Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3478432.3499236acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Are Executable Exams Executable?

Published: 03 March 2022 Publication History

Abstract

This lightning talk presents insights from preliminary research on attitudes toward executable exams in an Introduction to Computer Science (CS1) course. In an executable exam, during the exam, students work on a computer in a designated programming environment that enables them to compile their code and run unit tests. Although this exam format is authentic and resembles the way students work during their studies and in the industry, it is not a popular format. We implemented executable exams in the 2021 Winter semester final exam and explored the attitudes toward executable exams of three main groups - students, course staff, and industry representatives. In addition, we collected and analyzed data from high school CS teachers, CS and EE students from other academic institutions and CS lecturers around the world. The attitudes are categorized into three aspects: pedagogical, technical and psychological. All groups expressed concerns regarding technical problems related to computer malfunction and plagiarism. In addition, the course staff and the students expressed concern about the change in the exam format. The groups' attitudes are supported by the pedagogical advantages and disadvantages of executable exams they pointed out.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (SIGCSE22V2-lt0742v.mp4)
In this lightning talk we present insights from preliminary research on attitudes toward executable exams in an Introduction to Computer Science (CS1) course. In an executable exam, during the exam, students work on a computer in a designated programming environment that enables them to compile their code and run unit tests. We implemented executable exams and explored the attitudes toward executable exams of three groups ? students, teaching staff, and industry representatives. The attitudes are categorized into three aspects: pedagogical, technical and psychological. All groups expressed concerns regarding technical problems related to computer malfunction and plagiarism. In addition, the course staff and the students expressed concern about the change in the exam format. The groups? attitudes are supported by the pedagogical advantages and disadvantages of executable exams the research participants pointed out.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2
March 2022
254 pages
ISBN:9781450390712
DOI:10.1145/3478432
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 March 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. assessment
  2. computer-based exam
  3. cs1
  4. evaluation
  5. executable exam
  6. lab exam

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

SIGCSE 2022
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE Virtual 2024
1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
December 5 - 8, 2024
Virtual Event , NC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media