Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Quality Assessment Criteria and Methods for 3D Digital Replica of Historical Printing Woodblocks

Published: 09 August 2023 Publication History

Abstract

With the available 3D scanning technologies and the special historical characteristics of printing woodblocks, it is necessary to have concrete methods to assess the visual quality of 3D digital replica for preservation and promotion purposes. In this paper, we present our study for assessing the visual quality of 3D digital replica of historical printing woodblocks. In our study, first, assessment criteria are formed to meet the preservation requirements by consulting with printing woodblock conservationists and assessment methods are developed to assess the quality of 3D digital woodblock replica regarding those criteria. Then, a suitable 3D scanning method is applied to a typical set of printing woodblocks to obtain their 3D digital replicas which are used to evaluate the proposed assessment methods. The experimental results reveal that our proposed assessment criteria and methods can be used to evaluate visual quality of 3D digital woodblock replicas regarding the requirements of preservation and promotion of woodblocks.

References

[1]
Fabrizio I. Apollonio. 2016. Classification schemes and model validation of 3D digital reconstruction process. W. Börner, S. Uhlirz (a cura di), Proceedings of the 20th Cultural Heritage and New Technologies, Museen der Stadt Wien–Stadtarchäologie, Vienna.
[2]
Blender. 2020. Blender Software. (accessed April 25, 2020). https://www.blender.org.
[3]
Mario Centofanti and Stefano Brusaporci. 2013. Architectural 3D modeling in historical buildings knowledge and restoration processes. (2013).
[4]
Damon M. Chandler and Sheila S. Hemami. 2007. VSNR: A wavelet-based visual signal-to-noise ratio for natural images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16, 9 (2007), 2284–2298.
[5]
Deepti Ghadiyaram and Alan C. Bovik. 2017. Perceptual quality prediction on authentically distorted images using a bag of features approach. Journal of Vision 17, 1 (2017), 32–32.
[6]
GOM-Inspect. 2020. GOM Inspect Software. (accessed April 25, 2020). https://www.gom.com/3d-software/gom-inspect.
[7]
Le Thanh Ha, Ngo Thi Duyen, Ma Thi Chau, Nguyen Minh Hoa, and Phi Hoang Linh. 2020. Research Methods of Digitizing and 3D Printing Royal Printing Woodblocks of Nguyen Dynasty - World Documentary Heritage. Technical Report. University of Engineering and Technology (VNU-UET). (The final report of the project “Research methods of digitizing and 3D printing Royal printing woodblocks of Nguyen Dynasty - World Documentary Heritage (2020)” which is funded by National Archives of Vietnam; the report is approved in March 2020).
[8]
Joo-Pyo Hong, Zongming Zhang, and Jiho Han. 2015. Reconstruction of the woodblock using three-dimensional scanning and computer numerical control machining. 63–66.
[9]
Thanh-Ha Le, Seung-Won Jung, and Chee Sun Won. 2017. A new depth image quality metric using a pair of color and depth images. Multimedia Tools and Applications 76, 9 (2017), 11285–11303.
[10]
Hongyuan Lei. 2014. The digital protection and inheritance of Chinese woodblock new year prints. 277–281.
[11]
Hongyuan Lei. 2014. The digital protection and inheritance of Chinese woodblock new year prints. In 2014 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems. IEEE, 277–281.
[12]
Tsung-Jung Liu, Hsin-Hua Liu, Soo-Chang Pei, and Kuan-Hsien Liu. 2018. A high-definition diversity-scene database for image quality assessment. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 45427–45438.
[13]
Anish Mittal, Rajiv Soundararajan, and Alan C. Bovik. 2012. Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 20, 3 (2012), 209–212.
[14]
Thanh Tung Pham, Thi Chau Ma, Manh Tuan Nguyen, Dinh Linh Le, and Thanh Ha Le. 2020. Compression artifacts image patch database for perceptual quality assessment. (2020).
[15]
Robert C. Streijl, Stefan Winkler, and David Hands. 2016. Mean opinion score (MOS) revisited: Methods and applications, limitations and alternatives. Multimedia Systems 22, 2 (2016).
[16]
A. Vrubel, O. R. P. Bellon, and L. Silva. 2009. A 3D reconstruction pipeline for digital preservation. In 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2687–2694.
[17]
Zhou Wang, Alan C. Bovik, Hamid R. Sheikh, and Eero P. Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 4 (2004), 600–612.
[18]
Sen Xiang, Li Yu, and Chang Wen Chen. 2015. No-reference depth assessment based on edge misalignment errors for T+ D images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 25, 3 (2015), 1479–1494.
[19]
Lin Zhang, Ying Shen, and Hongyu Li. 2014. VSI: A visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 23, 10 (2014), 4270–4281.

Index Terms

  1. Quality Assessment Criteria and Methods for 3D Digital Replica of Historical Printing Woodblocks

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
            Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 16, Issue 3
            September 2023
            468 pages
            ISSN:1556-4673
            EISSN:1556-4711
            DOI:10.1145/3615350
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            Published: 09 August 2023
            Online AM: 29 July 2022
            Accepted: 02 April 2022
            Revised: 23 March 2022
            Received: 06 August 2021
            Published in JOCCH Volume 16, Issue 3

            Permissions

            Request permissions for this article.

            Check for updates

            Author Tags

            1. 3D replica quality assessment
            2. printing woodblocks
            3. 3D reconstruction
            4. printing woodblock digitization

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article

            Funding Sources

            • AI-based Application for 3D-Model Restoration of Vietnamese and Korean Cultural Heritage

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • 0
              Total Citations
            • 263
              Total Downloads
            • Downloads (Last 12 months)127
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
            Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            View Options

            Get Access

            Login options

            Full Access

            View options

            PDF

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            Full Text

            View this article in Full Text.

            Full Text

            Media

            Figures

            Other

            Tables

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media