Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3551663.3558680acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Realistic Assessment of Transport Protocols Performance over LEO-based Communications

Published: 24 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

We study the performance exhibited by transport protocols, TCP and QUIC, over realistic satellite networks. We propose a novel methodology, which combines real implementation (exploiting virtualization techniques) and simulation, to carry out systematic and repetitive experiments. We modify the default operation of the ns-3 framework and we integrate the dynamism that characterizes links in satellite communications, particularly links to LEO satellites. We carry out a thorough assessment over different setups, changing the operating band and the buffer length. In addition, we ascertain the impact of using the multi-streaming feature that QUIC includes. The results show that QUIC yields lower delays than TCP, although in particular setups it might suffer from higher jitter. In addition, using multiple streams in QUIC does not yield a relevant gain. In any case, we can conclude that the behavior of transport protocols over non-terrestrial-networks might not be always optimum and that QUIC can bring benefits when compared to TCP.

References

[1]
A. Chen, C. Chang, and Y. Yao. 2001. Performance evaluation of ARQ operations with OBP and inter-satellite links: delay performance. In IEEE 54th Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings (VTC Fall 2001), Vol. 4. 2346--2350 vol.4. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTC.2001.957168
[2]
Tasneem Darwish, Gunes Karabulut Kurt, Halim Yanikomeroglu, Michel Bellemare, and Guillaume Lamontagne. 2022. LEO Satellites in 5G and Beyond Networks: A Review From a Standardization Perspective. IEEE Access, Vol. 10 (2022), 35040--35060. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3162243
[3]
Boya Di, Lingyang Song, Yonghui Li, and H. Vincent Poor. 2019. Ultra-Dense LEO: Integration of Satellite Access Networks into 5G and Beyond. IEEE Wireless Communications, Vol. 26, 2 (2019), 62--69. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2019.1800301
[4]
Jasenka Dizdarevic and Admela Jukan. 2021. Experimental Benchmarking of HTTP/QUIC Protocol in IoT Cloud/Edge Continuum. In ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications. 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC42927.2021.9500675
[5]
F. P. Fontan, M. Vazquez-Castro, C. E. Cabado, J. P. Garcia, and E. Kubista. 2001. Statistical modeling of the LMS channel. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 50, 6 (2001), 1549--1567. https://doi.org/10.1109/25.966585
[6]
Meilin He, Lei Zhong, Huidong Tan, Ying Qu, and Junyu Lai. 2020. A Novel Edge Computing Server Selection Strategy of LEO Constellation Broadband Network. In 2020 IEEE World Congress on Services (SERVICES). 275--280. https://doi.org/10.1109/SERVICES48979.2020.00061
[7]
R. Hermenier, C. Kissling, and A. Donner. 2009. A delay model for satellite constellation networks with inter-satellite links. In 2009 International Workshop on Satellite and Space Communications. 3--7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSSC.2009.5286440
[8]
Mohsen Hosseinian, Jihwan P. Choi, Seok-Ho Chang, and Jungwon Lee. 2021. Review of 5G NTN Standards Development and Technical Challenges for Satellite Integration With the 5G Network. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, Vol. 36, 8 (2021), 22--31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAES.2021.3072690
[9]
Jana Iyengar and Ian Swett. 2021. QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control. RFC 9002. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC9002
[10]
Jana Iyengar and Martin Thomson. 2021. QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport. RFC 9000. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC9000
[11]
Oltjon Kodheli, Stefano Andrenacci, Nicola Maturo, Symeon Chatzinotas, and Frank Zimmer. 2019. An Uplink UE Group-Based Scheduling Technique for 5G mMTC Systems Over LEO Satellite. IEEE Access, Vol. 7 (2019), 67413--67427. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2918581
[12]
Israel Leyva-Mayorga, Beatriz Soret, Maik Röper, Dirk Wübben, Bho Matthiesen, Armin Dekorsy, and Petar Popovski. 2020. LEO Small-Satellite Constellations for 5G and Beyond-5G Communications. IEEE Access, Vol. 8 (2020), 184955--184964. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029620
[13]
Shicong Liu, Zhen Gao, Yongpeng Wu, Derrick Wing Kwan Ng, Xiqi Gao, Kai-Kit Wong, Symeon Chatzinotas, and Björn Ottersten. 2021. LEO Satellite Constellations for 5G and Beyond: How Will They Reshape Vertical Domains? IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 59, 7 (2021), 30--36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2001081
[14]
Néstor J. Hernández Marcano, Luis Diez, Ramon Agüero, and Rune Hylsberg Jacobsen. 2022. Finite Buffer Queuing Delay Performance in the Low Earth Orbit Land Mobile Satellite Channel. In 2022 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). 132--137. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC51071.2022.9771859
[15]
Néstor J. Hernández Marcano, Luis Diez, Ramón Agüero Calvo, and Rune Hylsberg Jacobsen. 2021. On the Queuing Delay of Time-Varying Channels in Low Earth Orbit Satellite Constellations. IEEE Access, Vol. 9 (2021), 87378--87390. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3089005
[16]
Poorzare, Reza and Calveras, Anna. 2020. Open Trends On TCP Performance Over Urban 5G MmWave Networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks (Alicante, Spain) (PE-WASUN '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 85--92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3416011.3424749
[17]
Peng Qian, Ning Wang, and Rahim Tafazolli. 2018. Achieving Robust Mobile Web Content Delivery Performance Based on Multiple Coordinated QUIC Connections. IEEE Access, Vol. 6 (2018), 11313--11328. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2804222
[18]
Tanya Shreedhar, Rohit Panda, Sergey Podanev, and Vaibhav Bajpai. 2022. Evaluating QUIC Performance Over Web, Cloud Storage, and Video Workloads. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, Vol. 19, 2 (2022), 1366--1381. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2021.3134562
[19]
Qingqing Tang, Zesong Fei, Bin Li, and Zhu Han. 2021a. Computation Offloading in LEO Satellite Networks With Hybrid Cloud and Edge Computing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 8, 11 (2021), 9164--9176. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3056569
[20]
Zhixuan Tang, Haibo Zhou, Ting Ma, Kai Yu, and Xuemin Sherman Shen. 2021b. Leveraging LEO Assisted Cloud-Edge Collaboration for Energy Efficient Computation Offloading. In 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM). 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM46510.2021.9685309
[21]
Hiroshi Tsunoda, Nei Kato, Abbas Jamalipour, and Yoshiaki Nemoto. 2007. Performance Evaluation of SCTP wth Adaptive Multistreamiing over LEO Satellite Networks. In 2007 International Workshop on Satellite and Space Communications. 150--154. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSSC.2007.4409407
[22]
Kaixiang Wei, Qingqing Tang, Jing Guo, Ming Zeng, Zesong Fei, and Qimei Cui. 2021. Resource Scheduling and Offloading Strategy Based on LEO Satellite Edge Computing. In 2021 IEEE 94th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Fall). 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTC2021-Fall52928.2021.9625072
[23]
Renchao Xie, Qinqin Tang, Qiuning Wang, Xu Liu, F. Richard Yu, and Tao Huang. 2020. Satellite-Terrestrial Integrated Edge Computing Networks: Architecture, Challenges, and Open Issues. IEEE Network, Vol. 34, 3 (2020), 224--231. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.011.1900369
[24]
Siyu Yang, Hewu Li, and Qian Wu. 2018. Performance Analysis of QUIC Protocol in Integrated Satellites and Terrestrial Networks. In 2018 14th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC). 1425--1430. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2018.8450388
[25]
Wenjun Yang, Shengjie Shu, Lin Cai, and Jianping Pan. 2021. MM-QUIC: Mobility-aware Multipath QUIC for Satellite Networks. In 2021 17th International Conference on Mobility, Sensing and Networking (MSN). 608--615. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSN53354.2021.00093
[26]
Zhu Zhang, Qing Guo, and Zihe Gao. 2010. A Prediction Based SCTP Handover Scheme for IP/LEO Satellite Network. In 2010 6th International Conference on Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM). 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1109/WICOM.2010.5601455
[27]
Y. Zhu, M. Sheng, J. Li, and R. Liu. 2018. Performance Analysis of Intermittent Satellite Links With Time-Limited Queuing Model. IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 22, 11 (2018), 2282--2285. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2866570

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)ReACKed QUICer: Measuring the Performance of Instant Acknowledgments in QUIC HandshakesProceedings of the 2024 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3646547.3689022(389-400)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024

Index Terms

  1. Realistic Assessment of Transport Protocols Performance over LEO-based Communications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PE-WASUN '22: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks
      October 2022
      148 pages
      ISBN:9781450394833
      DOI:10.1145/3551663
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 24 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. LEO
      2. LMS
      3. QUIC
      4. delay
      5. docker
      6. ns-3

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      MSWiM '22
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      PE-WASUN '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 60 submissions, 28%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 70 of 240 submissions, 29%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)ReACKed QUICer: Measuring the Performance of Instant Acknowledgments in QUIC HandshakesProceedings of the 2024 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3646547.3689022(389-400)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media