Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3491140.3528294acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Learning Alone Yet Together: Enhancing Between-Learner Social Connectivity at Scale

Published: 01 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

MOOCs rely on asynchronous sessions to meet the individual need of a massive number of students geographically distributed. While the asynchronous design ensures the flexibility and accessibility of delivering courses at scale, the absence of synchronous opportunities brings up problems such as reduced interactivity and even the sense of isolation. However, as synchronicity in essence contradicts the asynchronous design which is considered to foster the fundamental appeal of MOOCs, adding synchronous parts to MOOCs in a simple and straightforward way is not feasible. To address this, an emerging functionality which is popular in entertainment video watching but newly used in MOOC learning is explored and evaluated. In this functionality, the lecture video and communication between learners are still implemented in an asynchronous way whereas the chat messages sent by previous and present learners in the process of watching are organized and displayed according to their sending timestamps along the video playback timeline to create an atmosphere of 'pseudo-synchronicity'. This study first evaluated the effect of this new design on learner interaction and compared the results with learners' use of the traditional discussion posts which served as the baseline of affording learning connectivity here. Then the findings were contrasted and consolidated with the feedback from learners in a survey. Preliminary results show that despite the difficulty in translating the temporary learning connections into deeper social relationships, this new system can effectively deliver the sense of connectedness to learners in their MOOC learning process.

References

[1]
Wise, A. F., & Cui, Y. 2018. Learning communities in the crowd: characteristics of content related interactions and social relationships in mooc discussion forums. Computers & Education, 122, pp. 221--242.
[2]
Crues, R., Bosch, N., Perry, M., Angrave, L., Shaik, N., & Bhat, S. 2018. Refocusing the Lens on Engagement in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. ACM.
[3]
Raspopovic, M., Cvetanovic, S., Medan, I., & Ljubojevic, D. 2017. The Effects of Integrating Social Learning Environment with Online Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1).
[4]
Linda Corrin, Paula G. de Barba, and Aneesha Bakharia. 2017. Using learning analytics to explore help-seeking learner profiles in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (LAK '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 424--428.
[5]
Reynolds, K. & Flynn-Wilson, L. 2018. Student Perception of the Quality of Discussion in a Synchronous Virtual Classroom Environment. In Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2111- 2116.
[6]
Ali, A., & Smith, D. 2015. Comparing social isolation effects on students attrition in online versus face- to-face courses in computer literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 12, 11--20.
[7]
Willging, P. A. and Johnson, S. D. 2009. Factors that influence students' decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115--127.
[8]
Zhang L.T. and Cassany D. 2019. The "danmu' phenomenon and media participation: Intercultural understanding and language learning through "The Ministry of Time'. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 27,1.
[9]
Johnson D. 2013. Polyphonic/pseudo-synchronic: Animated writing in the comment feed of Nicovideo. Japanese Studies, 33, 3, 297--313.
[10]
Hu, Y., Hao, Q., Zhou, Y., and Huang, Y. 2017. Interactive teaching and learning with smart phone app in Optoelectronic Instrument course. In Proceedings of 14th Conference on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics, ETOP 2017. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series.
[11]
Lee, Y.C., Lin, W.C., Cherng, F.Y., Wang, H.C., Sung, C.Y. and King, J.T. 2015. Using time-anchored peer comments to enhance social interaction in online educational videos. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 689--698.
[12]
Chen, D., Freeman, D. and Balakrishnan, R. 2019. Integrating Multimedia Tools to Enrich Interactions in Live Streaming for Language Learning. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--14.
[13]
Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. 2005. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360--363.
[14]
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. 1999. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The internet and higher education, 2(2--3), pp.87--105.
[15]
Yang, B. 2021. Identifying and Comparing Interaction Features of Different Topic Categories in Online Learning Discussions Supported by Danmaku. In Proceedings 1 of the 29th International Conference on Computers in Education Conference, pp. 333--338. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
[16]
Bente, G., Ruggenberg, S., Kramer, N. C., & Eschenburg, F. 2008. Avatar-mediated networking: increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 34(2), 287--318.
[17]
Wei, Chun-Wang, and Nian-Shing Chen. 2012. A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development 60, no. 3, pp.529--545.
[18]
Rogers, P.L. et al. (Eds.). 2009. Communities of inquiry in online learning. Encyclopedia of distance learning (2nd ed.), IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 352--355.
[19]
Weidlich, Joshua, Karel Kreijns, Kamakshi Rajagopal, and Theo Bastiaens. 2018. What Social Presence is, what it isn't, and how to measure it: A work in progress. In Proceedings of 2018 EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, pp. 2142--2150. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
[20]
Van der Zee, T., Davis, D., Saab, N., Giesbers, B., Ginn, J., Van Der Sluis, F., Paas, F. and Admiraal, W. 2018. Evaluating retrieval practice in a MOOC: how writing and reading summaries of videos affects student learning. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 216--225).
[21]
Matti Nelimarkka and Arto Hellas. 2018. Social Help-seeking Strategies in a Programming MOOC. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 116--121.
[22]
Schaeffer, C. E., & Konetes, G. D. 2010. Impact of learner engagement on attrition rates and student success in online learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(5), 3--9.
[23]
Zheng, S., J., Pamela Wisniewski, Mary Beth Rosson, and JohnMCarroll. 2016. Ask the Instructors: Motivations and Challenges of Teaching Massive Open Online Courses. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 206--221. ACM.
[24]
Ali, A., & Smith, D. 2015. Comparing social isolation effects on students attrition in online versus face- to-face courses in computer literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 12, 11--20.
[25]
Kwon, K., Han, D., Bang, E. J., & Armstrong, S. 2010. Feelings of isolation and coping mechanism in online learning environments: A case study of Asian international students. International Journal of Learning, 17(2).

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
L@S '22: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
June 2022
491 pages
ISBN:9781450391580
DOI:10.1145/3491140
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. MOOCs
  2. danmaku
  3. sense of connectedness
  4. social learning

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Conference

L@S '22
L@S '22: Ninth (2022) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
June 1 - 3, 2022
NY, New York City, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 219
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)110
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media