Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3493612.3520464acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Sounds and (Braille) cells: co-designing music technology with blind and visually impaired musicians

Published: 27 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Music creation technologies often use highly visual representations of music and mouse/touch screen gestures for manipulating it. While graphic user interfaces can make music creation more understandable and approachable, they pose access barriers to blind and visually impaired people who operate computers with keyboards and use assistive technologies like screen readers. I believe that vision ability should not be a prerequisite to expressive music creation with technology. In my dissertation, I intend to address the accessibility barriers prevalent in music technology design across three phases of research: First, an interview study conducted in 2020 with experienced blind and visually impaired music makers depicts the the current state of accessibility and workflows within commercially available tools [18]. Second, findings from that study led to the ongoing development of a browser-based music notation tool SoundCells. A technical paper describing its design along with the results and recommendations gathered from co-design and testing with 7 blind musicians will be presented at Web4All, 2022. Finally, I propose forming an electronic music ensemble with blind and visually impaired music makers who will collectively write and perform original music using SoundCells and other technologies. Much of this research is carried out in partnership with students and teachers at the Filomen M. D'Agostino Greenberg (FMDG) School [9], a community music school that teaches blind and visually impaired musicians of all ages and skill levels.

References

[1]
Samuel Aaron, Alan F Blackwell, and Pamela Burnard. 2016. The development of Sonic Pi and its use in educational partnerships: Co-creating pedagogies for learning computer programming. Journal of Music, Technology & Education 9, 1 (2016), 75--94.
[2]
Apple. 2020. Logic Pro X. Retrieved May 1, 2020 from https://www.apple.com/logic-pro/
[3]
Alexy Bhowmick and Shyamanta M. Hazarika. 2017. An insight into assistive technology for the visually impaired and blind people: state-of-the-art and future trends. 11, 2 (Jan. 2017), 149--172.
[4]
Chi Kim and Rocco Fiorentino. 2020. Flo Tools: Enhanced Workflow for Pro Tools Users With Visual Impairments. Retrieved May 1, 2021 from http://flotools.org
[5]
Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher 32, 1 (2003), 5--8.
[6]
Dancing Dots. 2020. Dancing Dots: Accessible Music Technology for Blind and Low Vision Performers since 1992. https://www.dancingdots.com/
[7]
Betsy DiSalvo and Kayla DesPortes. 2017. Participatory design for value-driven learning. In Participatory Design for Learning. Routledge, 175--188.
[8]
Timothy Edwards and R Benjamin Sutherland. 2012. Eyes off the screen! techniques for restoring visual freedom in LEO performance. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Laptop Ensembles & Orchestras (SLEO) (Baton Rouge, Louisiana). 33--40. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~ruviaro/texts/SLEO_2012_Proceedings.pdf
[9]
Filomen M. D'Agostino Greenberg Music School. 2021. FMDG School: Fostering education, access, and inclusion for people of all ages with vision loss. Retrieved May 1, 2021 from https://fmdgmusicschool.org
[10]
Jason Freeman, Brian Magerko, Tom McKlin, Mike Reilly, Justin Permar, Cameron Summers, and Eric Fruchter. 2014. Engaging underrepresented groups in high school introductory computing through computational remixing with EarSketch. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 85--90.
[11]
Emma Frid. 2019. Accessible digital musical instruments---A review of musical interfaces in inclusive music practice. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3, 3 (2019).
[12]
Jamie Gorson, Nikita Patel, Elham Beheshti, Brian Magerko, and Michael Horn. 2017. TunePad: Computational Thinking Through Sound Composition. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Stanford, California, USA) (IDC '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 484--489.
[13]
Lucy Green and David Baker. 2017. Digital Music Technologies: The Changing Landscape. In Insights in Sound: Visually Impaired Musicians' Lives and Learning. Routledge, Chapter 9, 158--173.
[14]
Thomas Haenselmann, Hendrik Lemelson, Kerstin Adam, and Wolfgang Effelsberg. 2009. A tangible MIDI sequencer for visually impaired people. In Proceedings of the seventeen ACM international conference on Multimedia - MM '09. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 993.
[15]
Scott Hewitt and Pierre Alexandre Tremblay. 2012. Notational Approaches for Laptop Ensembles. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Laptop Ensembles and Orchestras (Baton Rouge, Louisiana). 72--75. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~ruviaro/texts/SLEO_2012_Proceedings.pdf
[16]
Aaron Karp and Bryan Pardo. 2017. HaptEQ. In Proceedings of the 12th International Audio Mostly Conference on Augmented and Participatory Sound and Music Experiences. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--4.
[17]
Andrew Leyshon. 2009. The Software Slump?: Digital Music, the Democratisation of Technology, and the Decline of the Recording Studio Sector within the Musical Economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41, 6 (6 2009), 1309--1331.
[18]
William Christopher Payne, Alex Yixuan Xu, Fabiha Ahmed, Lisa Ye, and Amy Hurst. 2020. How Blind and Visually Impaired Composers, Producers, and Songwriters Leverage and Adapt Music Technology. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--12.
[19]
Kylie Peppler. 2017. Interest-driven Music Education. The Oxford handbook of technology and music education (2017), 191.
[20]
Venkatesh Potluri, Priyan Vaithilingam, Suresh Iyengar, Y. Vidya, Manohar Swaminathan, and Gopal Srinivasa. 2018. CodeTalk: Improving Programming Environment Accessibility for Visually Impaired Developers. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--11.
[21]
Public Forum. 2020. Logic Accessibility Google Group. Retrieved May 1, 2020 from https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/logic-accessibility
[22]
Public Forum. 2020. Pro Tools Accessibility Google Group. Retrieved May 1, 2020 from https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ptaccess
[23]
Marc Sabatella. 2013. ABC For Blind Musicians. Retrieved May 1, 2021 from https://accessiblemusicnotation.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/abc-for-blind-musicians/
[24]
Abir Saha and Anne Marie Piper. 2020. Understanding Audio Production Practices of People with Vision Impairments. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--13.
[25]
R Benjamin Shapiro, Annie Kelly, Matthew Ahrens, and Rebecca Fiebrink. 2016. BlockyTalky: A physical and distributed computer music toolkit for kids. NIME.
[26]
Lawrence R. Smith, Karin Auckenthaler, Gilbert Busch, Karen Gearreald, Dan Geminder, Beverly McKenney, Harvey Miller, and Tom Ridgeway. 2015. Braille Music Code. American Printing House for the Blind, Louisville, Kentucky.
[27]
Andreas M. Stefik, Christopher Hundhausen, and Derrick Smith. 2011. On the Design of an Educational Infrastructure for the Blind and Visually Impaired in Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Dallas, TX, USA) (SIGCSE '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 571--576.
[28]
Atau Tanaka and Adam Parkinson. 2016. Haptic Wave. (2016), 2150--2161.
[29]
Dan Trueman. 2007. Why a laptop orchestra? Organised Sound 12, 2 (2007), 171--179.
[30]
Nicolas Villar, Cecily Morrison, Daniel Cletheroe, Tim Regan, Anja Thieme, and Greg Saul. 2019. Physical Programming for Blind and Low Vision Children at Scale. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--4.
[31]
Ge Wang, Dan Trueman, Scott Smallwood, and Perry R. Cook. 2008. The Laptop Orchestra as Classroom. Computer Music Journal 32, 1 (2008), 26--37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072662

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)“Why are there so many steps?”: Improving Access to Blind and Low Vision Music Learning through Personal Adaptations and Future Design IdeasACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/361566316:3(1-20)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2023

Index Terms

  1. Sounds and (Braille) cells: co-designing music technology with blind and visually impaired musicians

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      W4A '22: Proceedings of the 19th International Web for All Conference
      April 2022
      209 pages
      ISBN:9781450391702
      DOI:10.1145/3493612
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 27 April 2022

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Braille
      2. accessibility
      3. co-design
      4. music notation
      5. music technology
      6. visual impairments

      Qualifiers

      • Extended-abstract

      Conference

      W4A'22
      W4A'22: 19th Web for All Conference
      April 25 - 26, 2022
      Lyon, France

      Acceptance Rates

      W4A '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 18 of 36 submissions, 50%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 171 of 371 submissions, 46%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)“Why are there so many steps?”: Improving Access to Blind and Low Vision Music Learning through Personal Adaptations and Future Design IdeasACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/361566316:3(1-20)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2023

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media