Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3543106.3543112acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Examining Entrepreneurship Ecosystem for Digital Startup towards Sustainability after the Pandemic

Published: 22 August 2022 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    To encourage entrepreneurship as one of the main sources of economic growth in Indonesia, it is necessary to integrate every element that supports entrepreneurship. The elements are reflected in an integrated and mutually reinforcing entrepreneurial ecosystem. The establishment and strengthening of the entrepreneurial ecosystem are important to accelerate Indonesia as an emerging country towards sustainability. This research aims to find out the interconnected link between stakeholders in the entrepreneurial ecosystem in Indonesia. The role of ecosystem highlights digitalization and innovation for sustainable, inclusive economic development. By using a qualitative approach, this research answered who and how the actors are involved in the entrepreneurial ecosystem so that stakeholders and the drivers of entrepreneurship are expected to have much greater opportunities. This research focused on digital startups since the startups are the future of the country's supremacy. The framework of the entrepreneurship ecosystem is provided to help shape the mindset and work patterns of stakeholders in designing a sustainable program and ultimately raise the productivity and competitiveness of the Indonesian industry through digitalization and innovation.

    References

    [1]
    Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A. and Balocco, R., 2019. Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(4), 1291-1321.
    [2]
    Dhewanto, W., Lantu, D.C., Herliana, S. and Anggadwita, G., 2015. The innovation cluster of ICT start-up companies in developing countries: case of Bandung, Indonesia. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 32-46.
    [3]
    Moogk, D.R., 2012. Minimum viable product and the importance of experimentation in technology startups. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(3).
    [4]
    Katadata Insight Center, 2020, Strategi Bertahan Startup Digital di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Retrieved from https://katadata.co.id/katadatainsightscenter/analisisdata/5f1a622e0cc46/strategi-bertahan-startup-digital-di-tengah-pandemi-covid-19
    [5]
    Sulaeman, 2021, Imbas 1 Tahun Pandemi, Jumlah Startup di Indonesia Alami Penurunan. Retrieved from https://www.merdeka.com/uang/imbas-1-tahun-pandemi-jumlah-startup-di-indonesia-alami-penurunan.html?page=1
    [6]
    Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J. and Matsumoto, Y., 2018. A review of the ecosystem concept—Towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, pp.49-58.
    [7]
    Valkokari, K., 2015. Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: How they differ and how to survive and thrive within them. Technology innovation management review, 5(8).
    [8]
    Weber, M.L. and Hine, M., 2015. Who inhabits a business ecosystem? The technospecies as a unifying concept. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(5), pp.31-44.
    [9]
    Alizadeh, N., Dariani, H.E. and Smida, A., 2017. Business Ecosystem, a Secured Strategy to Gain Competitive Advantage According to SMOCS Model. International Business Research, 10(8), pp.72-79.
    [10]
    Kumar, P., Dass, M. and Kumar, S., 2015. From competitive advantage to nodal advantage: Ecosystem structure and the new five forces that affect prosperity. Business Horizons, 58(4), pp.469-481.
    [11]
    Stoycheva, M. and Ruskov, P., 2015, July. Growth mindset development pattern. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (pp. 1-6).
    [12]
    Zahra, S.A. and Nambisan, S., 2012. Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business horizons, 55(3), pp.219-229.
    [13]
    Audretsch, D.B., Cunningham, J.A., Kuratko, D.F., Lehmann, E.E. and Menter, M., 2019. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. The Journal of technology transfer, 44(2), pp.313-325.
    [14]
    Isenberg, D.J., 2010. How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard business review, 88(6), pp.40-50.
    [15]
    Boley, H. and Chang, E., 2007, February. Digital ecosystems: Principles and semantics. In 2007 Inaugural IEEE-IES Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference (pp. 398-403). IEEE.
    [16]
    Adner, R., 2006. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), p.98.
    [17]
    Malecki, E.J., 2018. Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography compass, 12(3), p.e12359.
    [18]
    Stam, E., 2015. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European planning studies, 23(9), pp.1759-1769.
    [19]
    Acs, Z.J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T. and Szerb, L., 2018. Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51(2), pp.501-514.
    [20]
    Knudsen, E.S., Lien, L.B., Timmermans, B., Belik, I. and Pandey, S., 2021. Stability in turbulent times? The effect of digitalization on the sustainability of competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 128, pp.360-369.
    [21]
    Zarrouk, H., Ghak, T.E. and Bakhouche, A., 2021. Exploring economic and technological determinants of FinTech startups’ success and growth in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), p.50.
    [22]
    Aaldering, L.J. and Song, C.H., 2021. Of leaders and laggards-Towards digitalization of the process industries. Technovation, 105, p.102211.
    [23]
    Harris, L., Rae, A. and Misner, I., 2012. Punching above their weight: the changing role of networking in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development.
    [24]
    Rocha, C.F., Mamédio, D.F. and Quandt, C.O., 2019. Startups and the innovation ecosystem in Industry 4.0. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(12), pp.1474-1487.
    [25]
    Lyytinen, K., Nambisan, S. and Yoo, Y., 2020. A transdisciplinary research agenda for digital innovation: key themes and directions for future research. In Handbook of digital innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
    [26]
    Schwab, L., Gold, S., Kunz, N. and Reiner, G., 2017. Sustainable business growth: Exploring operations decision-making. Journal of Global Responsibility.
    [27]
    D. Setyowati, Startup Besar Indonesia Melirik Potensi Bisnis Ramah Lingkungan. 2021, Retrieved from https://katadata.co.id/desysetyowati/digital/6033b13a4478b/startup-besar-indonesia-melirik-potensi-bisnis-ramah-lingkungan
    [28]
    Hapsari, S.A.D., Hutagaol, M.P. and Asmara, A., 2013. Pertumbuhan Inklusif: Fenomena Pertumbuhan Inklusif di Kawasan Indonesia Bagian Barat dan Indonesia Bagian Timur. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, 2(2), pp.85-112.
    [29]
    Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N. and Mustikaningtiyas, F., 2021. Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach. Heliyon, 7(3), p.e06453.
    [30]
    Ayuso, S. and Navarrete‐Báez, F.E., 2018. How does entrepreneurial and international orientation influence SMEs' commitment to sustainable development? Empirical evidence from Spain and Mexico. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), pp.80-94.
    [31]
    Amaeshi, K., Adegbite, E. and Rajwani, T., 2016. Corporate social responsibility in challenging and non-enabling institutional contexts: Do institutional voids matter?. Journal of business ethics, 134(1), pp.135-153.
    [32]
    Yeremeyev, I., Dychko, A., Remez, N., Kraychuk, S. and Ostapchuk, N., 2021. Problems of sustainable development of ecosystems. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 628, No. 1, p. 012014). IOP Publishing.
    [33]
    Saunders, M. and Lewis, P., 2017. Doing research in business and management. Pearson.
    [34]
    Mohajan, H.K., 2018. Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), pp.23-48.
    [35]
    Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2021, GEM 2020/2021 GLOBAL REPORT, Retrieved from https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-20202021-global-report
    [36]
    Shwetzer, C., Maritz, A. and Nguyen, Q., 2019. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic and dynamic approach. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration.

    Index Terms

    1. Examining Entrepreneurship Ecosystem for Digital Startup towards Sustainability after the Pandemic

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEMC '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on E-business and Mobile Commerce
      May 2022
      173 pages
      ISBN:9781450397162
      DOI:10.1145/3543106
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 August 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Digital Startup
      2. Entrepreneurship Ecosystem
      3. Sustainability

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ICEMC 2022

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 101
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media