Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3489849.3489908acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvrstConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Visualisation methods for patient monitoring in anaesthetic procedures using augmented reality

Published: 08 December 2021 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In health care, there are still many devices with poorly designed user interfaces that can lead to user errors. Especially in acute care, an error can lead to critical conditions in patients. Previous research has shown that the use of augmented reality can help to better monitor the condition of patients and better detect unforeseen events. The system created in this work is intended to aid in the detection of changes in patient and equipment-data in order to increase detection of critical conditions or errors.

    References

    [1]
    Mark Billinghurst and Hirokazu Kato. 1999. Collaborative Mixed Reality.
    [2]
    Arindam Dey, Mark Billinghurst, Robert W. Lindeman, and J. Edward Swan. 2018. A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014. Front. Robot. AI 5 (April 2018), 37. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
    [3]
    Windel Hartwig, Scholl. 2015. Adaptive Reminders for Safe Work. In In T. MacTavish, S. Basapur (Eds.), Persuasive Technology. 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_12
    [4]
    JohnGeorge Karippacheril and TamYuk Ho. 2013. Data acquisition from S/5 GE Datex anesthesia monitor using VSCapture: An open source.NET/Mono tool. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 29, 3 (2013), 423. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.117096
    [5]
    J.C. Knight. 2002. Safety critical systems: challenges and directions. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2002. 547–550.
    [6]
    Laura Lin, Racquel Isla, Karine Doniz, Heather Harkness, Kim J Vicente, and D John Doyle. 1997. Applying Human Factors to the Design of Medical Equipment: Patient-Controlled Analgesia. (1997), 11.
    [7]
    David Liu, Simon A Jenkins, and Penelope M Sanderson. 2009. Patient monitoring with head-mounted displays:. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 22, 6 (Dec. 2009), 796–803. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833269c1
    [8]
    Michael T. Pascale, Penelope Sanderson, David Liu, Ismail Mohamed, Birgit Brecknell, and Robert G. Loeb. 2019. The Impact of Head-Worn Displays on Strategic Alarm Management and Situation Awareness. Hum Factors 61, 4 (June 2019), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818814969 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Exploring Plausibility and Presence in Mixed Reality ExperiencesIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.324704629:5(2680-2689)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
    • (2022)Push the Red Button: Comparing Notification Placement with Augmented and Non-Augmented Tasks in ARProceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3565970.3567701(1-11)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    VRST '21: Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
    December 2021
    563 pages
    ISBN:9781450390927
    DOI:10.1145/3489849
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 December 2021

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. augmented reality
    2. health care
    3. safety-critical-systems

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    VRST '21

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 66 of 254 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    VRST '24

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Exploring Plausibility and Presence in Mixed Reality ExperiencesIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.324704629:5(2680-2689)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
    • (2022)Push the Red Button: Comparing Notification Placement with Augmented and Non-Augmented Tasks in ARProceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3565970.3567701(1-11)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media