Research on Online Interaction Quality Evaluation of Collaborative Knowledge Construction
Authors: 
Sihong Lin, Huatao TangAuthors Info & Claims
Sihong Lin, Huatao TangAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 207 - 213
Abstract
With the widespread application of online learning platforms in universities, the functional section of the online discussion area has gradually become a virtual place for expressing communication, collaborative sharing, presentation, reporting and debate evaluation. Interactive discussion is an important means of forming knowledge construction. However, it is difficult for the existing system framework to reflect the systematic nature of online collaborative discussion. Therefore, this study aims to reconstruct the interaction quality evaluation framework of collaborative knowledge construction, and use the Delphi method to revise the framework to help teachers better conduct design and analysis of collaborative discussions. Finally, combined with the framework, the text discussion posts are automatically classified to verify the feasibility of automatic evaluation under the new coding system.
References
[1]
He Ji, Yanfei Zhu. Inheritance and Innovation: From Community to Learning Community [J]. China Distance Education, 2019(10):74-79.
[2]
Yanru Wu. Empirical research on blended learning to promote the development of college students' critical thinking ability[J].Electronic Education Research,2014,35(08):83-88.
[3]
Decuyper S, Dochy F, Van den Bossche P. Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations[J]. Educational Research Review, 2010, 5(2): 111-133.
[4]
Qingtang Liu, Liming He and Linjing. Educational Text Mining Model and Application in the Age of Intelligence [J]. Modern Distance Education Research, 2020,32(05):95-103.
[5]
Zhiqiang Ma, Wenxin Guo and Wang Meng. Intelligent Mining Analysis of Conversation Content for Collaborative Knowledge Construction [J]. Modern Distance Education, 2022(01):3-13.
[6]
Garrison D R, Anderson T, Archer W. The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective[J]. The internet and higher education, 2010, 13(1-2): 5-9.
[7]
Henri F. Computer conferencing and content analysis[M]//Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992: 117-136.
[8]
Gunawardena C N, Lowe C A, Anderson T. Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing[J]. Journal of educational computing research, 1997, 17(4): 397-431.
[9]
Chi M T H, Wylie R. The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes[J]. Educational psychologist, 2014, 49(4): 219-243.
[10]
Anderson L W, Krathwohl D R. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives[M]. Longman, 2001.
[11]
Veerman A L, Andriessen J E B, Kanselaar G. Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation[J]. 1999.
[12]
Nandi D, Hamilton M, Chang S, Evaluating quality in online asynchronous interactions between students and discussion facilitators[J]. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2012, 28(4).
[13]
Dongmei Zhang, Lu Wang. Research on the Influence of Cognitive Conflict Management on the Quality of Cooperative Learning [J]. China Electronic Education, 2021(09):131-136.
[14]
Cendros Araujo R, Gadanidis G. Online collaborative mind mapping in a mathematics teacher education program: a study on student interaction and knowledge construction[J]. ZDM, 2020, 52(5): 943-958.
[15]
McKenzie W, Murphy D. " I hope this goes somewhere": Evaluation of an online discussion group[J]. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2000, 16(3).
[16]
Jiping Jiang, Jinyan Hu, and Yibing Zhang. Research on the Development Track of "Perspective Improvement" in Knowledge Construction Learning Community [J]. Electronic Education Research, 2019,40(02):21-29. 003.
[17]
Marshal, Huan Huang, Tingting He, and Wei Huang. Evaluation of College Teachers' Network Teaching Investment Based on Teaching Behavior Analysis: Taking Z University in Hubei Province as an Example [J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2021,31(03):57-63.
[18]
Pena-Shaff J B, Nicholls C. Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions[J]. Computers & Education, 2004, 42(3): 243-265.
[19]
Yibing Zhang. Knowledge Construction: Transformation of Teaching and Learning from the Perspective of New Education Equity [M]. Nanjing Normal University Press, 2018.
[20]
Liying Wang, Yibing Zhang. Quality Evaluation of Viewpoints Integrating Knowledge Construction and Machine Learning[J].Modern Educational Technology,2020,30(11):62-69.
[21]
Tiansheng Cao, Fanshi Kong, Ke Zhu, and Yanmin Li. Research on grouping strategies to promote the depth of interaction between learners[J].Modern Educational Technology,2020,30(06):55-60.
[22]
Yunzhen Liang. Research on learner interaction evaluation in online learning space[J].Modern Educational Technology,2018,28(11):73-79.
[23]
Ling Chen, Chongyang Yang, and Shengquan Yu. Research on the internal mechanism of high-quality dialogue between teachers and students in online tutoring [J]. Distance Education Journal, 2021,39(05):76-86. /g4.2021.05.008.
[24]
Yanyan Li, Yu Peng, Jia Kang, Haogang Bao, and You Su. Analysis Model Construction and Application of Group Learning Engagement in Online Collaborative Learning [J]. China Distance Education, 2020(02):40-48+77.
[25]
Xuejiao Huang, Dongdai Zhou, and Fengjuan Liu. Research on the developmental trajectory of learners' critical thinking in online interactive activities[J].Modern Distance Education, 2021(01):24-31.
[26]
Xinlai Dai, Congcong Liu. Research on Deep Interaction of Virtual Learning Community Based on Learning Analysis [J]. Modern Distance Education, 2019(05):51-58.
[27]
Yaqian Xu, Li Chen. Research on the Relationship between Individual Network Status and Conceptual Network Characteristics in Connectivism Learning——Based on the Analysis of Partial Interactive Content of cMOOC Phase 1 Course[J]. China Distance Education, 2019(10):9-19+51 +92.
[28]
Pingxia Zhang, Jia Lv. Research on Learning Evaluation of MOOC Discussion Area Based on Text Mining [D]. Chongqing Normal University, 2018.
[29]
Yassine, Benjelloun & Hadioui, Abdelladim & El Faddouli, Nour-eddine & Bennani, Samir. (2020). Machine learning for Knowledge construction in a MOOC Discussion Forum. 9. 2933-2942.
[30]
Shimojo S, Hayashi Y. Prompting learner-learner collaborative learning for deeper interaction: conversational analysis based on the ICAP framework[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. 2020: 177-182.
[31]
Junling Liu, Wenlan Zhang, Bin Liu. Design and Application of Online Collaborative Interactive Text Coding System: A Research Based on Emotional Interaction Perspective [J]. Research in Electronic Education, 2020,41(06):53-59. cnki.eer.2020.06.008.
[32]
MacKinnon G R. The dilemma of evaluating electronic discussion groups[J]. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 2000, 33(2): 125-131.
[33]
Lee S J C, Abdul Rabu S N. Google docs for higher education: Evaluating online interaction and reflective writing using content analysis approach[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2021: 1-31.
[34]
Nami F, Marandi S S, Sotoudehnama E. Interaction in a discussion list: An exploration of cognitive, social, and teaching presence in teachers’ online collaborations[J]. ReCALL, 2018, 30(3): 375-398.
[35]
Ling Yang, Shukun Tang, and Peixiao Qi. Research on evaluation indicators of popular science service in Chinese universities based on grounded theory [J]. Popular Science Research, 2021,16(05):76-84+103.
Index Terms
- Research on Online Interaction Quality Evaluation of Collaborative Knowledge Construction
Recommendations
Effects of an individual's prior knowledge on collaborative knowledge construction and individual learning outcomes in videoconferencing
CSCL '05: Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years!This paper deals with collaborative knowledge construction in videoconferencing. The main topic for investigation is how to predict individual learning outcomes, and in particular the degree to which an individual's prior knowledge and collaborative ...
Fostering collaborative knowledge construction in desktop video-conferencing: effects of content schemes and cooperation scripts in peer teaching settings
CSCL '02: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL CommunityVideo-conferencing is expected to become increasingly important for tele-learning environments. In contrast to asynchronous, text-based computer-mediated communication, video-conferencing facilitates cooperation tasks that require highly frequent and ...
The effects of social regulation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction in collaborative problem solving
ICETT '24: Proceedings of the 2024 10th International Conference on Education and Training TechnologiesSocial regulation, which is highly situated and cyclical in nature, enables students to reach a higher level of shared understanding of new concepts and co-create new knowledge. However, little empirical evidence has been examined on the effects of ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2022
482 pages
ISBN:9781450396455
DOI:10.1145/3551708
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 18 November 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
ICEMT 2022
ICEMT 2022: 2022 6th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology
July 13 - 15, 2022
Guangzhou, China
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 29Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)11
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format