Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3508546.3508647acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesacaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Ranking of Software Reliability Evaluation Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Technique

Published: 25 February 2022 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    During the software life cycle, software reliability is limited by various uncertain factors, and relevant factors need to be aggregated for reliability evaluation. The influence of these factors on reliability is often determined by engineering experience and subjective judgment, which inevitably leads to subjectivity and vague, and fuzzy set theory is an effective method to deal with uncertain information. The research in this paper aims to help software development organizations complete the software engineering evaluations that are the efficient measures of software reliability. The metrics value of each evaluation criterion was elicited through expert opinion and an aggregation technology is then developed for transforming attribute values into intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs) to obtain the collective evaluation of each alternative. Next, according to the intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging operator, the collective attribute values are aggregated to overall evaluations of alternatives. Finally, the ranking functions are applied to indicate the score degree and the rank of each alternative. A practical example is provided for applying software project reliability evaluation to demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed method.

    References

    [1]
    A. Kaufmann, and A. Press, Introduction to the theory of fuzzy subsets, p.pp. 235-243: Academic Press, 1975.
    [2]
    O. Georgieva, and A. Dimov, “Software reliability assessment via fuzzy logic model,” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, pp. 653-658, 2011.
    [3]
    A. K. Pandey, and N. K. Goyal, “Predicting fault-prone software module using data mining technique and fuzzy logic,” International Journal of Computer and Communication Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 56-63, 2010.
    [4]
    D. K. Yadav, S. Chaturvedi, and R. B. Misra, “Early Software Defects Prediction Using Fuzzy Logic,” International Journal of Performability Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, 2012.
    [5]
    S. K. Khalsa, “A Fuzzified Approach for the Prediction of Fault Proneness and Defect Density,” Lecture Notes in Engineering & Computer Science, vol. 2176, no. 1, 2009.
    [6]
    L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information & Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338-353, 1965.
    [7]
    K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87-96, 1986/08/01/, 1986.
    [8]
    K. T. Atanassov, "Intuitionistic fuzzy sets," Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, pp. 1-137: Springer, 1999.
    [9]
    H. Zhang, “Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application in MAGDM,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2014, 2014.
    [10]
    Z. Xu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators,” IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1179-1187, 2007.
    [11]
    H. Liao, and Z. Xu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted aggregation operators,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 971-993, 2014.
    [12]
    Z. Ashraf, M. S. Khan, and Q. D. Lohani, “New bounded variation based similarity measures between Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets for clustering and pattern recognition,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 85, pp. 105529, 2019.
    [13]
    K. Hu, and J.-Q. Li, “The Entropy and Similarity Measure of Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Their Relationship,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 279-288, 2013.
    [14]
    J.-Z. Wu, and Q. Zhang, “Multicriteria decision making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy weighted entropy,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 916-922, 2011.
    [15]
    M. I. Ali, F. Feng, T. Mahmood, I. Mahmood, and H. Faizan, “A graphical method for ranking Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy values using the uncertainty index and entropy,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2692-2712, 2019.
    [16]
    O. López-Ortega, and M.-A. Rosales, “An agent-oriented decision support system combining fuzzy clustering and the AHP,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 8275-8284, 2011.
    [17]
    A. Asim, R. Nasar, and T. Rashid, “Correlation coefficient of intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets based on informational energy and their applications to clustering analysis,” Soft Computing, vol. 23, no. 20, pp. 10393-10406, 2019.
    [18]
    J. Vaníček, I. Vrana, and S. Aly, “Fuzzy aggregation and averaging for group decision making: a generalization and survey,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 79-84, 2009.
    [19]
    R. a. Y. Wang, Xian-wei, “Multi-criteria Decision-making Method Based on a New Score Function under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment,” Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 102-106, 2016.
    [20]
    C. a. L. WU, Qian and WAN, Xiang-yu, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making Approach Based on Prospect Score Function,” Statistics &Information Forum, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3-8, 2014.
    [21]
    D. Zhang, X. Bao, and C. Wu, “An extended TODIM method based on novel score function and accuracy function under intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 27, no. 06, pp. 905-930, 2019.
    [22]
    S. Agrawal, and P. Tripathi, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Score Function Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method for Selection of Cloud Service Provider,” International Journal of Sensors Wireless Communications and Control, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 533-539, 2020.
    [23]
    F. Feng, Y. Zheng, J. C. R. Alcantud, and Q. Wang, “Minkowski weighted score functions of intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1143, 2020.
    [24]
    S.-M. Chen, and J.-M. Tan, “Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory,” Fuzzy sets and systems, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 163-172, 1994.
    [25]
    D. H. Hong, and C.-H. Choi, “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory,” Fuzzy sets and systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 103-113, 2000.
    [26]
    L. Lin, X.-H. Yuan, and Z.-Q. Xia, “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Journal of computer and System Sciences, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 84-88, 2007.
    [27]
    Y. M. FENG Feng, LIU Xiaoyan, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Decision Making Method Based on Expectation Score Functions,” Journal of Jilin University (Science Edition), vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1084-1090, 2018.
    [28]
    Y. Zhong-liang, “The Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Environmental Quality Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set [J],” Mathematics in Practice and Theory, vol. 8, 2008.
    [29]
    Z. Yue, Y. Jia, and G. Ye, “An approach for multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy information,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 17, no. 03, pp. 317-332, 2009.
    [30]
    J. Xu, S.-P. Wan, and J.-Y. Dong, “Aggregating decision information into Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 41, pp. 331-351, 2016.
    [31]
    S.-P. Wan, J. Xu, and J.-Y. Dong, “Aggregating decision information into interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 113, pp. 155-170, 2016.
    [32]
    J. Lin, and Q. Zhang, “Note on aggregating crisp values into intuitionistic fuzzy number,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 40, no. 23-24, pp. 10800-10808, 2016.
    [33]
    S. K. De, R. Biswas, and A. R. Roy, “Some operations on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 477-484, 2000.
    [34]
    S. Liu, and W. H. Qiu, “Studies on the basic theories for MADM,” Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice, vol. 18, pp. 38-43, 01/01, 1998.
    [35]
    N. Fenton, M. Neil, W. Marsh, P. Hearty, Ł. Radliński, and P. Krause, “On the effectiveness of early life cycle defect prediction with Bayesian Nets,” Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 499-537, 2008.
    [36]
    M. Li, and C. S. Smidts, “A ranking of software engineering measures based on expert opinion,” IEEE Transactions on Software engineering, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 811-824, 2003.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ACAI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence
    December 2021
    699 pages
    ISBN:9781450385053
    DOI:10.1145/3508546
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 February 2022

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Aggregation technology
    2. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets
    3. Multi-attribute decision-making
    4. Ranking functions
    5. Software reliability

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ACAI'21

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 173 of 395 submissions, 44%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 39
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media