Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3502178.3529109acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

L’intelligence hybride pour prédire l’évolution des maladies chroniques: Hybrid intelligence to predict chronic disease progression

Published: 01 November 2022 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In personalized medicine, care individualization is a key challenge to provide a more adapted and personalized clinical decision for each patient. The access to large amounts of medical data with the available computational power as well as the evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms allow to overcome this challenge. However, the application of AI algorithms must enable efficient and accurate communication with physicians. The complementarity between human and artificial intelligence holds the most promise for a safe and innovative medical future. We propose a new personalized medicine approach to improve the results of machine learning algorithms and overcome some barriers to the adoption of AI in medical practice. The proposed approach is based on human-machine interaction to create predictive models of chronic disease progression, especially for multiple sclerosis (MS).

    References

    [1]
    Bassem I. Yamout and Raed Alroughani. 2018. Multiple Sclerosis. Seminars in Neurology 38, 2 (2018), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649502
    [2]
    Clare Walton, Rachel King, Lindsay Rechtman, Wendy Kaye, Emmanuelle Leray, Ruth Ann Marrie, Neil Robertson, Nicholas La Rocca, Bernard Uitdehaag, Ingrid van der Mei, Mitchell Wallin, Anne Helme, Ceri Angood Napier, Nick Rijke, and Peer Baneke. 2020. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Multiple Sclerosis Journal 26, 14 (Dec. 2020), 1816–1821. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458520970841 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd STM.
    [3]
    Pierre-Antoine Gourraud, Roland Henry, Bruce AC Cree, Jason C Crane, Antoine Lizee, Marram P Olson, Adam V. Santaniello, Esha Datta, Alyssa H. Zhu, Carolyn J. Bevan, Jeffrey M. Gelfand, Jennifer A. Graves, Douglas E. Goodin, Ari Green, H.-Christian von Büdingen, Emmanuelle Waubant, Scott S. Zamvil, Elizabeth Crabtree-Hartman, Sarah Nelson, Sergio E. Baranzini, and Stephen L. Hauser. 2014. Precision medicine in chronic disease management: the MS BioScreen. Annals of neurology 76, 5 (Nov. 2014), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24282
    [4]
    Vittorio Martinelli, M Rodegher, Lucia Moiola, and Giacomo Comi. 2004. Late onset multiple sclerosis: Clinical characteristics, prognostic factors and differential diagnosis. Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology 25 Suppl 4 (Dec. 2004), S350–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-004-0339-8
    [5]
    Tatjana Reynders, Miguel D’haeseleer, Jacques De Keyser, Guy Nagels, and Marie B. D’hooghe. 2017. Definition, prevalence and predictive factors of benign multiple sclerosis. eNeurologicalSci 7 (June 2017), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensci.2017.05.002
    [6]
    Caspar E. P. van Munster and Bernard M. J. Uitdehaag. 2017. Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis. CNS Drugs 31, 3 (2017), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-017-0412-5
    [7]
    Pavel Hamet and Johanne Tremblay. 2017. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental 69S (April 2017), S36–S40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.011
    [8]
    Chris Giordano, Meghan Brennan, Basma Mohamed, Parisa Rashidi, François Modave, and Patrick Tighe. 2021. Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making. Frontiers in Digital Health 3 (June 2021), 645232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.645232
    [9]
    I. Glenn Cohen, Ruben Amarasingham, Anand Shah, Bin Xie, and Bernard Lo. 2014. The legal and ethical concerns that arise from using complex predictive analytics in health care. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 33, 7 (July 2014), 1139–1147. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0048
    [10]
    James Shaw, Frank Rudzicz, Trevor Jamieson, and Avi Goldfarb. 2019. Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, 7 (July 2019), e13659. https://doi.org/10.2196/13659
    [11]
    Jonathan Waring, Charlotta Lindvall, and Renato Umeton. 2020. Automated machine learning: Review of the state-of-the-art and opportunities for healthcare. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 104 (April 2020), 101822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101822
    [12]
    Ibrahim Habli, Tom Lawton, and Zoe Porter. 2020. Artificial intelligence in health care: accountability and safety. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 98, 4 (April 2020), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.19.237487
    [13]
    Ariadne A. Nichol, Jason N. Batten, Meghan C. Halley, Julia K. Axelrod, Pamela L. Sankar, and Mildred K. Cho. 2021. A Typology of Existing Machine Learning-Based Predictive Analytic Tools Focused on Reducing Costs and Improving Quality in Health Care: Systematic Search and Content Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23, 6 (June 2021), e26391. https://doi.org/10.2196/26391
    [14]
    Yifan Xiang, Lanqin Zhao, Zhenzhen Liu, Xiaohang Wu, Jingjing Chen, Erping Long, Duoru Lin, Yi Zhu, Chuan Chen, Zhuoling Lin, and Haotian Lin. 2020. Implementation of artificial intelligence in medicine: Status analysis and development suggestions. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 102 (Jan. 2020), 101780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101780
    [15]
    Sahil Sandhu, Anthony L. Lin, Nathan Brajer, Jessica Sperling, William Ratliff, Armando D. Bedoya, Suresh Balu, Cara O’Brien, and Mark P. Sendak. 2020. Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, 11 (Nov. 2020), e22421. https://doi.org/10.2196/22421
    [16]
    Cécile Petitgand, Aude Motulsky, Jean-Louis Denis, and Catherine Régis. 2020. Investigating the Barriers to Physician Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence- Based Decision Support System in Emergency Care: An Interpretative Qualitative Study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 270 (June 2020), 1001–1005. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI200312
    [17]
    Lawrence A. Lynn. 2019. Artificial intelligence systems for complex decision-making in acute care medicine: a review. Patient Safety in Surgery 13 (2019), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0188-2
    [18]
    E. Leray, T. Moreau, A. Fromont, and G. Edan. [n.d.]. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. 172, 1([n. d.]), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2015.10.006
    [19]
    Tomas Kalincik. [n.d.]. Multiple Sclerosis Relapses: Epidemiology, Outcomes and Management. A Systematic Review. 44, 4([n. d.]), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1159/000382130 Publisher: Karger Publishers.
    [20]
    Nicola De Stefano, Maria Stromillo, Antonio Giorgio, Marco Battaglini, Maria Bartolozzi, Maria Amato, and Maria Pia Sormani. [n.d.]. Long-term assessment of No Evidence of Disease Activity in relapsing-remitting MS. 85 ([n. d.]). https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002105
    [21]
    Abhimanyu S. Ahuja. 2019. The impact of artificial intelligence in medicine on the future role of the physician. PeerJ 7 (Oct. 2019). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7702
    [22]
    RH Gross, SH Sillau, AE Miller, C Farrell, and SC Krieger. 2019. The Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score: fluctuations and prognostic ability in a longitudinal cohort of patients with MS. Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical 5, 1 (March 2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217319837254
    [23]
    Loren A. Rolak. 2003. Multiple Sclerosis: It’s Not The Disease You Thought It Was. Clinical Medicine and Research 1, 1 (Jan. 2003), 57–60. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Addressing the Challenges and Barriers to the Integration of Machine Learning into Clinical Practice: An Innovative Method to Hybrid Human–Machine IntelligenceSensors10.3390/s2221831322:21(8313)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022

    Index Terms

    1. L’intelligence hybride pour prédire l’évolution des maladies chroniques: Hybrid intelligence to predict chronic disease progression

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          IHM '22 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on l'Interaction Humain-Machine
          April 2022
          32 pages
          ISBN:9781450391986
          DOI:10.1145/3502178
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 01 November 2022

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Artificial Intelligence
          2. Human-Machine Interaction
          3. Intelligence artificielle
          4. Interaction humain-machine
          5. Médecine personnalisée
          6. Personalized medicine

          Qualifiers

          • Extended-abstract
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Funding Sources

          • Région Pays de la Loire
          • European Union?s Horizon 2020
          • National Research Agency

          Conference

          IHM '22
          Sponsor:

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 103 of 199 submissions, 52%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
          Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2022)Addressing the Challenges and Barriers to the Integration of Machine Learning into Clinical Practice: An Innovative Method to Hybrid Human–Machine IntelligenceSensors10.3390/s2221831322:21(8313)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022

          View Options

          Get Access

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media