Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3543174.3547117acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cause-and-Effect Analysis of ADAS: A Comparison Study between Literature Review and Complaint Data

Published: 17 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are designed to improve vehicle safety. However, it is difficult to achieve such benefits without understanding the causes and limitations of the current ADAS and their possible solutions. This study 1) investigated the limitations and solutions of ADAS through a literature review, 2) identified the causes and effects of ADAS through consumer complaints using natural language processing models, and 3) compared the major differences between the two. These two lines of research identified similar categories of ADAS causes, including human factors, environmental factors, and vehicle factors. However, academic research focused more on human factors of ADAS issues and proposed advanced algorithms to mitigate such issues while drivers complained more of vehicle factors of ADAS failures, which led to associated top consequences. The findings from these two sources tend to complement each other and provide important implications for the improvement of ADAS in the future.

References

[1]
2022. Autonomous vehicles. https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/autonomous-vehicles/
[2]
Hillary Abraham, Chaiwoo Lee, Samantha Brady, Craig Fitzgerald, Bruce Mehler, Bryan Reimer, and Joseph F Coughlin. 2017. Autonomous vehicles and alternatives to driving: trust, preferences, and effects of age. In Proceedings of the transportation research board 96th annual meeting (TRB’17).
[3]
American Automobile Association 2019. Automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection. Retrieved January 20(2019), 2020. https://www.aaa.com/AAA/common/aar/files/Research-Report-Pedestrian-Detection.pdf
[4]
Jackie Ayoub, Lilit Avetisyan, Mustapha Makki, and Feng Zhou. 2021. An Investigation of Drivers’ Dynamic Situational Trust in Conditionally Automated Driving. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems(2021).
[5]
Jackie Ayoub, X Jessie Yang, and Feng Zhou. 2021. Combat COVID-19 infodemic using explainable natural language processing models. Information Processing & Management 58, 4 (2021), 102569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102569
[6]
Jackie Ayoub, X Jessie Yang, and Feng Zhou. 2021. Modeling dispositional and initial learned trust in automated vehicles with predictability and explainability. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 77 (2021), 102–116.
[7]
BMW. [n.d.]. BMW X3 — Owner’s Manual. BMW.
[8]
Marine Capallera, Quentin Meteier, Emmanuel de Salis, Leonardo Angelini, Stefano Carrino, Omar Abou Khaled, and Elena Mugellini. 2019. Owner manuals review and taxonomy of ADAS limitations in partially automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344530
[9]
Redge Melroy Castelino, Gabriel Passos Moreira Pinheiro, Bruno Justino Garcia Praciano, Giovanni Almeida Santos, Lothar Weichenberger, and Rafael Timóteo De Sousa Júnior. 2020. Improving the Accuracy of Pedestrian Detection in Partially Occluded or Obstructed Scenarios. In 2020 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). IEEE, 834–838. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT49673.2020.9208877
[10]
Chongpu Chen, Jianhua Guo, Chong Guo, Chaoyi Chen, Yao Zhang, and Jiawei Wang. 2021. Adaptive Cruise Control for Cut-In Scenarios Based on Model Predictive Control Algorithm. Applied Sciences 11, 11 (2021), 5293. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115293
[11]
Qiang Chen, Miao Lin, Bing Dai, and Jiguang Chen. 2015. Typical pedestrian accident scenarios in China and crash severity mitigation by autonomous emergency braking systems. In SAE 2015 World Congress Proceedings. SAE International. https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1464.
[12]
Shizeng Chen, Bijun Li, Yuan Guo, and Jian Zhou. 2019. Lane Detection Based on Histogram of Oriented Vanishing Points. In Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition. Springer, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3651-9_1
[13]
Wen-Hui Chen, Chi-Wei Kuan, and Chuan-Cho Chiang. 2020. Integrating Multiscale Deformable Part Models and Convolutional Networks for Pedestrian Detection. In VEHITS. 515–521.
[14]
Jiyong Cho and Jeongyun Heo. 2020. The More You Know, The More You Can Trust: Drivers’ Understanding of the Advanced Driver Assistance System. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50523-3_16
[15]
Jessica B Cicchino. 2017. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. Accident Analysis & Prevention 99 (2017), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009
[16]
Kevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V Le, and Christopher D Manning. 2020. Electra: Pre-training text encoders as discriminators rather than generators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.10555(2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.10555
[17]
Caroline Crump, David Cades, Benjamin Lester, Scott Reed, Brandon Barakat, Laurene Milan, and Douglas Young. 2016. Differing perceptions of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 60. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 861–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601197
[18]
Qi Deng, Maryam Saleh, Foghor Tanshi, and Dirk Söffker. 2020. Online intention recognition applied to real simulated driving maneuvers. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA). IEEE, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogSIMA49017.2020.9216115
[19]
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805(2018). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805
[20]
Xiangyu Gao, Sumit Roy, and Guanbin Xing. 2021. MIMO-SAR: A Hierarchical High-Resolution Imaging Algorithm for mmWave FMCW Radar in Autonomous Driving. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 70, 8 (2021), 7322–7334. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2021.3092355
[21]
Christopher Goodin, Daniel Carruth, Matthew Doude, and Christopher Hudson. 2019. Predicting the Influence of Rain on LIDAR in ADAS. Electronics 8, 1 (2019), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8010089
[22]
Hsiang-Yu Han, Yu-Chi Chen, Pei-Yung Hsiao, and Li-Chen Fu. 2020. Using channel-wise attention for deep CNN based real-time semantic segmentation with class-aware edge information. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22, 2(2020), 1041–1051. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2962094
[23]
Iris Hendrickx, Su Nam Kim, Zornitsa Kozareva, Preslav Nakov, Diarmuid O Séaghdha, Sebastian Padó, Marco Pennacchiotti, Lorenza Romano, and Stan Szpakowicz. 2019. Semeval-2010 task 8: Multi-way classification of semantic relations between pairs of nominals. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.10422(2019). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.10422
[24]
Danyang Huang, Zhiheng Zhou, Ming Deng, and Zhihao Li. 2021. Nighttime vehicle detection based on direction attention network and bayes corner localization. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy SystemsPreprint (2021), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-202676
[25]
Xin Huang, Stephen G McGill, Jonathan A DeCastro, Luke Fletcher, John J Leonard, Brian C Williams, and Guy Rosman. 2021. CARPAL: Confidence-aware intent recognition for parallel autonomy. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6, 3 (2021), 4433–4440. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3068894
[26]
Lydia Jin, Brian C Tefft, and William J Horrey. 2019. Mining consumer complaints to identify unsuccessful interactions with advanced driver assistance systems. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings. 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351313
[27]
Daejun Kang and Dongsuk Kum. 2020. Camera and radar sensor fusion for robust vehicle localization via vehicle part localization. IEEE Access 8(2020), 75223–75236. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985075
[28]
Nima Khairdoost, Mohsen Shirpour, Michael A Bauer, and Steven S Beauchemin. 2020. Real-time driver maneuver prediction using LSTM. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 5, 4 (2020), 714–724. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2020.3003889
[29]
Hussam Ullah Khan, Afsheen Rafaqat Ali, Ali Hassan, Ahmed Ali, Wajahat Kazmi, and Aamer Zaheer. 2020. Lane detection using lane boundary marker network with road geometry constraints. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. 1834–1843.
[30]
David G Kidd, Jessica B Cicchino, Ian J Reagan, and Laura B Kerfoot. 2017. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles. Traffic injury prevention 18, sup1 (2017), S44–S50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1297532
[31]
Dae Jung Kim, Jin Sung Kim, Jin Ho Yang, Seok Cheol Kee, and Chung Choo Chung. 2021. Lane change intention classification of surrounding vehicles utilizing open set recognition. IEEE Access 9(2021), 57589–57602. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072413
[32]
Jihun Kim, Dong Seog Han, and Benaoumeur Senouci. 2018. Radar and Vision Sensor Fusion for Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicle Surroundings. In 2018 Tenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN). 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUFN.2018.8436959
[33]
Mila Kotur, Nemanja Lukić, Momčilo Krunić, and Željko Lukač. 2021. Camera and LiDAR Sensor Fusion for 3D Object Tracking in a Collision Avoidance System. In 2021 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC). IEEE, 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1109/ZINC52049.2021.9499281
[34]
Mila Kotur, Nemanja Lukić, Momčilo Krunić, and Željko Lukač. 2021. Camera and LiDAR Sensor Fusion for 3D Object Tracking in a Collision Avoidance System. In 2021 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC). 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1109/ZINC52049.2021.9499281
[35]
Kristofer D Kusano and Hampton C Gabler. 2012. Safety benefits of forward collision warning, brake assist, and autonomous braking systems in rear-end collisions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 13, 4(2012), 1546–1555. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2012.2191542
[36]
Kristofer D Kusano and Hampton C Gabler. 2015. Comparison of expected crash and injury reduction from production forward collision and lane departure warning systems. Traffic injury prevention 16, sup2 (2015), S109–S114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2015.1063619
[37]
Dongwook Lee, Ji-Chul Kim, Mingeuk Kim, and Hanmin Lee. 2021. Intelligent tire sensor-based real-time road surface classification using an artificial neural network. Sensors 21, 9 (2021), 3233. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093233
[38]
Wenhui Li, Feng Qu, Jialun Liu, Fengdong Sun, and Ying Wang. 2020. A lane detection network based on IBN and attention. Multimedia Tools and Applications 79, 23 (2020), 16473–16486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7475-x
[39]
Kiho Lim, Tariqul Islam, Hyunbum Kim, and Jingon Joung. 2020. A Sybil Attack Detection Scheme based on ADAS Sensors for Vehicular Networks. In 2020 IEEE 17th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC46108.2020.9045356
[40]
Huei-Yung Lin, Jyun-Min Dai, Lu-Ting Wu, and Li-Qi Chen. 2020. A vision-based driver assistance system with forward collision and overtaking detection. Sensors 20, 18 (2020), 5139. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185139
[41]
Ashley McDonald, Cher Carney, and Daniel V McGehee. 2018. Vehicle owners’ experiences with and reactions to advanced driver assistance systems. (2018).
[42]
Dietmar PF Möller, Isabell A Jehle, and Roland E Haas. 2018. Challenges for vehicular cybersecurity. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT). IEEE, 0428–0433. https://doi.org/10.1109/EIT.2018.8500208
[43]
Alexandra S Mueller, Ian J Reagan, and Jessica B Cicchino. 2021. Addressing Driver Disengagement and Proper System Use: Human Factors Recommendations for Level 2 Driving Automation Design. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 15, 1 (2021), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343420983126
[44]
Jason Nataprawira, Yanlei Gu, Igor Goncharenko, and Shunsuke Kamijo. 2021. Pedestrian detection using multispectral images and a deep neural network. Sensors 21, 7 (2021), 2536. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072536
[45]
NHTSA. 2011. Vehicle Owner’s Complaint Database. Retrieved October 7, 2011 from http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/downloads/
[46]
Raja Parasuraman and Victor Riley. 1997. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human factors 39, 2 (1997), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886
[47]
A Paul, R Chauhan, R Srivastava, and M Baruah. [n.d.]. Advanced driver assistance systems. 2016. SAE Technical Paper([n. d.]).
[48]
Francesco Piccoli, Rajarathnam Balakrishnan, Maria Jesus Perez, Moraldeepsingh Sachdeo, Carlos Nunez, Matthew Tang, Kajsa Andreasson, Kalle Bjurek, Ria Dass Raj, Ebba Davidsson, 2020. Fussi-net: Fusion of spatio-temporal skeletons for intention prediction network. In 2020 54th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. IEEE, 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF51394.2020.9443552
[49]
Ian J Reagan and Anne T McCartt. 2016. Observed activation status of lane departure warning and forward collision warning of Honda vehicles at dealership service centers. Traffic injury prevention 17, 8 (2016), 827–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2016.1149698
[50]
JH Richardson. 2001. Human factors research priorities for ADAS systems: a UK perspective. In 2001 ADAS. International Conference on Advanced Driver Assistance Systems,(IEE Conf. Publ. No. 483). IET, 20–24.
[51]
Chang-Gyun Roh, Jisoo Kim, and I-Jeong Im. 2020. Analysis of impact of rain conditions on ADAS. Sensors 20, 23 (2020), 6720. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236720
[52]
Eldar Šabanovič, Vidas Žuraulis, Olegas Prentkovskis, and Viktor Skrickij. 2020. Identification of road-surface type using deep neural networks for friction coefficient estimation. Sensors 20, 3 (2020), 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030612
[53]
J Seo, S Oh, and YK Kim. 2021. A study of curved lane detection based on dual sensor monitoring of LiDAR and camera. Transaction of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 29, 2(2021), 197–204.
[54]
Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Tao Qin, Jianfeng Lu, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2020. Mpnet: Masked and permuted pre-training for language understanding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 16857–16867.
[55]
Neville A Stanton and Mark S Young. 2005. Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics 48, 10 (2005), 1294–1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130500252990
[56]
Haitian Sun, Takumi Nakane, Naidan Zhang, and Chao Zhang. 2021. Evolutionary Rear-Lamp Tracking at Nighttime. IEEE Access 9(2021), 86667–86676. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3087238
[57]
Ting Yau Teo, Ricky Sutopo, Joanne Mun-Yee Lim, and KokSheik Wong. 2021. Innovative lane detection method to increase the accuracy of lane departure warning system. Multimedia Tools and Applications 80, 2 (2021), 2063–2080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09819-0
[58]
Eric R Teoh. 2021. Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates. Traffic injury prevention 22, 4 (2021), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.1893700
[59]
Jun Tian, Shiwang Liu, Xunyu Zhong, and Jianping Zeng. 2021. LSD-based adaptive lane detection and tracking for ADAS in structured road environment. Soft Computing 25, 7 (2021), 5709–5722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05566-4
[60]
Paulius Tumas, Artūras Serackis, and Adam Nowosielski. 2021. Augmentation of Severe Weather Impact to Far-Infrared Sensor Images to Improve Pedestrian Detection System. Electronics 10, 8 (2021), 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10080934
[61]
Masahiro Umehira, Takeo Okuda, Xiaoyan Wang, Shigeki Takeda, and Hiroshi Kuroda. 2020. An Adaptive Interference Detection and Suppression Scheme Using Iterative Processing for Automotive FMCW Radars. In 2020 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf20). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/RadarConf2043947.2020.9266712
[62]
Simona Vermiglio, Victor Champaney, Abel Sancarlos, Fatima Daim, Jean Claude Kedzia, Jean Louis Duval, Pedro Diez, and Francisco Chinesta. 2020. Parametric Electromagnetic Analysis of Radar-Based Advanced Driver Assistant Systems. Sensors 20, 19 (Oct 2020), 5686. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20195686
[63]
Yao Wang, Fangfa Fu, Fengchang Lai, Weizhe Xu, Jinjin Shi, and Jinxiang Wang. 2018. Efficient road specular reflection removal based on gradient properties. Multimedia Tools and Applications 77, 23 (2018), 30615–30631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6156-5
[64]
Ziran Wang, Xishun Liao, Chao Wang, David Oswald, Guoyuan Wu, Kanok Boriboonsomsin, Matthew J Barth, Kyungtae Han, BaekGyu Kim, and Prashant Tiwari. 2020. Driver behavior modeling using game engine and real vehicle: A learning-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 5, 4 (2020), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2020.2991948
[65]
Mark Wielitzka, Matthias Dagen, and Tobias Ortmaier. 2017. State and maximum friction coefficient estimation in vehicle dynamics using UKF. In 2017 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 4322–4327. https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2017.7963620
[66]
Hermann Winner, Stephan Hakuli, Felix Lotz, and Christina Singer. 2014. Handbook of driver assistance systems. Springer International Publishing Amsterdam, The Netherlands:.
[67]
Guoliang Yuan, Yafei Wang, Jinjia Peng, and Xianping Fu. 2021. A Novel Driving Behavior Learning and Visualization Method With Natural Gaze Prediction. IEEE Access 9(2021), 18560–18568. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3054951
[68]
Ronghui Zhang, Yueying Wu, Wanting Gou, and Junzhou Chen. 2021. Rs-Lane: a robust lane detection method based on ResNeSt and self-attention distillation for challenging traffic situations. Journal of advanced transportation 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7544355
[69]
Yangtao Zhang, X Jessie Yang, and Feng Zhou. 2021. Disengagement Cause-and-Effect Relationships Extraction Using an NLP Pipeline. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.03511(2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.03511
[70]
Guangzhe Zhao, Yanqing He, Hanting Yang, and Yong Tao. 2022. Research on fatigue detection based on visual features. IET Image Processing 16, 4 (2022), 1044–1053. https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.12207
[71]
Hongyu Zheng and Mingxin Zhao. 2020. An investigation on coordination of lane departure warning based on driver behaviour characteristics. International Journal of Vehicle Autonomous Systems 15, 1 (2020), 77–99.
[72]
Dong Zhou, Hongyi Liu, Huimin Ma, Xiang Wang, Xiaoqin Zhang, and Yuhan Dong. 2020. Driving behavior prediction considering cognitive prior and driving context. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22, 5(2020), 2669–2678. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.2973751
[73]
Feng Zhou, Areen Alsaid, Mike Blommer, Reates Curry, Radhakrishnan Swaminathan, Dev Kochhar, Walter Talamonti, and Louis Tijerina. 2022. Predicting Driver Fatigue in Monotonous Automated Driving with Explanation using GPBoost and SHAP. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 38, 8(2022), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1965774
[74]
Feng Zhou, Areen Alsaid, Mike Blommer, Reates Curry, Radhakrishnan Swaminathan, Dev Kochhar, Walter Talamonti, Louis Tijerina, and Baiying Lei. 2020. Driver fatigue transition prediction in highly automated driving using physiological features. Expert Systems with Applications 147 (2020), 113204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113204
[75]
Feng Zhou, Xingda Qu, Martin G Helander, and Jianxin Roger Jiao. 2011. Affect prediction from physiological measures via visual stimuli. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69, 12 (2011), 801–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.07.005
[76]
Feng Zhou, X Jessie Yang, and Xin Zhang. 2020. Takeover transition in autonomous vehicles: a YouTube study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36, 3(2020), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1634317
[77]
Bin Zhu, Augusto Ferrante, Johan Karlsson, and Mattia Zorzi. 2019. Fusion of sensors data in automotive radar systems: A spectral estimation approach. In 2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, 5088–5093. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC40024.2019.9029655
[78]
Adam Ziebinski, Rafal Cupek, Hueseyin Erdogan, and Sonja Waechter. 2016. A survey of ADAS technologies for the future perspective of sensor fusion. In International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence. Springer, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45246-3_13

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Economical Multilevel Backup Strategy for Electro-Hydraulic Braking System by Integrating Driving and Electronic Parking Brake SystemsSAE International Journal of Vehicle Dynamics, Stability, and NVH10.4271/10-08-04-00298:4Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
  • (2024)A short review of the ADAS progress in the last decade and the potential concept of Human-Machine Symbiosis (HMS)The Scientific Bulletin of Electrical Engineering Faculty10.2478/sbeef-2024-000724:1(41-45)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Minimising Missed and False Alarms: A Vehicle Spacing based Approach to Conflict Detection2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)10.1109/IV55156.2024.10588396(1982-1987)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AutomotiveUI '22: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
September 2022
371 pages
ISBN:9781450394154
DOI:10.1145/3543174
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 September 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ADAS
  2. cause and effect
  3. complaint data
  4. literature review
  5. natural language processing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING and MANUFACTURING, NORTH AMERICA, INC.

Conference

AutomotiveUI '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)201
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Economical Multilevel Backup Strategy for Electro-Hydraulic Braking System by Integrating Driving and Electronic Parking Brake SystemsSAE International Journal of Vehicle Dynamics, Stability, and NVH10.4271/10-08-04-00298:4Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
  • (2024)A short review of the ADAS progress in the last decade and the potential concept of Human-Machine Symbiosis (HMS)The Scientific Bulletin of Electrical Engineering Faculty10.2478/sbeef-2024-000724:1(41-45)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Minimising Missed and False Alarms: A Vehicle Spacing based Approach to Conflict Detection2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)10.1109/IV55156.2024.10588396(1982-1987)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Securing the Future: A Comprehensive Review of Security Challenges and Solutions in Advanced Driver Assistance SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.334720012(643-678)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2023)Real-Time Trust Prediction in Conditionally Automated Driving Using Physiological MeasuresIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2023.329578324:12(14642-14650)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Development and Validation of Autonomous Emergency Braking System for Advanced Driver Assistance Application2023 7th International Conference On Computing, Communication, Control And Automation (ICCUBEA)10.1109/ICCUBEA58933.2023.10392133(1-6)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Automated Generation of OpenSCENARIO Scenarios for Evaluating Advanced Driver Assistance Systems2023 7th International Conference On Computing, Communication, Control And Automation (ICCUBEA)10.1109/ICCUBEA58933.2023.10391957(1-8)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Design a sustainable micro-mobility future: trends and challenges in the US and EUJournal of Engineering Design10.1080/09544828.2022.214290433:8-9(587-606)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2022

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media