On Appropriation and Nostalgic Reminiscence of Technology
Article No.: 287, Pages 1 - 6
Abstract
Technological objects present themselves as necessary, only to become obsolete faster than ever before. This phenomenon has led to a population that experiences a plethora of technological objects and interfaces as they age, which become associated with certain stages of life and disappear thereafter. Noting the expanding body of literature within HCI about appropriation, our work pinpoints an area that needs more attention, “outdated technologies.” In other words, we assert that design practices can profit as much from imaginaries of the future as they can from reassessing artefacts from the past in a critical way. In a two-week fieldwork with 37 HCI students, we gathered an international collection of nostalgic devices from 14 different countries to investigate what memories people still have of older technologies and the ways in which these memories reveal normative and accidental use of technological objects. We found that participants primarily remembered older technologies with positive connotations and shared memories of how they had adapted and appropriated these technologies, rather than normative uses. We refer to this phenomenon as nostalgic reminiscence. In the future, we would like to develop this concept further by discussing how nostalgic reminiscence can be operationalized to stimulate speculative design in the present.
Supplementary Material
Talk Video
- Download
- 9.92 MB
References
[1]
Adler, O. and Pansky, A. 2020. A “rosy view” of the past: Positive memory biases. Cognitive biases in health and psychiatric disorders. Elsevier. 139–171.
[2]
Avellino, I. 2020. Hard Constraints: Why Telemanipulated Surgical Robots Affect Creative Tool Use. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020), 1–7.
[3]
Barclay, C.R. and Wellman, H.M. 1986. Accuracies and inaccuracies in autobiographical memories. Journal of Memory and Language. 25, 1 (1986), 93–103.
[4]
Boym, S. 2001. The future of nostalgia. Basic Books.
[5]
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
[6]
Campopiano, J. 2014. Memory, temporality, & manifestations of our tech-nostalgia. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture (PDT&C). 43, 3 (2014), 75–85.
[7]
Christensen, T.C. 2003. Remembering everyday experience through the prism of self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 29, 1 (2003), 51–62.
[8]
Croyle, R.T. 2006. How well do people recall risk factor test results? Accuracy and bias among cholesterol screening participants. Health Psychology. 25, 3 (2006), 425.
[9]
Desdemoustier, J. 2019. Smart City appropriation by local actors: An instrument in the making. Cities. 92, (2019), 175–186.
[10]
Dix, A. 2007. Designing for appropriation. Proceedings of HCI 2007 The 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference University of Lancaster, UK 21 (2007), 1–4.
[11]
Dourish, P. 2003. The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 12, 4 (2003), 465–490.
[12]
Flint, T. and Turner, P. 2011. The role of appropriation in the design of engaging artefacts. Proceedings of Re-Thinking Technology in Museums. (2011).
[13]
van Gennip, D. 2015. Things That Make Us Reminisce: Everyday Memory Cues as Opportunities for Interaction Design. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul Republic of Korea, Apr. 2015), 3443–3452.
[14]
Hoskins, J. 2006. Agency, biography and objects. Handbook of material culture. 1, (2006), 74–85.
[15]
Hoskins, J. 2013. Biographical objects: how things tell the stories of peoples’ lives. Routledge.
[16]
Imperatore, G. and Dunlop, M.D. 2015. An investigation into appropriation of portable smart devices by users with aphasia. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (2015), 323–324.
[17]
Isaacs, E. 2013. Echoes from the past: how technology mediated reflection improves well-being. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (2013), 1071–1080.
[18]
Lambton-Howard, D. 2020. Unplatformed Design: A Model for Appropriating Social Media Technologies for Coordinated Participation. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020), 1–13.
[19]
Miller, D. 2008. The comfort of things. Polity.
[20]
Mitchell, T.R. 1997. Temporal Adjustments in the Evaluation of Events: The “Rosy View.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 33, 4 (Jul. 1997), 421–448.
[21]
Norman, D. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books.
[22]
Odom, W. 2020. Exploring the reflective potentialities of personal data with different temporal modalities: A field study of Olo radio. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2020), 283–295.
[23]
Petrelli, D. 2008. AutoTopography: What Can Physical Mementos Tell us about Digital Memories? (2008), 10.
[24]
Petrelli, D. and Whittaker, S. 2010. Family memories in the home: contrasting physical and digital mementos. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 14, 2 (2010), 153–169.
[25]
Rogers, Y. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 4th Edition | Wiley. Wiley John + Sons;
[26]
Salovaara, A. 2011. Appropriation and creative use: linking user studies and design. CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 37–40.
[27]
Sellen, A.J. and Whittaker, S. 2010. Beyond total capture: a constructive critique of lifelogging. Communications of the ACM. 53, 5 (2010), 70–77.
[28]
Skowronski, J.J. 2014. The fading affect bias: Its history, its implications, and its future. Advances in experimental social psychology. 49, (2014), 163–218.
[29]
Skowronski, J.J. 2011. The positivity bias and the fading affect bias in autobiographical memory: A self-motives perspective. (2011).
[30]
Soden, R. 2021. Time for Historicism in CSCW: An Invitation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 459:1-459:18.
[31]
Soro, A. 2019. Designing the past. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019), 1–10.
[32]
Uhde, A. and Hassenzahl, M. 2021. Time perspectives in technology-mediated reminiscing: effects of basic design decisions on subjective well-being. Human–Computer Interaction. (2021), 1–33.
[33]
Umar Ismail, S. 2020. Nostalgia as a psychological resource for people with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence of effectiveness from experimental studies. Dementia. 19, 2 (2020), 330–351.
[34]
Zhou, R. and DiSalvo, B. 2020. User's Role in Platform Infrastructuralization: WeChat as an Exemplar. Proceedings of the 2020 chi conference on human factors in computing systems (2020), 1–13. 2022. technostalgia. Wiktionary.
Recommendations
Things That Make Us Reminisce: Everyday Memory Cues as Opportunities for Interaction Design
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsInteractive devices can support personal remembering to benefit well-being. These designs require insight into what brings the past to mind, and how people relate to such cues. Prior work focused on mementos in the home; instead, this paper presents a ...
Enactive appropriation
The appropriation of digital artefacts involves their use, which has changed, evolved or developed beyond their original design. Thus, to understand appropriation, we must understand use. We define use as the active, purposive exploitation of the ...
The Phenomenology of Remembered Experience: A Repertoire for Design
ECCE '16: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive ErgonomicsThere is a growing interest in interactive technologies that support remembering by considering functional, experiential, and emotional support to their users. Design driven research benefits from an understanding of how people experience ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
April 2022
3066 pages
ISBN:9781450391566
DOI:10.1145/3491101
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 28 April 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CHI '22
Sponsor:
CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 29 - May 5, 2022
LA, New Orleans, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
CHI 2025
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 255Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)119
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24
Reflects downloads up to 03 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format