Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3543106.3543125acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on Volatility Modeling of China's Oil Industry

Published: 22 August 2022 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Stock prices in the oil industry tend to fluctuate frequently, but violent price fluctuations will also have a serious impact on the lives of investors and residents. Companies in the oil industry often show many similar or related characteristics due to wilderness factors. This correlation between companies includes a risk spillover effect. This spillover effect should play a vital role in risk management and investment decision-making. If an econometric model to measure this effect can be got, the existing fundamental analysis will produce the effect of qualitative change: from qualitative analysis to quantitative analysis. Firstly, this paper will verify that this spillover effect is statistically real through the Granger causality test. Next, it needs to quantify the risk of a single company through the existing volatility models, including GARCH family models applicable for low-frequency data and HAR models applicable for high-frequency data. It is found that there is a causal relationship between the volatility of oil enterprises in China's stock market. In addition, through the volatility modeling of Sinopec, it is found that its logarithmic return series has obvious leverage effect, and its logarithmic return distribution also has obvious characteristics of high tail thick peak. Finally, The HAR model is used to predict the realized volatility series of Sinopec, and the final out of sample prediction RMSE is 4.49e-05.

    References

    [1]
    Kim HY, Won CH, 2018, Forecasting the volatility of stock price index: A hybrid model integrating LSTM with multiple GARCH-type models. Expert Syst Appl. 103:25-37.
    [2]
    Kristjanpoller W, Minutolo MC, 2016, Forecasting volatility of oil price using an artificial neural network-GARCH model. Expert Syst Appl. 65: 233-241.
    [3]
    Engle R. 1982, Auto Regressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimata of the Variance of UK Inflation[J]. Econometrica, 50(1): 987-1008.
    [4]
    Bollerslev T. 1986, Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3): 307-327.
    [5]
    Nelson D B. 1991, Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 59(2): 347-370.
    [6]
    Zakoian J M. 1994, Threshold Heteroskedastic Models[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18(5): 931-955.
    [7]
    Andersen T G, Bollerslev T. 1998, Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts[J]. International Economic Review, (39) 4: 885-905.
    [8]
    Corsi F. 2009, A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility[J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics,7(2): 174-196.
    [9]
    Gong, X., Lin, B., 2018. The incremental information content of investor fear gauge for volatility forecasting in the crude oil futures market. Energy Econ. 74, 370–386.
    [10]
    Goddard, J., Kita, A. and Wang, Q. 2015, “Investor attention and FX market volatility”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 38, pp. 79-96.
    [11]
    Yuze Li, Xuerong Li. 2021, The role of news sentiment in oil futures returns and volatility forecasting: Data-decomposition based deep learning approach [J]. Energy Economics, 95:105140.
    [12]
    Data source. Wind financial database. https://www.wind.com.cn/.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEMC '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on E-business and Mobile Commerce
    May 2022
    173 pages
    ISBN:9781450397162
    DOI:10.1145/3543106
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 August 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. GARCH-type model
    2. HAR model
    3. VAR model
    4. spillover effect
    5. volatility modeling

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICEMC 2022

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 23
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media