Opportunities to Support Mechanical Ventilation Weaning
Authors: 
Joshua Dawson, 
Kazi Sinthia Kabir, 
Thomas Kauffman, Stephen K Trapp, 
Jason WieseAuthors Info & Claims
Joshua Dawson, Kazi Sinthia Kabir, Thomas Kauffman, Stephen K Trapp, Jason WieseAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 24 - 26
Abstract
Individuals with spinal cord injury or disorder (SCI/D) may experience respiratory impairment and require mechanical ventilation. A key clinical goal is to withdraw ventilator support when possible to manage the risk of secondary complications. However, mechanical ventilation weaning (MVW) trials are often a stressful experience since feelings of inability to breathe and failed weaning attempts can induce anxiety. This study aims to support patients’ more comfortable and theoretically expedited MVW process. Our findings reveal the potential for technology integration to support MVW and key challenges for implementing various technologies. Considering the design and implementation barriers within the clinical context is vital as we move toward such technology-oriented solutions.
References
[1]
Robert Brown, Anthony F DiMarco, Jeannette D Hoit, and Eric Garshick. 2006. Respiratory dysfunction and management in spinal cord injury. Respiratory care 51, 8 (2006), 853–870.
[2]
Jean Chastre and Jean-Yves Fagon. 2002. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 165, 7(2002), 867–903. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.165.7.2105078
[3]
Yu-Ju Chen, W Jake Jacobs, Stuart F Quan, Aurelio J Figueredo, and Amy HT Davis. 2011. Psychophysiological determinants of repeated ventilator weaning failure: an explanatory model. American Journal of Critical Care 20, 4 (2011), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2011886
[4]
Mayo Clinic. 2019. Spinal Cord Injury- Overview. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/spinal-cord-injury/symptoms-causes/syc-20377890, Retrieved: 25 November, 2019.
[5]
Deborah J Cook, Maureen O Meade, and Anne G Perry. 2001. Qualitative studies on the patient’s experience of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Chest 120, 6 (2001), 469S–473S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.120.6_suppl.469S
[6]
Sarah E Jolley, Christopher R Dale, and Catherine L Hough. 2015. Hospital-level factors associated with report of physical activity in patients on mechanical ventilation across Washington State. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 12, 2 (2015), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201410-480OC
[7]
Kazi Sinthia Kabir, Ahmad Alsaleem, and Jason Wiese. 2021. The Impact of Spinal Cord Injury on Participation in Human-Centered Research. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1902–1914. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462122
[8]
Rabia Khalaila, Wajdi Zbidat, Kabaha Anwar, Abed Bayya, David M Linton, and Sigal Sviri. 2011. Communication difficulties and psychoemotional distress in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. American Journal of Critical Care 20, 6 (2011), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2011989
[9]
Kevin D McCaul and James M Malott. 1984. Distraction and coping with pain.Psychological bulletin 95, 3 (1984), 516.
[10]
Sahiti Myneni, Debra McGinnis, Khalid Almoosa, Trevor Cohen, Bela Patel, and Vimla L Patel. 2016. Effective use of clinical decision support in critical care: Using risk assessment framework for evaluation of a computerized weaning protocol. In Advances in Healthcare Informatics and Analytics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23294-2_10
[11]
Armando J Rotondi, Lakshmipathi Chelluri, Carl Sirio, Aaron Mendelsohn, Richard Schulz, Steven Belle, Kelly Im, Michael Donahoe, and Michael R Pinsky. 2002. Patients’ recollections of stressful experiences while receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit. Critical care medicine 30, 4 (2002), 746–752.
[12]
Hossam Zein, Alireza Baratloo, Ahmed Negida, and Saeed Safari. 2016. Ventilator weaning and spontaneous breathing trials; an educational review. Emergency 4, 2 (2016), 65.
Index Terms
- Opportunities to Support Mechanical Ventilation Weaning
Recommendations
Mechanical ventilation and thoracic artificial lung assistance during mechanical circulatory support with PUCA pump: In silico study
Patients assisted with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) may require prolonged mechanical ventilatory assistance secondary to postoperative respiratory failure. The goal of this work is the study of the interdependent effects LVAD like pulsatile ...
In silico study of the haemodynamic effects induced by mechanical ventilation and biventricular pacemaker
In silico modeling of the cardiovascular system (CVS) can help both in understanding pharmacological or pathophysiological process and in providing information which could not be obtained by means of traditional clinical research methods due to ...
Cardiorespiratory dynamics during transitions between mechanical and spontaneous ventilation in intensive care
Life support devices (e.g., heart pacemakers, ventilators, dialysis machines) are commonly thought to affect mainly their target organ system. This preliminary study attempts to determine the extent to which mechanical support of one organ system (lungs ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2022
538 pages
ISBN:9781450394239
DOI:10.1145/3544793
Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 24 April 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
UbiComp/ISWC '22
Sponsor:
UbiComp/ISWC '22: The 2022 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
September 11 - 15, 2022
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 55Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)17
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format