Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Reinforcement Learning-Based MAC Protocol for Underwater Multimedia Sensor Networks

Published: 19 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

High propagation delay, high error probability, floating node mobility, and low data rates are the key challenges for Underwater Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks (UMWSNs). In this article, we propose RL-MAC, a Reinforcement Learning (RL)–based Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol for multimedia sensing in an Underwater Acoustic Network (UAN) environment. The proposed scheme uses Transmission Opportunity (TXOP) for relay nodes in a multi-hop network for improved efficiency concerning the mobility of the relays and sensor nodes. The access point (AP) and relay nodes calculate traffic demands from the initial contention of the sensor nodes. Our solution uses Q-learning to enhance the contention mechanism at the initial phase of multimedia transmission. Based on the traffic demands, RL-MAC allocates TXOP duration for the uplink multimedia reception. Further, the Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) and compression techniques are used for calculating the image quality at the receiver end and reducing the image at the destination, respectively. We implement a prototype of the proposed scheme over an off-the-shelf, low-cost hardware setup. Moreover, extensive simulation over NS-3 shows a significant packet delivery ratio and throughput compared with the existing state-of-the-art.

References

[1]
2011. Quality aware image transmission over underwater multimedia sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 9, 7 (2011), 1287–1301.
[2]
Faisal Alfouzan, Alireza Shahrabi, Seyed Mohammad Ghoreyshi, and Tuleen Boutaleb. 2016. Performance comparison of sender-based and receiver-based scheduling MAC protocols for underwater sensor networks. In 19th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS’16). IEEE, 99–106.
[3]
Faisal Alfouzan, Alireza Shahrabi, Seyed Mohammad Ghoreyshi, and Tuleen Boutaleb. 2017. Efficient depth-based scheduling MAC protocols for underwater sensor networks. In 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN’17). IEEE, 827–832.
[4]
Faisal Alfouzan, Alireza Shahrabi, Seyed Mohammad Ghoreyshi, and Tuleen Boutaleb. 2019. A comparative performance evaluation of distributed collision-free MAC protocols for underwater sensor networks. In SENSORNETS. 85–93.
[5]
Muhammad Awais, Nadeem Javaid, Nidal Naseer, and Muhammad Imran. 2019. Exploiting energy efficient routing protocols for void hole alleviation in IoT enabled underwater WSN. In 15th International Wireless Communications Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC’19). 1797–1802.
[6]
Jenith L. Banluta, Lilet D. Balbuena, Nestor Michael C. Tiglao, and Jhoanna Rhodette I. Pedrasa. 2017. Comparison of contention-based MAC protocols for underwater sensor networks. In International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN’17). IEEE, 518–523.
[7]
Fatma Bouabdallah, Raouf Boutaba, Ahmed Mehaoua, et al. 2018. Collision avoidance energy efficient multi-channel MAC protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 18, 10 (2018), 2298–2314.
[8]
JungHun Byun, Jin Hoon Park, and Ohyun Jo. 2020. Deep learning based BER prediction model in underwater IoT networks. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology 10, 6 (2020), 41–48.
[9]
Cecilia Carbonelli and Urbashi Mitra. 2006. Cooperative multihop communication for underwater acoustic networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks. 97–100.
[10]
W. Chen, Q. Guan, H. Yu, F. Ji, and F. Chen. 2021. Medium access control under space-time coupling in underwater acoustic networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2021), 1–1.
[11]
Min Deng, Huifang Chen, and Lei Xie. 2018. DCO-MAC: A hybrid MAC protocol for data collection in underwater acoustic sensor networks. Sensors 18, 7 (2018), 2300.
[12]
Dmitrii Dugaev, Zheng Peng, Yu Luo, and Lina Pu. 2020. Reinforcement-learning based dynamic transmission range adjustment in medium access control for underwater wireless sensor networks. Electronics 9, 10 (2020), 1727.
[13]
Guangyu Fan, Huifang Chen, Lei Xie, and Kuang Wang. 2013. A hybrid reservation-based MAC protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 11, 3 (2013), 1178–1192.
[14]
Qiang Fan, Jing Fan, Jie Li, and Xiaofang Wang. 2012. A multi-hop energy-efficient sleeping MAC protocol based on TDMA scheduling for wireless mesh sensor networks. Journal of Networks 7, 9 (2012), 1355–1361.
[15]
Firoj Gazi, Sudip Misra, Nurzaman Ahmed, Anandarup Mukherjee, and Neeraj Kumar. 2020. UnRest: Underwater reliable acoustic communication for multimedia streaming. In IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM’20). IEEE, 1–6.
[16]
Xuan Geng and Y. Rosa Zheng. 2019. MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks based on deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems. ACM.
[17]
T. J. Hajenko and C. R. Benson. 2010. The high frequency underwater acoustic channel. In OCEANS. IEEE, 1–3.
[18]
Seongwon Han, Youngtae Noh, Uichin Lee, and Mario Gerla. 2019. Optical-acoustic hybrid network toward real-time video streaming for mobile underwater sensors. Ad Hoc Networks 83 (2019), 1–7.
[19]
Waheed Hyder, Adnan Nadeem, Abdul Basit, Kashif Rizwan, Kamran Ahsan, and Nadeem Mehmood. 2017. A review and classification of energy efficient MAC protocols for underwater wireless sensor network. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 13 (2017), 63–70.
[20]
Zhigang Jin, Qinyi Zhao, and Yishan Su. 2019. RCAR: A reinforcement-learning-based routing protocol for congestion-avoided underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal 19, 22 (2019), 10881–10891.
[21]
Delphin Raj, Jinyoung Lee, Eunbi Ko, Soo-Young Shin, Jung-Il Namgung, Sun-Ho Yum, and Soo-Hyun Park. 2020. Underwater network management system in Internet of Underwater Things: Open challenges, benefits, and feasible solution. Electronics 9, 7 (2020).
[22]
Lutful Karim, Qusay H. Mahmoud, Nidal Nasser, Alagan Anpalagan, and Nargis Khan. 2017. Localization in terrestrial and underwater sensor-based M2M communication networks: Architecture, classification and challenges. International Journal of Communication Systems 30, 4 (2017), e2997.
[23]
Evgeny Khorov, Andrey Lyakhov, Alexander Krotov, and Andrey Guschin. 2015. A survey on IEEE 802.11 ah: An enabling networking technology for smart cities. Computer Communications 58 (2015), 53–69.
[24]
Hee-won Kim, Tae Ho Im, and Ho-Shin Cho. 2018. UCMAC: A cooperative MAC protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Sensors 18, 6 (2018), 1969.
[25]
Kieran Gerard Larkin. 2015. Structural similarity index SSIMplified: Is there really a simpler concept at the heart of image quality measurement?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.06680 (2015).
[26]
Meiqin Liu, Weikun Huang, Liangfang Qian, and Senlin Zhang. 2016. An improved R-MAC based MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. In IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC’16). IEEE, 1–6.
[27]
Robert Martin, Yibo Zhu, Lina Pu, Fei Dou, Zheng Peng, Jun-Hong Cui, and Sanguthevar Rajasekaran. 2015. Aqua-sim next generation: A NS-3 based simulator for underwater sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems. Springer, 1–2.
[28]
Heungwoo Nam and Sunshin An. 2007. An ultrasonic sensor based low-power acoustic modem for underwater communication in underwater wireless sensor networks. In International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 494–504.
[29]
Sung Hyun Park, Paul Daniel Mitchell, and David Grace. 2018. Performance of the ALOHA-Q MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. In International Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communications Engineering (iCCECE’18). IEEE, 189–194.
[30]
Sung Hyun Park, Paul Daniel Mitchell, and David Grace. 2019. Reinforcement learning based MAC protocol (UW-ALOHA-Q) for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 165531–165542.
[31]
Sung Hyun Park, Paul Daniel Mitchell, and David Grace. 2020. Reinforcement learning based MAC protocol (UW-ALOHA-QM) for mobile underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access (2020), 5906–5919.
[32]
Bernd-Christian Renner, Jan Heitmann, and Fabian Steinmetz. 2020. ahoi: Inexpensive, low-power communication and localization for underwater sensor networks and \(\mu\) AUVs. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 16, 2 (2020), 1–46.
[33]
Alak Roy and Nityananda Sarma. 2021. A synchronous duty-cycled reservation based MAC protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Digital Communications and Networks 7, 3 (2021), 385–398. DOI:.
[34]
Milica Stojanovic. 2007. On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 11, 4 (2007), 34–43.
[35]
William H. Thorp. 1967. Analytic description of the low-frequency attenuation coefficient. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 42, 1 (1967), 270–270.
[36]
SM Ullah. 2019. A robust energy efficient MAC protocol design for Underwater sensor network. Ph.D. Dissertation. Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
[37]
Lijuan Wang, Xiujuan Du, Xiuxiu Liu, Chong Li, and ShengLin Lan. 2018. Design and implementation of state-based MAC protocol for UANs in real testbed. In OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston. IEEE, 1–5.
[38]
Zhou Wang, Alan C. Bovik, Hamid R. Sheikh, and Eero P. Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 4 (2004), 600–612.
[39]
Liang Xiao, Donghua Jiang, Ye Chen, Wei Su, and Yuliang Tang. 2019. Reinforcement-learning-based relay mobility and power allocation for underwater sensor networks against jamming. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 45, 3 (2019), 1148–1156.
[40]
Xiaowen Ye, Yiding Yu, and Liqun Fu. 2022. Deep reinforcement learning based MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 21, 5 (2022), 1625–1638.
[41]
Xiaowen Ye, Yiding Yu, and Liqun Fu. 2020. Deep reinforcement learning based MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2020), 1–1.
[42]
Ziwei Zhang, Wei Shi, Qiuna Niu, Ying Guo, Jingjing Wizeang, and Hanjiang Luo. 2019. A load-based hybrid MAC protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 104542–104552.
[43]
Xiaoxiao Zhuo, Meiyan Liu, Yan Wei, Guanding Yu, Fengzhong Qu, and Rui Sun. 2020. AUV-aided energy-efficient data collection in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7, 10 (2020), 10010–10022.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Energy-Efficient and Reliable Deployment Models for Hybrid Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks with a Mobile GatewayJournal of Marine Science and Application10.1007/s11804-024-00444-zOnline publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • (2023)DR-ALOHA-Q: A Q-Learning-Based Adaptive MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor NetworksSensors10.3390/s2309447423:9(4474)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
  • (2023)Survey of Reinforcement-Learning-Based MAC Protocols for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks with a MAC Reference ModelEntropy10.3390/e2501010125:1(101)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Reinforcement Learning-Based MAC Protocol for Underwater Multimedia Sensor Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
    ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 18, Issue 3
    August 2022
    480 pages
    ISSN:1550-4859
    EISSN:1550-4867
    DOI:10.1145/3531537
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Journal Family

    Publication History

    Published: 19 September 2022
    Online AM: 23 February 2022
    Accepted: 26 August 2021
    Revised: 27 July 2021
    Received: 17 April 2021
    Published in TOSN Volume 18, Issue 3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Underwater Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks (UMWSNs)
    2. underwater sensor networks
    3. underwater IoT
    4. Underwater Acoustic Network (UAN)
    5. reinforcement learning
    6. Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM)
    7. Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)263
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Energy-Efficient and Reliable Deployment Models for Hybrid Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks with a Mobile GatewayJournal of Marine Science and Application10.1007/s11804-024-00444-zOnline publication date: 8-Jul-2024
    • (2023)DR-ALOHA-Q: A Q-Learning-Based Adaptive MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor NetworksSensors10.3390/s2309447423:9(4474)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
    • (2023)Survey of Reinforcement-Learning-Based MAC Protocols for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks with a MAC Reference ModelEntropy10.3390/e2501010125:1(101)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2023
    • (2023)A Q-learning-based distributed queuing Mac protocol for Internet-of-Things networksEURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking10.1186/s13638-023-02288-72023:1Online publication date: 16-Aug-2023
    • (2023)RE-MAC: A Hybrid MAC Protocol for Underwater Multimedia Communication SystemIEEE Systems Journal10.1109/JSYST.2022.318501517:1(840-847)Online publication date: Mar-2023
    • (2023)Energy-balanced routing in wireless sensor networks with reinforcement learning using greedy action chainsSoft Computing10.1007/s00500-023-08734-4Online publication date: 21-Jun-2023

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media