Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3460421.3478822acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Where Should I Look? Comparing Reference Frames for Spatial Tactile Cues

Published: 21 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

When designing tactile displays on the wrist for spatial cues, it is crucial to keep the natural movement of the body in mind. Depending on the movement of the wrist, different reference frames can influence the output of the wristband. In this paper, we compared two possible reference frames, one where spatial cues are fixed in a wrist-centered frame of reference, and an allocentric frame of reference which fixes spatial cues in the global coordinate system. We compared both conditions in terms of reaction time, achievable accuracy and cognitive load. Our study with 20 participants shows that utilizing the allocentric reference frame reduces cognitive load (avg. 38% reduction) and reaction time (avg. 240ms reduction), with no statistically significant difference in accuracy.

References

[1]
Paul Bach-y Rita, Carter C Collins, Frank A Saunders, Benjamin White, and Lawrence Scadden. 1969. Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature 221, 5184 (1969), 963–964. https://doi.org/10.1038/221963a0
[2]
Stephen Brewster and Lorna M. Brown. 2004. Tactons: Structured Tactile Messages for Non-visual Information Display. In AUIC ’04 (Dunedin, New Zealand). Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, 9 pages.
[3]
Sylvain Cardin, Frédéric Vexo, and Daniel Thalmann. 2006. Vibro-tactile interface for enhancing piloting abilities during long term flight. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 18 (2006). https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2006.p0381
[4]
Roger W Cholewiak and Amy A Collins. 2003. Vibrotactile localization on the arm: Effects of place, space, and age. Perception & psychophysics 65, 7 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194834
[5]
F. Gemperle, N. Ota, and D. Siewiorek. 2001. Design of a wearable tactile display. In Proceedings Fifth International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2001.962082
[6]
Sandra G Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 50. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
[7]
Tobias Heed and Elena Azañón. 2014. Using time to investigate space: a review of tactile temporal order judgments as a window onto spatial processing in touch. Frontiers in psychology 5 (2014), 76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00076
[8]
Seungyon Claire Lee and Thad Starner. 2010. BuzzWear: alert perception in wearable tactile displays on the wrist. In CHI’10. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753392
[9]
Pia Ley, Ulf Steinberg, Ileana L. Hanganu-Opatz, and Brigitte Röder. 2015. Event-related potential evidence for a dynamic (re-)weighting of somatotopic and external coordinates of touch during visual-tactile interactions. The European journal of neuroscience 41, 11 (2015), 1466–1474. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12896
[10]
Tomi Nukarinen, Jussi Rantala, Ahmed Farooq, and Roope Raisamo. 2015. Delivering directional haptic cues through eyeglasses and a seat. In World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2015 IEEE. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2015.7177736
[11]
Krista E Overvliet, E Azañón, and Salvador Soto-Faraco. 2011. Somatosensory saccades reveal the timing of tactile spatial remapping. Neuropsychologia 49, 11 (2011), 3046–3052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.005
[12]
Birthe Pagel, Tobias Heed, and Brigitte Röder. 2009. Change of reference frame for tactile localization during child development. Developmental science 12, 6 (2009), 929–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00845.x
[13]
Sabrina Panëels, Lucie Brunet, and Steven Strachan. 2013. Strike a pose: directional cueing on the wrist and the effect of orientation. In International Workshop on Haptic and Audio Interaction Design. Springer, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41068-0_13
[14]
Isabelle Pennel, Yann Coello, and Jean-Pierre Orliaguet. 2002. Frame of reference and adaptation to directional bias in a video-controlled reaching task. Ergonomics 45, 15 (2002), 1047–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130210166906
[15]
Erik Pescara, Vincent Diener, and Michael Beigl. 2019. VibrAid: comparing temporal and spatial tactile cues in control room environments. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316782.3321531
[16]
Martin Pielot, Niels Henze, and Susanne Boll. 2009. Supporting map-based wayfinding with tactile cues. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1613858.1613888
[17]
Matthew S Prewett, Linda R Elliott, Ashley G Walvoord, and Michael D Coovert. 2012. A meta-analysis of vibrotactile and visual information displays for improving task performance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 42, 1(2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2103057
[18]
Luigi Tamè, Anja Wühle, Caroline D Petri, Francesco Pavani, and Christoph Braun. 2017. Concurrent use of somatotopic and external reference frames in a tactile mislocalization task. Brain and cognition 111(2017), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.10.005
[19]
Hong Tan, Robert Gray, J Jay Young, and Ryan Taylor. 2003. A haptic back display for attentional and directional cueing. (2003).
[20]
Koji Tsukada and Michiaki Yasumura. 2004. Activebelt: Belt-type wearable tactile display for directional navigation. In international conference on ubiquitous computing. Springer, 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30119-6_23
[21]
Robert Volcic, Maarten W. A. Wijntjes, and Astrid M. L. Kappers. 2009. Haptic mental rotation revisited: multiple reference frame dependence. Acta Psychologica 130, 3 (2009), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.004
[22]
Clint Zeagler. 2017. Where to wear it: functional, technical, and social considerations in on-body location for wearable technology 20 years of designing for wearability. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123021.3123042

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Functional Now, Wearable Later: Examining the Design Practices of Wearable TechnologistsProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3675095.3676615(71-81)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ISWC '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
September 2021
220 pages
ISBN:9781450384629
DOI:10.1145/3460421
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 September 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Haptic Interfaces
  2. Reference Frames
  3. Spatial Cues

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

UbiComp '21

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 38 of 196 submissions, 19%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Functional Now, Wearable Later: Examining the Design Practices of Wearable TechnologistsProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3675095.3676615(71-81)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media