Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3460210.3493584acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesk-capConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Differential Causal Rules Mining in Knowledge Graphs

Published: 02 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, keen interest towards Knowledge Graphs has increased in both academia and the industry which has led to the creation of various datasets and the development of different research topics. In this paper, we present an approach that discovers differential causal rules in Knowledge Graphs. Such rules express that for two different class instances, a different treatment leads to different outcomes. Discovering causal rules is often the key of experiments, independently of their domain. The proposed approach is based on semantic matching relying on community detection and strata that can be defined as complex sub-classes. An experimental evaluation on two datasets shows that such mined rules can help gain insights into various domains.

References

[1]
José J. Ramasco Andrea Lancichinetti, Filippo Radicchi and Santo Fortunato. 2011. Finding statistically significant communities in networks. PLoS One (2011).
[2]
Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, Vol. 2008, 10 (Oct 2008), P10008.
[3]
Luis Galárraga, Christina Teflioudi, Katja Hose, and Fabian Suchanek. 2013. AMIE: Association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases. WWW 2013 - Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, 413--422.
[4]
Stefano M. Iacus, Gary King, and Giuseppe Porro. 2012. Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching . Political Analysis, Vol. 20, 1 (2012), 1--24.
[5]
Georgi Kobilarov, Christian Bizer, Sören Auer, and Jens Lehmann. 2009. DBpedia - A Linked Data Hub and Data Source for Web Applications and Enterprises.
[6]
Jiuyong Li, Thuc Duy Le, Lin Liu, Jixue Liu, Zhou Jin, and Bingyu Sun. 2013. Mining causal association rules . Proceedings - IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDMW 2013 (2013), 114--123.
[7]
Melanie Munch, Juliette Dibie, Pierre-Henri Wuillemin, and Cristina E. Manfredotti. 2019. Towards Interactive Causal Relation Discovery Driven by an Ontology. In International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference .
[8]
Petra Kralj Novak, Nada Lavravc, and Geoffrey I. Webb. 2009. Supervised Descriptive Rule Discovery: A Unifying Survey of Contrast Set, Emerging Pattern and Subgroup Mining. J. Mach. Learn. Res., Vol. 10 (June 2009), 377--403.
[9]
Stefano Ortona, Venkata Vamsikrishna Meduri, and Paolo Papotti. 2018. RuDiK: Rule discovery in knowledge bases . Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Vol. 11 (2018), 1946--1949.
[10]
Judea Pearl. 2009. Causality .Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Alina Petrova, Evgeny Sherkhonov, Bernardo Cuenca Grau, and Ian Horrocks. 2017. Entity comparison in RDF graphs ., Vol. 10587 LNCS (2017), 526--541.
[12]
Joe Raad, Nathalie Pernelle, and Fatiha Saïs. 2017. Detection of contextual identity links in a knowledge base. In Proceedings of the Knowledge Capture Conference, K-CAP 2017 .
[13]
Rubin D. B. 1974. Estimating causal effects of treatment in randomized and nonrandomized studies . Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 66, 5 (1974), 688--701.
[14]
Nicolas Salliou, Patrick Taillandier, and Rallou Thomopoulos. 2019. VITAMIN project (VegetarIan Transition Argument ModellINg) .
[15]
Elizabeth A. Stuart. 2010. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 25, 1 (2010), 1--21.
[16]
Magdalena Szumilas. 2010. Explaining odds ratios. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry l'adolescent, Vol. 19 (2010), 227.
[17]
Rallou Thomopoulos, Nicolas Salliou, Patrick Taillandier, and Alberto Tonda. 2020. Consumers' Motivations towards Environment-Friendly Dietary Changes: An Assessment of Trends Related to the Consumption of Animal Products . In Handbook of Climate Change Across the Food Supply Chain.
[18]
Clifford H. Wagner. 1982. Simpson's Paradox in Real Life. The American Statistician, Vol. 36, 1 (1982), 46--48.
[19]
Po-Wei Wang, Daria Stepanova, Csaba Domokos, and J. Zico Kolter. 2020. Differentiable learning of numerical rules in knowledge graphs. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26--30, 2020 .

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)CauseKG: A Framework Enhancing Causal Inference With Implicit Knowledge Deduced From Knowledge GraphsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.339513412(61810-61827)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2022)Discovering Causal Rules in Knowledge Graphs using Graph Embeddings2022 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)10.1109/WI-IAT55865.2022.00023(95-102)Online publication date: Nov-2022
  • (2022)Counter Effect Rules Mining in Knowledge GraphsKnowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management10.1007/978-3-031-17105-5_12(167-173)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
K-CAP '21: Proceedings of the 11th Knowledge Capture Conference
December 2021
300 pages
ISBN:9781450384575
DOI:10.1145/3460210
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 December 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. causal rules
  2. explainability
  3. knowledge graphs

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

K-CAP '21
Sponsor:
K-CAP '21: Knowledge Capture Conference
December 2 - 3, 2021
Virtual Event, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 198 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)76
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)CauseKG: A Framework Enhancing Causal Inference With Implicit Knowledge Deduced From Knowledge GraphsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.339513412(61810-61827)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2022)Discovering Causal Rules in Knowledge Graphs using Graph Embeddings2022 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)10.1109/WI-IAT55865.2022.00023(95-102)Online publication date: Nov-2022
  • (2022)Counter Effect Rules Mining in Knowledge GraphsKnowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management10.1007/978-3-031-17105-5_12(167-173)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2022

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media