Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

CityLightSense: A Participatory Sensing-based System for Monitoring and Mapping of Illumination levels

Published: 26 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Adequate nighttime lighting of city streets is necessary for safe vehicle and pedestrian movement, deterrent of crime, improvement of the citizens’ perceptions of safety, and so on. However, monitoring and mapping of illumination levels in city streets during the nighttime is a tedious activity that is usually based on manual inspection reports. The advancement in smartphone technology comes up with a better way to monitor city illumination using a rich set of smartphone-equipped inexpensive but powerful sensors (e.g., light sensor, GPS, etc). In this context, the main objective of this work is to use the power of smartphone sensors and IoT-cloud-based framework to collect, store, and analyze nighttime illumination data from citizens to generate high granular city illumination map. The development of high granular illumination map is an effective way of visualizing and assessing the illumination of city streets during nighttime. In this article, an illumination mapping algorithm called Street Illumination Mapping is proposed that works on participatory sensing-based illumination data collected using smartphones as IoT devices to generate city illumination map. The proposed method is evaluated on a real-world illumination dataset collected by participants in two different urban areas of city Kolkata. The results are also compared with the baseline mapping techniques, namely, Spatial k-Nearest Neighbors, Inverse Distance Weighting, Random Forest Regressor, Support Vector Regressor, and Artificial Neural Network.

References

[1]
Munshi Yusuf Alam, Shahrukh Imam, Harshit Anurag, Sujoy Saha, Subrata Nandi, and Mousumi Saha. 2018. LiSense: Monitoring city street lighting during night using smartphone sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDMW’18). IEEE, 596–603.
[2]
Chris Albon. 2020. Feature Selection Using Random Forest. Retrieved from https://chrisalbon.com/machine_learning/trees_and_forests/feature_selection_using_random_forest/.
[3]
Arcgis. 2020. Inverse distance squared weighted interpolation. Retrieved from https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/analysis/geostatistical-analyst/how-inverse-distance-weighted-interpolation-works.htm.
[4]
Peter R. Boyce, Neil H. Eklund, Barbara J. Hamilton, and Lisa D. Bruno. 2000. Perceptions of safety at night in different lighting conditions. Int. J. Light. Res. Technol. 32, 2 (2000), 79–91.
[5]
Rodrigo Bustamante, Cathy Dichmont, Nick Ellis, Wayne Rochester, Shane Griffiths, Peter Rothlisberg, Michele Burford, Quinton Dell, Mark Tonks, Hector Lozano-Montes, et al. 2011. Effects of trawling on the benthos and biodiversity: Development and delivery of a spatially-explicit management framework for the northern prawn fishery. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research. https://publications.csiro.au/publications/publication/PIcsiro:EP112693.
[6]
Andrea Capponi, Claudio Fiandrino, Burak Kantarci, Luca Foschini, Dzmitry Kliazovich, and Pascal Bouvry. 2019. A survey on mobile crowdsensing systems: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities. IEEE Commun. Surveys Tutor. 21, 3 (2019), 2419–2465.
[7]
Baidik Chandra, Asif Iqbal Middya, and Sarbani Roy. 2021. Spatio-temporal prediction of noise pollution using participatory sensing. In Emerging Technologies in Data Mining and Information Security. Springer, 597–607.
[8]
Yanqing Cui, Jan Chipchase, and Fumiko Ichikawa. 2007. A cross culture study on phone carrying and physical personalization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Usability and Internationalization. Springer, 483–492.
[9]
Joy Dutta, Chandreyee Chowdhury, Sarbani Roy, Asif Iqbal Middya, and Firoj Gazi. 2017. Towards smart city: Sensing air quality in city based on opportunistic crowd-sensing. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking. 1–6.
[10]
Martin Ester, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Jörg Sander, Xiaowei Xu, et al. 1996. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’96). 226–231.
[11]
Nicolas Gilardi. 2002. Machine Learning for Spatial Data Analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation. Verlag nicht ermittelbar.
[12]
Jose-Maria Gutierrez-Martinez, Ana Castillo-Martinez, Jose-Amelio Medina-Merodio, Juan Aguado-Delgado, and Jose-Javier Martinez-Herraiz. 2017. Smartphones as a light measurement tool: Case of study. Appl. Sci. 7, 6 (2017), 616.
[13]
Antal Haans and Yvonne A. W. De Kort. 2012. Light distribution in dynamic street lighting: Two experimental studies on its effects on perceived safety, prospect, concealment, and escape. J. Environ. Psychol. 32, 4 (2012), 342–352.
[14]
Xin-Ming Huang, Jing Ma, and Lawrence E. Leblanc. 2004. Wireless sensor network for streetlight monitoring and control. In Digital Wireless Communications VI, Vol. 5440. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 313–321.
[15]
Chunguo Jing, Dongmei Shu, and Deying Gu. 2007. Design of streetlight monitoring and control system based on wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. IEEE, 57–62.
[16]
Devroop Kar, Asif Iqbal Middya, and Sarbani Roy. 2019. An approach to detect travel patterns using smartphone sensing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS’19). IEEE, 1–6.
[17]
Krukarius. 2020. Light around us and how to measure it. Retrieved from http://www.mkrgeo-blog.com/light-around-us-and-how-to-measure-it/.
[18]
Sumeet Kumar, Ajay Deshpande, Stephen S. Ho, Jason S. Ku, and Sanjay E. Sarma. 2016. Urban street lighting infrastructure monitoring using a mobile sensor platform. IEEE Sensors J. 16, 12 (2016), 4981–4994.
[19]
Huang-Chen Lee and Huang-Bin Huang. 2014. A low-cost and noninvasive system for the measurement and detection of faulty streetlights. IEEE Trans. Instrument. Measure. 64, 4 (2014), 1019–1031.
[20]
Jin Li and Andrew D. Heap. 2011. A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: Performance and impact factors. Ecol. Inform. 6, 3–4 (2011), 228–241.
[21]
Jin Li and Andrew D. Heap. 2014. Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review. Environ. Model. Softw. 53 (2014), 173–189.
[22]
Jin Li, Andrew D. Heap, Anna Potter, Zhi Huang, and James J. Daniell. 2011. Can we improve the spatial predictions of seabed sediments? A case study of spatial interpolation of mud content across the southwest Australian margin. Continent. Shelf Res. 31, 13 (2011), 1365–1376.
[23]
Asif Iqbal Middya and Sarbani Roy. 2021. Spatial interpolation techniques on participatory sensing data. ACM Trans. Spatial Algor. Syst. 7, 3 (2021), 1–32.
[24]
Asif Iqbal Middya, Sarbani Roy, Joy Dutta, and Rituparna Das. 2020. JUSense: A unified framework for participatory-based urban sensing system. Mobile Netw. Appl. 25, 4 (May 2020), 1249–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01539-x
[25]
Asif Iqbal Middya, Sarbani Roy, Saptarshi Mandal, and Rahul Talukdar. 2021. Privacy protected user identification using deep learning for smartphone-based participatory sensing applications. Neural Comput. Appl. (July 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06319-6
[26]
OSM. 2020. Open Street Map. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3zmjCTF.
[27]
Susmita Patra, Asif Iqbal Middya, and Sarbani Roy. 2021. PotSpot: Participatory sensing based monitoring system for pothole detection using deep learning. Multimedia Tools Appl. 80, 16 (Apr. 2021), 25171–25195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10874-4
[28]
Scikit-learn. 2020. Linear Regression. Retrieved from https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.linear_model.LinearRegression.html.
[29]
P. Singh and P. A. Meshram. 2017. Survey of density based clustering algorithms and its variants. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Inventive Computing and Informatics (ICICI’17). 920–926.
[30]
Dhiraj Sunehra and Sangem Rajasri. 2017. Automatic street light control system using wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering (ICPCSI’17). IEEE, 2915–2919.
[31]
Matti T. Vaaja, Matti Kurkela, Mikko Maksimainen, Juho-Pekka Virtanen, Antero Kukko, Ville V. Lehtola, Juha Hyyppä, Hannu Hyyppä, et al. 2018. Mobile mapping of night-time road environment lighting conditions. Photogram. J. Finland 26 (2018), 1–17.
[32]
F. Van Diggen. 1999. Gps accuracy: Lies, damn lies and statistics. GPS World 1 (1999), 41.
[33]
Jay M. Ver Hoef and Hailemariam Temesgen. 2013. A comparison of the spatial linear model to nearest neighbor (k-NN) methods for forestry applications. PloS One 8, 3 (2013), e59129.
[34]
Jing Yuan, Yu Zheng, Chengyang Zhang, Xing Xie, and Guang-Zhong Sun. 2010. An interactive-voting based map matching algorithm. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile Data Management. IEEE, 43–52.
[35]
Ashraf Zatari, Gordon Dodds, Karen McMenemy, and Richard Robinson. 2005. Glare, luminance, and illuminance measurements of road lighting using vehicle mounted CCD cameras. Leukos 1, 2 (2005), 85–106.
[36]
Yu Zheng, Licia Capra, Ouri Wolfson, and Hai Yang. 2014. Urban computing: Concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 5, 3 (2014), 1–55.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)User recognition in participatory sensing systems using deep learning based on spectro-temporal representation of accelerometer signalsKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110046258:COnline publication date: 22-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Investigating the combined effect of ALAN and noise on sleep by simultaneous real-time monitoring using low-cost smartphone devicesEnvironmental Research10.1016/j.envres.2022.113941214(113941)Online publication date: Nov-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems
ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems  Volume 8, Issue 1
March 2022
184 pages
ISSN:2374-0353
EISSN:2374-0361
DOI:10.1145/3488003
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 October 2021
Accepted: 01 September 2021
Revised: 01 July 2021
Received: 01 January 2021
Published in TSAS Volume 8, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Participatory sensing
  2. illumination mapping
  3. smartphone sensors

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • UGC-NET Junior Research Fellowship
  • “Participatory and Realtime Pollution Monitoring System For Smart City”
  • Department of Science & Technology, Government of West Bengal, India

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)User recognition in participatory sensing systems using deep learning based on spectro-temporal representation of accelerometer signalsKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110046258:COnline publication date: 22-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Investigating the combined effect of ALAN and noise on sleep by simultaneous real-time monitoring using low-cost smartphone devicesEnvironmental Research10.1016/j.envres.2022.113941214(113941)Online publication date: Nov-2022

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media