Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3556787.3556866acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswipsceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Comparing Teachers’ and Preservice Teachers’ Opinions on Teaching Methods in Computer Science Education

Published: 31 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Teaching methods are a variety of pedagogical approaches that can be used by teachers to enable student learning in the classroom. While the efficiency of these methods largely depends on the characteristics of the individual learners and the classroom dynamics, the characteristics of the teachers and their opinions towards these methods determine the actual integration in the classroom. But an appropriate judgment on the suitability of these methods for different teaching situations needs years of practice, which is why preservice teachers’ opinions towards using these methods might differ from other teachers’ experiences. To address this mismatch in Computer Science Teacher Education, we replicated a study by Zendler et al. with 16 preservice teachers and compare the results in this article. Results indicate that preservice teachers have a more generally positive opinion towards the use of teaching methods in specific learning phases than experienced teachers, but also a lower range of preferences. Problem-based learning was found to be the best-ranked method for both, preservice and experienced teachers, while other methods’ evaluations differ. In particular, preservice teachers also prefer project work and programmed instruction. We conclude that teaching methods should be a part of Computer Science Teacher Education, not just in theory, but also in practice.

References

[1]
Roy Andersson and Lars Bendix. 2006. eXtreme teaching: A framework for continuous improvement. Computer Science Education 16, 3 (2006), 175–184.
[2]
Tim Bell, Frances Rosamond, and Nancy Casey. 2012. Computer Science Unplugged and Related Projects in Math and Computer Science Popularization. In The multivariate algorithmic revolution and beyond, M. R. Fellows and H. L. Bodlaender (Eds.). Lecture notes in computer science, 0302-9743, Vol. 7370. Springer, Heidelberg, 398–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30891-8_18
[3]
Jerome S. Bruner. 1960. The process of education. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[4]
Association for Computing Machinery. 2013. Computer Science Curriculum.
[5]
John A. Hattie. 2008. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York : Routledge, London.
[6]
Orit Hazzan and Tami Lapidot. 2004. The Practicum in Computer Science Education: Bridging Gaps between Theoretical Knowledge and Actual Performance. SIGCSE Bull. 36, 4 (jun 2004), 47–51.
[7]
Orit Hazzan, Tami Lapidot, and Noa Ragonis. 2011. Teaching Methods in Computer Science Education. Springer London, London, 91–118.
[8]
Yen-Chu Hung. 2012. The Effect of Teaching Methods and Learning Style on Learning Program Design in Web-Based Education Systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research 47, 4 (2012), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.47.4.d arXiv:https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.47.4.d
[9]
Hilbert Meyer. 2014. Praxisbuch Meyer: Was ist guter Unterricht?Cornelsen Scriptor, Berlin, Germany.
[10]
Mostafa Mohammed, Clifford A. Shaffer, and Susan H. Rodger. 2021. Teaching Formal Languages with Visualizations and Auto-Graded Exercises. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Virtual Event, USA) (SIGCSE ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432398
[11]
Neena Thota and Richard Whitfield. 2010. Holistic approach to learning and teaching introductory object-oriented programming. Computer Science Education 20, 2 (2010), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2010.486260 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2010.486260
[12]
Mark J Van Gorp and Scott Grissom. 2001. An empirical evaluation of using constructive classroom activities to teach introductory programming. Computer Science Education 11, 3 (2001), 247–260.
[13]
Fern K Willits, Gene L Theodori, and AE Luloff. 2016. Another look at Likert scales. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 31, 3 (2016), 6.
[14]
Andreas Zendler. 2018. Instructional methods in computing education judged by computer science teachers and educational experts. it-Information Technology 60, 2 (2018), 79–90.
[15]
Andreas Zendler and Dieter Klaudt. 2018. Bewertung von Unterrichtsmethoden durch Informatiklehrer. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20675-8_4
[16]
Andreas Zendler and K Klein. 2018. The effect of direct instruction and web quest on learning outcome in computer science education. Education and Information Technologies 23, 6 (2018), 2765–2782.
[17]
Andreas Zendler and Swetlana Reile. 2018. The effect of reciprocal teaching and programmed instruction on learning outcome in computer science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation 58 (2018), 132–144.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Análisis de la calidad educacional desde la perspectiva estudiantil en instituciones educativas ecuatorianasAnalysis of educational quality from the student’s perspective in Ecuadorian educational institutionsRevista Científica Multidisciplinaria Ogma10.69516/n3c5yr633:3(45-54)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Applying the Mathematical Task Framework to K-8 ComputingProceedings of the 18th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research10.1145/3605468.3609753(1-2)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Learning Analytics and Classroom Management in Specialized Environments: Enhancing the VR Classroom for CS Teacher EducationImmersive Learning Research Network10.1007/978-3-031-47328-9_3(37-52)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023

Index Terms

  1. Comparing Teachers’ and Preservice Teachers’ Opinions on Teaching Methods in Computer Science Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WiPSCE '22: Proceedings of the 17th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education
    October 2022
    130 pages
    ISBN:9781450398534
    DOI:10.1145/3556787
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 31 October 2022

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Computer Science Education
    2. Educational Methods
    3. Preservice Teachers
    4. Teacher Education
    5. Teaching Methods

    Qualifiers

    • Work in progress
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    WiPSCE '22
    WiPSCE '22: The 17th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education
    October 31 - November 2, 2022
    Morschach, Switzerland

    Acceptance Rates

    WiPSCE '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 14 of 41 submissions, 34%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 104 of 279 submissions, 37%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Análisis de la calidad educacional desde la perspectiva estudiantil en instituciones educativas ecuatorianasAnalysis of educational quality from the student’s perspective in Ecuadorian educational institutionsRevista Científica Multidisciplinaria Ogma10.69516/n3c5yr633:3(45-54)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
    • (2023)Applying the Mathematical Task Framework to K-8 ComputingProceedings of the 18th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research10.1145/3605468.3609753(1-2)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Learning Analytics and Classroom Management in Specialized Environments: Enhancing the VR Classroom for CS Teacher EducationImmersive Learning Research Network10.1007/978-3-031-47328-9_3(37-52)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media