Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3564246.3585103acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Resolving Matrix Spencer Conjecture Up to Poly-logarithmic Rank

Published: 02 June 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    We give a simple proof of the matrix Spencer conjecture up to poly-logarithmic rank: given symmetric d × d matrices A1,…,An each with ||Ai||op ≤ 1 and rank at most n/log3 n, one can efficiently find ± 1 signs x1,…,xn such that their signed sum has spectral norm ||∑i=1n xi Ai||op = O(√n). This result also implies a logn − Ω( loglogn) qubit lower bound for quantum random access codes encoding n classical bits with advantage ≫ 1/√n.
    Our proof uses the recent refinement of the non-commutative Khintchine inequality in [Bandeira, Boedihardjo, van Handel, 2021] for random matrices with correlated Gaussian entries.

    References

    [1]
    Rudolf Ahlswede and Andreas Winter. 2002. Strong converse for identification via quantum channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 48, 3 (2002), 569–579.
    [2]
    Andris Ambainis, Ashwin Nayak, Amnon Ta-Shma, and Umesh Vazirani. 2002. Dense quantum coding and quantum finite automata. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 49, 4 (2002), 496–511.
    [3]
    Wojciech Banaszczyk. 1998. Balancing vectors and Gaussian measures of n-dimensional convex bodies. Random Structures & Algorithms, 12, 4 (1998), 351–360.
    [4]
    Afonso S Bandeira, March T Boedihardjo, and Ramon van Handel. 2021. Matrix Concentration Inequalities and Free Probability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.06312.
    [5]
    Nikhil Bansal. 2010. Constructive algorithms for discrepancy minimization. In Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 3–10.
    [6]
    Nikhil Bansal. 2019. On a generalization of iterated and randomized rounding. In Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC. 1125–1135.
    [7]
    Nikhil Bansal, Moses Charikar, Ravishankar Krishnaswamy, and Shi Li. 2014. Better algorithms and hardness for broadcast scheduling via a discrepancy approach. In Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 55–71.
    [8]
    Nikhil Bansal, Haotian Jiang, and Raghu Meka. 2022. An Elementary Proof of a More General Matrix Discrepancy Bound. Unpublished Manuscript.
    [9]
    Nikhil Bansal, Haotian Jiang, Sahil Singla, and Makrand Sinha. 2020. Online vector balancing and geometric discrepancy. In Symposium on Theory of Computing. 1139–1152.
    [10]
    Nikhil Bansal, Lars Rohwedder, and Ola Svensson. 2022. Flow time scheduling and prefix beck-fiala. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. 331–342.
    [11]
    Nikhil Bansal and Joel Spencer. 2013. Deterministic discrepancy minimization. Algorithmica, 67, 4 (2013), 451–471.
    [12]
    Joshua Batson, Daniel A Spielman, and Nikhil Srivastava. 2012. Twice-ramanujan sparsifiers. SIAM J. Comput., 41, 6 (2012), 1704–1721.
    [13]
    József Beck. 1981. Roth’s estimate of the discrepancy of integer sequences is nearly sharp. Combinatorica, 1, 4 (1981), 319–325.
    [14]
    József Beck and Tibor Fiala. 1981. “Integer-making” theorems. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 3, 1 (1981), 1–8.
    [15]
    Bernard Chazelle. 2000. The discrepancy method: randomness and complexity. Cambridge University Press.
    [16]
    William Chen, Anand Srivastav, and Giancarlo Travaglini. 2014. A panorama of discrepancy theory. 2107, Springer.
    [17]
    Daniel Dadush, Haotian Jiang, and Victor Reis. 2022. A New Framework for Matrix Discrepancy: Partial Coloring Bounds via Mirror Descent. In Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC).
    [18]
    Ronen Eldan and Mohit Singh. 2018. Efficient algorithms for discrepancy minimization in convex sets. Random Structures & Algorithms, 53, 2 (2018), 289–307.
    [19]
    Apostolos A Giannopoulos. 1997. On some vector balancing problems. Studia Mathematica, 122, 3 (1997), 225–234.
    [20]
    Efim Davydovich Gluskin. 1989. Extremal properties of orthogonal parallelepipeds and their applications to the geometry of Banach spaces. Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik, 64, 1 (1989), 85.
    [21]
    Christopher Harshaw, Fredrik Sävje, Daniel Spielman, and Peng Zhang. 2019. Balancing covariates in randomized experiments using the gram-schmidt walk. arXiv e-prints, arXiv–1911.
    [22]
    Samuel B Hopkins, Prasad Raghavendra, and Abhishek Shetty. 2022. Matrix discrepancy from quantum communication. In Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC).
    [23]
    Haotian Jiang, Janardhan Kulkarni, and Sahil Singla. 2019. Online geometric discrepancy for stochastic arrivals with applications to envy minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01073.
    [24]
    Rasmus Kyng, Kyle Luh, and Zhao Song. 2020. Four deviations suffice for rank 1 matrices. Advances in Mathematics, 375 (2020), 107366.
    [25]
    Avi Levy, Harishchandra Ramadas, and Thomas Rothvoss. 2017. Deterministic discrepancy minimization via the multiplicative weight update method. In Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (IPCO). 380–391.
    [26]
    Shachar Lovett and Raghu Meka. 2015. Constructive discrepancy minimization by walking on the edges. SIAM J. Comput., 44, 5 (2015), 1573–1582.
    [27]
    Françoise Lust-Piquard. 1986. Inégalités de Khintchine dans C_p (1 < p < ∞ ). C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 303, 7 (1986), 289–292.
    [28]
    Françoise Lust-Piquard and Gilles Pisier. 1991. Non commutative Khintchine and Paley inequalities. Arkiv för matematik, 29, 1 (1991), 241–260.
    [29]
    Adam W Marcus, Daniel A Spielman, and Nikhil Srivastava. 2015. Interlacing families II: Mixed characteristic polynomials and the Kadison—Singer problem. Annals of Mathematics, 327–350.
    [30]
    Jiri Matousek. 2009. Geometric discrepancy: An illustrated guide. 18, Springer Science & Business Media.
    [31]
    Raghu Meka. 2014. Discrepancy and beating the union bound.
    [32]
    S. Muthukrishnan and Aleksandar Nikolov. 2012. Optimal private halfspace counting via discrepancy. In Symposium on Theory of computing. 1285–1292.
    [33]
    Aleksandar Nikolov, Kunal Talwar, and Li Zhang. 2013. The geometry of differential privacy: the sparse and approximate cases. In Symposium on Theory of computing. 351–360.
    [34]
    Roberto Oliveira. 2010. Sums of random Hermitian matrices and an inequality by Rudelson. Electron. Commun. Probab., 15 (2010), no. 19, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1214/ECP.v15-1544
    [35]
    Gilles Pisier. 2003. Introduction to operator space theory. Cambridge University Press.
    [36]
    Victor Reis and Thomas Rothvoss. 2020. Linear size sparsifier and the geometry of the operator norm ball. In Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). 2337–2348.
    [37]
    Victor Reis and Thomas Rothvoss. 2023. Vector balancing in lebesgue spaces. Random Structures & Algorithms, 62, 3 (2023), 667–688.
    [38]
    Thomas Rothvoss. 2013. Approximating bin packing within o ( ologOPT* olog ologOPT) bins. In Foundations of Computer Science. 20–29.
    [39]
    Thomas Rothvoss. 2017. Constructive discrepancy minimization for convex sets. SIAM J. Comput., 46, 1 (2017), 224–234.
    [40]
    Joel Spencer. 1985. Six standard deviations suffice. Transactions of the American mathematical society, 289, 2 (1985), 679–706.
    [41]
    Terence Tao. 2012. Topics in random matrix theory. 132, American Mathematical Soc.
    [42]
    Joel A. Tropp. 2015. An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalities. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 8, 1-2 (2015), 1–230. issn:1935-8237 https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000048
    [43]
    Joel A. Tropp. 2018. Second-order matrix concentration inequalities. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 44, 3 (2018), 700–736. issn:1063-5203 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2016.07.005
    [44]
    Roman Vershynin. 2018. High-dimensional probability: An introduction with applications in data science. Cambridge university press.
    [45]
    Van H. Vu. 2014. Modern aspects of random matrix theory. 72, American Mathematical Society.
    [46]
    Anastasios Zouzias. 2012. A matrix hyperbolic cosine algorithm and applications. In International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming. 846–858.

    Index Terms

    1. Resolving Matrix Spencer Conjecture Up to Poly-logarithmic Rank

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC 2023: Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
      June 2023
      1926 pages
      ISBN:9781450399135
      DOI:10.1145/3564246
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 02 June 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Matrix discrepancy
      2. matrix concentration
      3. quantum random access codes

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      STOC '23
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 156
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)117
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media