Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3536221.3556582acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Emotions Matter: Towards Personalizing Human-System Interactions Using a Two-layer Multimodal Approach

Published: 07 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Monitoring and predicting user task performance is critical as it provides valuable insights for developing personalized human-system interactions. Key factors that impact task performance include cognitive workload, physiological responses, and affective states. However, a lack of consideration of any of these factors could lead to inaccurate task performance prediction because of their interplay. To address this challenge, we developed a novel hierarchical machine learning approach that considers these three factors to predict task performance. We exposed twenty-eight participants to a two-step experimental study. The first step aimed to induce different affective states using a validated video database. The second step required participants to perform validated low and high cognitive workload-inducing tasks. To evaluate the performance, we compared the models developed using the hierarchical approach that uses emotional and physiological information, to models that use only physiological information. We observed that our proposed approach always outperformed the models that only use physiological information to predict task performance by achieving a better average person independent mean absolute error. However, information gained across various models using the hierarchical approach was not linear. Additionally, we found that the top predictors for each model varied, and the model with the highest information gain included emotional features. These findings suggest the importance of choosing the appropriate machine learning model and predictors for building robust models for predicting task performance.

References

[1]
Hussein A Abbass, William M Mount, D Tucek, and Jean-Philippe Pinheiro. 2011. Towards a code of best practice for evaluating air traffic control interfaces. In Australian Transport Research Forum, Adelaide, Australia.
[2]
Mustafa Al’Absi, Kenneth Hugdahl, and William R Lovallo. 2002. Adrenocortical stress responses and altered working memory performance. Psychophysiology 39, 1 (Jan. 2002), 95–99.
[3]
Amy L Alexander, Christopher D Wickens, and David H Merwin. 2005. Perspective and coplanar cockpit displays of traffic information: Implications for maneuver choice, flight safety, and mental workload. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 15, 1 (Nov. 2005), 1–21.
[4]
Hasan Ayaz, Ben Willems, B Bunce, Patricia A Shewokis, Kurtulus Izzetoglu, Sehchang Hah, Atul Deshmukh, and Banu Onaral. 2010. Cognitive workload assessment of air traffic controllers using optical brain imaging sensors. Advances in understanding human performance: Neuroergonomics, human factors design, and special populations (May 2010), 21–31.
[5]
Ashwin Ramesh Babu, Akilesh Rajavenkatanarayanan, James Robert Brady, and Fillia Makedon. 2018. Multimodal approach for cognitive task performance prediction from body postures, facial expressions and EEG signal. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Modeling Cognitive Processes from Multimodal Data. 1–7.
[6]
Chris Berka, Daniel J Levendowski, Milenko M Cvetinovic, Miroslav M Petrovic, Gene Davis, Michelle N Lumicao, Vladimir T Zivkovic, Miodrag V Popovic, and Richard Olmstead. 2004. Real-time analysis of EEG indexes of alertness, cognition, and memory acquired with a wireless EEG headset. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 17, 2 (June 2004), 151–170.
[7]
Gary G Berntson, J Thomas Bigger Jr, Dwain L Eckberg, Paul Grossman, Peter G Kaufmann, Marek Malik, Haikady N Nagaraja, Stephen W Porges, J Philip Saul, Peter H Stone, 1997. Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology 34, 6 (Nov. 1997), 623–648.
[8]
Gunilla Bohlin. 1976. Delayed habituation of the electrodermal orienting response as a function of increased level of arousal. Psychophysiology 13, 4 (July 1976), 345–351.
[9]
Margaret M Bradley and Peter J Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 25, 1 (March 1994), 49–59.
[10]
Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45, 1 (Oct. 2001), 5–32.
[11]
Per Brodal. 2004. The central nervous system: structure and function. Oxford University Press.
[12]
John G Casali and Walter W Wierwille. 1984. On the measurement of pilot perceptual workload: a comparison of assessment techniques addressing sensitivity and intrusion issues. Ergonomics 27, 10 (May 1984), 1033–1050.
[13]
DF Cechetto, CB Saper, AD Loewy, and KM Spyer. 1990. Central regulation of autonomic functions. Oxford University Press, New York(1990), 208–223.
[14]
Rebecca L Charles and Jim Nixon. 2019. Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review. Applied ergonomics 74 (Jan. 2019), 221–232.
[15]
Zi Cheng, Lin Shu, Jinyan Xie, and CL Philip Chen. 2017. A novel ECG-based real-time detection method of negative emotions in wearable applications. In Conference on Security, Pattern Analysis, and Cybernetics.
[16]
Burcu Cinaz, Bert Arnrich, Roberto La Marca, and Gerhard Tröster. 2013. Monitoring of mental workload levels during an everyday life office-work scenario. Personal and ubiquitous computing 17, 2 (Oct. 2013), 229–239.
[17]
Michel De Rivecourt, MN Kuperus, WJ Post, and LJM Mulder. 2008. Cardiovascular and eye activity measures as indices for momentary changes in mental effort during simulated flight. Ergonomics 51, 9 (Sept. 2008), 1295–1319.
[18]
AK Dey and DD Mann. 2010. A complete task analysis to measure the workload associated with operating an agricultural sprayer equipped with a navigation device. Applied ergonomics 41, 1 (Jan. 2010), 146–149.
[19]
Mark S Edwards, Philippa Moore, James C Champion, and Elizabeth J Edwards. 2015. Effects of trait anxiety and situational stress on attentional shifting are buffered by working memory capacity. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping 28, 1 (April 2015), 1–16.
[20]
Stephen H Fairclough and Louise Venables. 2006. Prediction of subjective states from psychophysiology: A multivariate approach. Biological psychology 71, 1 (Jan. 2006), 100–110.
[21]
Jianzhong Fan, Haihui Li, Yu Zhan, and Yajun Yu. 2019. An electrocardiogram acquisition and analysis system for detection of human stress. In International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics.
[22]
L Finsen, K Søgaard, C Jensen, V Borg, and H Christensen. 2001. Muscle activity and cardiovascular response during computer-mouse work with and without memory demands. Ergonomics 44, 14 (Nov. 2001), 1312–1329.
[23]
Hannah J Foy and Peter Chapman. 2018. Mental workload is reflected in driver behaviour, physiology, eye movements and prefrontal cortex activation. Applied ergonomics 73 (Nov. 2018), 90–99.
[24]
Edith Galy. 2018. Consideration of several mental workload categories: perspectives for elaboration of new ergonomic recommendations concerning shiftwork. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science 19, 4 (Sept. 2018), 483–497.
[25]
Qin Gao, Yang Wang, Fei Song, Zhizhong Li, and Xiaolu Dong. 2013. Mental workload measurement for emergency operating procedures in digital nuclear power plants. Ergonomics 56, 7 (May 2013), 1070–1085.
[26]
Vishnunarayan Girishan Prabhu, Kevin Taaffe, Ronald Pirrallo, and Dotan Shvorin. 2020. Stress and burnout among attending and resident physicians in the ED: a comparative study. IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering 11, 1 (Aug. 2020), 1–10.
[27]
Alberto Greco, Antonio Lanata, Gaetano Valenza, Giuseppina Rota, Nicola Vanello, and Enzo Pasquale Scilingo. 2012. On the deconvolution analysis of electrodermal activity in bipolar patients. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 6691–6694.
[28]
Mark K Greenwald, Margaret M Bradley, Alfons O Hamm, and PJ Lang. 1993. Looking at pictures: evaluative, facial, visceral and behavioral responses. Psychophysiology 30, 3 (May 1993), 261–273.
[29]
Han-Wen Guo, Yu-Shun Huang, Chien-Hung Lin, Jen-Chien Chien, Koichi Haraikawa, and Jiann-Shing Shieh. 2016. Heart rate variability signal features for emotion recognition by using principal component analysis and support vectors machine. In Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE). 274–277.
[30]
Peter A Hancock and Paula A Desmond. 2001. Stress, workload, and fatigue. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[31]
Peter A Hancock and Gerald Matthews. 2019. Workload and performance: Associations, insensitivities, and dissociations. Human factors 61, 3 (Dec. 2019), 374–392.
[32]
Nis Hjortskov, Dag Rissén, Anne Katrine Blangsted, Nils Fallentin, Ulf Lundberg, and Karen Søgaard. 2004. The effect of mental stress on heart rate variability and blood pressure during computer work. European journal of applied physiology 92, 1 (June 2004), 84–89.
[33]
G Robert J Hockey. 1997. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological psychology 45, 1-3 (March 1997), 73–93.
[34]
Eva Hudlicka and Michael D Mcneese. 2002. Assessment of user affective and belief states for interface adaptation: Application to an Air Force pilot task. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12, 1 (Feb. 2002), 1–47.
[35]
Sander Koelstra, Christian Muhl, Mohammad Soleymani, Jong-Seok Lee, Ashkan Yazdani, Touradj Ebrahimi, Thierry Pun, Anton Nijholt, and Ioannis Patras. 2011. Deap: A database for emotion analysis; using physiological signals. Transactions on affective computing 3, 1 (June 2011), 18–31.
[36]
Peter J Lang. 1995. The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American psychologist 50, 5 (May 1995), 372.
[37]
Peter J Lang, Margaret M Bradley, Bruce N Cuthbert, 1997. International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention 1, 39-58(1997), 3.
[38]
Ying Lean and Fu Shan. 2012. Brief review on physiological and biochemical evaluations of human mental workload. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 22, 3 (Nov. 2012), 177–187.
[39]
Gerhard Marquart, Christopher Cabrall, and Joost de Winter. 2015. Review of eye-related measures of drivers’ mental workload. Procedia Manufacturing 3(2015), 2854–2861.
[40]
Lukasz M Mazur, Prithima R Mosaly, Carlton Moore, and Lawrence Marks. 2019. Association of the usability of electronic health records with cognitive workload and performance levels among physicians. JAMA network open 2, 4 (April 2019), e191709–e191709.
[41]
Albert Mehrabian. 1997. Comparison of the PAD and PANAS as models for describing emotions and for differentiating anxiety from depression. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment 19, 4 (Dec. 1997), 331–357.
[42]
Jim Nixon and Rebecca Charles. 2017. Understanding the human performance envelope using electrophysiological measures from wearable technology. Cognition, Technology & Work 19, 4 (Sept. 2017), 655–666.
[43]
Michalis Papakostas, Konstantinos Tsiakas, Theodoros Giannakopoulos, and Fillia Makedon. 2017. Towards predicting task performance from EEG signals. In Big Data.
[44]
Rosalind W Picard. 2000. Affective computing. MIT press.
[45]
Hugo F Posada-Quintero and Jeffrey B Bolkhovsky. 2019. Machine learning models for the identification of cognitive tasks using autonomic reactions from heart rate variability and electrodermal activity. Behavioral Sciences 9, 4 (April 2019), 45.
[46]
Rodney A Rhoades and David R Bell. 2012. Medical phisiology: Principles for clinical medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
[47]
Kenneth S Saladin. 2005. Human anatomy. Rex Bookstore.
[48]
Fred Shaffer and Jay P Ginsberg. 2017. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Frontiers in public health(2017), 258.
[49]
Mohammad Soleymani, Jeroen Lichtenauer, Thierry Pun, and Maja Pantic. 2011. A multimodal database for affect recognition and implicit tagging. IEEE transactions on affective computing 3, 1 (Aug. 2011), 42–55.
[50]
Barbara A Sorg and Paul Whitney. 1992. The effect of trait anxiety and situational stress on working memory capacity. Journal of research in personality 26, 3 (April 1992), 235–241.
[51]
Gaetano Valenza, Luca Citi, Antonio Lanatá, Enzo Pasquale Scilingo, and Riccardo Barbieri. 2014. Revealing real-time emotional responses: a personalized assessment based on heartbeat dynamics. Scientific reports 4, 1 (May 2014), 1–13.
[52]
Bram B Van Acker, Davy D Parmentier, Peter Vlerick, and Jelle Saldien. 2018. Understanding mental workload: from a clarifying concept analysis toward an implementable framework. Cognition, technology & work 20, 3 (Aug. 2018), 351–365.
[53]
Christopher D Wickens. 2002. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science 3, 2 (Nov. 2002), 159–177.
[54]
Wickens, Christopher D and McCarley, Jason S. 2019. Applied attention theory. CRC press.
[55]
Glenn F Wilson and Christopher A Russell. 2003. Real-time assessment of mental workload using psychophysiological measures and artificial neural networks. Human factors 45, 4 (Dec. 2003), 635–644.
[56]
Mark S Young and Neville A Stanton. 2002. Attention and automation: new perspectives on mental underload and performance. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science 3, 2 (2002), 178–194.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICMI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
November 2022
830 pages
ISBN:9781450393904
DOI:10.1145/3536221
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 November 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Affective Computing
  2. Cognitive workload
  3. Machine learning
  4. Physiological signals
  5. Task performance

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • National Science Fundation

Conference

ICMI '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 453 of 1,080 submissions, 42%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 229
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 06 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media