. Int. J. Hum.-comput. Stud. 69, 12 (2011), 820–838.
[73]
Andreas Stefik, Christopher Hundhausen, and Derrick Smith. 2011. On the design of an educational infrastructure for the blind and visually impaired in computer science. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, New York, NY, 571–576.
[74]
Andreas Stefik and Richard Ladner. 2017. The Quorum programming language (abstract only). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, New York, NY, 641–641.
[75]
Anja Thieme, Cecily Morrison, Nicolas Villar, Martin Grayson, and Siân Lindley. 2017. Enabling collaboration in learning computer programing inclusive of children with vision impairments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 739–752.
[76]
Twitter. 2021. Bootstrap. Retrieved from https://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.4/.
[77]
Teresa Whelley, Richard Radtke, Sheryl Burgstahler, and Theodore Christ. 2003. Mentors, advisors, role models and peer supporters: Career development relationships and individuals with disabilities. Amer. Rehabil. 27, 1 (2003), 42–48.
[78]
Jaroslaw Wiazowski. 2013. Creating tactile images—Decision making process. In Proceedings of the 7th International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology (i-CREATe'13).
[79]
Tessa Wright, Beth Harris, and Eric Sticken. 2010. A best-evidence synthesis of research on orientation and mobility involving tactile maps and models. J. Vi. Impair. Blind. 104, 2 (2010), 95–106.
[80]
W3C. 2016. Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion/.
[81]
W3C. 2016. HTML & CSS. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/htmlcss#whatcss.
[82]
W3C. 2019. HTML 5.2. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/introduction.html#a-quick-introduction-to-html.
[83]
W3C. 2020. Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) Overview. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/atag/.
[84]
W3C. 2020. Python Indentation. Retrieved from https://www.w3schools.com/python/gloss_python_indentation.asp.
[85]
Kim T. Zebehazy and Adam P. Wilton. 2014. Straight from the source: Perceptions of students with visual impairments about graphic use. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 108, 4 (2014), 275–286.
[86]
Zoom Video Communications, Inc. 2021. Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing—Zoom. Retrieved from https://zoom.us/.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)UI Development Experiences of Programmers with Visual Impairments in Product TeamsEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_8(121-133)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
  • (2023)The Scenarios of Artificial Intelligence and Wireframes Implementation in Engineering EducationSustainability10.3390/su1508685015:8(6850)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Combined with multi-objective optimization algorithm of college art professional college students’ social practice nurturing function and realization wayApplied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences10.2478/amns.2023.2.012949:1Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Accessible Web Development: Opportunities to Improve the Education and Practice of web Development with a Screen Reader

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
    ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 14, Issue 2
    June 2021
    174 pages
    ISSN:1936-7228
    EISSN:1936-7236
    DOI:10.1145/3477222
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 July 2021
    Accepted: 01 March 2021
    Revised: 01 January 2021
    Received: 01 August 2020
    Published in TACCESS Volume 14, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Accessibility
    2. Human-centered computing
    3. accessible design tools
    4. accessible web design
    5. accessible web development
    6. screen reader
    7. visually impaired/blind programmers

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)407
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)UI Development Experiences of Programmers with Visual Impairments in Product TeamsEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_8(121-133)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
    • (2023)The Scenarios of Artificial Intelligence and Wireframes Implementation in Engineering EducationSustainability10.3390/su1508685015:8(6850)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Combined with multi-objective optimization algorithm of college art professional college students’ social practice nurturing function and realization wayApplied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences10.2478/amns.2023.2.012949:1Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Designing While Blind: Nonvisual Tools and Inclusive Workflows for Tactile Graphic CreationProceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3597638.3614546(1-8)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Understanding Digital Content Creation Needs of Blind and Low Vision PeopleProceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3597638.3608387(1-15)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
    • (2022)TangibleGrid: Tangible Web Layout Design for Blind UsersProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3526113.3545627(1-12)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Empowering Blind Musicians to Compose and Notate Music with SoundCellsProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3544825(1-14)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
    • (2022)CodeWalk: Facilitating Shared Awareness in Mixed-Ability Collaborative Software DevelopmentProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3544812(1-16)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Accessibility of UI Frameworks and Libraries for Programmers with Visual Impairments2022 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL/HCC53370.2022.9833098(1-10)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
    • (2022)Reference Model for the Development of a Learning Management System with an Integrated Voice Assistant for the Optimization of the Teaching Process of a Foreign Language for People with Visual Impairment2022 IEEE XXIX International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON)10.1109/INTERCON55795.2022.9870128(1-4)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2022

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media