Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3556384.3556420acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

YOLOX-based ship target detection for Shore-based monitoring

Published: 29 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

With the development of artificial intelligence technology, people have higher requirements for intelligent monitoring system in terms of accuracy and detection speed of ship target detection algorithm. YOLOX, as the latest proposed high-performance real-time detection model, adds advanced target detection techniques such as decoupling head and tag assignment strategy SimOTA to the YOLO series, and achieves very good results on the COCO dataset. Therefore, we use it on a ship intelligent monitoring system to study its effectiveness on ship target detection tasks. We evaluate the performance of YOLOX using the well-known ship image dataset Seaships and compare the results with those of other studies. The results show that YOLOX achieves the best performance on the dataset. Among them, YOLOX_Tiny(The easiest YOLOX) has the fastest detection speed with an FPS of 129.3; YOLOX_X(The most complex YOLOX) achieves 97.54% of mAP. this is the best performance on this dataset so far.

References

[1]
Wang Kun, Qu Zhi, Shi Xiao Dong, and Chen Qi Shuai. 2021. Application of intelligent video surveillance system in offshore oil field. Tianjin Science and Technology. 48(02), 55-56+61. https://doi.org/10.14099/j.cnki.tjkj.2021.02.017
[2]
Ryan Wen Liu, Weiqiao Yuan, Xianqing Chen, and Yuxu. 2021. An enhanced CNN-enabled learning method for promoting ship detection in maritime surveillance system. ScienceDirect. Ocean Engineering. 235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109435
[3]
Shao Zhenfeng, Wu Wenjing, Wang Zhongyuan, Du Wang, and Li Chenyuan. 2018. Seaships: A large-scale precisely annotated dataset for ship detection. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 20 (10), 2593–2604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2018.2865686.
[4]
Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, and Ali Farhadi. 2016. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 779–788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.91
[5]
Ge Zheng, Liu Songtao, Wang Feng, and Li Zeming. 2021. YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.08430
[6]
Bochkovskiy Alexey, Wang Chienyao, and Liao Hongyuan. 2020. YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection. http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.10934
[7]
YOLO-V5. August 13, 2020 from https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5
[8]
Joseph Redmon, and Ali Farhadi. 2018. YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement. http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.02767
[9]
Wan Huiyao. Chen Jie. Huang Zhixiang. Xia RunFan. Wu BoCai. 2022. AFSar: An Anchor-Free SAR Target Detection Algorithm Based on Multiscale Enhancement Representation Learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3137817
[10]
Bingqian Liu. Jianye Huang. Shuang Lin. Yan Yang and Yincheng Qi. 2021. Improved YOLOX-S Abnormal Condition Detection for Power Transmission Line Corridors. In Proceedings of IEEE 3rd International Conference on Power Data Science (ICPDS).IEEE, Harbin, pp. 13-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICPDS54746.2021.9690074
[11]
Jinhai Wang. Zongyin Zhang. Lufeng Luo. Wenbo Zhu. Jianwen Chen and Wei Wang. 2021. SwinGD: A Robust Grape Bunch Detection Model Based on Swin Transformer in Complex Vineyard Environment. Horticulturae 2021, 7(11), 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7110492
[12]
Shao Zhenfeng, Wu Wenjing, Wang Zhongyuan, Du Wang, and Wu Wenjing. 2019. Saliency-aware convolution neural network for ship detection in surveillance video. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 30 (3), 781–794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2019.2897980.
[13]
Jie Yang. Leonidas. LilianAsimwe. Mumtaz Farhan and Ali Munsif. 2021. Ship detection and tracking in inland waterways using improved YOLOv3 and Deep SORT. Symmetry 13,308–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym13020308
[14]
Liqiong Chen. Wenxuan Shi and Dexiang Deng. 2021. Improved YOLOv3 Based on Attention Mechanism for Fast and Accurate Ship Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sensing, 13(4):660. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13040660
[15]
Tao Liu. Bo Pang. Shangmao Ai and Xiaoqiang Sun. 2020. Study on Visual Detection Algorithm of Sea Surface Targets Based on Improved YOLOv3. Sensors, 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20247263
[16]
Xu Han. Lining Zhao. Yue Ning and Jingfeng Hu.2021. ShipYOLO: An Enhanced Model for Ship Detection. Journal of Advanced Transportation. 2021(10):1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1060182

Index Terms

  1. YOLOX-based ship target detection for Shore-based monitoring

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SPML '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning
    August 2022
    309 pages
    ISBN:9781450396912
    DOI:10.1145/3556384
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 October 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    SPML 2022

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 56
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media