research-article

PySPH: A Python-based Framework for Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics

ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), Volume 47, Issue 4

Article No.: 34, Pages 1 - 38

https://doi.org/10.1145/3460773

Published: 28 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

PySPH is an open-source, Python-based, framework for particle methods in general and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) in particular. PySPH allows a user to define a complete SPH simulation using pure Python. High-performance code is generated from this high-level Python code and executed on either multiple cores, or on GPUs, seamlessly. It also supports distributed execution using MPI. PySPH supports a wide variety of SPH schemes and formulations. These include, incompressible and compressible fluid flow, elastic dynamics, rigid body dynamics, shallow water equations, and other problems. PySPH supports a variety of boundary conditions including mirror, periodic, solid wall, and inlet/outlet boundary conditions. The package is written to facilitate reuse and reproducibility. This article discusses the overall design of PySPH and demonstrates many of its features. Several example results are shown to demonstrate the range of features that PySPH provides.

References

[1]

L. B. Lucy. 1977. A numerical approach to testing the fission hypothesis. The Astronomical Journal 82, 12 (1977), 1013–1024.

[2]

R. A. Gingold and J. J. Monaghan. 1977. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 181, 3 (1977), 375–389.

[3]

Alejandro J. C. Crespo, José M. Domínguez, Benedict D. Rogers, Moncho Gómez-Gesteira, S. Longshaw, R. Canelas, Renato Vacondio, A. Barreiro, and O. García-Feal. 2015. DualSPHysics: Open-source parallel CFD solver based on Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Computer Physics Communications 187 (2015), 204–216.

[4]

Volker Springel, Rüdiger Pakmor, Oliver Zier, and Martin Reinecke. 2021. Simulating cosmic structure formation with the GADGET-4 code. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 506, 2 (2021), 2871–2949.

[5]

Jose L. Cercos-Pita. 2015. AQUAgpusph, a new free 3D SPH solver accelerated with OpenCL. Computer Physics Communications 192 (2015), 295–312.

[6]

Daniel J. Price, James Wurster, Terrence S. Tricco, Chris Nixon, Stéven Toupin, Alex Pettitt, Conrad Chan, Daniel Mentiplay, Guillaume Laibe, Simon Glover, Clare Dobbs, Rebecca Nealon, David Liptai, Hauke Worpel, Clément Bonnerot, Giovanni Dipierro, Giulia Ballabio, Enrico Ragusa, Christoph Federrath, Roberto Iaconi, Thomas Reichardt, Duncan Forgan, Mark Hutchison, Thomas Constantino, Ben Ayliffe, Kieran Hirsh, and Giuseppe Lodato.2018. PHANTOM: A smoothed particle hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics code for astrophysics. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 35 (2018), e031.

Digital Library

[7]

Dan Koschier, Jan Bender, Barbara Solenthaler, and Matthias Teschner. 2019. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics techniques for the physics based simulation of fluids and solids. In Proceedings of the Eurographics 2019 - Tutorials, Wenzel Jakob and Enrico Puppo (Eds.). The Eurographics Association.

[8]

M. S. Shadloo, G. Oger, and D. Le Touze. 2016. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for fluid flows, toward industrial applications: Motivations, current state, and challenges. Computers & Fluids 136 (September 2016), 11–34.

Digital Library

[9]

Philip F. Hopkins. 2015. A new class of accurate, mesh-free hydrodynamic simulation methods. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450, 1 (2015), 53–110.

[10]

Giuseppe Bilotta, Alexis Hérault, Annalisa Cappello, Gaetana Ganci, and Ciro Del Negro. 2016. GPUSPH: A Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics model for the thermal and rheological evolution of lava flows. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 426, 1 (2016), 387–408.

[11]

Andrea Amicarelli, Sauro Manenti, Raffaele Albano, Giordano Agate, Marco Paggi, Laura Longoni, Domenica Mirauda, Latifa Ziane, Giacomo Viccione, Sara Todeschini, Aurelia Sole, Lara Martina Baldini, Davide Brambilla, Monica Papini, Mohamed Cherif Khellaf, Bonaventura Tagliafierro, Luca Sarno, and Guido Pirovano.2020. SPHERA v. 9.0. 0: A computational fluid dynamics research code, based on the smoothed particle hydrodynamics mesh-less method. Computer Physics Communications 250, (2020), 107157.

[12]

J. Michael Owen et al. 2011–. SPHERAL++. (2011–). Retrieved on 28th December, 2020 from https://github.com/LLNL/spheral.

[13]

Chi Zhang, Massoud Rezavand, Yujie Zhu, Yongchuan Yu, Dong Wu, Wenbin Zhang, Shuoguo Zhang, Jianhang Wang, and Xiangyu Hu. 2020. SPHinXsys: An open-source meshless, multi-resolution and multi-physics library. Software Impacts 6 (2020), 100033.

[14]

L. Prechelt. 2000. An empirical comparison of seven programming languages. Computer 33, 10 (Oct. 2000), 23–29.

Digital Library

[15]

Jan Gmys, Tiago Carneiro, Nouredine Melab, El-Ghazali Talbi, and Daniel Tuyttens. 2020. A comparative study of high-productivity high-performance programming languages for parallel metaheuristics. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 57 (Sept. 2020), 100720.

[16]

Guido van Rossum and Fred L. Drake. 1991–. The Python Programming Language. (1991–). Retrieved August 12, 2019 from http://www.python.org/.

[17]

Jefferey M. Perkel. 2015. Pickup Python. Nature 5187537 (February 2015), 125–126.

[18]

Philip Guo. 2014. Python is Now the Most Popular Introductory Teaching Language at Top U.S. Universities. (2014). Retrieved December 24, 2020 from http://goo.gl/iYc1qt.

[19]

Peter A. Cundall and Otto D. L. Strack. 1979. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. geotechnique 29, 1 (1979), 47–65.

[20]

Wing Kam Liu, Sukky Jun, and Yi Fei Zhang. 1995. Reproducing kernel particle methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 20, 8–9 (1995), 1081–1106.

[21]

Gary A. Dilts. 1999. Moving-least-squares-particle hydrodynamics—I. Consistency and stability. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 44, 8 (1999), 1115–1155. 3.0.CO;2-L

[22]

Vinh Phu Nguyen, Timon Rabczuk, Stéphane Bordas, and Marc Duflot. 2008. Meshless methods: A review and computer implementation aspects. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 79, 3 (2008), 763–813.

Digital Library

[23]

Prabhu Ramachandran. 2016. PySPH: A reproducible and high-performance framework for smoothed particle hydrodynamics. In Proceedings of the 15th Python in Science Conference, Sebastian Benthall and Scott Rostrup (Eds.). 127–135.

[24]

Nils Meyer, Oleg Saburow, Martin Hohberg, Andrew N. Hrymak, Frank Henning, and Luise Kärger. 2020. Parameter identification of fiber orientation models based on direct fiber simulation with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Composites Science 4, 2 (June 2020), 77.

[25]

Erin Arai, Alexandre Tartakovsky, R. Glynn Holt, Sheryl Grace, and Emily Ryan. 2020. Comparison of surface tension generation methods in smoothed particle hydrodynamics for dynamic systems. Computers & Fluids 203 (May 2020), 104540.

[26]

Ling Li, Luming Shen, Giang D. Nguyen, Abbas El-Zein, and Federico Maggi. 2018. A smoothed particle hydrodynamics framework for modelling multiphase interactions at meso-scale. Computational Mechanics 62, 5 (Nov. 2018), 1071–1085.

Digital Library

[27]

Yanyao Bao, Ling Li, Luming Shen, Chengwang Lei, and Yixiang Gan. 2019. Modified smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach for modelling dynamic contact angle hysteresis. Acta Mechanica Sinica 35, 3 (June 2019), 472–485.

[28]

Damien Violeau. 2012. Fluid mechanics and the SPH method: theory and applications (1st ed ed.). Oxford University Press. OCLC: ocn776772541.

[29]

J. J. Monaghan. 1992. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 30, 1 (1992), 543–574. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551

[30]

J. J. Monaghan. 2005. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Reports on Progress in Physics 68 (2005), 1703–1759.

[31]

Moncho Gomez-Gesteria, Benedict D. Rogers, Robert. A Dalrymple, and Alex J. C. Crespo. 2010. State-of-the-art classical SPH for free-surface flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research 84 (2010), 6–27.

[32]

L. Hernquist and N. Katz. 1989. TREESPH - A unification of SPH with the hierarchical tree method. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 70 (1989), 419–446.

[33]

Volker Springel. 2005. The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 364 (2005), 1105–1134.

[34]

J. M. Dominguez, A. J. C. Crespo, M. Gomez-Gesteira, and J. C. Marongiu. 2011. Neighbour lists in smoothed particle hydrodynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 67, 12 (2011), 2026–2042.

[35]

G. Morton. 1966. A Computer Oriented Geodetic Data Base and a New Technique in File Sequencing. IBM, Ottawa.

[36]

J. J. Monaghan. 1994. Simulating free surface flows with SPH. Journal of Computational Physics 110, 2 (1994), 399–406.

Digital Library

[37]

J. P. Hughes and D. I. Graham. 2010. Comparison of incompressible and weakly-compressible SPH models for free-surface water flows. Journal of Hydraulic Research 48, sup 1 (2010), 105–117.

[38]

J. J. Monaghan. 2000. SPH without a tensile instability. Journal of Computational Physics 159, 2 (2000), 290–311.

Digital Library

[39]

S. Marrone, M. Antuono, A. Colagrossi, G. Colicchio, D. Le Touzé, and G. Graziani. 2011. -SPH model for simulating violent impact flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 200, 13–16 (March 2011), 1526–1542.

[40]

S. Adami, X. Y. Hu, and N. A. Adams. 2013. A transport-velocity formulation for smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 241 (May 2013), 292–307.

Digital Library

[41]

Chi. Zhang, Xiangyu Y. T. Hu, and Nikolaus A. Adams. 2017. A generalized transport-velocity formulation for smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 337 (2017), 216–232.

Digital Library

[42]

Prabhu Ramachandran and Kunal Puri. 2019. Entropically damped artificial compressibility for SPH. Computers and Fluids 179, 30 (January 2019), 579–594.

[43]

Prabhu Ramachandran, Abhinav Muta, and Mokkapati Ramakrishna. 2021. Dual-Time smoothed particle hydrodynamics for incompressible fluid simulation. Computers & Fluids227 (15 September 2021), 105031.

[44]

Joseph P. Morris. 2000. Simulating surface tension with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 33, 3 (2000), 333–353. -7

[45]

S. Adami, X. Y. Hu, and N. A. Adams. 2010. A new surface-tension formulation for multi-phase SPH using a reproducing divergence approximation. Journal of Computational Physics 229, 13 (2010), 5011–5021.

Digital Library

[46]

S. J. Cummins and M. Rudman. 1999. An SPH projection method. Journal of Computational Physics 152, 2 (1999), 584–607.

Digital Library

[47]

Markus Ihmsen, Jens Cornelis, Barbara Solenthaler, Christopher Horvath, and Matthias Teschner. 2014. Implicit Incompressible SPH. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 3 (2014), 426–435.

Digital Library

[48]

Abhinav Muta, Prabhu Ramachandran, and Pawan Negi. An efficient, open source, iterative ISPH scheme. Computer Physics Communications 255 (2020) 107283.

[49]

Shu-ichiro Inutsuka. 2002. Reformulation of smoothed particle hydrodynamics with riemann solver. Journal of Computational Physics 179, 1 (2002), 238–267.

[50]

Kunal Puri and Prabhu Ramachandran. 2014. Approximate Riemann solvers for the Godunov SPH. Journal of Computational Physics 270 (2014), 432–458.

[51]

Leonardo Di G. Sigalotti, Hender López, Arnaldo Donoso, Eloy Sira, and Jaime Klapp. 2006. A shock-capturing SPH scheme based on adaptive kernel estimation. Journal of Computational Physics 212, 1 (2006), 124–149.

Digital Library

[52]

Daniel J. Price. 2012. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 231, 3 (2012), 759–794.

Digital Library

[53]

Nicholas Frontiere, Cody D. Raskin, and J. Michael Owen. 2017. CRKSPH - A conservative reproducing kernel smoothed particle hydrodynamics scheme. Journal of Computational Physics 332, 1 (March 2017), 160–209.

[54]

J. P. Gray, J. J. Monaghan, and R. P. Swift. 2001. SPH elastic dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 190, 49 (2001), 6641–6662.

[55]

Nadir Akinci, Markus Ihmsen, Gizem Akinci, Barbara Solenthaler, and Matthias Teschner. 2012. Versatile rigid-fluid coupling for incompressible SPH. ACM Transactions on Graphics 31, 4 (July 2012), Article 62, 8 pages.

Digital Library

[56]

R. Vacondio, B. D. Rogers, P. K. Stansby, and P. Mignosa. 2013. Shallow water SPH for flooding with dynamic particle coalescing and splitting. Advances in Water Resources 58 (2013), 10–23.

[57]

R. Vacondio, B. D. Rogers, and P. K. Stansby. 2012. Accurate particle splitting for smoothed particle hydrodynamics in shallow water with shock capturing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 69, 8 (2012), 1377–1410.

[58]

Miguel Rodriguez-Paz and Javier Bonet. 2005. A corrected smooth particle hydrodynamics formulation of the shallow-water equations. Computers & Structures 83, 17 (2005), 1396–1410.

Digital Library

[59]

Ata. Riadh and Azzeddine. Soulaïmani. 2005. A stabilized SPH method for inviscid shallow water flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 47, 2 (2005), 139–159.

[60]

J. Bonet and T.-S. L. Lok. 1999. Variational and momentum preservation aspects of Smooth Particle Hydrodynamic formulations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 180, 1 (1999), 97–115.

[61]

Rui Xu, Peter Stansby, and Dominique Laurence. 2009. Accuracy and stability in incompressible SPH based on the projection method and a new approach. Journal of Computational Physics 228, 18 (2009), 6703–6725.

Digital Library

[62]

Alex Skillen, Steven Lind, Peter K. Stansby, and Benedict D. Rogers. 2013. Incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics with reduced temporal noise and generalised Fickian smoothing applied to body–water slam and efficient wave–body interaction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 265 (2013), 163–173.

[63]

S. Adami, X. Y. Hu, and N. A. Adams. 2012. A generalized wall boundary condition for smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 231, 21 (Aug. 2012), 7057–7075.

Digital Library

[64]

I. Federico, S. Marrone, A. Colagrossi, F. Aristodemo, and M. Antuono. 2012. Simulating 2D open-channel flows through an SPH model. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids 34 (2012), 35–46.

[65]

Pawan Negi, Prabhu Ramachandran, and Asmelash Haftu. 2020. An improved non-reflecting outlet boundary condition for weakly-compressible SPH. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 367 (2020), 113119.

[66]

Martin Lastiwka, Mihai Basa, and Nathan J. Quinlan. 2009. Permeable and non-reflecting boundary conditions in SPH. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 61, 7 (2009), 709–724.

[67]

A. Tafuni, J. M. Domínguez, R. Vacondio, and A. J. C. Crespo. 2018. A versatile algorithm for the treatment of of open boundary conditions in smoothed particle hydrodynamics GPU models. Computer methods in applied mechanical engineering 342 (2018), 604–624.

[68]

Travis Oliphant. 2006. Guide to NumPy. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, North Charleston, SC

Digital Library

[69]

Aditya Bhosale and Prabhu Ramachandran. 2020. Compyle: a Python package for parallel computing. In Proceedings of the 19th Python in Science Conference, Meghann Agarwal, Chris Calloway, Dillon Niederhut, and David Shupe (Eds.). 32–39.

[70]

Erik Boman, Karen Devine, Lee Ann Fisk, Robert Heaphy, Bruce Hendrickson, Vitus Leung, Courtenay Vaughan, Umit Catalyurek, Doruk Bozdag, and William Mitchell. 1999. Zoltan home page. (1999). Retrieved August 12, 2019 from http://www.cs.sandia.gov/Zoltan.

[71]

E. G. Boman, U. V. Catalyurek, C. Chevalier, and K. D. Devine. 2012. The Zoltan and Isorropia Parallel Toolkits for Combinatorial Scientific Computing: Partitioning, Ordering, and Coloring. Scientific Programming 20, 2 (2012), 129–150.

Digital Library

[72]

Kunal Puri, Prabhu Ramachandran, and Pushkar Godbole. 2013. Load balancing strategies for SPH. In Proceedings of the 2013 National Conference on Parallel Computing Technologies. IEEE.

[73]

Prabhu Ramachandran and Gaël Varoquaux. 2011. Mayavi: 3D Visualization of Scientific Data. Computing in Science and Engineering 13, 2 (2011), 40–51.

Digital Library

[74]

Thomas Kluyver, Benjamin Ragan-Kelley, Fernando Pérez, Brian Granger, Matthias Bussonnier, Jonathan Frederic, Kyle Kelley, Jessica Hamrick, Jason Grout, Sylvain Corlay, Paul Ivanov, Damián Avila, Safia Abdalla, and Carol Willing. 2016. Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In Proceedings of the Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, F. Loizides and B. Schmidt (Eds.). IOS Press, 87–90.

[75]

Matthias Bussonnier, Jessica Forde, Jeremy Freeman, Brian Granger, Tim Head, Chris Holdgraf, Kyle Kelley, Gladys Nalvarte, Andrew Osheroff, M Pacer, Yuvi Panda, Fernando Perez, Benjamin Ragan-Kelley, and Carol Willing. 2018. Binder 2.0 - Reproducible, interactive, sharable environments for science at scale. In Proceedings of the 17th Python in Science Conference, Fatih Akici, David Lippa, Dillon Niederhut, and M Pacer (Eds.). 113–120.

[76]

Stefan Behnel, Robert Bradshaw, Craig Citro, Lisandro Dalcin, Dag Sverre Seljebotn, and Kurt Smith. 2011. Cython: The Best of Both Worlds. Computing in Science and Engineering 13, 2 (March 2011), 31–39.

Digital Library

[77]

Andreas Klöckner, Nicolas Pinto, Yunsup Lee, Bryan Catanzaro, Paul Ivanov, and Ahmed Fasih. 2012. PyCUDA and PyOpenCL: A Scripting-based Approach to GPU Run-time Code Generation. Parallel Computing 38, 3 (March 2012), 157–174.

Digital Library

[78]

Mike Bayer et al. 2006–. Mako Templates. (2006–). Retrieved on 17th August, 2019 from https://www.makotemplates.org/.

[79]

Prabhu Ramachandran, Aditya Bhosale, and Rahul Govind. 2018–. ComPyle: execute a subset of Python on HPC platforms. (2018–). Retrieved December 25, 2020 from https://github.com/pypr/compyle.

[80]

Kunal Puri and Prabhu Ramachandran. 2013–. PyZoltan: a Python wrapper for the Zoltan library. (2013–). Retrieved 25th December, 2020 from https://github.com/pypr/pyzoltan.

[81]

Prabhu Ramachandran. 2018. automan: A Python-Based Automation Framework for Numerical Computing. Computing in Science & Engineering 20, 5 (Sep./Oct. 2018), 81–97.

[82]

U. Ghia, K. N. Ghia, and C. T. Shin. 1982. High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method. Journal of Computational Physics 48, 3 (1982), 387–411.

[83]

Brant E. Robertson, Andrey V. Kravtsov, Nickolay Y. Gnedin, Tom Abel, and Douglas H. Rudd. 2010. Computational Eulerian hydrodynamics and Galilean invariance. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 401, 4 (Jan. 2010), 2463–2476.

[84]

Stefan Luding. 2008. Introduction to discrete element methods: basic of contact force models and how to perform the micro-macro transition to continuum theory. European journal of environmental and civil engineering 12, 7–8 (2008), 785–826.

[85]

Dan Terpstra, Heike Jagode, Haihang You, and Jack Dongarra. 2010. Collecting Performance Data with PAPI-C. In Proceedings of the Tools for High Performance Computing 2009, Matthias S. Müller, Michael M. Resch, Alexander Schulz, and Wolfgang E. Nagel (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 157–173.

[86]

Endong Wang, Qing Zhang, Bo Shen, Guangyong Zhang, Xiaowei Lu, Qing Wu, and Yajuan Wang. 2014. Intel Math Kernel Library. High-Performance Computing on the Intel, Springer, Cham. 167–188.

Digital Library

Cited By

Myers CMusk JPalmer TPalmer C(2024)A hybrid finite volume method and smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach for efficient and accurate blast simulationsFrontiers in Physics10.3389/fphy.2023.132529411Online publication date: 8-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1325294
del Castillo EFávero Neto ABorja R(2024)Fault rupture propagation through stratified sand–clay deposits and engineered earth structures: a meshfree and critical-state modeling approachActa Geotechnica10.1007/s11440-024-02421-w19:12(7767-7798)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-024-02421-w
del Castillo EGeng JBorja R(2024)A nonlocal kernel-based continuum damage model for compaction band formation in porous sedimentary rockComputational Mechanics10.1007/s00466-024-02540-xOnline publication date: 4-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-024-02540-x
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

PySPH: A Python-based Framework for Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics
1. Applied computing
  1. Physical sciences and engineering
    1. Physics
2. Mathematics of computing
  1. Mathematical software
    1. Solvers

Recommendations

Divergence-free smoothed particle hydrodynamics
SCA '15: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation

In this paper we introduce an efficient and stable implicit SPH method for the physically-based simulation of incompressible fluids. In the area of computer graphics the most efficient SPH approaches focus solely on the correction of the density error ...
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite volume modelling of incompressible fluid flow

Fundamentals of two different numerical approaches to the fluid flow modelling are presented. The smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is a meshless approach, while the finite volume (FV) method is defined on a grid. Within SPH, the computational grid ...
Pairwise Force Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics model for multiphase flow

We present a novel formulation of the Pairwise Force Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (PF-SPH) model and use it to simulate two- and three-phase flows in bounded domains. In the PF-SPH model, the Navier-Stokes equations are discretized with the Smoothed ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software

ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software Volume 47, Issue 4

December 2021

242 pages

ISSN:0098-3500

EISSN:1557-7295

DOI:10.1145/3485138

Editors:
Zhaojun Bai
University of California at Davis, USA
,
Wolfgang Bangerth
Colorado State University, USA

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2021 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 September 2021

Accepted: 01 April 2021

Revised: 01 December 2020

Received: 01 December 2019

Published in TOMS Volume 47, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

26
Total Citations
View Citations
594
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)181
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14

Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Myers CMusk JPalmer TPalmer C(2024)A hybrid finite volume method and smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach for efficient and accurate blast simulationsFrontiers in Physics10.3389/fphy.2023.132529411Online publication date: 8-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1325294
del Castillo EFávero Neto ABorja R(2024)Fault rupture propagation through stratified sand–clay deposits and engineered earth structures: a meshfree and critical-state modeling approachActa Geotechnica10.1007/s11440-024-02421-w19:12(7767-7798)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-024-02421-w
del Castillo EGeng JBorja R(2024)A nonlocal kernel-based continuum damage model for compaction band formation in porous sedimentary rockComputational Mechanics10.1007/s00466-024-02540-xOnline publication date: 4-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-024-02540-x
del Castillo EFávero Neto AGeng JBorja R(2024)An SPH framework for drained and undrained loading over large deformationsInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics10.1002/nag.379048:12(3227-3257)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3790
Long SWong KFan XGuo XYang C(2023)Smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for free surface flow based on MPI parallel computingFrontiers in Physics10.3389/fphy.2023.114197211Online publication date: 20-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1141972
Cui BZhang L(2023)Application of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) for the Simulation of Flow-Like Landslides on 3D TerrainsComputer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences10.32604/cmes.2022.022309135:1(357-376)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2022.022309
Patil PGoudar B(2023) Single and multiple walled CNTs-TiO 2 ternary hybrid nanofluid flow of Williamson fluid in an unsteady combined convective regime: An entropy analysis Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications10.1080/10407782.2023.217422284:10(1216-1237)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2023.2174222
Lyu HSun PHuang XPeng YLiu NZhang XXu YZhang A(2023)SPHydro: Promoting smoothed particle hydrodynamics method toward extensive applications in ocean engineeringPhysics of Fluids10.1063/5.013378235:1Online publication date: 6-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133782
Patil PGoudar B(2023)Impact of impulsive motion on the Eyring-Powell nanofluid flow across a rotating sphere in MHD convective regime: Entropy analysisJournal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170590571(170590)Online publication date: Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170590
Myers CPalmer CPalmer T(2023)A coupled smoothed particle hydrodynamics-finite volume approach for shock capturing in one-dimensionHeliyon10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e179229:7(e17922)Online publication date: Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17922
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents