Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Struggling to Keep Tabs on Capstone Projects: A Chatbot to Tackle Student Procrastination

Published: 18 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Capstone projects usually represent the most significant academic endeavor with which students have been involved. Time management tends to be one of the hurdles. On top, University students are prone to procrastinatory behavior. Inexperience and procrastination team up for students failing to meet deadlines. Supervisors strive to help. Yet heavy workloads frequently prevent tutors from continuous involvement. This article looks into the extent to which conversational agents (a.k.a. chatbots) can tackle procrastination in single-student capstone projects. Specifically, chatbot enablers put in play include (1) alerts, (2) advice, (3) automatic rescheduling, (4) motivational messages, and (5) reference to previous capstone projects. Informed by Cognitive Behavioural Theory, these enablers are framed within the three phases involved in self-regulation misalignment: pre-actional, actional, and post-actional. To motivate this research, we first analyzed 77 capstone-project reports. We found that students’ Gantt charts (1) fail to acknowledge review meetings (70%) and milestones (100%) and (2) suffer deviations from the initial planned effort (16.28%). On these grounds, we develop GanttBot, a Telegram chatbot that is configured from the student’s Gantt diagram. GanttBot reminds students about close landmarks, it informs tutors when intervention might be required, and it learns from previous projects about common pitfalls, advising students accordingly. For evaluation purposes, course 17/18 acts as the control group ( \(N=28\) ) while course 18/19 acts as the treatment group ( \(N=25\) students). Using “overdue days” as the proxy for procrastination, results indicate that course 17/18 accounted for an average of 19 days of delay (SD = 5), whereas these days go down to 10 for the intervention group in course 18/19 (SD = 4). GanttBot is available for public usage as a Telegram chatbot.

References

[1]
GAN file format description. Retrieved May 10, 2020 from https://datatypes.net/open-gan-files/.
[2]
Gerhard Andersson and Nickolai Titov. 2014. Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatr. 13, 1 (2014), 4–11.
[3]
Sarah L. Ash and Patti H. Clayton. 2009. Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education 1, 1 (2009), 25–48.
[4]
Sebastian Baltes, Lorik Dumani, Christoph Treude, and Stephan Diehl. 2018. Sotorrent: Reconstructing and analyzing the evolution of stack overflow posts. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Graphical and Robotic Embodied Agents for Therapeutic Systems, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 20–23 September 2016. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories. 319–330.
[5]
Albert Bandura. 2010. Self-efficacy. Corsini Encycl. Psychol. (2010), 1–3.
[6]
Dmitry Barashev. 2019. Official GanttProject Repository. Bard Software. May 10, 2020 from https://github.com/bardsoftware/ganttproject.
[7]
Luciana Benotti, María Cecilia Martínez, and Fernando Schapachnik. 2014. Engaging high school students using chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, Uppsala, Sweden, 63–68.
[8]
W. P. Brinkman. 2016. Virtual health agents for behavior change: Research perspectives and directions. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Graphical and Robotic Embodied Agents for Therapeutic Systems, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 20–23 September 2016.
[9]
Roger Buehler, Dale Griffin, and Michael Ross. 1994. Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 3 (1994), 366.
[10]
Sasha Butenko. 2019. Chatbots vs Apps Explained in 7 Points. Retrieved March 21, 2020 from https://jasoren.com/bots-vs-apps-explained-in-7-points/.
[11]
Amy Cheng, Vaishnavi Raghavaraju, Jayanth Kanugo, Yohanes P. Handrianto, and Yi Shang. 2018. Development and evaluation of a healthy coping voice interface application using the Google home for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC’18). IEEE, 1–5.
[12]
ClickUp. 2020. 12 Best Online Gantt Chart Software (2020 Review). Retrieved May 10, 2020 from https://clickup.com/blog/free-gantt-chart-software/.
[13]
Brian Cugelman, Mike Thelwall, and Phil Dawes. 2011. Online interventions for social marketing health behavior change campaigns: A meta-analysis of psychological architectures and adherence factors. J. Med. Internet Res. 13, 1 (2011), e17.
[14]
Fiorella De Rosis, Addolorata Cavalluzzi, Irene Mazzotta, and Nicole Novielli. 2005. Can embodied conversational agents induce empathy in users?Virt. Soc. Agents 65 (2005).
[15]
Ronald Derler. 2017. Chatbot vs. App vs. Website. Retrieved March 21, 2020 from https://chatbotsmagazine.com/chatbot-vs-app-vs-website-en-e0027e46c983.
[16]
Fabien Dubosson, Roger Schaer, Roland Savioz, and Michael Schumacher. 2017. Going beyond the relapse peak on social network smoking cessation programmes: ChatBot opportunities. Swiss Med. Inf. 33 (2017).
[17]
Marcus Eckert, David D. Ebert, Dirk Lehr, Bernhard Sieland, and Matthias Berking. 2018. Does sms-support make a difference? effectiveness of a two-week online-training to overcome procrastination. a randomized controlled Trial. Front. Psychol. 9 (2018), 1103.
[18]
Stephen H. Edwards, Joshua Martin, and Clifford A. Shaffer. 2015. Examining classroom interventions to reduce procrastination. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 254–259. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2729094.2742632
[19]
Stephen H. Edwards, Jason Snyder, Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones, Anthony Allevato, Dongkwan Kim, and Betsy Tretola. 2009. Comparing effective and ineffective behaviors of student programmers. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computing Education Research Workshop. 3–14.
[20]
Supratip Ghose and Jagat Joyti Barua. 2013. Toward the implementation of a topic specific dialogue based natural language chatbot as an undergraduate advisor. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV’13). IEEE, 1–5.
[21]
Ted Grover, Kael Rowan, Jina Suh, Daniel McDuff, and Mary Czerwinski. 2020. Design and evaluation of intelligent agent prototypes for assistance with focus and productivity at work. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 390–400.
[22]
T. Heatherton, Dianne M. Tice, et al. 1994. Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-regulation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
[23]
J. Heckhausen and H. Heckhausen (Eds.). 2008. Motivation and Action (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499821Jutta Ed Heckhausen and Heinz Ed Heckhausen. 2008. Motivation and Action. Cambridge University Press.
[24]
Robert Hurling, Bruce W. Fairley, and M. Benjamin Dias. 2006. Internet-based exercise intervention systems: Are more interactive designs better?Psychol. Health 21, 6 (2006), 757–772.
[25]
Michael S. Irwin and Stephen H. Edwards. 2019. Can mobile gaming psychology be used to improve time management on programming assignments? In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education (CompEd’19). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York, NY, 208–214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3300115.3309517
[26]
Julia Kagan. 2018. Gantt Chart. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gantt-chart.asp.
[27]
Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. 1977. Intuitive Prediction: Biases and Corrective Procedures. Technical Report. Decisions and Designs Inc., Mclean, VA.
[28]
Ayaan M. Kazerouni, Stephen H. Edwards, T. Simin Hall, and Clifford A. Shaffer. 2017. DevEventTracker: Tracking development events to assess incremental development and procrastination. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’17), Vol. Part F1286. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 104–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059050
[29]
Merel Keijsers, Christoph Bartneck, and Hussain Syed Kazmi. 2019. Cloud-based sentiment analysis for interactive agents. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. 43–50.
[30]
Robert M. Klassen, Lindsey L. Krawchuk, and Sukaina Rajani. 2008. Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 33, 4 (2008), 915–931.
[31]
Robert Klein. 1999. Scheduling of Resource-Constrained Projects. Vol. 10. Springer Science & Business Media.
[32]
Tobias Kowatsch, Marcia Ni’s sen, Chen-Hsuan I. Shih, Dominik Rüegger, Dirk Volland, Andreas Filler, Florian Künzler, Filipe Barata, Severin Hung, and Dirk Büchter. 2017. Text-based healthcare chatbots supporting patient and health professional teams: Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial on childhood obesity. In Proceedings of the Persuasive Embodied Agents for Behavior Change (PEACH’17). ETH Zurich.
[33]
Justin Kruger and Matt Evans. 2004. If you don’t want to be late, enumerate: Unpacking reduces the planning fallacy. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40, 5 (2004), 586–598.
[34]
Ann-Marie Küchler, Patrick Albus, David Daniel Ebert, and Harald Baumeister. 2019. Effectiveness of an internet-based intervention for procrastination in college students (StudiCare Procrastination): Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Internet Intervent. 17 (2019), 100245.
[35]
A. O. C. Lambert, C. H. T. Montañez, M. B. Martinez, and M. Funes-Gallanzi. 2017. A conversational agent for use in the identification of rare diseases. In Applications for Future Internet, E. Sucar, O. Mayora, and E. Munoz de Cote (Eds). Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol. 179. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49622-1_15
[36]
Annabel M. Latham, Keeley A. Crockett, David A. McLean, Bruce Edmonds, and Karen O’Shea. 2010. Oscar: An intelligent conversational agent tutor to estimate learning styles. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ’10). IEEE, 1–8.
[37]
Jennifer A. A. Lavoie and Timothy A. Pychyl. 2001. Cyberslacking and the procrastination superhighway: A web-based survey of online procrastination, attitudes, and emotion. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 19, 4 (2001), 431–444.
[38]
Christine Lisetti, Reza Amini, and Ugan Yasavur. 2015. Now all together: Overview of virtual health assistants emulating face-to-face health interview experience. Künstl. Intell. 29, 2 (2015), 161–172.
[39]
Christian Aljoscha Lukas and Matthias Berking. 2018. Reducing procrastination using a smartphone-based treatment program: A randomized controlled pilot study. Internet Intervent. 12 (2018), 83–90.
[40]
Karsten O. Lundqvist, Guy Pursey, and Shirley Williams. 2013. Design and implementation of conversational agents for harvesting feedback in eLearning systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Springer, 617–618.
[41]
Ahmad M. Mahasneh, Omar T. Bataineh, and Zohair H. Al-Zoubi. 2016. The relationship between academic procrastination and parenting styles among Jordanian undergraduate university students. Open Psychol. J. 9, 1 (2016).
[42]
Viljan Mahnič and Anže Časar. 2016. A computerized support tool for conducting a Scrum-based software engineering capstone course. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 32, 1 (2016), 278–293.
[43]
Joshua Martin, Stephen H. Edwards, and Clifford A. Shaffer. 2015. The effects of procrastination interventions on programming project success. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 3–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2787622.2787730
[44]
Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2000. Academic procrastinators and perfectionistic tendencies among graduate students. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 15, 5 (2000), 103–110.
[45]
Bilge Uzun Özer, Ayhan Demir, and Joseph R. Ferrari. 2009. Exploring academic procrastination among Turkish students: Possible gender differences in prevalence and reasons. J. Soc. Psychol. 149, 2 (2009), 241–257.
[46]
Glenda C. Rakes and Karee E. Dunn. 2010. The impact of online graduate students’ motivation and self-regulation on academic procrastination.J. Interact. Online Learn. 9, 1 (2010).
[47]
Sam Redding. 2013. Getting personal: The promise of personalized learning. Handb. Innov. Learn. (2013), 113–130.
[48]
Joaquin Rodriguez, Gabriele Piccoli, and Marcin Bartosiak. 2019. Nudging the classroom: Designing a socio-technical artifact to reduce academic procrastination. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[49]
Alexander Rozental, Sophie Bennett, David Forsström, David D. Ebert, Roz Shafran, Gerhard Andersson, and Per Carlbring. 2018. Targeting procrastination using psychological treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 9 (2018), 1588.
[50]
Alexander Rozental, Erik Forsell, Andreas Svensson, Gerhard Andersson, and Per Carlbring. 2015. Internet-based cognitive–behavior therapy for procrastination: A randomized controlled trial.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 83, 4 (2015), 808.
[51]
J. N. Salapatas. 2000. Best practices—The nine elements to success. In Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium. Project Management Institute.
[52]
Piers Steel. 2007. The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure.Psychol. Bull. 133, 1 (2007), 65.
[53]
Piers Steel. 2010. Arousal, avoidant and decisional procrastinators: Do they exist?Pers. Indiv. Differ. 48, 8 (2010), 926–934.
[54]
Carlos Toxtli, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Justin Cranshaw. 2018. Understanding chatbot-mediated task management. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.
[55]
Wendelien van Eerde and Katrin B. Klingsieck. 2018. Overcoming procrastination? A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Educ. Res. Rev. 25 (2018), 73–85.
[56]
William M. Waite, Michele H. Jackson, Amer Diwan, and Paul M. Leonardi. 2004. Student culture vs group work in computer science. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 12–16.
[57]
Rainer Winkler and Matthias Söllner. 2018. Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state-of-the-art analysis. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting (AOM), Chicago, USA.
[58]
Barry J. Zimmerman. 2002. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Pract. 41, 2 (2002), 64–70.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)O uso do ChatGPT para resolver problemas matemáticos sobre grandezas direta e inversamente proporcionaisRevista Pesquisa Qualitativa10.33361/RPQ.2024.v.12.n.30.71612:30(01-21)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
  • (2024)AI Chat GPT technologies in health sciences: A study with mathematical statistic correlation and probabilistic mission inductionJournal of Education Technology in Health Sciences10.18231/j.jeths.2024.01211:2(55-60)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Personalized Agent-Based Procrastination Suppression SystemProceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/3638380.3638449(657-668)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 22, Issue 1
March 2022
258 pages
EISSN:1946-6226
DOI:10.1145/3487993
  • Editor:
  • Amy J. Ko
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 October 2021
Accepted: 01 June 2021
Revised: 01 June 2021
Received: 01 June 2020
Published in TOCE Volume 22, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Conversational agents
  2. chatbots
  3. procrastination
  4. project management

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • MCIU/AEI/FEDER,UE
  • University of the Basque Country

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)549
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)35
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)O uso do ChatGPT para resolver problemas matemáticos sobre grandezas direta e inversamente proporcionaisRevista Pesquisa Qualitativa10.33361/RPQ.2024.v.12.n.30.71612:30(01-21)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
  • (2024)AI Chat GPT technologies in health sciences: A study with mathematical statistic correlation and probabilistic mission inductionJournal of Education Technology in Health Sciences10.18231/j.jeths.2024.01211:2(55-60)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Personalized Agent-Based Procrastination Suppression SystemProceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/3638380.3638449(657-668)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Comprehensive Supervision Platform (CSP) on Padlet as Open Educational Resources Initiative: Our ExperienceFinance, Accounting and Law in the Digital Age10.1007/978-3-031-27296-7_11(111-121)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media