Visualization and Attack Prevention for a Sensor-Based Agricultural Monitoring System
Authors: 
Yifan Zhou, Zhendong Shi, Ruoxi SunAuthors Info & Claims
Yifan Zhou, Zhendong Shi, Ruoxi SunAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 84 - 90
Abstract
This project proposes a sensor-based visual agricultural monitoring system. Distinguished from traditional agricultural monitoring systems, this system further analyzes basic agricultural data, prevents attacks such as Jamming, Flooding, and Exhaustion, and monitors common wireless network attacks such as Selective Forwarding, Black Hole Attacks, Sinkhole Attacks, Flooding Attacks and Misdirection Attacks. Experimental verification and evaluation of the attack prevention and monitoring are also conducted.
References
[1]
Ian F Akyildiz, Weilian Su, Yogesh Sankarasubramaniam, and Erdal Cayirci. 2002. Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer networks 38, 4 (2002), 393–422.
[2]
JL Avinash, KN Sunil Kumar, GB Arjun Kumar, GR Poornima, Ravi Gatti, and S Santosh Kumar. 2020. A Wireless Sensor Network Based Precision Agriculture. In 2020 International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT). IEEE, 413–417.
[3]
Radhika Baskar, K Raja, Christeena Joseph, and M Reji. 2017. Sinkhole Attack in Wireless Sensor Networks-Performance Analysis and Detection Methods. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 10, 12 (2017), 1–8.
[4]
Ismail Butun, Patrik Österberg, and Houbing Song. 2019. Security of the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, attacks, and countermeasures. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 22, 1 (2019), 616–644.
[5]
Erdal Cayirci and Chunming Rong. 2008. Security in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. John Wiley & Sons.
[6]
Lipi Chhaya, Paawan Sharma, Govind Bhagwatikar, and Adesh Kumar. 2017. Wireless sensor network based smart grid communications: Cyber attacks, intrusion detection system and topology control. Electronics 6, 1 (2017), 5.
[7]
Xiaotao Feng, Ruoxi Sun, Xiaogang Zhu, Minghui Xue, Sheng Wen, Dongxi Liu, Surya Nepal, and Yang Xiang. 2021. Snipuzz: Black-box Fuzzing of IoT Firmware via Message Snippet Inference. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (2021).
[8]
Nitesh Gondwal and Chander Diwaker. 2013. Detecting blackhole attack in WSN by check agent using multiple base stations. American International Journal of Research in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics 3, 2 (2013), 149–152.
[9]
Parli B Hari and Shailendra Narayan Singh. 2016. Security issues in Wireless Sensor Networks: Current research and challenges. In 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, & Automation (ICACCA)(Spring). IEEE, 1–6.
[10]
Navin G Haswani and Pramod J Deore. 2018. Web-based realtime underground drainage or sewage monitoring system using Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2018 Fourth International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA). IEEE, 1–5.
[11]
Avishek Jana and Arindam Roy. 2019. AN ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS FUNCTION IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK APPLIED IN PRECISION AGRICULTURE.International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science 10, 4(2019).
[12]
Chris Karlof and David Wagner. 2003. Secure routing in wireless sensor networks: Attacks and countermeasures. Ad hoc networks 1, 2-3 (2003), 293–315.
[13]
Manpreet Kaur and Amarvir Singh. 2016. Detection and mitigation of sinkhole attack in wireless sensor network. In 2016 International conference on micro-electronics and telecommunication engineering (ICMETE). IEEE, 217–221.
[14]
Shapla Khanam, Ismail Bin Ahmedy, Mohd Yamani Idna Idris, Mohamed Hisham Jaward, and Aznul Qalid Bin Md Sabri. 2020. A survey of security challenges, attacks taxonomy and advanced countermeasures in the internet of things. IEEE Access 8(2020), 219709–219743.
[15]
Petr Kubicek, Jiri Kozel, Radim Stampach, and Vojtech Lukas. 2013. Prototyping the visualization of geographic and sensor data for agriculture. Computers and electronics in agriculture 97 (2013), 83–91.
[16]
HN Lakshmi, Santosh Anand, and Somnath Sinha. 2019. Flooding attack in wireless sensor network-analysis and prevention. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology 8, 5(2019), 1792–1796.
[17]
P Rajendra Prasad, JL Avinash, GB Arjun Kumar, GR Poornima, S Santosh Kumar, and KN Sunil Kumar. 2020. IoT based Smart Water Quality Monitoring and Flow Control System. In 2020 International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT). IEEE, 358–362.
[18]
Radomir Prodanović, Dejan Rančić, Ivan Vulić, Nenad Zorić, Dušan Bogićević, Gordana Ostojić, Sohail Sarang, and Stevan Stankovski. 2020. Wireless sensor network in agriculture: Model of cyber security. Sensors 20, 23 (2020), 6747.
[19]
Prasad P Rajendra, N Nataraja, and GB Arjun Kumar. 2020. IoT based Agriculture Flood Water Harvesting and Crop Assessment. In 2020 International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT). IEEE, 368–372.
[20]
Mika Saari, A Muzaffar bin Baharudin, Pekka Sillberg, Sami Hyrynsalmi, and Wanglin Yan. 2018. LoRa—A survey of recent research trends. In 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). IEEE, 0872–0877.
[21]
Ayesha Siddique, Bhakti Prabhu, Aishwarya Chaskar, and Rasika Pathak. 2019. A review on intelligent agriculture service platform with lora based wireless sensor network. Life 100(2019), 7000.
[22]
Ruoxi Sun, Wei Wang, Minhui Xue, Gareth Tyson, Seyit Camtepe, and Damith C Ranasinghe. 2021. An empirical assessment of global COVID-19 contact tracing applications. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 1085–1097.
[23]
Ruoxi Sun, Wei Wang, Minhui Xue, Gareth Tyson, and Damith C Ranasinghe. 2020. VenueTrace: a privacy-by-design COVID-19 digital contact tracing solution. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 790–791.
[24]
Ruoxi Sun and Minhui Xue. 2020. Quality assessment of online automated privacy policy generators: an empirical study. In Proceedings of the Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. 270–275.
[25]
KN SunilKumar 2017. A review on security and privacy issues in wireless sensor networks. In 2017 2nd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT). IEEE, 1979–1984.
[26]
Yong Wang, Garhan Attebury, and Byrav Ramamurthy. 2006. A survey of security issues in wireless sensor networks. (2006).
Index Terms
- Visualization and Attack Prevention for a Sensor-Based Agricultural Monitoring System
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Prevention of a SYNflood attack using ExtremeXOS modular operating system
Network security has become a critical concern for protecting systems from attackers. Even though by securing these systems, a skilled attacker may use some techniques to launch a sophisticated attack. SYNflood attack is the commonly evolving attack ...
A Survey on XSS Attack Detection and Prevention in Web Applications
ICMLC '20: Proceedings of the 2020 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and ComputingWith the popularity of web technology, web applications become more increasingly vulnerable and are exposed to malicious attacks. Cross Site Scripting(XSS) is a typical attack in web applications. When a vulnerability is exploited, an attacker may ...
Mobile Jamming Attack and its Countermeasure in Wireless Sensor Networks
AINAW '07: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops - Volume 01Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks are serious threats due to the resources constrained property in wireless sensor networks. Jamming attacks are the representative energy-consumption DoS attacks that can be launched easily. Hence, many countermeasures ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 March 2022
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
ACSW 2022
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 61 of 141 submissions, 43%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 41Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)3
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format