Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3523286.3524508acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Mixed Use of Structural Particles Inhibits Cognitive Processes in Chinese Reading: Evidences from Eye Movements

Published: 31 May 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Abstract: The structural particles “De”(的) and “De”(地) are often mixed up in the written language, arousing heated debate on whether “De”(地) could be replaced by “De”(的). However, most of the current studies focus on grammatical or pragmatic differences of these two words, while no studies have been conducted to look into the effect of the mixed use of these two words on information processing and whether there are differences between the effect of two mixed use patterns—“De”(地)for “De”(的) and “De”(的) for “De”(地). In this study, an eye-tracking experiment with 30 college students was conducted to examine the influence of the mixed use on information processing and whether different patterns have different impacts. The results showed that: 1. the mixed use of “De”(的) and “De”(地) significantly affects the dwell time and fixation count of the whole sentence. In the violation condition, the dwell time was longer and the fixation count was higher; 2. the analysis of the target word showed that there was an interaction between the usage specification (standard or not) and the mixed-use pattern on many eye-tracking indicators, such as first fixation duration, dwell time, regression in times and fixation count, and this influence was mainly caused by “De”(地)for “De”(的) ; (3) the analysis of the remaining sentence after the target word showed different results-there was an interaction between the usage specification (standard or not) and the misuse patterns on fixation count, and the influence is mainly caused by “De”(的) for “De”(地). On the whole, both “De”(地)for “De”(的) and “De”(的) for “De”(地) caused disruption on readers' reading experience, while “De”(的) for “De”(地) with a low degree of violation had a delayed effect on information processing, which was mainly reflected in the remaining sentence after the target word. The findings of the current research provide evidence from eye-tracking studies for the division of “De”(的) and “De”(地).

References

[1]
Zhenzhong Li. 2008. The study on the division and combination of Chinese constructive adverb DE. J. Shanxi Normal Univ. (Soc. Sci. Edition), 5 (May 2008), 123-127.
[2]
YangChun Xu. 2004. The mergence and division of the auxiliary words “De (的)” and “De(地)”. J. Nanchang Univ. (Humanities and Soc. Sci.), 35, 6 (March 2004), 151-155. SUN: NCDS.0.2004-06-031.
[3]
SiQiang Cheng. 2015. The mergence and division of the structural auxiliary words “De(的)”, “De(地) ” and “De(得)”. Bull. Chinese Language Teaching (Acad. Edition), 38, 8 (May 2015), 52-54.
[4]
XueMei Liu. 2006. The analysis of the usage of the auxiliary words “De(的) ” “De(地) ” and “De(得)”. Modern Chinese (Linguistic Res.), 12 (June 2006), 98-99.
[5]
HaoMeng Zhang. 2004. Study of the mixing up of structural particles at elementary and secondary schools. Master Thesis, Nanchang University.
[6]
Hong Miao, Yafeng Guan, Hanwen Wang and Daoqian Zhu. 2009. Dynamic Pre-concentration Method of Gas Sample. Chinese J. Chromatography, 19, 1 (April 2001), 71-73.
[7]
Keith Rayner. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol. Bull., 124, 3 (November 1998), 372–422.
[8]
Keith Rayner. 2009. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Q J Exp Psychol, 62, 8 (August 2009), 1457-1506.
[9]
R Core Team. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing [OL]. 2018. https://cran.r-project.org.
[10]
Douglas Bates, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker and Steven Walker. 2019. LME4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R Package Version 0. 999375–39. Retrieved March 12, 2022 fromhttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
[11]
Alexandra Kuznetsova, Per B. Brockhoff and Rune H. B. 2017. Christensen. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw., 82, 13 (December 2017), 1-26.
[12]
Dale J. Barr, Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers and Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang, 68, 3 (April 2013), 255-278.
[13]
Pingping Liu, Weijun Li, Buxin Han and Xingshan Li. 2014. Effects of anomalous characters and small stroke omissions on eye movements during the reading of Chinese sentences. Ergonomics, 57, 11 (December 2014), 1659-1669.
[14]
Min Gao, Lin Li, HuiWen Xiang, Ralph Radach. 2017. Parafoveal preview benefits during silent and oral reading. Acta Psychol. Sinica, 49, 11 (April 2017), 1357-1369.
[15]
Stephen Crain, Weijia Ni, Donald P. Shankweiler, Laura Conway and David Braze. 1996. Meaning, memory and modularity. In Proceedings of the NELS 26 Sentence Processing Workshop (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 27-44.
[16]
Weijia Ni, Janet Dean Fodor, Stephen Crain and Donald Shankweiler. 1998. Anomaly detection: eye movement patterns. J. Psycholinguistic Res., 27, 5 (May 1998), 515-539.
[17]
David Braze, Donald Shankweiler, Weijia Ni and Laura Conway Palumbo. 2002. Readers' eye movements distinguish anomalies of form and content[J]. J. Psycholinguistic Res., 31, 1( July 2002), 25-44.
[18]
Guoli Yan, Jianping Xiong, Chuanli Zang, Lili Yu, Lei Cui and Xuejun Bai. 2013. Review of eye-movement measures in reading research. Adv. Psychological Sci., 21,4 (November 2013), 589-593.
[19]
Keith Rayner, Tessa Warren, Barbara J. Juhasz and Simon P. Liversedge. 2004. The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 30, 6 (April 2004), 1290-1301.
[20]
Angele Bernhard and Rayner Keith. 2013. Processing the in the parafovea: are articles skipped automatically?. J Exp. Psychol. Learn., 39, 2 (May 2013), 649-62.
[21]
Chuanli Zang, Manman Zhang, Xuejun Bai, Guoli Yan, Bernhard Angele and Simon P Liversedge. 2007. Skipping of the very-high-frequency structural particle de (的) in Chinese reading. Q J Exp Psychol, 71, 1 (January 2017), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1272617.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
BIC '22: Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing
January 2022
551 pages
ISBN:9781450395755
DOI:10.1145/3523286
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 May 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Eye-tracking Study
  2. Information Processing
  3. Mixed Use of Structural Particles

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

BIC 2022

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 141
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)45
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media