Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3500868.3560484acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Who Has an Interest in “Public Interest Technology”?: Critical Questions for Working with Local Governments & Impacted Communities

Published: 08 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Local governments use a wide array of software, algorithms, and data systems across domains such as policing, probation, child protective services, courts, education, public employment services, homelessness services, etc. A growing body of work in CSCW and HCI has emerged to study, design, or demonstrate the boundaries of these technologies, oftentimes working with local governments. Local governments ostensibly aim to serve the public. So, some prior work has collaborated with local governments in the name of the public interest. However, others argue that local governments primarily police poor, minoritized communities, especially with increasingly limited funding for public services such as education or housing. These tensions raise critical questions: (How) should researchers collaborate with local governments? When should we oppose governments? How do we ethically engage with communities without being extractive? In this one-day workshop, we will bring together researchers from academia, the public sector, and community organizations to first take stock of work around public interest technologies. We will reflect on critical questions to orient the future of public interest technology and how we can work with, around, or against local governments while centering impacted communities.

References

[1]
J. Khadijah Abdurahman. 2021. Calculating the Souls of Black Folk: Predictive Analytics in the New York City Administration for Children’s Services. Columbia Journal of Race and Law Forum 11, 4 (2021), 75–110. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjrl/article/view/8741
[2]
Asbjørn Ammitzbøll Flügge, Thomas Hildebrandt, and Naja Holten Møller. 2021. Street-level algorithms and AI in bureaucratic decision-making: A caseworker perspective. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1(2021), 1–23.
[3]
Pablo Aragón, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Claudia Flores-Saviaga, and Jorge Saldivar. 2020. Civic Technologies: Research, Practice and Open Challenges. Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(2020).
[4]
Wolmet Barendregt, Christoph Becker, EunJeong Cheon, Andrew Clement, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Douglas Schuler, and Lucy Suchman. 2021. Defund Big Tech, Refund Community. Tech Otherwise (2021).
[5]
Sarah Brayne. 2017. Big Data Surveillance: The Case of Policing. American Sociological Review 82, 5 (2017), 977–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417725865
[6]
Anna Brown, Alexandra Chouldechova, Emily Putnam-Hornstein, Andrew Tobin, and Rhema Vaithianathan. 2019. Toward Algorithmic Accountability in Public Services: A Qualitative Study of Affected Community Perspectives on Algorithmic Decision-making in Child Welfare Services. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2019, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, May 04-09, 2019. 41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300271
[7]
Hao-Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton, Anna Kawakami, Venkat Sivaraman, Yanghuidi Cheng, Diana Qing, Adam Perer, Kenneth Holstein, Zhiwei Steven Wu, and Haiyi Zhu. 2022. How Child Welfare Workers Reduce Racial Disparities in Algorithmic Decisions. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[8]
Alexandra Chouldechova, Diana Benavides-Prado, Oleksandr Fialko, and Rhema Vaithianathan. 2018. A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 134–148.
[9]
Ford Foundation Public Interest Tech Community. [n.d.]. 5 reasons you might be a Public Interest Technologist. https://www.fordfoundation.org/news-and-stories/stories/posts/5-reasons-you-might-be-a-public-interest-technologist/. Online; last accessed 21-June-2022.
[10]
Victoria Copeland. 2021. “It’s the Only System We’ve Got”: Exploring Emergency Response Decision-Making in Child Welfare. Columbia Journal of Race and Law Forum 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.52214/cjrl.v11i3.8740
[11]
Eric Corbett and Christopher Le Dantec. 2021. Designing Civic Technology with Trust. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 173, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445341
[12]
Eric Corbett and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2018. Exploring Trust in Digital Civics. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, 9–20.
[13]
Angela Y Davis, Gina Dent, Erica R Meiners, and Beth E Richie. 2022. Abolition. Feminism. Now.Vol. 2. Haymarket Books.
[14]
Sucheta Ghoshal, Andrea Grimes Parker, Christopher A Le Dantec, Carl Disalvo, Lilly Irani, and Amy Bruckman. 2019. Design and the Politics of Collaboration: A Grassroots Perspective. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 468–473.
[15]
Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M McLaren, and Vincent Aleven. 2018. Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-enhanced classrooms. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, 154–168.
[16]
Naja Holten Møller, Irina Shklovski, and Thomas T. Hildebrandt. 2020. Shifting concepts of value: Designing algorithmic decision-support systems for public services. NordiCHI (2020), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420149
[17]
PIT Cases: What’s New in PIT?2022. New America: Public Interest Technology University Network (2022). https://pitcases.org/about-us/
[18]
Mariame Kaba. 2021. We do this’ til we free us: Abolitionist organizing and transforming justice. Vol. 1. Haymarket Books.
[19]
Anna Kawakami, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Hao-Fei Cheng, Logan Stapleton, Yanghuidi Cheng, Diana Qing, Adam Perer, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Haiyi Zhu, and Kenneth Holstein. 2022. Improving Human-AI Partnerships in Child Welfare: Understanding Worker Practices, Challenges, and Desires for Algorithmic Decision Support. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18.
[20]
Anna Kawakami, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Logan Stapleton, Hao-Fei Cheng, Yanghuidi Cheng, Diana Qing, Adam Perer, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Haiyi Zhu, and Kenneth Holstein. 2022. Exploring Interface Designs to Support AI-Assisted Decision Making in Child Welfare. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS).
[21]
Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Anson Kahng, Ji Tae Kim, Xinran Yuan, Allissa Chan, Daniel See, Ritesh Noothigattu, Siheon Lee, Alexandros Psomas, and Ariel D. Procaccia. 2019. WeBuildAI: Participatory Framework for Algorithmic Governance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (nov 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359283
[22]
Ann Light and Anna Seravalli. 2019. The breakdown of the municipality as caring platform: lessons for co-design and co-learning in the age of platform capitalism. CoDesign 15, 3 (2019), 192–211.
[23]
Kristian Lum and William M. Isaac. 2016. To predict and serve?Significance 13(2016).
[24]
Vasilis Ntouros, Hara Kouki, and Vasilis Vlachokyriakos. 2021. Designing Sharing Economy Platforms through a ‘Solidarity HCI’ lens. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1(2021), 1–25.
[25]
Panoptykon Foundation. 2015. Profiling the unemployed in Poland: Social and political implications of algorithmic decision-making.
[26]
Anette C. M. Petersen, Marissa Leavitt Cohn, Thomas T. Hildebrandt, and Naja Holten Møller. 2021. ‘Thinking Problematically’ as a Resource for AI Design in Politicised Contexts. Proceedings of the ACM CHItaly Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter (CHItaly ’21)(2021), 1–8.
[27]
Derecka Purnell. 2021. Becoming Abolitionists: Police, Protests, and the Pursuit of Freedom. Astra Publishing House.
[28]
Dorothy E. Roberts. 2007. Child Welfare’s Paradox. William & Mary Law Review(2007). https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/578
[29]
Dorothy E. Roberts. 2022. Torn Apart: How the Child Welfare System Destroys Black Families–and How Abolition Can Build a Safer World. Basic Books.
[30]
Samantha Robertson, Tonya Nguyen, and Niloufar Salehi. 2021. Modeling Assumptions Clash with the Real World: Transparency, Equity, and Community Challenges for Student Assignment Algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 589, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445748
[31]
Devansh Saxena, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Pamela Wisniewski, and Shion Guha. 2020. Child Welfare System: Interaction of Policy, Practice and Algorithms. In Companion of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work. 119–122.
[32]
Devansh Saxena, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Pamela J. Wisniewski, and Shion Guha. 2021. A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-Welfare. 5, CSCW2 (2021), 41 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476089
[33]
Devansh Saxena, Erhardt Graeff, Shion Guha, EunJeong Cheon, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Dawn Walker, Christoph Becker, and Kenneth R Fleischmann. 2020. Collective Organizing and Social Responsibility at CSCW. In conference companion publication of the 2020 on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 503–509.
[34]
Devansh Saxena and Shion Guha. 2020. Conducting Participatory Design to Improve Algorithms in Public Services: Lessons and Challenges. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 383––388.
[35]
Maya Schenwar and Victoria Law. 2020. Prison by any other name: The harmful consequences of popular reforms. The New Press.
[36]
Kristen Scott, Sonja Mei Wang, Milagros Miceli, Pieter Delobelle, Karolina Sztandar-Sztanderska, and Bettina Berendt. 2022. Algorithmic Tools in Public Employment Services: Towards a Jobseeker-Centric Perspective. In Proceedings of 2022 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) (forthcoming). ACM.
[37]
Cathrine Seidelin, Therese Moreau, Irina Shklovski, and Naja Holten Møller. 2021. Auditing Risk Prediction of Long-Term Unemployment. Proceedings of the ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. (GROUP) 6 (2021), 1–12.
[38]
Logan Stapleton, Min Hun Lee, Diana Qing, Marya Wright, Alexandra Chouldechova, Kenneth Holstein, Zhiwei Steven Wu, and Haiyi Zhu. 2022. Imagining new futures beyond predictive systems in child welfare: A qualitative study with impacted stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT’22). 259–268. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08928
[39]
Halil Toros and Daniel Flaming. 2018. Prioritizing Homeless Assistance Using Predictive Algorithms: An Evidence-Based Approach. Cityscape 20, 1 (2018). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3202479
[40]
Jackie Wang. 2018. Carceral capitalism. Vol. 21. MIT Press.
[41]
Sebastian Weise, Paul Coulton, and Mike Chiasson. 2017. Designing in between local government and the public–Using institutional analysis in interventions on civic infrastructures. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 4 (2017), 927–958.
[42]
Angie Zhang, Alexander Boltz, Chun Wei Wang, and Min Kyung Lee. 2022. Algorithmic management reimagined for workers and by workers: Centering worker well-being in gig work. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–20.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Toward inclusive justice: Applying the Diverse Voices design method to improve the Washington State Access to Justice Technology PrinciplesACM Journal on Responsible Computing10.1145/36646161:3(1-30)Online publication date: 18-May-2024
  • (2024)Analysing and organising human communications for AI fairness assessmentAI & SOCIETY10.1007/s00146-024-01974-4Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Community-driven AI: Empowering people through responsible data-driven decision-makingCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3584931.3611282(532-536)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2023

Index Terms

  1. Who Has an Interest in “Public Interest Technology”?: Critical Questions for Working with Local Governments & Impacted Communities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW'22 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
    November 2022
    318 pages
    ISBN:9781450391900
    DOI:10.1145/3500868
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 November 2022

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. child welfare
    2. government algorithms
    3. impacted communities
    4. public interest technology

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CSCW '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)145
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Toward inclusive justice: Applying the Diverse Voices design method to improve the Washington State Access to Justice Technology PrinciplesACM Journal on Responsible Computing10.1145/36646161:3(1-30)Online publication date: 18-May-2024
    • (2024)Analysing and organising human communications for AI fairness assessmentAI & SOCIETY10.1007/s00146-024-01974-4Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Community-driven AI: Empowering people through responsible data-driven decision-makingCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3584931.3611282(532-536)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2023

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media