Work in Progress

Information Quality in Information Interaction and Retrieval: Workshop proposal for CHIIR 2022

Authors:

Frans van der Sluis,

Catherine Smith,

Florian MeierAuthors Info & Claims

CHIIR '22: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

Pages 371 - 373

https://doi.org/10.1145/3498366.3505798

Published: 14 March 2022 Publication History

First page of PDF

References

[1]

Eugene Agichtein, Eric Brill, and Susan Dumais. 2006. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR ’06. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 19. https://doi.org/10.1145/1148170.1148177

Digital Library

[2]

Johannes Aigner, Amelie Durchardt, Thiemo Kersting, Markus Kattenbeck, and David Elsweiler. 2017. Manipulating the Perception of Credibility in Refugee Related Social Media Posts(CHIIR ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 297–300. https://doi.org/10.1145/3020165.3022137

Digital Library

[3]

Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow. 2017. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31, 2 (may 2017), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211

[4]

Ofer Arazy and Rick Kopak. 2011. On the measurability of information quality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62, 1 (2011), 89–99. https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.21447

Digital Library

[5]

Yarimar Bonilla and Jonathan Rosa. 2015. #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American ethnologist 42, 1 (feb 2015), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12112

[6]

Jason LG Braasch, Ivar Bråten, and Matthew T McCrudden. 2018. Handbook of multiple source use. Routledge.

[7]

M Anne Britt, Jean-François Rouet, and Amanda Durik. 2018. Representations and processes in multiple source use. In Handbook of multiple source use. Routledge, 17–33.

[8]

Bradley Carron-Arthur, John A. Cunningham, and Kathleen M. Griffiths. 2014. Describing the distribution of engagement in an Internet support group by post frequency: A comparison of the 90-9-1 Principle and Zipf’s Law. Internet Interventions 1, 4 (oct 2014), 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2014.09.003

[9]

Rosemary Clark-Parsons. 2019. “SEE YOU, I BELIEVE YOU, I STAND WITH YOU”: #MeToo and the performance of networked feminist visibility. Feminist Media Studies (24 jun 2019), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1628797

[10]

Tarleton Gillespie. 2010. The politics of “platforms”. New Media & Society 12, 3 (may 2010), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738

[11]

Google. 2020. Search Quality Rating Guidelines. https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/guidelines.raterhub.com/en//searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf

[12]

[12] The Guardian.2017. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/15/google-quality-raters-flag-holocaust-denial-fake-news

[13]

Thorsten Joachims, Laura Granka, Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, and Geri Gay. 2005. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR ’05. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 154. https://doi.org/10.1145/1076034.1076063

Digital Library

[14]

Marijn Koolen. 2014. Advances in information retrieval. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 8416. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06028-6

[15]

Scott Kushner. 2016. Read only: The persistence of lurking in Web 2.0. First Monday 21, 6 (10 jun 2016). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i6.6789

[16]

Eun-Ju Lee and Soo Yun Shin. 2019. Mediated misinformation: questions answered, more questions to ask. American Behavioral Scientist (23 aug 2019), 000276421986940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869403

[17]

Thomas P Mackey and Trudi E Jacobson. 2010. Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries(2010), crl–76r1.

[18]

Jens-Erik Mai. 2011. Folksonomies and the new order: authority in the digital disorder. Knowledge Organization 38, 2 (2011), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2011-2-114

[19]

Jens-Erik Mai. 2013. The quality and qualities of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, 4 (apr 2013), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22783

[20]

Matthew T McCrudden. 2018. Text relevance and multiple-source use. In Handbook of multiple source use. Routledge, 168–183.

[21]

Miriam J. Metzger, Andrew J. Flanagin, and Ryan B. Medders. 2010. Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication 60, 3 (19 aug 2010), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x

[22]

Nicola Mößner and Philip Kitcher. 2017. Knowledge, democracy, and the internet. Minerva 55, 1 (mar 2017), 1–24.

[23]

Jessica Muirhead. 2019. Assessing Online Content Quality through User Surveys and Web Analytics(CHIIR ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298977

Digital Library

[24]

Tefko Saracevic. 2007. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 13 (nov 2007), 1915–1933. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20682

[25]

Reijo Savolainen. 2011. Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62, 7 (jul 2011), 1243–1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21546

Digital Library

[26]

Catherine L. Smith and Soo Young Rieh. 2019. Knowledge-Context in Search Systems: Toward Information-Literate Actions. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval - CHIIR ’19. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298940

Digital Library

[27]

Ivan Srba and Maria Bielikova. 2016. A comprehensive survey and classification of approaches for community question answering. ACM Transactions on the Web 10, 3 (16 aug 2016), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2934687

Digital Library

[28]

Helge I Strømsø, Ivar Bråten, and M Anne Britt. 2010. Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction 20, 3 (2010), 192–204. Publisher: Elsevier.

[29]

Besiki Stvilia, Michael B. Twidale, Les Gasser, and Linda C. Smith. 2005. Information Quality in a Community-based Encyclopedia. 101–113. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789812701527_0009

[30]

Besiki Stvilia, Michael B. Twidale, Linda C. Smith, and Les Gasser. 2008. Information quality work organization in wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 6 (2008), 983–1001. https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.20813

[31]

S. Shyam Sundar. 2008. The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility(2008), 73–100.

[32]

Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online.Science 359, 6380 (9 mar 2018), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559

[33]

Yiwei Wang, Shawon Sarkar, and Chirag Shah. 2017. Investigating Information Seekers’ Selection of Interpersonal and Impersonal Sources. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (Oslo, Norway) (CHIIR ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 353–356. https://doi.org/10.1145/3020165.3022151

Digital Library

[34]

Yiwei Wang, Shawon Sarkar, and Chirag Shah. 2018. Juggling with Information Sources, Task Type, and Information Quality. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval (New Brunswick, NJ, USA) (CHIIR ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176390

Digital Library

[35]

Yan Zhang and Shijie Song. 2020. Older Adults’ Evaluation of the Credibility of Online Health Information. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (Vancouver BC, Canada) (CHIIR ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3377997

Digital Library

Cited By

Van der Sluis FFaure JHomnual S(2024)An empirical exploration of the subjectivity problem of information qualitiesJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2488475:7(829-843)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1002/asi.24884

Index Terms

Information Quality in Information Interaction and Retrieval: Workshop proposal for CHIIR 2022
1. General and reference
  1. Document types
2. Information systems
  1. Information retrieval
  2. Information storage systems

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Quality Information Retrieval for the World Wide Web
WI-IAT '08: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 01

The World Wide Web is an unregulated communication medium which exhibits very limited means of quality control. Quality assurance has become a key issue for many information retrieval services on the Internet, e.g. web search engines. This paper ...
Connectionist interaction information retrieval
Modelling vagueness and subjectivity in information access

Connectionist views for adaptive clustering in information retrieval (IR) have proved to be viable approaches, and have yielded a number of models and techniques. However there has never been any exhaustive and methodical--i.e., theoretical, formal, ...
CHIIR '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHIIR '22: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

March 2022

399 pages

ISBN:9781450391863

DOI:10.1145/3498366

General Chairs:
David Elsweiler
University of Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany
,
Udo Kruschwitz
University of Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany
,
Bernd Ludwig
University of Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany

Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 March 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Work in progress
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CHIIR '22

Sponsor:

CHIIR '22: ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

March 14 - 18, 2022

Regensburg, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 163 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
75
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)7
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Van der Sluis FFaure JHomnual S(2024)An empirical exploration of the subjectivity problem of information qualitiesJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2488475:7(829-843)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1002/asi.24884

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents