Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3551349.3561170acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

ESAVE: Estimating Server and Virtual Machine Energy

Published: 05 January 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Sustainable software engineering has received a lot of attention in recent times, as we witness an ever-growing slice of energy use, for example, at data centers, as software systems utilize the underlying infrastructure. Characterizing servers for their energy use accurately without being intrusive, is therefore important to make sustainable software deployment choices. In this paper, we introduce ESAVE which is a machine learning-based approach that leverages a small set of hardware attributes to characterize a server or virtual machine’s energy usage across different levels of utilization. This is based upon an extensive exploration of multiple ML approaches, with a focus on a minimal set of required attributes, while showcasing good accuracy. Early validations show that ESAVE has only around 12% average prediction error, despite being non-intrusive.

    References

    [1]
    International Energy Agency. Accessed - 20/07/2022. Data Centres and Data Transmission Networks. https://www.iea.org/reports/data-centres-and-data-transmission-networks.
    [2]
    Lotfi Belkhir and Ahmed Elmeligi. 2018. Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 and recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production 177 (2018), 448–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.239
    [3]
    United Nations Environment Programme: Copenhagen Climate Centre. Accessed - 20/07/2022. Greenhouse gas emissions in the ICT sector: trends and methodologies. https://c2e2.unepccc.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/03/greenhouse-gas-emissions-in-the-ict-sector.pdf.
    [4]
    Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (San Francisco, California, USA) (KDD ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
    [5]
    cloudcarbonfootprint.org. Accessed - 20/07/2022. Cloud Carbon Footrpint. https://www.cloudcarbonfootprint.org.
    [6]
    Arnaud de Myttenaere, Boris Golden, Bénédicte Le Grand, and Fabrice Rossi. 2016. Mean Absolute Percentage Error for regression models. Neurocomputing 192(2016), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.114 Advances in artificial neural networks, machine learning and computational intelligence.
    [7]
    Larry D. Gray, Anil Kumar, and Harry H. Li. 2008. Workload Characterization of the SPECpower_ssj2008 Benchmark. In Performance Evaluation: Metrics, Models and Benchmarks, Samuel Kounev, Ian Gorton, and Kai Sachs (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 262–282.
    [8]
    Chung-Hsing Hsu and Stephen W. Poole. 2011. Power signature analysis of the SPECpower_ssj2008 benchmark. In (IEEE ISPASS) IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software. 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPASS.2011.5762739
    [9]
    Eva Kern, Markus Dick, Stefan Naumann, and Tim Hiller. 2015. Impacts of software and its engineering on the carbon footprint of ICT. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 52 (2015), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.07.003 Information technology and renewable energy - Modelling, simulation, decision support and environmental assessment.
    [10]
    Patricia Lago. 2015. Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Software. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Product Line Approaches in Software Engineering. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/PLEASE.2015.8
    [11]
    linux.org. Accessed - 20/07/2022. TURBOSTAT. https://www.linux.org/docs/man8/turbostat.html.
    [12]
    Rohit Mehra, Vibhu Saujanya Sharma, Vikrant Kaulgud, Sanjay Podder, and Adam P. Burden. 2022. Towards a Green Quotient for Software Projects. In To appear in the Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA) (ICSE ’22). ACM. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.12998
    [13]
    nature.com. Accessed - 20/07/2022. How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world’s electricity. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06610-y.
    [14]
    Gustavo Pinto and Fernando Castor. 2017. Energy Efficiency: A New Concern for Application Software Developers. Commun. ACM 60, 12 (nov 2017), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3154384
    [15]
    GHG Protocol. 2017. ICT Sector Guidance built on the GHG Protocol Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard. Global: GHG Protocol(2017).
    [16]
    pypi.org. Accessed - 20/07/2022. psutil. https://pypi.org/project/psutil/.
    [17]
    Jóakim von Kistowski, Klaus-Dieter Lange, Jeremy A. Arnold, Sanjay Sharma, Johann Pais, and Hansfried Block. 2018. Measuring and Benchmarking Power Consumption and Energy Efficiency. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (Berlin, Germany) (ICPE ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185768.3185775
    [18]
    Xiao Zhang, Jianjun Lu, and Xiao Qin. 2013. BFEPM: Best Fit Energy Prediction Modeling Based on CPU Utilization. In 2013 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Networking, Architecture and Storage. 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/NAS.2013.12

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ASE '22: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
    October 2022
    2006 pages
    ISBN:9781450394758
    DOI:10.1145/3551349
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 January 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ASE '22

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 82 of 337 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 79
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media