Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3498765.3498795acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicetcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning Behavior Analysis Based on Instant Message and Online Learning Platform

Published: 08 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

More and more teachers tend to use online learning platforms to assist teaching. Meanwhile, the instant messaging has generated increasing awareness of its educational value, due to its flexibility, convenience and widespread use. Many researches are to model and analyze the learning behavior based on data collected from online learning platforms or instant messaging (IM) platforms separately. But relatively little is known about how the students behave when combining these two kinds of platforms with traditional classroom learning. In this study, we investigate and analyze learning behaviors of first-year university students in a project-based course by exploring data collected from an online learning platform and an IM platform which are used in the course. Firstly, an interactive social network is constructed based on the IM messages, from which students’ engagement in the course and their preferred collaborative learning styles can be observed. Then learning behavior features extracted from both platforms are analyzed to get insights of the learning behaviors of students when combining these two kinds of platforms in the course. Our findings reveal that instant messaging platform can help students adapt to new fields, and their learning patterns on the IM platform are different, which ultimately leads to different learning performance. Finally, a learning performance prediction model called Student Predict Based On BI-LSTM (SPBI-LSTM) is proposed, which fuses student behavior sequences from two platforms to predict students who under-performing. We experimentally verify the improvement in accuracy when integrating instant messaging data.

References

[1]
Saurabh Nagrecha, John Z. Dillon, and Nitesh V. Chawla. 2017. MOOC Dropout Prediction: Lessons Learned from Making Pipelines Interpretable. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (WWW ’17 Companion). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 351–359.
[2]
Wenzheng Feng, Jie Tang, and Tracy Xiao Liu. Understanding Dropouts in MOOCs. AAAI Special Technical Track: AI for Social Impact. Vol 33 No 01. 2019
[3]
Gong, J., Feng, W., Wang, S., Peng, H., Yu, P. S., Wang, J., & Tang, J. (2020). Attentional graph convolutional networks for knowledge concept recommendation in MOOCs in a heterogeneous view. EMNLP
[4]
Romero, S Ventura and E. Garc´ ıa, Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial, Computers & Education, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 368-384, 2008.
[5]
Pimmer, C., & Rambe, P. (2021). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning The Inherent Tensions of “Instant Education”: A Critical Review of Mobile Instant Messaging The Inherent Tensions of “Instant Education”: A Critical Review of Mobile Instant Messaging.
[6]
Xu, B., Chen, N., & Chen, G. (2020), Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-Based online discussion learning, Computers & Education, 157(November 2019), 103956.
[7]
A. Bandura and R. H. Walters, Social Learning Theory, vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
[8]
J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Volume 521423740. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991.
[9]
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18, 2017.
[10]
N. Gitinabard, Y. Xu, S. Heckman, T. Barnes and C. F. Lynch, How Widely Can Prediction Models Be Generalized? Performance Prediction in Blended Courses, in IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 184-197, 1 April-June 2019.
[11]
L. C. Freeman, Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification, Soc. Netw., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 215–239, 1978.
[12]
J. S. Kinnebrew, K. M. Loretz, and G. Biswas, A contextualized, differential sequence mining method to derive students’ learning behavior patterns. JEDM—Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5(1):190–219, 2013.
[13]
Yang Wang, Qingtang Liu, David Stein, and Qihui Xia, "Measuring Students Affective States through Online Learning Logs — An Application of Learning Analytics," International Journal of Information and Education Technology vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 356-361, 2019.

Index Terms

  1. Learning Behavior Analysis Based on Instant Message and Online Learning Platform
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICETC '21: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers
        October 2021
        495 pages
        ISBN:9781450385114
        DOI:10.1145/3498765
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 08 February 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Online learning behavior
        2. behavior pattern
        3. instant messaging platform

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        ICETC 2021

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 67
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
        Reflects downloads up to 24 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media