Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3494106.3528677acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesasia-ccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Economic Analysis of Decentralized Exchange Market with Transaction Fee Mining

Published: 30 May 2022 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Blockchain-based Web 3.0, denoting the next-generation Internet, has attracted attention from academia and industry. However, the open-source application and the decentralized storage of users' interaction data break down the algorithm and data barriers, resulting in more fierce competition among service providers. To cope with the competition, decentralized exchanges (DEXs), the financial infrastructures of Web 3.0, adopt the transaction fee mining mechanism, which refunds the transaction fees to users in the form of governance tokens. However, the ratio of governance tokens a DEX decides to give to users would affect the enthusiasm of users to participate, which has not been discussed yet. In this paper, we establish the DEX market with transaction fee mining and formulate our model based on the Hotelling model. Besides, we propose a two-stage game to formulate the interaction between DEXs and users and derive the equilibriums under different conditions of two parameters: the transaction cost difference and users' stickiness. We show that though the service provider with a lower transaction cost can win the market, users' stickiness can offset the market advantage. Thus, incentivizing users with transaction fee mining has become a crucial strategy in the duopoly competition.

    Supplementary Material

    MP4 File (BSCI18-zhang.mp4)
    The video briefly introduces the DEX market with a transaction fee mining mechanism. As a novel mechanism, transaction fee mining refunds the transaction fees to users in the form of governance tokens. However, the ratio of governance tokens a DEX decides to give to users has not been discussed yet. By formulating a mathematical model, we propose a two-stage game to formulate the interaction between DEXs and users and derive the optimal strategies for users and service providers. With the derived equilibrium results, we also mark several insights in this video.

    References

    [1]
    Simon P Anderson and Stephen Coate. 2005. Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis. The review of Economic studies, Vol. 72, 4 (2005), 947--972.
    [2]
    Guillermo Angeris, Tarun Chitra, Alex Evans, and Stephen Boyd. 2021 a. Optimal Routing for Constant Function Market Makers. (2021).
    [3]
    Guillermo Angeris, Alex Evans, and Tarun Chitra. 2021 b. Replicating Monotonic Payoffs Without Oracles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13740 (2021).
    [4]
    Guillermo Angeris, Hsien-Tang Kao, Rei Chiang, Charlie Noyes, and Tarun Chitra. 2019. An analysis of Uniswap markets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03380 (2019).
    [5]
    Wei Cai, Zehua Wang, Jason B Ernst, Zhen Hong, Chen Feng, and Victor CM Leung. 2018. Decentralized applications: The blockchain-empowered software system. IEEE Access, Vol. 6 (2018), 53019--53033.
    [6]
    Ningning Ding, Zhixuan Fang, and Jianwei Huang. 2020. Information Disclosure Game on Sharing Platforms. In GLOBECOM 2020--2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, 1--6.
    [7]
    Haihan Duan, Jiaye Li, Sizheng Fan, Zhonghao Lin, Xiao Wu, and Wei Cai. 2021. Metaverse for social good: A university campus prototype. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 153--161.
    [8]
    Sizheng Fan, Hongbo Zhang, Yuchen Zeng, and Wei Cai. 2020. Hybrid blockchain-based resource trading system for federated learning in edge computing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 8, 4 (2020), 2252--2264.
    [9]
    Zhixuan Fang and Longbo Huang. 2016. Market share analysis with brand effect. In 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, 7016--7023.
    [10]
    Zhixuan Fang, Longbo Huang, and Adam Wierman. 2019. Prices and subsidies in the sharing economy. Performance Evaluation, Vol. 136 (2019), 102037.
    [11]
    Neil Gandal and Hanna Halaburda. 2016. Can we predict the winner in a market with network effects? Competition in cryptocurrency market. Games, Vol. 7, 3 (2016), 16.
    [12]
    Harold Hotelling. 1990. Stability in competition. In The collected economics articles of Harold Hotelling. Springer, 50--63.
    [13]
    Shangrong Jiang, Yuze Li, Shouyang Wang, and Lin Zhao. 2022. Blockchain competition: The tradeoff between platform stability and efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 296, 3 (2022), 1084--1097.
    [14]
    He Liu, Han Qiao, Shouyang Wang, and Yuze Li. 2019. Platform competition in peer-to-peer lending considering risk control ability. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 274, 1 (2019), 280--290.
    [15]
    Stefan Loesch, Nate Hindman, Mark B Richardson, and Nicholas Welch. 2021. Impermanent Loss in Uniswap v3. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09192 (2021).
    [16]
    Markus Reisinger. 2012. Platform competition for advertisers and users in media markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 30, 2 (2012), 243--252.
    [17]
    Konstantinos Stylianou, Leonhard Spiegelberg, Maurice Herlihy, and Nic Carter. 2021. Cryptocurrency Competition and Market Concentration in the Presence of Network Effects. Ledger, Vol. 6 (2021), 81--101.
    [18]
    Ye Wang, Yan Chen, Shuiguang Deng, and Roger Wattenhofer. 2021. Cyclic Arbitrage in Decentralized Exchange Markets. Available at SSRN 3834535 (2021).
    [19]
    Hongbo Zhang, Sizheng Fan, and Wei Cai. 2020. Decentralized Resource Sharing Platform for Mobile Edge Computing. In International Conference on 5G for Future Wireless Networks. Springer, 101--113.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Liquidity Pool Design on Automated Market MakersSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4801468Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)Navigating Industry 5.0: A Survey of Key Enabling Technologies, Trends, Challenges, and OpportunitiesIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2023.332947226:2(1080-1126)Online publication date: Oct-2025
    • (2023)Market Efficiency Improvements from Technical Developments of Decentralized Crypto ExchangesSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4495589Online publication date: 2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Economic Analysis of Decentralized Exchange Market with Transaction Fee Mining

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      BSCI '22: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Symposium on Blockchain and Secure Critical Infrastructure
      May 2022
      153 pages
      ISBN:9781450391757
      DOI:10.1145/3494106
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 30 May 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. blockchain
      2. decentralized exchanges
      3. economic analysis
      4. network effect

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society
      • Shenzhen Science and Technology Program

      Conference

      ASIA CCS '22
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 44 of 12 submissions, 367%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Liquidity Pool Design on Automated Market MakersSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4801468Online publication date: 2024
      • (2024)Navigating Industry 5.0: A Survey of Key Enabling Technologies, Trends, Challenges, and OpportunitiesIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2023.332947226:2(1080-1126)Online publication date: Oct-2025
      • (2023)Market Efficiency Improvements from Technical Developments of Decentralized Crypto ExchangesSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4495589Online publication date: 2023
      • (2023)Structural Identity Representation Learning for Blockchain-Enabled Metaverse Based on Complex Network AnalysisIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2022.323305910:5(2214-2225)Online publication date: Oct-2023
      • (2022)Towards understanding governance tokens in liquidity mining: a case study of decentralized exchangesWorld Wide Web10.1007/s11280-022-01077-426:3(1181-1200)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2022

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media