Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Computing Touch-Point Ambiguity on Mobile Touchscreens for Modeling Target Selection Times

Published: 30 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Finger-Fitts law (FFitts law) is a model to predict touch-pointing times, modified from Fitts' law. It considers the absolute touch-point precision, or a finger tremor factor σa, to decrease the admissible target area and thus increase the task difficulty. Among choices such as running an independent task or performing parameter optimization, there is no consensus on the best methodology to measure σa. This inconsistency could be detrimental to HCI studies such as pointing technique evaluations and user group comparisons. By integrating the results of our 1D and 2D touch-pointing experiments and reanalyses of previous studies' data, we examined the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to compute σa. We found that the parameter optimization method is a suboptimal choice for predicting the performance.

References

[1]
Bashar I. Ahmad, Patrick M. Langdon, Simon J. Godsill, Robert Hardy, Lee Skrypchuk, and Richard Donkor. 2015. Touchscreen Usability and Input Performance in Vehicles under Different Road Conditions: An Evaluative Study. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 47--54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799284
[2]
Hirotugu Akaike. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 19, 6 (Dec 1974), 716--723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
[3]
Gilles Bailly, Antti Oulasvirta, Timo Kötzing, and Sabrina Hoppe. 2013. MenuOptimizer: Interactive Optimization of Menu Systems. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (St. Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom) (UIST '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 331--342. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502024
[4]
Joanna Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, Antti Oulasvirta, and Stephen Brewster. 2011. The Effects of Walking Speed on Target Acquisition on a Touchscreen Interface. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Stockholm, Sweden) (MobileHCI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 143--146. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037396
[5]
Xiaojun Bi, Yang Li, and Shumin Zhai. 2013. FFitts Law: Modeling Finger Touch with Fitts' Law. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1363--1372. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466180
[6]
Xiaojun Bi and Shumin Zhai. 2013. Bayesian Touch: A Statistical Criterion of Target Selection with Finger Touch. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (St. Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom) (UIST '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51--60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502058
[7]
Xiaojun Bi and Shumin Zhai. 2016. Predicting Finger-Touch Accuracy Based on the Dual Gaussian Distribution Model. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (UIST '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 313--319. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984546
[8]
Olivier Chapuis and Pierre Dragicevic. 2011. Effects of Motor Scale, Visual Scale, and Quantization on Small Target Acquisition Difficulty. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 3, Article 13 (Aug. 2011), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993060.1993063
[9]
Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, Philippe Palanque, Yannick Deleris, Catherine Trask, Ashley Coveney, Marcus Yung, and Karon MacLean. 2017. Turbulent Touch: Touchscreen Input for Cockpit Flight Displays. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6742--6753. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025584
[10]
Louise V. Coutts, Katherine L. Plant, Mark Smith, Luke Bolton, Katie J. Parnell, James Arnold, and Neville A. Stanton. 2019. Future technology on the flight deck: assessing the use of touchscreens in vibration environments. Ergonomics 62, 2 (2019), 286--304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1552013
[11]
Edward R.F.W. Crossman. 1956. The speed and accuracy of simple hand movements. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Birmingham.
[12]
Peter Dixon. 2008. Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 4 (2008), 447--456.
[13]
Jan Eggers, Dominique Feillet, Steffen Kehl, Marc Oliver Wagner, and Bernard Yannou. 2003. Optimization of the keyboard arrangement problem using an Ant Colony algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research 148, 3 (2003), 672--686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00489-7
[14]
Paul M. Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 6 (1954), 381--391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392
[15]
Krzysztof Gajos and Daniel S. Weld. 2004. SUPPLE: Automatically Generating User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Funchal, Madeira, Portugal) (IUI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 93--100. https://doi.org/10.1145/964442.964461
[16]
Julien Gori and Olivier Rioul. 2020. A feedback information-theoretic transmission scheme (FITTS) for modeling trajectory variability in aimed movements. Biological Cybernetics 114, 6 (2020), 621--641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-020-00853-7
[17]
Julien Gori, Olivier Rioul, and Yves Guiard. 2018. Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff: A Formal Information-Theoretic Transmission Scheme (FITTS). ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 5, Article 27 (Sept. 2018), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3231595
[18]
Errol R. Hoffmann and Ilyas H. Sheikh. 1994. Effect of varying target height in a Fitts' movement task. Ergonomics 37, 6 (1994), 1071--1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963719
[19]
Christian Holz and Patrick Baudisch. 2010. The Generalized Perceived Input Point Model and How to Double Touch Accuracy by Extracting Fingerprints. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 581--590. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753413
[20]
Christian Holz and Patrick Baudisch. 2011. Understanding Touch. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2501--2510. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979308
[21]
Kaori Ikematsu, Haruna Oshima, Rachel Eardley, and Itiro Siio. 2020. Investigating How Smartphone Movement is Affected by Lying Down Body Posture. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, ISS, Article 192 (Nov. 2020), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427320
[22]
Robert E. Kass and Adrian E. Raftery. 1995. Bayes Factors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90, 430 (1995), 773--795. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
[23]
Yu-Jung Ko, Hang Zhao, Yoonsang Kim, IV Ramakrishnan, Shumin Zhai, and Xiaojun Bi. 2020. Modeling Two Dimensional Touch Pointing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Virtual Event, USA) (UIST '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 858--868. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379337.3415871
[24]
Min Lin, Rich Goldman, Kathleen J. Price, Andrew Sears, and Julie Jacko. 2007. How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 9 (2007), 759--769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.04.001
[25]
Yuexing Luo and Daniel Vogel. 2014. Crossing-based Selection with Direct Touch Input. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2627--2636. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557397
[26]
I. Scott MacKenzie. 1992. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 7, 1 (1992), 91--139. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3
[27]
I. Scott MacKenzie and William Buxton. 1992. Extending Fitts' Law to Two-dimensional Tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Monterey, California, USA) (CHI '92). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 219--226. https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142794
[28]
Blanca Mena, M José, Rafael Alarcón, Jaume Arnau Gras, Roser Bono Cabré, and Rebecca Bendayan. 2017. Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema 29, 4 (2017), 552--557.
[29]
Jeffrey Nichols, Brad A. Myers, and Kevin Litwack. 2004. Improving Automatic Interface Generation with Smart Templates. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Funchal, Madeira, Portugal) (IUI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 286--288. https://doi.org/10.1145/964442.964507
[30]
Halla B. Olafsdottir, Yves Guiard, Olivier Rioul, and Simon T. Perrault. 2012. A New Test of Throughput Invariance in Fitts' Law: Role of the Intercept and of Jensen's Inequality. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference on People and Computers (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (BCS-HCI '12). BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, GBR, 119--126.
[31]
R. L. Potter, L. J. Weldon, and B. Shneiderman. 1988. Improving the Accuracy of Touch Screens: An Experimental Evaluation of Three Strategies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Washington, D.C., USA) (CHI '88). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27--32. https://doi.org/10.1145/57167.57171
[32]
Bastian Schildbach and Enrico Rukzio. 2010. Investigating Selection and Reading Performance on a Mobile Phone While Walking. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Lisbon, Portugal) (MobileHCI '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93--102. https://doi.org/10.1145/1851600.1851619
[33]
R. William Soukoreff and I. Scott MacKenzie. 2004. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6 (2004), 751--789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.001
[34]
Da Tao, Jihong Zeng, Kaifeng Liu, and Xingda Qu. 2021. Effects of control-to-display gain and operation precision requirement on touchscreen operations in vibration environments. Applied Ergonomics 91 (2021), 103293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103293
[35]
Fabian van Noort. 2015. Effect of running on throughput in pointing tasks: a Fitts' law experiment. Master's thesis. Utrecht University.
[36]
Nout C. M. van Zon, Clark Borst, Daan M. Pool, and Marinus M. van Paassen. 2020. Touchscreens for Aircraft Navigation Tasks: Comparing Accuracy and Throughput of Three Flight Deck Interfaces Using Fitts' Law. Human Factors 62, 6 (2020), 897--908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819862146
[37]
Daniel Vogel and Patrick Baudisch. 2007. Shift: A Technique for Operating Pen-Based Interfaces Using Touch. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 657--666. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240727
[38]
Alan Travis Welford. 1968. Fundamentals of skill. Methuen Publishing, London, UK.
[39]
Jacob O. Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J. Higgins. 2011. The Aligned Rank Transform for Nonparametric Factorial Analyses Using Only Anova Procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143--146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963
[40]
Jacob O. Wobbrock, Kristen Shinohara, and Alex Jansen. 2011. The Effects of Task Dimensionality, Endpoint Deviation, Throughput Calculation, and Experiment Design on Pointing Measures and Models. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1639--1648. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979181
[41]
Julia Woodward, Jahelle Cato, Jesse Smith, Isaac Wang, Brett Benda, Lisa Anthony, and Jaime Ruiz. 2020. Examining Fitts' and FFitts' Law Models for Children's Pointing Tasks on Touchscreens. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Salerno, Italy) (AVI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 56, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3399715.3399844
[42]
Charles E. Wright and Francis Lee. 2013. Issues Related to HCI Application of Fitts's Law. Human-Computer Interaction 28, 6 (2013), 548--578. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2013.803873
[43]
Shota Yamanaka. 2018. Effect of Gaps with Penal Distractors Imposing Time Penalty in Touch-pointing Tasks. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Barcelona, Spain) (MobileHCI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229435
[44]
Shota Yamanaka. 2018. Risk Effects of Surrounding Distractors Imposing Time Penalty in Touch-Pointing Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (Tokyo, Japan) (ISS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129--135. https://doi.org/10.1145/3279778.3279781
[45]
Shota Yamanaka and Hiroki Usuba. 2020. Rethinking the Dual Gaussian Distribution Model for Predicting Touch Accuracy in On-Screen-Start Pointing Tasks. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, ISS, Article 205 (Nov. 2020), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427333
[46]
Shumin Zhai, Jing Kong, and Xiangshi Ren. 2004. Speed-accuracy tradeoff in Fitts' law tasks: on the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6 (2004), 823--856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.007

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Verifying Finger-Fitts Models for Normalizing Subjective Speed-Accuracy BiasesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36765328:MHCI(1-24)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Model Touch Pointing and Detect Parkinson's Disease via a Mobile GameProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36596278:2(1-24)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
  • (2024)Behavioral Differences between Tap and Swipe: Observations on Time, Error, Touch-point Distribution, and Trajectory for Tap-and-swipe Enabled TargetsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642272(1-12)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

Index Terms

  1. Computing Touch-Point Ambiguity on Mobile Touchscreens for Modeling Target Selection Times

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 5, Issue 4
      Dec 2021
      1307 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3508492
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 30 December 2021
      Published in IMWUT Volume 5, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Fitts' law
      2. finger input
      3. mobile devices
      4. pointing
      5. touchscreens

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Verifying Finger-Fitts Models for Normalizing Subjective Speed-Accuracy BiasesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36765328:MHCI(1-24)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
      • (2024)Model Touch Pointing and Detect Parkinson's Disease via a Mobile GameProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36596278:2(1-24)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
      • (2024)Behavioral Differences between Tap and Swipe: Observations on Time, Error, Touch-point Distribution, and Trajectory for Tap-and-swipe Enabled TargetsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642272(1-12)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media