Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3543434.3543465acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

E-petitioning as Online Collective Action in We the People: The Case of the Legalization of Marijuana in the US

Published: 14 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find further evidence that e-petitioning is a form of online collective action. From 2011- 2020, individuals have been able to express their policy preferences on We the People (WtP), the first web-enabled petitioning system for the US federal government. This Internet-based platform created by the Obama Administration allowed people to create and/or sign petitions and solicit support for policy suggestions. Using WtP petition data, this case study examines a set of petitions that were initiated by NORML, a national organization that advocates for marijuana law reforms, and other organizations starting the day WtP was launched on 9/22/2011 that include policy suggestions relating to marijuana legalization. Using data mining techniques, namely market basket analysis and social network analysis, I found evidence of the mobilization of online “communities” for various policy suggestions to address the issues surrounding the legalization of marijuana in the US.

References

[1]
Sinai, N. and Smith, G. 2013, December 6. The United States Releases its Second Open Government National Action Plan. Whitehouse.Gov. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2013/12/06/united-states-releasesits-second-open-government-national-action-plan
[2]
Pew Research Center. 2018, February 5. Social Media Fact Sheet. Retrieved February 11, 2018, from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/
[3]
Cagnassola, M.E., 2021. Fact check: Did the Biden administration remove the White House petitioning system? [WWW Document]. Newsweek. URL https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-biden-administration-remove-white-house-petitioning-system-1570052 (accessed 11.27.21).
[4]
Shear, M. D., 2017. Obama Calls for End to ‘Conversion’ Therapies for Gay and Transgender Youth. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/09/us/politics/obama-to-call-for-end-to-conversion-therapies-for-gay-and-transgender-youth.html
[5]
We the People, 2016. Enact Leelah's law to ban all LGBTQ+ conversion therapy. Retrieved on January 5, 2017 from https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/enact-leelahs-law-ban-all-lgbtq-conversion-therapy.
[6]
Marwell, G., & Oliver, P., 1993. The critical mass in collective action. Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Sandler, T., 1992. Collective action: Theory and applications. University of Michigan Press.
[8]
Olson, M., 2012. The logic of collective action [1965].Contemporary Sociological Theory, 124.
[9]
Hardin, R., 1971. Collective action as an agreeable n‐prisoners' dilemma. Behavioral science, 16(5), 472-481.
[10]
Sweeney Jr, J. W., 1973. An experimental investigation of the free-rider problem. Social Science Research, 2(3), 277-292.
[11]
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C., 2005. Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication theory, 15(4), 365-388.
[12]
James, J., 1951. A preliminary study of the size determinant in small group interaction. American sociological review, 16(4), 474-477.
[13]
Gross, N., Martin, W. E., & Darley, J. G.,1953. Studies of group behavior: leadership structures in small organized groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48(3), 429.
[14]
Hare, A. P.,1952. A study of interaction and consensus in different sized groups. American Sociological Review, 17(3), 261-267.
[15]
Simmel, G., 1950. The negative character of collective behavior. The Sociology of Georg Simmel.
[16]
Bimber, B., 2017. Three Prompts for Collective Action in the Context of Digital Media. Political Communication, 34(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1223772
[17]
Morozov, E., 2009. The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy. May 19. Retrieved on January 2, 2017 from: http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/05/19/the-brave-new-world-of-slacktivism/
[18]
Shulman, S. W., 2009. The case against mass e‐mails: Perverse incentives and low quality public participation in US federal rulemaking. Policy & Internet, 1(1), 23-53.
[19]
Bimber, B., 2001. Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53-67.
[20]
Gladwell, M., 2010). Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker.
[21]
Karpf, D. (2010). Online political mobilization from the advocacy group's perspective: Looking beyond clicktivism. Policy & Internet, 2(4), 7-41.
[22]
Christensen, H. S. (2011). Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means?. First Monday, 16(2).
[23]
Dumas, C., LaManna, D., Harrison, T. M., Ravi, S. S., Hagen, L., Kotfila, C., & Chen, F. 2015a. E-petitioning as collective political action in We the People. iConference 2015 Proceedings.
[24]
Dumas, C.L., LaManna, D., Harrison, T.M., Ravi, S.S., Kotfila, C., Gervais, N., Hagen, L. & Chen, F. 2015b. Examining political mobilization of online communities through e-petitioning behavior in We the People. Big Data & Society, 2(2), p.2053951715598170.
[25]
Dumas, C. L., 2021. Electronic petitioning as online collective action: Examining the e-petitioning behavior of an extremist group in we the people. Information Polity, 26(4), 477-499.
[26]
National Institute of Health., 2017. Medical marijuana. Retrieved on January 20, 2017 from https://nccih.nih.gov/health/marijuana.
[27]
Martin S., 2016. A brief history of marijuana law in America. Time. April 20. Retrieved on January 5, 2016 from http://time.com/4298038/marijuana-history-in-america/
[28]
Cohen R.R., 2012. Opinion | ‘The Fight Over Medical Marijuana.’ The New York Times. Retrieved May 5, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/opinion/the-fight-over-medical-marijuana.html
[29]
NORML.org, 2016. About NORML. Retrieved on January 20, 2017 from http://norml.org/about.
[30]
Obama forced to address petition to pardon Marc Emery | CTV Vancouver News. (2011). Retrieved May 4, 2018, from https://bc.ctvnews.ca/obama-forced-to-address-petition-to-pardon-marc-emery-1.710726
[31]
Cannabis Northern Ireland [WWW Document], n.d. Cannabis N.I. URL https://www.cannabisni.com/ (accessed 1.30.22)
[32]
White House Responds to “Pardon Marc Emery” Petition. (1 C.E., November 30). Free Marc Emery. http://www.freemarc.ca/group/freemarcca/white-house-responds-pardon-marc-emery-petition
[33]
mmp.org. 2017
[34]
mtcia.org. 2017
[35]
nugs.com. 2017
[36]
Law Enforcement Action Partnership. (2017). Mission & vision. Retrieved on January 20, 2017 from http://leap.cc/about-us/mission-and-vision/
[37]
Easley, D., and Kleinberg, J. 2010. Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press.
[38]
Newman, M. 2010. Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press
[39]
Tan, P., Steinbach, M. and Kumar, V. 2006. Introduction to data mining. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[40]
Freeman, L. 1979. Centrality in social networks: A conceptual clarification. Social Networks, (1), 215 239.
[41]
Morozov, E. 2009. The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy. May 19. Retrieved on January 2, 2018 from: http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/05/19/the-brave-new-world-of-slacktivism/
[42]
Karpf, D. 2010. Online political mobilization from the advocacy group's perspective: Looking beyond clicktivism. Policy & Internet, 2(4), 7-41.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
dg.o '22: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
June 2022
499 pages
ISBN:9781450397490
DOI:10.1145/3543434
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 September 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Electronic Petitioning
  2. Marijuana Legalization
  3. Market Basket Analysis
  4. Online Collective Action
  5. Social Network Analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

dg.o 2022

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 30
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media