Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585791acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Modulating Interoceptive Signals for Influencing the Conscious Experience

Published: 19 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Interoceptive signals play a key role in genesis of our conscious experience. Modulation of interoceptive signals holds great potential for developing new human-computer interactions by creating dynamic experiences that are able to engage on user’s emotional level. We present design of a wearable system for modulating interoceptive sympathetic signal of heart rate by closed-loop feedback via pneumatic haptic stimulation on carotid baroreceptors. Our preliminary results showcase potency of the system to modulate the sympathetic activity and consequently user’s conscious experience. We discuss the potential of modulating interoceptive signals as a new paradigm towards developing interactions and affective interventions for dynamically reshaping the conscious experience.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3544549.3585791-talk-video.mp4)
Pre-recorded Video Presentation

References

[1]
Hannah Boettcher, C Alex Brake, and David H Barlow. 2016. Origins and outlook of interoceptive exposure. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 53 (2016), 41–51.
[2]
Kyung Yun Choi, Neska ElHaouij, Jinmo Lee, Rosalind W. Picard, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2022. Design and Evaluation of a Clippable and Personalizable Pneumatic-haptic Feedback Device for Breathing Guidance. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 1 (mar 2022), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517234
[3]
Kyung Yun Choi and Hiroshi Ishii. 2020. AmbienBeat: Wrist-Worn Mobile Tactile Biofeedback for Heart Rate Rhythmic Regulation. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374938
[4]
Kyung Yun Choi, Jinmo Lee, Neska ElHaouij, Rosalind Picard, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2021. ASpire: Clippable, Mobile Pneumatic-Haptic Device for Breathing Rate Regulation via Personalizable Tactile Feedback. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 372, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451602
[5]
David M Clark, Paul M Salkovskis, Lars-Göran Öst, Elisabeth Breitholtz, Katherine A Koehler, Bengt E Westling, Ann Jeavons, and Michael Gelder. 1997. Misinterpretation of body sensations in panic disorder.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 65, 2 (1997), 203.
[6]
Manfred E Clynes and Nathan S Kline. 1960. Cyborgs and space. Astronautics 14, 9 (1960), 26–27.
[7]
Jean Costa, Alexander T. Adams, Malte F. Jung, François Guimbretière, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2016. EmotionCheck: Leveraging Bodily Signals and False Feedback to Regulate Our Emotions. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Heidelberg, Germany) (UbiComp ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 758–769. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971752
[8]
Jean Costa, François Guimbretière, Malte F. Jung, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2019. BoostMeUp: Improving Cognitive Performance in the Moment by Unobtrusively Regulating Emotions with a Smartwatch. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 2, Article 40 (June 2019), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328911
[9]
John Cotton. 1981. A review of research on Schachter’s theory of emotion and the misattribution of Arousal. European Journal of Social Psychology 11 (10 1981), 365 – 397. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420110403
[10]
A.D.B. Craig. 2002. How Do You Feel? Interoception: The Sense of the Physiological Condition of the Body. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 3 (09 2002), 655–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894
[11]
Barnaby D Dunn, Hannah C Galton, Ruth Morgan, Davy Evans, Clare Oliver, Marcel Meyer, Rhodri Cusack, Andrew D Lawrence, and Tim Dalgleish. 2010. Listening to your heart: How interoception shapes emotion experience and intuitive decision making. Psychological science 21, 12 (2010), 1835–1844.
[12]
Dana L Frank, Lamees Khorshid, Jerome F Kiffer, Christine S Moravec, and Michael G McKee. 2010. Biofeedback in medicine: who, when, why and how?Mental health in family medicine 7, 2 (2010), 85.
[13]
Hajime Fukui and Kumiko Toyoshima. 2014. Chill-inducing music enhances altruism in humans. Frontiers in psychology 5 (2014), 1215.
[14]
Ilanit Gordon, Avi Gilboa, Shai Cohen, Nir Milstein, Nir Haimovich, Shay Pinhasi, and Shahar Siegman. 2020. Physiological and behavioral synchrony predict group cohesion and performance. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–12.
[15]
James J Gross and Robert W Levenson. 1995. Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition & emotion 9, 1 (1995), 87–108.
[16]
AJH Haar, A Jain, F Schoeller, and P Maes. 2020. Augmenting aesthetic chills using a wearable prosthesis improves their downstream effects on reward and social cognition. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–9.
[17]
Cherly M Heesch. 1999. Reflexes that control cardiovascular function.Advances in Physiology Education 277, 6 (1999), S234.
[18]
Abhinandan Jain, Adam Haar Horowitz, Felix Schoeller, Sang-won Leigh, Pattie Maes, and Misha Sra. 2020. Designing Interactions Beyond Conscious Control: A New Model for Wearable Interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 3 (2020), 1–23.
[19]
Abhinandan Jain, Felix Schoeller, Emilie Zhang, and Pattie Maes. 2022. Frisson: Leveraging Metasomatic Interactions for Generating Aesthetic Chills. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (Bengaluru, India) (ICMI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/3536221.3556626
[20]
William James. 1884. What is an emotion?Mind os-IX, 34 (04 1884), 188–205.
[21]
Sahib S Khalsa, Ralph Adolphs, Oliver G Cameron, Hugo D Critchley, Paul W Davenport, Justin S Feinstein, Jamie D Feusner, Sarah N Garfinkel, Richard D Lane, Wolf E Mehling, 2018. Interoception and mental health: a roadmap. Biological psychiatry: cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging 3, 6 (2018), 501–513.
[22]
Kiyoe Lee, Yumiko Noda, Yumi Nakano, Sei Ogawa, Yoshihiro Kinoshita, Tadashi Funayama, and Toshiaki A Furukawa. 2006. Interoceptive hypersensitivity and interoceptive exposure in patients with panic disorder: specificity and effectiveness. Bmc Psychiatry 6, 1 (2006), 1–9.
[23]
Rongrong Li, Zhengze Dai, Ruidong Ye, Xinfeng Liu, Zhengkun Xia, and Gelin Xu. 2019. Magnetic stimulation of carotid sinus as a treatment for hypertension. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension 21, 2 (jan 2019), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.13470
[24]
J. Ludbrook, G. Mancia, A. Ferrari, and A. Zanchetti. 1977. The Variable-Pressure Neck-Chamber Method for Studying the Carotid Baroreflex in Man. Clinical Science 53, 2 (aug 1977), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0530165
[25]
Maria M Ng, Domenic A Sica, and William H Frishman. 2011. Rheos: an implantable carotid sinus stimulation device for the nonpharmacologic treatment of resistant hypertension. Cardiology in review 19, 2 (2011), 52–57.
[26]
Narihiro Nishimura, Asuka Ishi, Michi Sato, Shogo Fukushima, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2012. Facilitation of Affection by Tactile Feedback of False Heratbeat. In CHI ’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI EA ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2321–2326. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223796
[27]
Vasilios Papademetriou, Michael Doumas, Charles Faselis, Constantinos Tsioufis, Stella Douma, Eugene Gkaliagkousi, and Chrysanthos Zamboulis. 2011. Carotid baroreceptor stimulation for the treatment of resistant hypertension. International journal of hypertension 2011 (2011).
[28]
Harald Rau, Thomas Elbert, Bertram Geiger, and Werner Lutzenberger. 1992. PRES: The Controlled Noninvasiv Stimulation of the Carotid Baroreceptors in Humans. Psychophysiology 29, 2 (1992), 165–172.
[29]
Félix Schoeller, AJH Haar, Abhinandan Jain, and Pattie Maes. 2019. Enhancing human emotions with interoceptive technologies. Physics of life reviews 31 (2019), 310–319.
[30]
Rafał Seredyński, Tymoteusz Okupnik, Przemysław Musz, Stanisław Tubek, Beata Ponikowska, and Bartłomiej Paleczny. 2021. Neck Chamber Technique Revisited: Low-Noise Device Delivering Negative and Positive Pressure and Enabling Concomitant Carotid Artery Imaging With Ultrasonography. Frontiers in Physiology 12 (oct 2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.703692
[31]
Anil K Seth. 2013. Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in cognitive sciences 17, 11 (2013), 565–573.
[32]
Anil K Seth and Karl J Friston. 2016. Active interoceptive inference and the emotional brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371, 1708 (2016), 20160007.
[33]
Charles D Spielberger, Fernando Gonzalez-Reigosa, Angel Martinez-Urrutia, Luiz FS Natalicio, and Diana S Natalicio. 1971. The state-trait anxiety inventory. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia/Interamerican Journal of Psychology 5, 3 & 4 (1971).
[34]
Manos Tsakiris and Hugo Critchley. 2016. Interoception beyond homeostasis: Affect, cognition and mental health. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371 (11 2016). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0002
[35]
Ryoko Ueoka, Ali AlMutawa, and Hikaru Katsuki. 2016. Emotion Hacking VR (EH-VR): Amplifying Scary VR Experience by Accelerating Real Heart Rate Using False Vibrotactile Biofeedback. In SIGGRAPH ASIA 2016 Emerging Technologies (Macau) (SA ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2988240.2988247
[36]
Jaye Wald and Steven Taylor. 2008. Responses to interoceptive exposure in people with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A preliminary analysis of induced anxiety reactions and trauma memories and their relationship to anxiety sensitivity and PTSD symptom severity. Cognitive behaviour therapy 37, 2 (2008), 90–100.
[37]
Shigeo Yoshida, Takuji Narumi, Tomohiro Tanikawa, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Michitaka Hirose. 2021. Teardrop Glasses: Pseudo Tears Induce Sadness in You and Those Around You. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 508, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445741
[38]
Shigeo Yoshida, Tomohiro Tanikawa, Sho Sakurai, Michitaka Hirose, and Takuji Narumi. 2013. Manipulation of an Emotional Experience by Real-Time Deformed Facial Feedback. In Proceedings of the 4th Augmented Human International Conference (Stuttgart, Germany) (AH ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/2459236.2459243

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Elastic robotic structures: a multidisciplinary framework for the design and control of shape-morphing elastic system for architectural and design applicationsConstruction Robotics10.1007/s41693-024-00128-89:1Online publication date: 13-Jan-2025

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2023
3914 pages
ISBN:9781450394222
DOI:10.1145/3544549
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 April 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Biofeedback
  2. Emotion Regulation
  3. Haptics
  4. Health
  5. Interoception
  6. Pneumatic
  7. Wearable

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)330
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Elastic robotic structures: a multidisciplinary framework for the design and control of shape-morphing elastic system for architectural and design applicationsConstruction Robotics10.1007/s41693-024-00128-89:1Online publication date: 13-Jan-2025

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media