Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3565472.3592952acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Modelling the Training Practices of Recreational Marathon Runners to Make Personalised Training Recommendations

Published: 19 June 2023 Publication History

Abstract

These days we have all become increasingly aware of the role that exercise plays in a healthy lifestyle. Activities such as cycling, triathlons, and running have become popular ways for people to keep fit and test their abilities. For recreational athletes there is no shortage of training advice or programmes to follow, yet most offer only one-size-fits-all, or minimally tailored guidance, which often leaves novices under-supported on their fitness journeys. In this work, we describe a case-based reasoning system to generate personalised training recommendations for marathon runners, based on their training histories and the training histories of similar runners with comparable race goals. The system harnesses the type of activity data that is routinely collected by smartwatches and apps like Strava. It uses prefactual explanations to suggest to runners how they may wish to adjust their training as their fitness goals evolve. We evaluate the approach using a large-scale dataset of more than 300,000 real-world runners and we show that it is feasible to generate tailored, personalised recommendations for up to 80% of these runners. Additionally, we show that the recommendations produced are realistic and reasonable for a runner to implement, as part of their training programme. These suggestions typically include a small number (3-5) of incremental training adaptations, such as a change in weekly distance, long-run distance, or mean training pace. We argue that by engaging runners in this type of dialog about their training progress and race goals, we can better support novice runners, as their training unfolds, which may help to keep runners motivated on their long journey to race day.

References

[1]
Grant Abt and Ric Lovell. 2009. The use of individualized speed and intensity thresholds for determining the distance run at high-intensity in professional soccer. Journal of sports sciences 27, 9 (2009), 893–898.
[2]
Atiqa Ashfaq, Neil Cronin, and Philipp Müller. 2022. Recent advances in machine learning for maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) prediction: A review. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 28 (2022), 100863.
[3]
Jakim Berndsen, Aonghus Lawlor, and Barry Smyth. 2020. Exploring the wall in marathon running. Journal of Sports Analytics 6 (06 2020), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3233/JSA-200354
[4]
Jakim Berndsen, Barry Smyth, and Aonghus Lawlor. 2019. Pace my race: recommendations for marathon running. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, ACM, New York, New York, USA, 246–250.
[5]
Matthew P Buman, Britton W Brewer, Allen E Cornelius, Judy L Van Raalte, and Albert J Petitpas. 2008. Hitting the wall in the marathon: Phenomenological characteristics and associations with expectancy, gender, and running history. Psychology of sport and exercise 9, 2 (2008), 177–190.
[6]
Ruth MJ Byrne and Suzanne M Egan. 2004. Counterfactual and prefactual conditionals.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 58, 2 (2004), 113.
[7]
Ranganathan Chandrasekaran, Vipanchi Katthula, Evangelos Moustakas, 2020. Patterns of use and key predictors for the use of wearable health care devices by US adults: insights from a national survey. Journal of medical Internet research 22, 10 (2020), e22443.
[8]
Alexander Chikov, Nikolay Egorov, Dmitry Medvedev, Svetlana Chikova, Evgeniy Pavlov, Pavel Drobintsev, Alexander Krasichkov, and Dmitry Kaplun. 2022. Determination of the athletes’ anaerobic threshold using machine learning methods. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 73 (2022), 103414.
[9]
David Cornforth, Piers Campbell, Keith Nesbitt, Dean Robinson, and Herbert F Jelinek. 2015. Prediction of game performance in Australian football using heart rate variability measures. International Journal of Signal and Imaging Systems Engineering 8, 1-2 (2015), 80–88.
[10]
Ramon López de Mántaras, David McSherry, Derek G. Bridge, David B. Leake, Barry Smyth, Susan Craw, Boi Faltings, Mary Lou Maher, Michael T. Cox, Kenneth D. Forbus, Mark T. Keane, Agnar Aamodt, and Ian D. Watson. 2005. Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning. Knowledge Eng. Review 20, 3 (2005), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888906000646
[11]
Robert O Deaner, Vittorio Addona, Rickey E Carter, Michael J Joyner, and Sandra K Hunter. 2016. Fast men slow more than fast women in a 10 kilometer road race. PeerJ 4 (2016), e2235.
[12]
Robert O Deaner, Rickey E Carter, Michael J Joyner, and Sandra K Hunter. 2014. Men are More Likely than Women to Slow in the Marathon.Med Sci Sports Exerc 4, 3 (2014), 607–616.
[13]
Eoin Delaney, Derek Greene, Laurence Shalloo, Michael Lynch, and Mark T Keane. 2022. Forecasting for Sustainable Dairy Produce: Enhanced Long-Term, Milk-Supply Forecasting Using k-NN for Data Augmentation, with Prefactual Explanations for XAI. In Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development: 30th International Conference, ICCBR 2022, Nancy, France, September 12–15, 2022, Proceedings. Springer, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 365–379.
[14]
Keith M Diaz, David J Krupka, Melinda J Chang, James Peacock, Yao Ma, Jeff Goldsmith, Joseph E Schwartz, and Karina W Davidson. 2015. Fitbit®: An accurate and reliable device for wireless physical activity tracking. International journal of cardiology 185 (2015), 138–140.
[15]
Cailbhe Doherty, Alison Keogh, James Davenport, Aonghus Lawlor, Barry Smyth, and Brian Caulfield. 2020. An evaluation of the training determinants of marathon performance: A meta-analysis with meta-regression. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 23, 2 (2020), 182–188.
[16]
Dónal Doyle, Alexey Tsymbal, and Pádraig Cunningham. 2003. A review of explanation and explanation in case-based reasoning. (2003).
[17]
Thorsten Emig and Jussi Peltonen. 2020. Human running performance from real-world big data. Nature communications 11, 1 (2020), 4936.
[18]
Kai Epstude, Annika Scholl, and Neal J Roese. 2016. Prefactual thoughts: Mental simulations about what might happen. Review of General Psychology 20, 1 (2016), 48–56.
[19]
Urtats Etxegarai, Eva Portillo, Jon Irazusta, Ander Arriandiaga, and Itziar Cabanes. 2018. Estimation of lactate threshold with machine learning techniques in recreational runners. Applied Soft Computing 63 (2018), 181–196.
[20]
Ciara Feely, Brian Caulfield, Aonghus Lawlor, and Barry Smyth. 2020. Providing Explainable Race-Time Predictions and Training Plan Recommendations to Marathon Runners. In Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Virtual Event, Brazil) (RecSys ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383313.3412220
[21]
Ciara Feely, Brian Caulfield, Aonghus Lawlor, and Barry Smyth. 2020. Using Case-Based Reasoning to Predict Marathon Performance and Recommend Tailored Training Plans. In Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 67–81.
[22]
Ciara Feely, Brian Caulfield, Aonghus Lawlor, and Barry Smyth. 2021. A Case-Based Reasoning Approach to Predicting and Explaining Running Related Injuries. In International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. Springer, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 79–93.
[23]
Ciara Feely, Brian Caulfield, Aonghus Lawlor, and Barry Smyth. 2022. An Extended Case-Based Approach to Race-Time Prediction for Recreational Marathon Runners. In Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development: 30th International Conference, ICCBR 2022, Nancy, France, September 12–15, 2022, Proceedings. Springer, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 335–349.
[24]
Iztok Fister, Samo Rauter, Xin-She Yang, Karin Ljubič, and Iztok Fister. 2015. Planning the Sports Training Sessions with the Bat Algorithm. Neurocomput. 149, PB (Feb. 2015), 993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.07.034
[25]
Iztok Fister Jr and Iztok Fister. 2017. Generating the training plans based on existing sports activities using swarm intelligence. In Nature-Inspired Computing and Optimization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 79–94.
[26]
Ander Garcia, Maria Teresa Linaza, Olatz Arbelaitz, M FUCHS, F RICCI, and L CANTONI. 2012. Evaluation of intelligent routes for personalised electronic tourist guides. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 284–295.
[27]
Mark T Keane and Barry Smyth. 2020. Good counterfactuals and where to find them: A case-based technique for generating counterfactuals for explainable AI (XAI). In International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. Springer, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 163–178.
[28]
Alison Keogh, Barry Smyth, Brian Caulfield, Aonghus Lawlor, Jakim Berndsen, and Cailbhe Doherty. 2019. Prediction Equations for Marathon Performance: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 14, 9 (2019), 1159–1169.
[29]
Leonid Kholkine, Tom De Schepper, Tim Verdonck, and Steven Latré. 2020. A machine learning approach for road cycling race performance prediction. In International workshop on machine learning and data mining for sports analytics. Springer, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 103–112.
[30]
J Kite-Powell. 2016. Polar: The original fitness tracker and heart rate monitor. Forbes.
[31]
P López-Matencio, J Vales Alonso, FJ González-Castano, JL Sieiro, and JJ Alcaraz. 2010. Ambient intelligence assistant for running sports based on k-NN classifiers. In 3rd International Conference on Human System Interaction. IEEE, IEEE, New York, New York, 605–611.
[32]
MB Maron and SM Horvath. 1978. The marathon: a history and review of the literature.Medicine and science in sports 10, 2 (1978), 137–150.
[33]
Alberto E. Minetti, Christian Moia, Giulio S. Roi, Davide Susta, and Guido Ferretti. 2002. Energy Cost of Walking and Running at Extreme Uphill and Downhill Slopes. Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985) 93, 3 (Sept. 2002), 1039–1046. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01177.2001
[34]
John O’Donovan and Barry Smyth. 2005. Trust in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM Press, San Diego, California, 167–174.
[35]
Andrej Panjan, Nejc Sarabon, and Aleš Filipčič. 2010. Prediction of the successfulness of tennis players with machine learning methods. Kinesiology 42, 1 (2010), 98–106.
[36]
Alen Rajšp and Iztok Fister. 2020. A Systematic Literature Review of Intelligent Data Analysis Methods for Smart Sport Training. Applied Sciences 10, 9 (2020), 3013.
[37]
Barry Smyth. 2018. Fast Starters and Slow Finishers: A Large-Scale Data Analysis of Pacing at the Beginning and End of the Marathon for Recreational Runners. Journal of Sports Analytics 4, 3 (Jan. 2018), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.3233/JSA-170205
[38]
Barry Smyth. 2019. Recommender Systems: A Healthy Obsession. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 33 (July 2019), 9790–9794. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019790
[39]
Barry Smyth. 2021. How recreational marathon runners hit the wall: A large-scale data analysis of late-race pacing collapse in the marathon. PloS one 16, 5 (2021), e0251513.
[40]
Barry Smyth and Pádraig Cunningham. 2017. Running with Cases: A CBR Approach to Running Your Best Marathon. In Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development - 25th International Conference, ICCBR 2017, Trondheim, Norway, June 26-28, 2017, Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61030-6_25
[41]
Barry Smyth and Pádraig Cunningham. 2018. An Analysis of Case Representations for Marathon Race Prediction and Planning. In Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development - 26th International Conference, ICCBR 2018, Stockholm, Sweden, July 9-12, 2018, Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01081-2_25
[42]
Barry Smyth, Aonghus Lawlor, Jakim Berndsen, and Ciara Feely. 2022. Recommendations for marathon runners: on the application of recommender systems and machine learning to support recreational marathon runners. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 32, 5 (2022), 787–838.
[43]
Marta Stragà and Donatella Ferrante. 2014. Will You Train Harder for the Next Marathon? The Effect of Counterfactual and Prefactual Thinking on Marathon Runners’ Intentions. In Proceedings of the Trieste Symposium on Perception and Cognition. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 144–146.
[44]
Myung-Kyung Suh, Ani Nahapetian, Jonathan Woodbridge, Mahsan Rofouei, and Majid Sarrafzadeh. 2012. Machine Learning-Based Adaptive Wireless Interval Training Guidance System. Mob. Netw. Appl. 17, 2 (April 2012), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-011-0331-5
[45]
Zahari Taha, Rabiu Muazu Musa, Anwar PP Abdul Majeed, Muhammad Muaz Alim, and Mohamad Razali Abdullah. 2018. The identification of high potential archers based on fitness and motor ability variables: A Support Vector Machine approach. Human movement science 57 (2018), 184–193.
[46]
Brett G Toresdahl, Jordan D Metzl, James Kinderknecht, Kathryn McElheny, Polly de Mille, Brianna Quijano, and Mark A Fontana. 2023. Training patterns associated with injury in New York City Marathon runners. British Journal of Sports Medicine 57, 3 (2023), 146–152.
[47]
Gytis Tumas and Francesco Ricci. 2009. Personalized mobile city transport advisory system. Information and communication technologies in tourism 2009 (2009), 173–183.
[48]
Bereket Abera Yilma, Yannick Naudet, and Hervé Panetto. 2019. Introduction to personalisation in cyber-physical-social systems. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2018 Workshops: Confederated International Workshops: EI2N, FBM, ICSP, and Meta4eS 2018, Valletta, Malta, October 22–26, 2018, Revised Selected Papers. Springer, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 25–35.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Recommending Personalised Targeted Training Adjustments for Marathon RunnersProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688192(1051-1056)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Interaction Visualization for Analysing and Improving User ModelsAdjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3631700.3664877(160-163)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Digital twins in sport: Concepts, taxonomies, challenges and practical potentialsExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125104258(125104)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Modelling the Training Practices of Recreational Marathon Runners to Make Personalised Training Recommendations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UMAP '23: Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
      June 2023
      333 pages
      ISBN:9781450399326
      DOI:10.1145/3565472
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 19 June 2023

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. case-based reasoning
      2. explainable AI
      3. marathon running
      4. recommender systems
      5. user-adaptated personalisation

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      UMAP '23
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

      Upcoming Conference

      UMAP '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)812
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)121
      Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Recommending Personalised Targeted Training Adjustments for Marathon RunnersProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688192(1051-1056)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Interaction Visualization for Analysing and Improving User ModelsAdjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3631700.3664877(160-163)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Digital twins in sport: Concepts, taxonomies, challenges and practical potentialsExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125104258(125104)Online publication date: Dec-2024
      • (2024)Sports recommender systems: overview and research directionsJournal of Intelligent Information Systems10.1007/s10844-024-00857-w62:4(1125-1164)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Using Pseudo Cases and Stratified Case-Based Reasoning to Generate and Evaluate Training Adjustments for Marathon RunnersArtificial Intelligence XLI10.1007/978-3-031-77918-3_7(88-101)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2024
      • (2024)Learning to Run Marathons: On the Applications of Machine Learning to Recreational Marathon RunningArtificial Intelligence in Sports, Movement, and Health10.1007/978-3-031-67256-9_13(209-231)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Login options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media