Darwin's Theory of Censorship: Analysing the Evolution of Censored Topics with Dynamic Topic Models
Pages 103 - 108
Abstract
We present a statistical analysis of changes in the Internet censorship policy of the government of India from 2016 to 2020. Using longitudinal observations of censorship collected by the ICLab censorship measurement project, together with historical records of web page contents collected by the Internet Archive, we find that machine classification techniques can detect censors' reactions to events without prior knowledge of what those events are. However, gaps in ICLab's observations can cause the classifier to fail to detect censored topics, and gaps in the Internet Archive's records can cause it to misidentify them.
References
[1]
Ziv Bar-Yossef and Sridhar Rajagopalan. 2002. Template detection via data mining and its applications. In Web Conference. 580--591. https://doi.org/10.1145/511446.511522
[2]
Adrien Barbaresi. 2021. Trafilatura: A Web Scraping Library and Command-Line Tool for Text Discovery and Extraction. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 122--131. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-demo.15
[3]
Mehrab Bin Morshed, Michaelanne Dye, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Neha Kumar. 2017. When the Internet Goes Down in Bangladesh. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1591--1604. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998237
[4]
David M. Blei and John D. Lafferty. 2006. Dynamic Topic Models. In International Conference on Machine Learning. 113--120.
[5]
David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 3 (March 2003), 993--1022.
[6]
Abdelberi Chaabane, Terence Chen, Mathieu Cunche, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Arik Friedman, and Mohamed Kaafar. 2014. Censorship in the Wild: Analyzing Internet Filtering in Syria. In Internet Measurement Conference. 285--298.
[7]
Le Chen, Chi Zhang, and Christo Wilson. 2013. Tweeting under Pressure: Analyzing Trending Topics and Evolving Word Choice on Sina Weibo. In Online Social Networks. 89--100.
[8]
Shinyoung Cho, Rishab Nithyanand, Abbas Razaghpanah, and Phillipa Gill. 2017. A Churn for the Better: Localizing Censorship Using Network-Level Path Churn and Network Tomography. In Conference on Emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT). 81--87. https://doi.org/10.1145/3143361.3143386
[9]
Alexander Darer, Oliver Farnan, and Joss Wright. 2018. Automated discovery of internet censorship by web crawling. In Web Science. 195--204.
[10]
Ronald Deibert, John Palfrey, Rafal Rohozinski, and Jonathan Zittrain (Eds.). 2010. Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace.
[11]
Adji B. Dieng, Francisco J. R. Ruiz, and David M. Blei. 2019. The Dynamic Embedded Topic Model. (2019). showeprint[arXiv]1907.05545 [cs.CL]
[12]
Arturo Filasto and Jacob Appelbaum. 2012. OONI: Open Observatory of Network Interference. In Free and Open Communications on the Internet. 8 pages.
[13]
FortiNet. 2005--. FortiGuard Labs Web Filter. https://fortiguard.com/webfilter
[14]
Devashish Gosain, Anshika Agarwal, Sahil Shekhawat, Hrishikesh B. Acharya, and Sambuddho Chakravarty. 2018. Mending Wall: On the Implementation of Censorship in India. In Security and Privacy in Communication Networks. 418--437. showeprint[arXiv]1806.06518 [cs.CR]
[15]
Derek Greene and James P. Cross. 2017. Exploring the Political Agenda of the European Parliament Using a Dynamic Topic Modeling Approach. Political Analysis, Vol. 25, 1 (2017), 77--94.
[16]
Matthew Hoffman, Francis Bach, and David M. Blei. 2010. Online Learning for Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 23 (2010), 856--864.
[17]
Internet Archive. 1996--. Wayback Machine. https://web.archive.org
[18]
Jeffrey Knockel, Masashi Crete-Nishihata, Jason Q. Ng, Adam Senft, and Jedidiah R. Crandall. 2015. Every Rose Has Its Thorn: Censorship and Surveillance on Social Video Platforms in China. In Free and Open Communications on the Internet. 10 pages.
[19]
Jeffrey Knockel, Lotus Ruan, and Masashi Crete-Nishihata. 2018. An analysis of automatic image filtering on WeChat Moments. In Free and Open Communications on the Internet. 12 pages.
[20]
Marco Linton, Ernie Gin Swee Teo, Elisabeth Bommes, CY Chen, and Wolfgang Karl H"ardle. 2017. Dynamic topic modelling for cryptocurrency community forums. In Applied quantitative finance. 355--372.
[21]
Arian Akhavan Niaki, Shinyoung Cho, Zachary Weinberg, Nguyen Phong Hoang, Abbas Razaghpanah, Nicolas Christin, and Phillipa Gill. 2020. ICLab: A Global, Longitudinal Internet Censorship Measurement Platform. In Symposium on Security and Privacy. 214--230.
[22]
Raymond Rambert, Zachary Weinberg, Diogo Barradas, and Nicolas Christin. 2021. Chinese Wall or Swiss Cheese? Keyword filtering in the Great Firewall of China. In Web Conference. 472--483. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3450076
[23]
Reethika Ramesh, Ram Sundara Raman, Matthew Bernhard, Victor Ongkowijaya, Leonid Evdokimov, Anne Edmundson, Steven Sprecher, Muhammad Ikram, and Roya Ensafi. 2020. Decentralized Control: A Case Study of Russia. In Network and Distributed Systems Security Symposium. 18 pages.
[24]
Ram Sundara Raman, Adrian Stoll, Jakub Dalek, Reethkia Ramesh, Will Scott, and Roya Ensafi. 2020. Measuring the Deployment of Network Censorship Filters at Global Scale. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. 16 pages.
[25]
Rima S. Tanash, Zhouhan Chen, Tanmay Thakur, Dan S. Wallach, and Devika Subramanian. 2015. Known Unknowns: An Analysis of Twitter Censorship in Turkey. In Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. 11--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2808138.2808147
[26]
Zachary Weinberg, Mahmood Sharif, Janos Szurdi, and Nicolas Christin. 2017. Topics of Controversy: An Empirical Analysis of Web Censorship Lists. Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Vol. 2017, 1 (2017), 42--61.
[27]
Pengtao Xie, Yuntian Deng, and Eric Xing. 2015. Diversifying Restricted Boltzmann Machine for Document Modeling. In Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1315--1324. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2783264
[28]
Xueyang Xu, Z. Morley Mao, and J. Alex Halderman. 2011. Internet censorship in China: Where does the filtering occur?. In Passive and Active Network Measurement. 133--142.
[29]
Tarun Kumar Yadav, Akshat Sinha, Devashish Gosain, Piyush Kumar Sharma, and Sambuddho Chakravarty. 2018. Where The Light Gets In: Analyzing Web Censorship Mechanisms in India. In Internet Measurement Conference. 252--264. arxiv: 1808.01708 [cs.CY]io
Index Terms
- Darwin's Theory of Censorship: Analysing the Evolution of Censored Topics with Dynamic Topic Models
Recommendations
Censored Planet: An Internet-wide, Longitudinal Censorship Observatory
CCS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications SecurityRemote censorship measurement techniques offer capabilities for monitoring Internet reachability around the world. However, operating these techniques continuously is labor-intensive and requires specialized knowledge and synchronization, leading to ...
A Case for Marrying Censorship Measurements with Circumvention
HotNets-XIV: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in NetworksExisting research on Internet censorship primarily focuses on either measurements or circumvention. Considering these two in isolation often leads to designs with limited capabilities: Circumvention is not driven by measurement data and end users find ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 07 November 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
Conference
CCS '22
Sponsor:
CCS '22: 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
November 7, 2022
CA, Los Angeles, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 106 of 355 submissions, 30%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 91Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)27
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in