research-article

Emergence as a Feature of Practice-based Design Research

Authors:

Peter Gall Krogh,

David ChattingAuthors Info & Claims

DIS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Pages 517 - 526

https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533524

Published: 13 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Practice-based design research is often emergent. Methods, tactics, goals and even topics can unfold and change as researchers adapt and learn in the course of their projects. This adaptability is one of the strengths of design as an approach to research, but it seems to contradict assumptions about research as a systematic, inquiry-led investigation. This leads to a tension in practicing and reporting research that we unpack here, before making a series of suggestions for practice-based researchers and reviewers about how to better navigate emergence when pursuing, reporting and evaluating practice-based design research.

References

[1]

[1]Kristina Andersen and Ron Wakkary. 2019. The Magic Machine Workshops: Making Personal Design Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–13.

Digital Library

[2]

[2]Les Back and Nirmal Puwar. 2012. A manifesto for live methods: provocations and capacities. The sociological review 60, (2012), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02114.x

[3]

[3]Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2015. Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2093–2102.

Digital Library

[4]

[4]Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041

Digital Library

[5]

[5]Leonard Bickman. 1987. The functions of program theory. New directions for program evaluation 1987, 33 (1987), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1443

[6]

[6]Lucienne TM Blessing and Amaresh Chakrabarti. 2009. DRM: A design reseach methodology. Springer.

Digital Library

[7]

[7]Mark Blythe. 2014. Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557098

Digital Library

[8]

[8]Mark Blythe. 2017. Research fiction: storytelling, plot and design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5400–5411. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026023

Digital Library

[9]

[9]Christopher Booker. 2004. The seven basic plots: Why we tell stories. A&C Black.

[10]

[10]Andy Boucher, Dean Brown, Liliana Ovalle, Andy Sheen, Mike Vanis, William Odom, Doenja Oogjes, and William Gaver. 2018. TaskCam: Designing and Testing an Open Tool for Cultural Probes Studies. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173645

Digital Library

[11]

[11]John Bowers. 2012. The Logic of Annotated Portfolios: Communicating the Value of “Research Through Design.” In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’12), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 68–77.

Digital Library

[12]

[12]Colin Burns, Eric Dishman, William Verplank, and Bud Lassiter. 1994. Actors, Hairdos & Videotape—Informance Design. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’94), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 119–120.

Digital Library

[13]

[13]Graham Button and Paul Dourish. 1996. Technomethodology: paradoxes and possibilities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238394

Digital Library

[14]

[14]James Clifford and George E Marcus. 1986. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography: a School of American Research advanced seminar. Univ of California Press.

[15]

[15]Paul Coulton, Joseph Galen Lindley, Miriam Sturdee, and Michael Stead. 2017. Design fiction as world building. In Proceedings of Research through Design Conference 2017.

[16]

[16]Audrey Desjardins and Heidi R. Biggs. 2021. Data Epics: Embarking on Literary Journeys of Home Internet of Things Data. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–17.

Digital Library

[17]

[17]Kees Dorst. 2015. Frame innovation: Create new thinking by design. MIT press.

[18]

[18]Anthony Dunne and William W Gaver. 1997. The Pillow: Artist-designers in the digital age. In CHI’97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 361–362. https://doi.org/10.1145/1120212.1120434

Digital Library

[19]

[19]Pelle Ehn. 1988. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. PhD Thesis. Arbetslivscentrum.

Digital Library

[20]

[20]Pelle Ehn and Morten Kyng. 2020. Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future. In Design at work. CRC Press, 169–195.

[21]

[21]Syd Field. 2005. Screenplay: The foundations of screenwriting. Delta.

[22]

[22]Christopher Frauenberger. 2019. Entanglement HCI The Next Wave? ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 1 (November 2019).

Digital Library

[23]

[23]Christopher Frayling. 1994. Research in art and design (Royal College of Art Research Papers, vol 1, no 1, 1993/4). (1994).

[24]

[24]Nanny Fröman. Marie and Pierre Curie and the discovery of polonium and radium. Retrieved February 17, 2022 from www.nobelprize.org/prizes/themes/marie-and-pierre-curie-and-the-discovery-of-polonium-and-radium/

[25]

[25]Harold Garfinkel. 1984. Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.

[26]

[26]Bill Gaver and John Bowers. 2012. Annotated Portfolios. Interactions 19, 4 (July 2012), 40–49.

Digital Library

[27]

[27]Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: cultural probes. interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235

Digital Library

[28]

[28]William Gaver. 2011. Making spaces: how design workbooks work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1551–1560. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979169

Digital Library

[29]

[29]William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 937–946. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538

Digital Library

[30]

[30]William Gaver, Mark Blythe, Andy Boucher, Nadine Jarvis, John Bowers, and Peter Wright. 2010. The prayer companion: openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2055–2064. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753640

Digital Library

[31]

[31]William Gaver, Andy Boucher, Nadine Jarvis, David Cameron, Mark Hauenstein, Sarah Pennington, John Bowers, James Pike, Robin Beitra, and Liliana Ovalle. 2016. The Datacatcher: batch deployment and documentation of 130 location-aware, mobile devices that put sociopolitically-relevant big data in people's hands: polyphonic interpretation at scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1597–1607. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858472

Digital Library

[32]

[32]William Gaver, Andy Boucher, Michail Vanis, Andy Sheen, Dean Brown, Liliana Ovalle, Naho Matsuda, Amina Abbas-Nazari, and Robert Phillips. 2019. My Naturewatch Camera: Disseminating Practice Research with a Cheap and Easy DIY Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300532

Digital Library

[33]

[33]William W. Gaver, Andrew Boucher, Sarah Pennington, and Brendan Walker. 2004. Cultural Probes and the Value of Uncertainty. Interactions 11, 5 (September 2004), 53–56.

Digital Library

[34]

[34]Don George and Lavinia Spalding. 2009. Lonely Planet's guide to travel writing. Lonely Planet.

[35]

[35]Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, Christian Dindler, Kim Halskov, Ole Sejer Iversen, Claus Bossen, Ditte Amund Basballe, and Ben Schouten. 2019. How participatory design works: mechanisms and effects. In Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3369460

Digital Library

[36]

[36]Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14, 3 (1988), 575.

[37]

[37]Kristina Höök. 2018. Designing with the body: Somaesthetic interaction design. MIT Press.

[38]

[38]Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’03), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–24.

Digital Library

[39]

[39]François Jacob. 2001. From night bustle to printed quietness. Treballs de la Societat Catalana de Biologia (2001), 11–13.

[40]

[40]Tom Jenkins. 2017. Living Apart, Together: Cohousing as a Site for ICT Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1039–1051.

Digital Library

[41]

[41]Tom Jenkins. 2018. Cohousing IoT: Design Prototyping for Community Life. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 667–673.

Digital Library

[42]

[42]John Chris Jones. 1992. Design methods. John Wiley & Sons.

[43]

[43]Finn Kensing and Jeanette Blomberg. 1998. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 7, 3–4 (September 1998), 167–185.

Digital Library

[44]

[44]Koskinen, I., Binder, T. and Redström, J. Lab, Field, Gallery, and Beyond. Artifact, 2, 1 (2008), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460802303333

[45]

[45]Ilpo Koskinen and Peter Gall Krogh. 2015. Design accountability: When design research entangles theory and practice. International Journal of Design 9, 1 (2015).

[46]

[46]P Krogh and Ilpo Koskinen. 2020. Drifting by intention. Springer.

[47]

[47]Peter Gall Krogh and Ilpo Koskinen. 2021. Drifting by Intention – Four Epistemic traditions in Constructive Design Research. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–3.

Digital Library

[48]

[48]Peter Gall Krogh, Thomas Markussen, and Anne Louise Bang. 2015. Ways of Drifting—Five Methods of Experimentation in Research Through Design. In ICoRD’15 – Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume 1, Amaresh Chakrabarti (ed.). Springer India, New Delhi, 39–50.

[49]

[49]Imre Lakatos. Science and pseudoscience. In Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues.

[50]

[50]John Law and John Urry. 2004. Enacting the social. Economy and society 33, 3 (2004), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716

[51]

[51]Minha Lee, Renee Noortman, Cristina Zaga, Alain Starke, Gijs Huisman, and Kristina Andersen. 2021. Conversational Futures: Emancipating Conversational Interactions for Futures Worth Wanting. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.

Digital Library

[52]

[52]Jonas Löwgren and Erik Stolterman. 2004. Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Mit Press.

Digital Library

[53]

[53]Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford. 2012. Introduction: A perpetual inventory. In Inventive Methods. Routledge, 15–38.

[54]

[54]Michael Lynch. 1997. Ethnomethodology without indifference. Human Studies 20, 3 (1997) 371–76

[55]

[55]Noortje Marres, Michael Guggenheim, and Alex Wilkie. 2018. Inventing the social. Mattering Press.

[56]

[56]Mike Michael. 2012. Anecdote. In Inventive Methods. Routledge.

[57]

[57]Gerald de Montigny. 2017. Ethnomethodological indifference: Just a passing phase? Human Studies 40, 3 (2017), 331–364.

[58]

[58]Harold G Nelson and Erik Stolterman. 2014. The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. MIT press.

Digital Library

[59]

[59]Donald A Norman. 1981. Categorization of action slips. Psychological review 88, 1 (1981), 1.

[60]

[60]Brian A Nosek, Charles R Ebersole, Alexander C DeHaven, and David T Mellor. 2018. The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 11 (2018), 2600–2606.

[61]

[61]William Odom, Richard Banks, Abigail Durrant, David Kirk, and James Pierce. 2012. Slow technology: critical reflection and future directions. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 816–817. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318088

Digital Library

[62]

[62]William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Youn-kyung Lim, Audrey Desjardins, Bart Hengeveld, and Richard Banks. 2016. From Research Prototype to Research Product. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2549–2561. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858447

Digital Library

[63]

[63]Doenja Oogjes, William Odom, and Pete Fung. 2018. Designing for an Other Home: Expanding and Speculating on Different Forms of Domestic Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 313–326.

Digital Library

[64]

[64]Johan Redström. 2011. Some notes on programme-experiment dialectics. Nordes 4 (2011).

[65]

[65]Johan Redström. 2017. Making design theory. MIT Press.

[66]

[66]Horst WJ Rittel and Melvin M Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4, 2 (1973), 155–169.

[67]

[67]Daniela K Rosner, Samantha Shorey, Brock R Craft, and Helen Remick. 2018. Making core memory: Design inquiry into gendered legacies of engineering and craftwork. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174105

Digital Library

[68]

[68]Antti Salovaara, Kristina Höök, Keith Cheverst, Michael Twidale, Matthew Chalmers, and Corina Sas. 2011. Appropriation and Creative Use: Linking User Studies and Design. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’11), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 37–40.

Digital Library

[69]

[69]Donald A Schön. 2017. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.

[70]

[70]Herbert A Simon. 1969. The sciences of the artificial, MA. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass 4, (1969), 4ff.

Digital Library

[71]

[71]Herbert A Simon. 1988. The science of design: Creating the artificial. Design Issues (1988), 67–82.

[72]

[72]Gillian Crampton Smith and Philip Tabor. 1996. The role of the artist-designer. In Bringing design to software. 37–61.

[73]

[73]Erik Stolterman. 2008. The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design 2, 1 (2008).

[74]

[74]Lucille Alice Suchman. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions (2nd ed ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ; New York.

[75]

[75]Gregory Taylor. The Oblique Strategies. Retrieved February 16, 2022 from http://www.rtqe.net/ObliqueStrategies/

[76]

[76]University of Manchester. The story of graphene. Retrieved February 17, 2022 from https://www.graphene.manchester.ac.uk/learn/discovery-of-graphene/

[77]

[77]Ron Wakkary, Audrey Desjardins, and Sabrina Hauser. 2016. Unselfconscious interaction: A conceptual construct. Interacting with Computers 28, 4 (2016), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098319

Digital Library

[78]

[78]Ron Wakkary and Leah Maestri. 2007. The resourcefulness of everyday design. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1254984

Digital Library

[79]

[79]Jayne Wallace. 2007. Emotionally charged: A practice-centred enquiry of digital jewellery and personal emotional significance. PhD Thesis. Sheffield Hallam University (United Kingdom).

[80]

[80]John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704

Digital Library

[81]

[81]John Zimmerman, Erik Stolterman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. An Analysis and Critique of Research Through Design: Towards a Formalization of a Research Approach. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’10), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 310–319.

Digital Library

Cited By

Straand IBaxter KFølstad A(2024)Remote Inclusion of Vulnerable Users in mHealth Intervention Design: Retrospective Case AnalysisJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/5554812(e55548)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.2196/55548
Höök KAndersen KKozel S(2024)Ten Permissions for Facilitating (Live) Design ActivitiesCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3663710(92-95)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656156.3663710
Bang TAlaoui STyse GSchwartz EBevilacqua F(2024)A Retrospective Autoethnography Documenting Dance Learning Through Data PhysicalisationsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661607(2357-2373)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661607
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Problems in Practice: Understanding Design Research by Critiquing Cases
CHI EA '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Responding to challenges to better understand design research practice, its contributions to knowledge production and its value to HCI, our one-day workshop critically reflects on case examples of design research practice in interdisciplinary HCI ...
An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach
DIS '10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

The field of HCI is experiencing a growing interest in Research through Design (RtD), a research approach that employs methods and processes from design practice as a legitimate method of inquiry. We are interested in expanding and formalizing this ...
Power Struggles and Disciplined Designers - A Nexus Analytic Inquiry on Cross-Disciplinary Research and Design
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Design is at the heart of Human Computer Interaction research and practice. In the research community, there has emerged an increasing interest in understanding and conceptualizing our research practice, particularly such entailing design. However, ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

DIS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

June 2022

1947 pages

ISBN:9781450393584

DOI:10.1145/3532106

Editors:
Florian `Floyd' Mueller
Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
,
Stefan Greuter
Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
,
Rohit Ashok Khot
RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
,
Penny Sweetser
The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
,
Marianna Obrist
University College London, UK

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 June 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

European Research Council

Conference

DIS '22

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

DIS '22: Designing Interactive Systems Conference

June 13 - 17, 2022

Virtual Event, Australia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

43
Total Citations
View Citations
1,180
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)444
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)32

Reflects downloads up to 10 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Straand IBaxter KFølstad A(2024)Remote Inclusion of Vulnerable Users in mHealth Intervention Design: Retrospective Case AnalysisJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/5554812(e55548)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.2196/55548
Höök KAndersen KKozel S(2024)Ten Permissions for Facilitating (Live) Design ActivitiesCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3663710(92-95)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656156.3663710
Bang TAlaoui STyse GSchwartz EBevilacqua F(2024)A Retrospective Autoethnography Documenting Dance Learning Through Data PhysicalisationsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661607(2357-2373)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661607
Lin PAndersen KSchmidt RSchoenmakers SHofmeyer HPauwels PIjsselsteijn W(2024)Text-to-Image AI as a Catalyst for Semantic Convergence in Creative CollaborationsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661543(2753-2767)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661543
Janicki SParvin NHowell N(2024)Crip Reflections on Designing with Plants: Intersecting Disability Theory, Chronic Illness, and More-than-Human Design✱Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661509(1044-1058)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661509
Meiklejohn EDevendorf LPosch I(2024)Design Bookkeeping: Making Practice Intelligible through a Managerial LensProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660754(35-49)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660754
Bagchi PElsden CSpeed CChan K(2024)Baking An Institutional Doughnut: A Systemic Design Journey for Diverse Stakeholder EngagementProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660748(2213-2226)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660748
Odom WBarnett SBrand NYoo MLin HWhite J(2024)Negotiating Conceptual and Practical Frictions in Making the Capra Short Film: Extending a Research through Design Artifact with VideoProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660739(2866-2881)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660739
Hendriks SGamboa MObaid M(2024)The Undertable: A Design Remake of the Mediated BodyProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660698(2591-2610)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660698
Benjamin JLindley JEdwards ERubegni EKorjakow TGrist DSharkey R(2024)Responding to Generative AI Technologies with Research-through-Design: The Ryelands AI Lab as an Exploratory StudyProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660677(1823-1841)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660677
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents