Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3458864.3466862acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

SOS: isolated health monitoring system to <u>s</u>ave <u>o</u>ur <u>s</u>atellites

Published: 24 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

With the advent of Space-IoTs, the rate of launch of satellites has grown significantly. Alongside, the failure rate of satellites has also surged increased tremendously. Satellites are non-repairable systems in orbit, and the financial loss incurred when the satellites fail before their expected mission time is substantial. If the source of a failure is known while the satellite is in orbit, then there is a possibility to revive it by sending appropriate commands from ground stations. In this work, we present a simple, independent satellite health monitoring system called Chirper. The Chirper is equipped with multiple modules such as IMU, isolated voltage and current measurement probes, and an onboard communication channel. We present a new approach to measure low DC voltages in an isolated way, providing a resolution and accuracy of around 1 V. We evaluated the design and performance of the Chirper through simulation, testing it in space systems test facility, and by mounting it on a helium balloon. With extensive experiments we show that 90% of the time the dc voltage measurement error is within 0.8 V, and the maximum error is 0.9 V. We expect to launch the Chirper soon on a space system.

References

[1]
NASA. (2019) Small-satellite mission failure rates. [Online]. Available: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20190002705.pdf
[2]
"A study of on-orbit spacecraft failures," Acta Astronautica, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 195 -- 205, 2009.
[3]
T. Yairi, Y. Kato, and K. Hori, "Fault detection by mining association rules from housekeeping data," in In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, 2001.
[4]
S. Bottone, D. Lee, M. O'Sullivan, and M. Spivack, "Failure prediction and diagnosis for satellite monitoring systems using bayesian networks," in MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference, Nov 2008, pp. 1--7.
[5]
R. H. Chen, H. K. Ng, J. L. Speyer, L. S. Guntur, and R. Carpenter, "Health monitoring of a satellite system," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 593--605, 2006. [Online]. Available
[6]
L. A. Times. (2019) The latest lost satellite is now space junk that could put other spacecraft at risk. [Online]. Available: https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/19/18507439/intelsat-29e-geostationary-orbit-satellite-failure-space-debris
[7]
S. Now. (2018) Isro loses contact with new communications satellite. [Online]. Available: https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/04/03/isro-loses-contact-with-new-communications-satellite/
[8]
NASA. (2014) Cots components in spacecraft systems: Understanding the risk. [Online]. Available: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/cots.pdf
[9]
S. Narayana, R. V. Prasad, V. S. Rao, and C. Verhoeven, "Swans: Sensor wireless actuator network in space," in Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, ser. SenSys '17, 2017.
[10]
M. E. S. Sally Cole. (2020) Small satellites increasingly tapping cots components. [Online]. Available: http://mil-embedded.com/articles/small-tapping-cots-components/
[11]
Starlink. (2020) Starlink. [Online]. Available: https://www.starlink.com/
[12]
S. News. (2019) Digitalglobe loses worldview-4 satellite to gyro failure. [Online]. Available: https://spacenews.com/digitalglobe-loses-worldview-4-satellite-to-gyro-failure/
[13]
ESA. (2001) Ers-2 goes gyro-less. [Online]. Available: https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Operations/ERS-2_goes_gyro-less
[14]
G. A. Landis, "Tabulation of power-related satellite failure causes," in 11th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, 2013.
[15]
M. Oredsson, "Electrical power system for the cubestar nanosatellite," 2010.
[16]
Y. Borthomieu, "14 - satellite lithium-ion batteries," in Lithium-Ion Batteries, G. Pistoia, Ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, pp. 311 -- 344. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444595133000145
[17]
S. Narayana, R. Muralishankar, R. V. Prasad, and V. S. Rao, "Recovering bits from thin air: Demodulation of bandpass sampled noisy signals for space iot," in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, ser. IPSN '19. Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, p. 1--12.
[18]
E. Dynamics. (2020) Fft gyro 600 pro. [Online]. Available: https://eurekadynamics.com/fft-gyro-600/
[19]
V. Chatzigiannakis and S. Papavassiliou, "Diagnosing anomalies and identifying faulty nodes in sensor networks," IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 637--645, 2007.
[20]
T. Chakraborty, A. U. Nambi, R. Chandra, R. Sharma, M. Swaminathan, Z. Kapetanovic, and J. Appavoo, "Fall-curve: A novel primitive for iot fault detection and isolation," in Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, ser. SenSys '18. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, p. 95--107.
[21]
B. Sheng, Q. Li, W. Mao, and W. Jin, "Outlier detection in sensor networks," in Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, ser. MobiHoc '07. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2007, p. 219--228.
[22]
F. Koushanfar, M. Potkonjak, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, "On-line fault detection of sensor measurements," in SENSORS, 2003 IEEE, vol. 2, 2003, pp. 974--979 Vol.2.
[23]
D. Lawrence, J. S. Donnal, S. Leeb, and Y. He, "Non-contact measurement of line voltage," IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 24, pp. 8990--8997, 2016.
[24]
P. S. Shenil, R. Arjun, and B. George, "Feasibility study of a non-contact ac voltage measurement system," in 2015 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings, 2015, pp. 399--404.
[25]
S. Wei, L. Zhang, W. Gao, and Z. Cao, "Non-contact voltage measurement based on electric-field effect," Procedia Engineering, vol. 15, pp. 1973 -- 1977, 2011, cEIS 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705811018698
[26]
A. Delle Femine, D. Gallo, C. Landi, A. Lo Schiavo, and M. Luiso, "Low power contactless voltage sensor for low voltage power systems," Sensors, vol. 19, no. 16, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/16/3513
[27]
TDK. (2020) Surface potential sensors efs series. [Online]. Available: https://product.tdk.com/info/en/products/sensor/sensor/surface-potential/technote/tpo/index.html

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MobiSys '21: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services
June 2021
528 pages
ISBN:9781450384438
DOI:10.1145/3458864
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

MobiSys '21
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

MobiSys '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 166 submissions, 22%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 274 of 1,679 submissions, 16%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 687
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)201
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)33
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

EPUB

View this article in ePub.

ePub

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media