Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3549555.3549569acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescbmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

A Fine Grained Quality Assessment of Video Anomaly Detection

Published: 07 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we propose a new approach to assess the performance of video anomaly detection algorithms. Inspired by the COCO metrics we propose a quartile based quality assessment of video anomaly detection to have a detailed breakdown of algorithm performance. The proposed assessment divides the detection into five categories based on the measurement quartiles of the position, scale and motion magnitude of anomalies. A weighted precision is introduced in the average precision calculation such that the frame-level average precision reported in categories can be compared to each other regardless of the baseline of the precision-recall curve in every category.
We evaluated three video anomaly detection approaches, including supervised and unsupervised approaches, on five public datasets using the proposed approach. Our evaluation shows that the anomaly scale introduces performance difference in detection. For both supervised and unsupervised methods evaluated, the detection achieve higher average precision for the large anomalies in scale. Our assessment also shows that the supervised multiple instance learning method is robust to the motion magnitude differences in anomalies, while the unsupervised one-class neural network method performs better than the unsupervised autoencoder reconstruction method when the motion magnitudes are small. Our experiments, however, also show that the positions of the anomalies have impact on the performance of the multiple instance learning method and the one-class neural network method but the impact on the autoencoder-based approach is negligible.

References

[1]
Shuai Bai, Zhiqun He, Yu Lei, Wei Wu, Chengkai Zhu, Ming Sun, and Junjie Yan. 2019. Traffic Anomaly Detection via Perspective Map based on Spatial-temporal Information Matrix. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops.
[2]
Raghavendra Chalapathy, Aditya Krishna Menon, and Sanjay Chawla. 2018. Anomaly Detection using One-Class Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06360(2018).
[3]
Y. Cong, J. Yuan, and J. Liu. 2011. Sparse reconstruction cost for abnormal event detection. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3449–3456. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995434
[4]
Keval Doshi and Yasin Yilmaz. 2020. Any-Shot Sequential Anomaly Detection in Surveillance Videos. In 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR Workshops. IEEE, 4037–4042. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00475
[5]
Shikha Dubey, Abhijeet Boragule, and Moongu Jeon. 2019. 3D ResNet with Ranking Loss Function for Abnormal Activity Detection in Videos. 2019 International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS) (2019), 1–6.
[6]
M. Hasan, J. Choi, J. Neumann, A. K. Roy-Chowdhury, and L. S. Davis. 2016. Learning Temporal Regularity in Video Sequences. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 733–742. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.86
[7]
Ammar Mansoor Kamoona, Amirali Khodadadian Gostar, Alireza Bab-Hadiashar, and Reza Hoseinnezhad. 2020. Multiple Instance-Based Video Anomaly Detection using Deep Temporal Encoding-Decoding. CoRR abs/2007.01548(2020). arxiv:2007.01548https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01548
[8]
Andrej Karpathy, George Toderici, Sanketh Shetty, Thomas Leung, Rahul Sukthankar, and Li Fei-Fei. 2014. Large-Scale Video Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1725–1732. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2014.223
[9]
Roberto Leyva, Victor Sanchez, and Chang Tsun Li. 2017. The LV dataset: A realistic surveillance video dataset for abnormal event detection. In Proceedings of the 2017 5th International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF 2017). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWBF.2017.7935096
[10]
Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C. Lawrence Zitnick. 2014. Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2014-01-01). Zürich. /se3/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/coco_eccv.pdf, http://mscoco.org
[11]
Kun Liu and Huadong Ma. 2019. Exploring Background-Bias for Anomaly Detection in Surveillance Videos. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1490–1499.
[12]
Wen Liu, Weixin Luo, Dongze Lian, and Shenghua Gao. 2018. Future Frame Prediction for Anomaly Detection - A New Baseline. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, 6536–6545. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00684
[13]
Cewu Lu, Jianping Shi, and Jiaya Jia. 2013. Abnormal Event Detection at 150 FPS in MATLAB. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision(ICCV ’13). 2720–2727. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2013.338
[14]
Vijay Mahadevan, Wei-Xin LI, Viral Bhalodia, and Nuno Vasconcelos. 2010. Anomaly Detection in Crowded Scenes. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1975–1981.
[15]
B. Ramachandra, M. Jones, and R. Vatsavai. 5555. A Survey of Single-Scene Video Anomaly Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence01 (5555), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3040591
[16]
Bharathkumar Ramachandra and Michael J. Jones. 2020. Street Scene: A new dataset and evaluation protocol for video anomaly detection. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). 2569–2578. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV45572.2020.9093457
[17]
Mahdyar Ravanbakhsh, Moin Nabi, Enver Sangineto, Lucio Marcenaro, Carlo S. Regazzoni, and Nicu Sebe. 2017. Abnormal event detection in videos using generative adversarial nets. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP. 1577–1581. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2017.8296547
[18]
Lukas Ruff, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Nico Görnitz, Lucas Deecke, Shoaib A. Siddiqui, Alexander Binder, Emmanuel Müller, and Marius Kloft. 2018. Deep One-Class Classification. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 80. 4393–4402.
[19]
W. Sultani, C. Chen, and M. Shah. 2018. Real-World Anomaly Detection in Surveillance Videos. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 6479–6488. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00678
[20]
Du Tran, Lubomir Bourdev, Rob Fergus, Lorenzo Torresani, and Manohar Paluri. 2015. Learning Spatiotemporal Features with 3D Convolutional Networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). 4489–4497. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.510
[21]
Hanh Tran and David C. Hogg. 2017. Anomaly Detection using a Convolutional Winner-Take-All Autoencoder. In BMVC.
[22]
Gaoang Wang, Xinyu Yuan, Aotian Zheng, Hung-Min Hsu, and Jenq-Neng Hwang. 2019. Anomaly Candidate Identification and Starting Time Estimation of Vehicles from Traffic Videos. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 382–390. http://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_CVPRW_2019/html/AI_City/Wang_Anomaly_Candidate_Identification_and_Starting_Time_Estimation_of_Vehicles_from_CVPRW_2019_paper.html

Index Terms

  1. A Fine Grained Quality Assessment of Video Anomaly Detection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CBMI '22: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Content-based Multimedia Indexing
    September 2022
    208 pages
    ISBN:9781450397209
    DOI:10.1145/3549555
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 October 2022

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. evaluation metrics
    2. neural networks
    3. video anomaly detection

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CBMI 2022

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 416
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)196
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)61
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media