Towards Improving the Adoption and Usage of National Digital Identity Systems
Authors: 
Malyun Muhudin Hilowle, William Yeoh, Marthie Grobler, Graeme Pye, Frank JiangAuthors Info & Claims
Malyun Muhudin Hilowle, William Yeoh, Marthie Grobler, Graeme Pye, Frank JiangAuthors Info & ClaimsASE '22: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
Article No.: 223, Pages 1 - 6
Abstract
User perceptions of national digital identity systems (NDIDs) significantly impact their use and acceptance. Previous study on the use of NDIDs has provided limited frameworks for future research, with a strong emphasis on government services as well as how the system may be improved. This study evaluates how human-centric cybersecurity factors influence the use of NDIDs and acceptance among users. For instance, MyHealth record, which is used in Australia to record medical services provided to users, was overwhelmingly rejected by users due to concerns about digital identification information being used without authorisation and other privacy concerns. We hypothesise that human-centric cybersecurity factors influence the use of NDID and acceptance among users. The study also has a practical implication since it provides a framework to determine human-centric cybersecurity factors that influence adoption and improve NDIDs usage.
References
[1]
Mburu, Z.G., L. Nderu, and M. Tobias, Review of digital identity management system models. International Journal of Technology and Systems, 2019. 4(1): p. 21-33.
[2]
Velásquez, I., A. Caro, and A. Rodríguez, Authentication schemes and methods: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 2018. 94: p. 30-37.
[3]
Kumari, S., Design of a user anonymous password authentication scheme without smart card. International Journal of Communication Systems, 2016. 29(3): p. 441-458.
[4]
Mondego, D.Y. and E. Gide, Exploring the Factors that Have Impact On Consumers’ Trust in Mobile Payment Systems in Australia. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 2020.
[5]
McCauley, D. My Health Record opt-out doubles to 2.5 million people. 2019 [cited 2022 February 18].
[6]
Danila, R. and A. Abdullah, User's Satisfaction on E-government Services: An Integrated Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014. 164: p. 575-582.
[7]
Dubey, A., Z. Saquib, and S. Dwivedi. Electronic authentication for e-Government services - a survey. 2015. Institution of Engineering and Technology.
[8]
Marta, I., Digital identity as a key enabler for e-government services. 2016, GSMA.
[9]
Klopper, R. and S. Lubbe, The Matrix Method of Literature Review. Alternation, 2007. 14.
[10]
Webster, J. and R. Watson, Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 2002. 26.
[11]
Liaropoulos, A., A Human-Centric Approach to Cybersecurity: Securing the Human in the Era of Cyberphobia. Journal of Information Warfare, 2015. 14(4): p. 15-24.
[12]
Rahul, B. and K. Sanjay, E- authentication framework for e-governanceservices. open access, 2015.
[13]
Banihashemi, S., Identifying and Prioritizing Evaluation Criteria for User-Centric Digital Identity Management Systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2016. 7(7).
[14]
Alt, R., S. Human, and G. Neumann. End-user empowerment in the digital age. in Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2020.
[15]
Altinkemer, K. and T. Wang, Cost and benefit analysis of authentication systems. Decision Support Systems, 2011. 51(3): p. 394-404.
[16]
Acharya, B., Impacts of the digital divide on the e-government portals of Nepal, in Digital Inequalities in the Global South 2020: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 33-57.
[17]
Anand, D. and V. Khemchandani, Unified and integrated authentication and key agreement scheme for e-governance system without verification table. Sādhanā, 2019. 44(9).
[18]
Chowdhury, N.H., M.T.P. Adam, and G. Skinner, The impact of time pressure on cybersecurity behaviour: a systematic literature review. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2019. 38(12): p. 1290-1308.
[19]
Forget, A., S. Chiasson, and R. Biddle, User-centred authentication feature framework. Information and Computer Security, 2015. 23(5): p. 497-515.
[20]
Chong, K.W., Y.S. Kim, and J. Choi, A Study of Factors Affecting Intention to Adopt a Cloud-Based Digital Signature Service. Information, 2021. 12(2): p. 60.
[21]
Velásquez, I., A. Caro, and A. Rodríguez, Multifactor Authentication Methods: A Framework for Their Comparison and Selection. 2020, IntechOpen.
[22]
Bruun, A., K. Jensen, and D. Kristensen, Usability of Single- and Multi-factor Authentication Methods on Tabletops: A Comparative Study. 2014, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 299-306.
[23]
Carretero, J., Federated Identity Architecture of the European eID System. IEEE Access, 2018. 6: p. 75302-75326.
[24]
Laux, D., Adoption of Biometric Authentication Systems: Implications for Research and Practice in the Deployment of End-User Security Systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2011. 21(3): p. 221-245.
[25]
Carter, L. and F. Belanger. Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives. 2004. IEEE.
[26]
Carter, L. and F. BÈlanger, The utilization of e government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors Information Systems Journal, 2005. 15: p. 5-25.
[27]
Vossaert, J., User-Centric Identity Management Using Trusted Modules. 2011, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 155-170.
[28]
Eliasson, C., M. Fiedler, and I. Jorstad. A Criteria-Based Evaluation Framework for Authentication Schemes in IMS. in International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security. 2009. IEEE.
[29]
Huang, D.-L., P.-L.P. Rau, and G. Salvendy, Perception of information security. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2010. 29(3): p. 221-232.
[30]
Rajapakse, J., e-Government Adoptions in Developing Countries. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2013. 9(4): p. 38-55.
[31]
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Digital Identity Guidelines. 2017.
[32]
Australian Government Information Management Office, ‘National e-Authentication framework’, D.o.F.a. Deregulation, Editor. 2009. p. 1-49.
[33]
ISO, ‘ISO/IEC 29115:2013 Information technology — Security techniques — Entity authentication assurance framework’. 2013: Switzerland. p. 1-35.
[34]
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ‘Digital identity management’, in Enabling Innovation and Trust in the Internet Economy. 2011.
[35]
Government of Qatar. National Authentication System (Tawtheeq). 2021 [cited 2021 November].
[36]
Government of India, e-Pramaan: Framework for e-Authentication. 2014.
[37]
Government of Canada. Standard on Identity and Credential Assurance. 2013 [cited 2020 05 December]; Available from: https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=26776.
[38]
Australian/New Zealand Standard, ‘Corporate governance of information technology’. 2010, SAI Global.
[39]
The Guardian. My Health Record. 2019 [cited 2021 16th May]; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/feb/20/more-than-25-million-people-have-opted-out-of-my-health-record.
[40]
Parliament of Australia. Identity cards and the Access Card. 2010 [cited 2021 16th May]; Available from: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/Publications_Archive/archive/identitycards.
[41]
Digital Transformation Agency, Trusted Digital Identity Framework. 2018. 1.2.
[42]
White, P. Identity management architecture in the Australian public sector. in 5th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications ICITA. 2008.
[43]
The New York Times. Cambridge Analytica and Facebook: The Scandal and the Fallout So Far. 2018 [cited 2022 04 February]; Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-scandal-fallout.html.
[44]
Beduschi, A., Rethinking digital identity for post-COVID-19 societies: Data privacy and human rights considerations. Data & Policy, 2021. 3.
[45]
Ali, A., Factors affecting user adoption of identity management systems: an empirical study, in School of Information Systems, Technology and Management. 2013, The University of New South Wale: New South wales. p. 373.
[46]
Alnuaimi, M., Barriers to electronic government citizens' adoption: a case of municipal sector in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. 2011. IEEE.
[47]
Guel, M.D., A Framework for Choosing Your Next Generation Authentication/Authorization System. Information Security Technical Report, 2002. 7(1): p. 63-78.
[48]
Jang-Jaccard, J. and S. Nepal, A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 2014. 80(5): p. 973-993.
[49]
Heartfield, R. and G. Loukas, Detecting semantic social engineering attacks with the weakest link: Implementation and empirical evaluation of a human-as-a-security-sensor framework. Computers & Security, 2018. 76: p. 101-127.
Index Terms
- Towards Improving the Adoption and Usage of National Digital Identity Systems
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Evaluation of digital library continuous usage: role of digital library overall quality, perceived usefulness and user satisfaction
The study investigates the role of digital library overall quality (DLOQ), perceived usefulness (PU) and users' satisfaction (US) in digital library continuous usage intention (DLCUI) among students at higher education institutions (HEIs). For this ...
Exploring Credit Card Adoption and Usage Model of College Student: An Analysis Based on TAM Model
ICISE '09: Proceedings of the 2009 First IEEE International Conference on Information Science and EngineeringThis study investigates adoption/use behavior within the context of college students. A research framework based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is developed to identify factors that would influence the adoption and continue use of the credit ...
Towards a privacy-preserving national identity card
DPM'09/SETOP'09: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop, and Second international conference on Data Privacy Management and Autonomous Spontaneous SecurityIn this paper, we propose to replace the national identity card, currently used in many countries, by a personal device that allows its user to prove some binary statements about himself while minimizing personal information leakage. The privacy of the ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2022
2006 pages
ISBN:9781450394758
DOI:10.1145/3551349
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 05 January 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- CSCRC Cyber Security Cooperative Research Centre
Conference
ASE '22
ASE '22: 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
October 10 - 14, 2022
MI, Rochester, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 82 of 337 submissions, 24%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 137Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)50
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format