Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3501409.3501670acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An FPGA Implementation for Non-Evasive Video Latency Measurement

Published: 31 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Video latency plays a critical role in applications that require real time delivery of video content. Key areas include video teleconferencing, remote control, cloud gaming, and live news gathering. Given the value latency plays into these markets, video latency measurement remains an important topic. With the advent of artificial intelligence and deep learning neural networks, reliable low latency transmission becomes critical for automated real time control. Human judgements and one-off manual procedures are no longer reliable. Frame freezes, frame jumps, slow clock drifts, or even frame level corruption can bring instability into the tight control loop, resulting in jitter, drifts, and noise to the remotely controlled target. There exist several classes of video latency measurement approaches, including watermark embedding, out-of-band metadata, and passive feature extraction. In addressing the integrity monitoring of latency for the existing video delivery network base, this paper presents a novel approach following the passive feature extraction class. The solution extracts unique characteristics within each frame of the video stream in question. The characteristics must be unique between frames in the stream, within the range of the maximum delay window. The same feature extraction method is then applied to the delayed stream. By comparing the features between any two frames, the measurement can be carried out by finding the best match between the two streams. The proposal was implemented on an Xilinx Artix family FPGA, utilizing only 20KLUTS of resources. Given the memory size required to store the reference frames, external DDR memory is necessary to support 8K video formats.

References

[1]
Jamalzadeh, M., L.-D. Ong, and M.N.B.M. Nor, 5G Technologies: A New Network Architectures and Design. Journal of Internet Technology, 2018. 19(7): p. 1983--1991
[2]
Du, G.M., et al., A low-latency DMM-1 encoder for 3D-HEVC. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 2020. 17(3): p. 691--702.
[3]
Hwang, S., et al., High-Throughput and Low-Latency Digital Baseband Architecture for Energy-Efficient Wireless VR Systems. Electronics, 2019. 8(7).
[4]
3GPP 26.929: QoE parameters and metrics relevant to the Virtual Reality (VR) user experience, https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/26_series/26.929/.
[5]
Ruan, J.J. and D.L. Xie, Networked VR: State of the Art, Solutions, and Challenges. Electronics, 2021. 10(2): p. 18.
[6]
El Marai, O. and T. Taleb, Smooth and Low Latency Video Streaming for Autonomous Cars During Handover. Ieee Network, 2020. 34(6): p. 302--309.
[7]
ITU-R BT.1120-6, Digital interfaces for HDTV studio signals
[8]
SJ/T 11407.1-2009, Content protection specifications for digital interface - Part 1: System architecture
[9]
GB/T 19263--2003, Technical specification of transport of MPEG-2 signals in SDH network
[10]
Minallah Nasru, Ullah Khadem, Frnda Jaroslav, et al. On the Performance of Video Resolution, Motion and Dynamism in Transmission Using Near-Capacity Transceiver for Wireless Communication[J]. Entropy, 2021, 23(5):562--562.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EITCE '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
October 2021
1723 pages
ISBN:9781450384322
DOI:10.1145/3501409
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 December 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. FPGA
  2. Non-destructive testing
  3. delay measurement
  4. video latency

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

EITCE 2021

Acceptance Rates

EITCE '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 294 of 531 submissions, 55%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 508 of 972 submissions, 52%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 38
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media