Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

A Study of Human–AI Symbiosis for Creative Work: Recent Developments and Future Directions in Deep Learning

Published: 26 September 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, are having an enormous impact on our society today. Record numbers of jobs previously held by people have been automated, from manufacturing to transportation to customer services. The concerns of AI replacing humans by taking over people's jobs need to be urgently addressed. This article investigates some promising different directions of AI development: Instead of using AI to replace people, we should use AI to team up with people so that both can work better and smarter. Human–AI symbiosis refers to people and AI working together to jointly solve problems and perform specific tasks. The recent developments in deep learning models and frameworks have significantly improved the efficiency and performance of human and AI collaborations. In this article, some research work on human–AI collaborative environments has been extensively studied and analyzed to reveal the progress in this field. Although the teaming of humans and machines includes many complex tasks, the development has been very promising. One of the main goals in this field is to develop additional capabilities in machines capable of being successful teammates with a human partner. The correctness of the outcomes is often determined by the underlying technology and how performance and human satisfaction are measured through the collaborative nature of the system. We conclude that the teaming of humans and AI, particularly deep learning, has the advantage of combining the power of AI with the human domain expertise to improve performance and create value. Human–AI symbiosis could be a promising future direction for AI's continuing integration into the world.

    References

    [1]
    Z. Lv, L. Qiao, A. Kumar Singh, and Q. Wang. 2021. AI-empowered IoT (internet of things) security for smart cities. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 21, 4 (July 2021), 99. DOI:
    [2]
    D. Jiang, L. Huo, P. Zhang, and Z. Lv. 2021. Energy-Efficient heterogeneous networking for electric vehicles networks in smart future cities. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 22, 3 (March 2021), 1868–1880. DOI:
    [3]
    M. Tanveer et al. 2020. Machine learning techniques for the diagnosis of alzheimer's disease. ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl. 16, 1s (April 2020), 30. DOI:
    [4]
    Z. Lv, D. Chen, and J. Li. 2021. Novel system design and implementation for the smart city vertical market. IEEE Commun. Mag. 61, 4 (April 2021), 126–131.
    [5]
    B. U. Mahmud and A. A. Sharmin. 2021. Deep insights of deepfake technology: A review. DOI:
    [6]
    Z. Lv, L. Qiao, and Q. Wang. 2021. Cognitive robotics on 5g networks. ACM Trans. Internet Things 21, 4 (July 2021), 92. DOI:
    [7]
    P. Chopade, S. Khan, K. Stoeffler, D. Edwards, Y. Rosen, and A. Von Davier. 2018. Framework for effective teamwork assessment in collaborative learning and problem solving. In CEUR Workshop Proc. 2153, 48–59.
    [8]
    O. C. Santos and J. G. Boticario. 2014. Involving users to improve the collaborative logical framework. Sci. World J., (January, 2014). DOI:
    [9]
    P. Burggräf, J. Wagner, B. Koke, and M. Bamberg. 2020. Performance assessment methodology for AI-supported decision-making in production management. Proc. CIRP 93 (2020), 891–896. DOI:
    [10]
    D. Wang et al. 2019. Human-AI collaboration in data science. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (November 2019), 24. DOI:
    [11]
    A. T. Nguyen et al. 2018. Believe it or not: Designing a human-Ai partnership for mixed-initiative fact-checking. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’18). 189–199. DOI:
    [12]
    PAI Staff. 2019. Human-AI Collaboration Framework and Case Studies. Retrieved Oct. 15, 2021 from https://partnershiponai.org/paper/human-ai-collaboration-framework-case-studies/.
    [13]
    H. James Wilson and Paul R. Daugherty. 2018. Humans and machines can enhance each other's strengths. Retrieved February 2, 2022 from https://hbr.org/2018/07/collaborative-intelligence-humans-and-ai-are-joining-forces.
    [14]
    J. Heard, R. Heald, C. Harriott, and J. Adams. 2019. A diagnostic human workload assessment algorithm for collaborative and supervisory human–robot teams. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. 8, 2 (2019), 1–30.
    [15]
    M. Gombolay, A. Bair, C. Huang, and J. Shah. 2017. Computational design of mixed-initiative human– robot teaming that considers human factors: situational awareness, workload, and workflow preferences. Int. J. Robot. Res. 36 (2017), 597–617.
    [16]
    P. Lasota, T. Fong, and J. Shah. 2017. A survey of methods for safe human-robot interaction. Found. Trends Robot. 5, 4 (2017), 261–349
    [17]
    D. Gorecky, M. Schmitt, M. Loskyll, and D. Zühlke. 2014. Human-machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN’14). 289–294.
    [18]
    V. Groom and C. Nass. 2007. Can robots be teammates? Interact. Stud. Soc. Behav. Commun. Biol. Artif. Syst. 8, 3 (November 2007), 483–500. DOI:
    [19]
    N. J. McNeese, M. Demir, N. J. Cooke, and C. Myers. 2018. Teaming with a synthetic teammate: Insights into human-autonomy teaming. Hum. Factors 60, 2 (2018), 262–273. DOI:
    [20]
    RC. O'Reilly, R. Bhattacharyya, M. D. Howard, and N. Ketz. 2011. Complementary learning systems. Cogn. Sci. 38, 6 (2014 Aug), 1229–48. DOI:. x. Epub 2011 Dec 5. 22141588.
    [21]
    Stephanie Kanowitz. 2021. Human-AI Teaming for DC-based Emergency Response. Retrieved February 2, 2022 from https://gcn.com/data-analytics/2021/04/human-ai-teaming-for-dc-based-emergency-response/315332/.
    [22]
    I. Seeber et al. 2020. Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration. Inf. Manag. 57, 2 (March 2020), 103174. DOI:
    [23]
    J. Schmidt, M. R. G. Marques, S. Botti et al. 2019. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj Comput. Mater. 5 (2019), 83.
    [24]
    B. U. Mahmud, S. S. Bose, M. M. R. Majumder, M. S. Arefin, and A. Sharmin. 2020. Ecommerce product rating system based on senti-lexicon analysis. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 9, 8 (2020). 369–373. DOI:
    [25]
    M. R. Majumder, B. U. Mahmud, B. Jahan, and M. Alam. 2019. Offline optical character recognition (OCR) method: An effective method for scanned documents. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT’19). IEEE, 1–5.
    [26]
    B. U. Mahmud and A. Sharmin. 2022. Impact analysis of harassment against women using association rule mining approaches: Bangladesh prospective. arXiv:2202.01308. https://arXiv.org/abs/2202.01308.
    [27]
    S. Corbett-Davies, E. Pierson, A. Feller, S. Goel, and A. Huq. 2017. Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Part F1296. 797–806. DOI:
    [28]
    H. Lakkaraju, J. Kleinberg, J. Leskovec, J. Ludwig, and S. Mullainathan. 2017. The selective labels problem: Evaluating algorithmic predictions in the presence of unobservables. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'17). 275–284.
    [29]
    N. Kilbertus, M. Rojas Carulla, G. Parascandolo, M. Hardt, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf. 2017. Avoiding discrimination through causal reasoning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 30.
    [30]
    D. Wei. 2020. Optimal policies for the homogeneous selective labels problem. DOI:
    [31]
    L. Matheson, F. M. Lacey, and J. Jesson. 2011. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. SAGE Publications.
    [32]
    F. Weidt and R. L. Silva. 2016. Systematic Literature Review in Computer Science—A Practical Guide.
    [33]
    Frâncila Weidt Neiva, José Maria N. David, Regina Braga, and Fernanda Campos. 2016. Towards pragmatic interoperability to support collaboration: A systematic review and mapping of the literature. Inf. Softw. Technol. 72 (2016), 137–150.
    [34]
    D. Adiwardana, M. T. Luong, D. R. So, J. Hall, N. Fiedel, R. Thoppilan, and Q. V. Le. 2020. Towards a human-like open-domain chatbot. arXiv:2001.09977. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.09977.
    [35]
    D. R. So, C. Liang, and Q. V. Le. 2019. The evolved transformer. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’19). 10315–10328.
    [36]
    L. F. D'Haro et al. 2015. A neural conversational model (Seq-to-Seq on Chatbot). Nat. Lang. Dialog Syst. Intell. Assist. 37 (2015), 233–239.
    [37]
    W. Yin. 2020. Meta-learning for few-shot natural language processing: A survey. CoRR2007.09604, (2020).
    [38]
    Y. Wang, Q. Yao, J. T. Kwok, and L. M. Ni. 2020. Generalizing from a few examples: A survey on few-shot learning. ACM Comput. Surv. 53, 3 (2020), 1–34. DOI:
    [39]
    N. Akoury, S. Wang, J. Whiting, S. Hood, N. Peng, and M. Iyyer. 2020. STORIUM: A dataset and evaluation platform for machine-in-the-loop story generation. arXiv:2010.01717. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01717.
    [40]
    M. Iyyer, A. Guha, S. Chaturvedi, J. Boyd-Graber, and H. D. Iii. 2021. Feuding Families and Former Friends: Unsupervised Learning for Dynamic Fictional Relationships. Retrieved October 26, 2021 from http://github.com/.
    [41]
    Better Language Models and Their Implications. Retrieved October 26, 2021 from https://openai.com/blog/better-language-models/.
    [42]
    Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summarization Branches Out. Association for Computational Linguistics, 74–81.
    [43]
    R. Sennrich, B. Haddow, and A. Birch. 2016. Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1715–1725.
    [44]
    T. Zhao, R. Zhao, and M. Eskenazi. 2017. Learning discourse-level diversity for neural dialog models using conditional variational autoencoders. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association Computer Linguistics (ACL’17). 654–664. DOI:
    [45]
    Steven Levy. 2015. Inside Deep Dreams: How Google Made Its Computers Go Crazy. Retrieved October 01, 2021 from https://www.wired.com/2015/12/inside-deep-dreams-how-google-made-its-computers-go-crazy/.
    [46]
    Alexander Mordvintsev et al. 2015. Google AI Blog: Inceptionism: Going Deeper into Neural Networks. Retrieved October 01 2021 from https://ai.googleblog.com/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html.
    [47]
    N. Davis, C.-P. Hsiao, K. Yashraj Singh, L. Li, and B. Magerko. 2016. Empirically studying participatory sense-making in abstract drawing with a co-creative cognitive agent. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'16). 196–207.
    [48]
    P. Karimi, M. Lou Maher, N. Davis, and K. Grace. 2019. Deep learning in a computational model for conceptual shifts in a co-creative design system. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC’19). 17–24.
    [49]
    J. E. Fan, M. Dinculescu, and D. Ha. 2019. Collabdraw: An environment for collaborative sketching with an artificial agent. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (CC’19). 556–561. DOI:
    [50]
    M. Cooney and P. Berck. 2019. Designing a robot which paints with a human: Visual metaphors to convey contingency and artistry. In ICRA-X Robotic Art Forum.
    [51]
    C. Oh, J. Song, J. Choi, S. Kim, S. Lee, and B. Suh. 2018. I lead, you help but only with enough details: Understanding the user experience of co-creation with artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. DOI:
    [52]
    David Ha et al. 2017. Draw Together with a Neural Network. Retrieved October 05, 2021 from https://magenta.tensorflow.org/sketch-rnn-demo/.
    [53]
    I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio. 2014. Generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the Conference and Workshop on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’14).
    [54]
    Simon Chandler. 2020. Why Deepfakes Are a Net Positive for Humanity. Retrieved December 2 2021, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonchandler/2020/.
    [55]
    Geraint Rees. 2019. Here's how deepfake technology can actually be a good thing. Retrieved December 1, 2021 from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/advantages-ofartificial-intelligence/.
    [56]
    Patrick L. Plaisance. 2019. Ethics and “Synthetic Media.” Retrieved December 5, 2021 from https://www.psychologytoday.com/sg/blog/virtue-in-themedia-world/201909/ethics-and-syntheticmedia.
    [57]
    David Bau, Jun-Yan Zhu, Hendrik Strobelt, Bolei Zhou, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, William T. Freeman, and Antonio Torralba. 2019. GAN dissection: Visualizing and understanding generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).
    [58]
    Z. Cheng, H. Sun, M. Takeuchi, and J. Katto. 2019. Energy compaction-based image compression using convolutional autoencoder. IEEE Trans. Multimedia. DOI:
    [59]
    A. Dickson and E. J. Dickson. 2021. Deepfake porn is still a threat, particularly for K-Pop stars. Retrieved December 2, 2021 from https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culturenews/deepfakes-nonconsensual-porn-study-kpop895605/.
    [60]
    James Vincent. 2019. New AI deepfake app creates nude images of women in seconds. Retrieved December 5, 2021 from https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/27/18760896/deepfakenude-ai-app-women-deepnude-non-consensualpornography.
    [61]
    Joseph Foley. 2021. 10 Deepfake Example That Terrified and Amused the Internet. Retrieved December 3, 2021 from https://www.creativebloq.com/features/deepfake-videosexamples.
    [62]
    D. Williams. 2016. The History of Augmented Reality. Retrieved February 5, 2022 from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-history-of-augmented-_b_9955048.
    [63]
    T. Alldieck, M. Magnor, B. L. Bhatnagar, C. Theobalt, and G. Pons-Moll. 2019. Learning to reconstruct people in clothing from a single RGB camera. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1175–1186.
    [64]
    B. U. Mahmud, R. D. Shuva, S. S. Bose, M. M. R. Majumder, B. Jahan, and M. M. Alam. 2019. A proposed method for recognizing complex hand drawn graphs using digital geometric techniques. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 4.0 (STI’19). IEEE, 1–6. DOI:
    [65]
    Bahar Uddin Mahmud, Shib Shankar Bose, and Afsana Sharmin. 2020. Image histogram equalization using parallel processing (GPU computation) in open CL to correct the contrast of images. J. Comput. Aid. Parallel Program. 5, 1 (2020), 1–18.
    [66]
    Z. Lähner, D. Cremers, and T. Tung. 2018. DeepWrinkles: Accurate and realistic clothing modeling. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 698–715.
    [67]
    G. Tiwari, B. L. Bhatnagar, T. Tung, and G. Pons-Moll. 2020. SIZER: A dataset and model for parsing 3D clothing and learning size sensitive 3D clothing. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 1–18.
    [68]
    B. Deng, J. P. Lewis, T. Jeruzalski, G. Pons-Moll, G. Hinton, M. Norouzi, and A. Tagliasacchi. 2020. NASA neural articulated shape approximation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Cham. 612–628.
    [69]
    G. Tiwari, N. Sarafianos, T. Tung, and G. Pons-Moll. 2021. Neural-GIF: Neural generalized implicit functions for animating people in clothing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 11708–11718.
    [70]
    S. Saito, J. Yang, Q. Ma, and M. J. Black. 2021. SCANimate: Weakly supervised learning of skinned clothed avatar networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2886–2897.
    [71]
    M. Mihajlovic, Y. Zhang, M. J. Black, and S. Tang, 2021. LEAP: Learning articulated occupancy of people. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 10461–10471.
    [72]
    Stan Sclaroff and Alex Pentland. 1991. Generalized implicit functions for computer graphics. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 25, 4 (July 1991), 247–250. DOI:
    [73]
    Q. Ma, J. Yang, A. Ranjan, S. Pujades, G. Pons-Moll, S. Tang, and M. J. Black. 2020. Learning to dress 3d people in generative clothing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 6469–6478.
    [74]
    F. Bogo, J. Romero, G. Pons-Moll, and M. Black. 2017. Dynamic FAUST: Registering human bodies in motion. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’17).
    [75]
    D. Xiang, F. Prada, T. Bagautdinov, W. Xu, Y. Dong, H. Wen, ... and C. Wu. 2021. Modeling clothing as a separate layer for an animatable human avatar. ACM Trans. Graph. 40, 6 (2021), 1–15.
    [76]
    M. Arjovsky and L. Bottou. 2017. Towards principled methods for training generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1701.04862. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.04862.
    [77]
    N. Cooke, J. Gorman, C. Myers, and J. Duran. 2013. Interactive team cognition. Cogn. Sci. 37, 2 (2013), 255–285
    [78]
    Min Hun Lee, Daniel P. Siewiorek, Asim Smailagic, Alexandre Bernardino, and Sergi Bermúdez i Badia. 2021. A Human-AI collaborative approach for clinical decision making on rehabilitation assessment. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'21). ACM, New York, NY.
    [79]
    D. Bennett, S. Bode, M. Brydevall, H. Warren, and C. Murawski. 2016. Intrinsic valuation of information in decision making under uncertainty. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, 7.
    [80]
    A. Landrum, B. Eaves, and P. Shafto. 2015. Learning to trust and trusting to learn: A theoretical framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 3 (2015), 109–111.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Crafting Seeding Imagery for Artmaking Generative AI ToolsComputational Practices and Applications for Digital Art and Crafting10.4018/979-8-3693-2927-6.ch002(21-46)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of 3D Volumetric Image and Microstructural AnalysisSensors10.3390/s2305264023:5(2640)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2023

    Index Terms

    1. A Study of Human–AI Symbiosis for Creative Work: Recent Developments and Future Directions in Deep Learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
      ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 20, Issue 2
      February 2024
      548 pages
      ISSN:1551-6857
      EISSN:1551-6865
      DOI:10.1145/3613570
      • Editor:
      • Abdulmotaleb El Saddik
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 September 2023
      Online AM: 28 July 2022
      Accepted: 06 May 2022
      Revised: 15 March 2022
      Received: 12 December 2021
      Published in TOMM Volume 20, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Human–AI collaboration
      2. human–AI teaming
      3. artificial intelligence
      4. collaborative concept development

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2,203
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)158
      Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Crafting Seeding Imagery for Artmaking Generative AI ToolsComputational Practices and Applications for Digital Art and Crafting10.4018/979-8-3693-2927-6.ch002(21-46)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
      • (2023)Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of 3D Volumetric Image and Microstructural AnalysisSensors10.3390/s2305264023:5(2640)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2023

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      Full Text

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media